Microscopy ListServer Archives  


File Requested = 0605.txt
Retrival Software Version=NJZ07060908

From: one_twinklestar-at-yahoo.com.sg
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 04:01:07 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Sales of Epitaxial Film-Enquires

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi All:

A very good day to all of you. I would like to know if
anyone can direct me to the companies that are selling
ZnO Epitaxial Films. I have been searching around but
with no results.

I thank you all in advance first!

Have a good day ahead!

Cheers,
Yee Yan
School of Materials Science and Engineering
University of New South Wales





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 1GB free storage!
http://sg.whatsnew.mail.yahoo.com

==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 18 -- From one_twinklestar-at-yahoo.com.sg Mon May 1 04:01:07 2006
7, 18 -- Received: from web50010.mail.yahoo.com (web50010.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.25])
7, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k41916Pu024269
7, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 04:01:06 -0500
7, 18 -- Received: (qmail 91664 invoked by uid 60001); 1 May 2006 09:01:05 -0000
7, 18 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
7, 18 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.sg;
7, 18 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
7, 18 -- b=5X6mYpJ0adRKGCyi1HYiLfZgfD3n1UTOWYpfktlv7xh0XnsOsytsigvgbd+xaY4l9V3usDjmZ5b0VfJO7lD52mGmDdfilNAZcphfk4Nv5qlOFtelbjHojxXEm8wj+K16VM1ovWTUCpjFd/ahCOmx1JKwb56FxF9SR1P3rBp26DQ= ;
7, 18 -- Message-ID: {20060501090105.91662.qmail-at-web50010.mail.yahoo.com}
7, 18 -- Received: from [202.7.166.164] by web50010.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:01:05 CST
7, 18 -- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:01:05 +0800 (CST)
7, 18 -- From: Tay Yee Yan {one_twinklestar-at-yahoo.com.sg}
7, 18 -- Subject: Sales of Epitaxial Film-Enquires
7, 18 -- To: microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com
7, 18 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
7, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: woad-at-iinet.net.au
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 08:14:49 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] AskAMicroscopist: structured illumination

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (woad-at-iinet.net.au)
from http://www.microscopy.org/Ask-A-Microscopist/Ask-A-Microscopist.html on Sunday, April 30, 2006 at 21:45:31
Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to both woad-at-iinet.net.au as well as to the Microscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: woad-at-iinet.net.au
Name: Francois Burtonbradley

Organization: University of Newcastle

Education: Undergraduate College

Location: Newcastle,NSW, Australia

Title: structured illumination

Question: hi,
I'm looking for 3 example images (moved out of phase by a 1/3 each) that have been recorded using structured illumination (say using a standing wave or otherwise projected) and the resultant merged hi-res version.
I would like to apply the merging formula myself to the 3 images to see whether they turn out the way I hope them to i.e (that they are identical to a provided merged image).
Hope you can help....

thanks,

fbb

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com Mon May 1 08:14:48 2006
10, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
10, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k41DEmC7005493
10, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 08:14:48 -0500
10, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
10, 12 -- X-Sender: zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com (Unverified)
10, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c07bba35d6d2-at-[206.69.208.22]}
10, 12 -- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 08:14:47 -0500
10, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
10, 12 -- From: woad-at-iinet.net.au (by way of Ask-A-Microscopist)
10, 12 -- Subject: AskAMicroscopist: structured illumination
10, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: bigelow-at-engin.umich.edu
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:28:37 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] RE: Grease for ion millers

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Sputter Films Inc (805-963-9651) sells a fluid lubricant (Torr Lube)
that is advertised as being especially formulated for use on rotating
and sliding seals, to have a vapor pressure below 10-6 Pa, and to
provide a service life of up to 30 times that of most vacuum greases
in such applications (See Vacuum Methods In Electron Microscopy , p.
460).

I have also found that the perfluorinated polyether diffusion pump
fluids (ibid. p. 181) such as Fomblin Y-HVAC 25/9 and Krytox 1625 are
very good lubricants for use on rotating and sliding vacuum seals,
and might cost you a bit less than the Torr Lube. You can get these
from most of the suppliers of EM products (Spi, Ladd, M. E. Taylor,
etc.etc).
--
Wilbur C. Bigelow, Professor Emeritus
Materials Sci. & Engr., Univ. of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136
e-mail: bigelow-at-engin.umich.edu;
Fx:734-763-4788; Ph:734-662-5237
Address mail to: 1136 Mixtwood Rd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48103-3035

==============================Original Headers==============================
2, 14 -- From bigelow-at-engin.umich.edu Mon May 1 14:28:37 2006
2, 14 -- Received: from srvr22.engin.umich.edu (srvr22.engin.umich.edu [141.213.75.21])
2, 14 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k41JSbTb020718
2, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 14:28:37 -0500
2, 14 -- Received: from [141.212.131.221] (bigelow-g4.engin.umich.edu [141.212.131.221])
2, 14 -- by srvr22.engin.umich.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k41JSaTT008861
2, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 15:28:37 -0400 (EDT)
2, 14 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
2, 14 -- Message-Id: {p06210202c07c0e976fb0-at-[141.212.131.221]}
2, 14 -- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:28:36 -0400
2, 14 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
2, 14 -- From: Wil Bigelow {bigelow-at-engin.umich.edu}
2, 14 -- Subject: [Microscopy] RE: Grease for ion millers
2, 14 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: kerverhe-at-msu.edu
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:38:18 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Diamond knives

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both kerverhe-at-msu.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: kerverhe-at-msu.edu
Name: Heather Kerver

Organization: Beaumont Hospital

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Diamond knives

Question: I was wondering what kind of glue is used to set the diamond knife. I am aware that it is a hydrophilic glue but what is the actual substance used?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 1 17:38:18 2006
6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k41McHjW001530
6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 17:38:18 -0500
6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110404c07c3e4acc7d-at-[206.69.208.22]}
6, 12 -- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:38:16 -0500
6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 12 -- From: kerverhe-at-msu.edu (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Diamond knives
6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: carnahan-at-edison-labs.com
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:38:55 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Amray 1700 Turbo vacuum logic board

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both carnahan-at-edison-labs.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: carnahan-at-edison-labs.com
Name: James Carnahan

Organization: Edison Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Amray 1700 Turbo vacuum logic board

Question: We had an unfortunate electrical accident that led to 120V going through part of the vacuum logic board from a failed turbo controller on an Amray 1700 Turbo. The console was off but the current blew the tops off of several of the logic chips and made a fuse out of one trace in the ground plane. We have some replacement chips and have found others on the net but are concerned about hidden damage. If anyone has an out-of-service 1700 Turbo or any Amray using the ES-7005-025 Vacuum logic board, we would be interested in purchasing the board.

Also, if anyone has experienced this problem we would like to hear their story.


Jim Carnahan
Edison Analytical Labs
(518) 393-2112

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 1 17:38:55 2006
9, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
9, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k41McrGh001971
9, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 17:38:54 -0500
9, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
9, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
9, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110405c07c3e64d274-at-[206.69.208.22]}
9, 12 -- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:38:52 -0500
9, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
9, 12 -- From: carnahan-at-edison-labs.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
9, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Amray 1700 Turbo vacuum logic board
9, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: nizets2-at-yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 06:13:13 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: holes in the formvar film

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

For the sake of SPI I just wanted to precise that the
"high price and long delivery times" did not concern
SPI products.

Stephane

--- "Garber, Charles A." {cgarber-at-2spi.com} wrote:

} But would you mind my asking you, were you
} experiencing long delivery delays from SPI Supplies?
} For Formvar coated grids, the delivery times are
} usually pretty fast. I can't comment on what you
} might perceive to be a high cost for purchased
} filmed grids, most of our customers tell us that our
} regular prices are lower than they could possibly
} make them themselves.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 19 -- From nizets2-at-yahoo.com Tue May 2 06:13:13 2006
6, 19 -- Received: from web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.67])
6, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k42BDDaX000481
6, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 06:13:13 -0500
6, 19 -- Received: (qmail 7695 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2006 11:13:13 -0000
6, 19 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
6, 19 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
6, 19 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
6, 19 -- b=lRzT9FRlGWfwPLhUX3hDY8FRJljGPFlpmCuZqIULpOobEblfhouFaAU3dDt/S9Kngi5YREC11XcYwA+OxrsGNZceg09BDlyD85FyHaKues8ULyj3i4QKrOgkR93J+AJJkg4hEuf5d3gqXY9a0c27Ctd6J6L45nuJzZehm2rUGJ8= ;
6, 19 -- Message-ID: {20060502111313.7693.qmail-at-web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com}
6, 19 -- Received: from [80.122.101.102] by web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:13:13 PDT
6, 19 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 04:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
6, 19 -- From: Stephane Nizet {nizets2-at-yahoo.com}
6, 19 -- Subject: Re: holes in the formvar film
6, 19 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {000c01c66a2d$1df584e0$b5750a0a-at-ibm1x23g2abfyg}
6, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
6, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
6, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: diller-at-stefan-diller.com
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 06:25:41 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Looking for Zeiss EM 10 high voltage cable

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear all,
I am looking for a high voltage cable for a ZEISS TEM EM 10.
If anybody has a spare one and is willing to sell it, please contact me.

Thanks,
Stefan Diller



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Stefan Diller - Scientific Photography
Arndtstrasse 22
D - 97072 Wuerzburg Germany
++49 - 931 - 7848700 Phone
++49 - 931 - 7848701 Fax
++49 - 175 - 717 70 51 Cell-Phone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------



==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 28 -- From diller-at-stefan-diller.com Tue May 2 06:25:41 2006
7, 28 -- Received: from bottom.rox.net (bottom.rox.net [213.214.0.43])
7, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42BPfSr010712
7, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 06:25:41 -0500
7, 28 -- Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
7, 28 -- by bottom.rox.net with esmtp (Exim 4.61)
7, 28 -- (envelope-from {diller-at-stefan-diller.com} )
7, 28 -- id 1Fat0f-0004fo-JK
7, 28 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Tue, 02 May 2006 13:25:41 +0200
7, 28 -- Received: from pd9e4523a.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.228.82.58] helo=dose)
7, 28 -- by bottom.rox.net with smtp (Exim 4.61)
7, 28 -- (envelope-from {diller-at-stefan-diller.com} )
7, 28 -- id 1Fat0e-0004dE-FU
7, 28 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Tue, 02 May 2006 13:25:40 +0200
7, 28 -- Message-ID: {003901c66ddb$23aa3320$7900a8c0-at-dose}
7, 28 -- From: "Stefan Diller" {diller-at-stefan-diller.com}
7, 28 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
7, 28 -- Subject: Looking for Zeiss EM 10 high voltage cable
7, 28 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:25:36 +0200
7, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
7, 28 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
7, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7, 28 -- X-Priority: 3
7, 28 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
7, 28 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
7, 28 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
7, 28 -- X-Scanned-By: rockenstein AG
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: leforestier-at-lps.u-psud.fr
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 07:43:52 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: engineer position in cryo-electron microscopy

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both leforestier-at-lps.u-psud.fr as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: leforestier-at-lps.u-psud.fr
Name: leforestier amelie

Organization: CNRS Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Orsay

Title-Subject: [Filtered] engineer position in cryo-electron microscopy

Question: We are seeking an engineer in cryo-electron microscopy:
The candidate will be in charge of a 200 kV LaB6 electron microscope equipped with a cryo-specimen holder and a post-column energy filter (GIF). He/she will conduct cryo-TEM experiments in biology as well as in physics of complex systems (polymers, colloids, amphiphiles, Ö), from specimen preparation to interpretation and image analysis. He/she must possess good abilities to design new and delicate experiments.
Theoretical and practical background in transmission electron microscopy is required. Cryo-EM expertise will be appreciated.
The candidate will integrate a multidisciplinary team "Structure and function of condensed DNA" located at the Solid State Physics Laboratory of the Paris-Sud University (Orsay, France). The position could suit either a physicist or a biologist with strong motivation for interdisciplinarity.
Mastering of the English and French languages is required (the interview will be in French). Application deadline May 22.

Contact: FranÁoise Livolant
Livolant-at-lps.u-psud.fr {mailto:Livolant-at-lps.u-psud.fr}
Tel: 33 1 69 15 53 92
http://www.lps.u-psud.fr/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=9&lang=fr

Inscription: http://www.education.gouv.fr/personnel/administratif_technique/itrf/inscrire.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 14 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Tue May 2 07:43:52 2006
9, 14 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
9, 14 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42Chpj5021591
9, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:43:51 -0500
9, 14 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
9, 14 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
9, 14 -- Message-Id: {p06110400c07d045136d4-at-[206.69.208.22]}
9, 14 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 07:43:50 -0500
9, 14 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
9, 14 -- From: leforestier-at-lps.u-psud.fr (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
9, 14 -- Subject: viaWWW: engineer position in cryo-electron microscopy
9, 14 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
9, 14 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
9, 14 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42Chpj5021591
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: TindallR-at-missouri.edu
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:26:14 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi Listers,

Just another day in multi-user world.

Today's challenge is trying to image platinum nanoparticles in an
agarose matrix, in order to see how they distribute themselves and to
get a size distribution. TEM and/or SEM are possibilities. So far, my
check of the literature finds tons of stuff on nanoparticles in
electrophoresis gels, but none of it is relevant, since the particles
are removed from the gels and put back into a liquid medium. The one
article I found that is comparable to our problem used thin-sectioning
and we have tried that.

We have also tried melting the agarose, dipping grids into the
particle/agarose mix, then rinsing the grid in hot water to thin the
gelatin out. We can get images in the TEM, but the results are
inconsistent when repeating with the same sample. Also, there is the
chance that the hot water and melting are re-arranging the particles.

We have tried thin sectioning the dehydrated agarose with particles, but
finding the particles in a given thin section is a crap shoot with long
odds. Also, we may be cutting through aggregations we want to see.

We have tried viewing carbon-coated dehydrated agarose with particles
using backscattered electrons in our FESEM. This gives images with
particles, but only those on or right at the surface are imaged clearly
enough for good size data. Plus, we can't see far into the agarose for
good distribution data.

We are going to try increasing the concentration of the particles to
increase chances of getting them reliably in thin sections, and we will
also try putting the melted mixture on cover slips in a thin layer and
re-trying the BSE imaging after carbon coating. (The latter still has
the potential problem of redistributing the particles, however.) We
could also try doing large thick or semi-thin sections and viewing them
in BSE imaging.

However, if someone out there has viewing nanos in agarose down to a
fine art, we, as usual, would be delighted to hear about it. In the
meantime, I will continue to search the databases.

Thanks to all!

Randy

Randy Tindall
EM Specialist
Electron Microscopy Core Facility---We Do Small Immediately----Nano
Takes a Little Longer!
W125 Veterinary Medicine
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211
Tel: (573) 882-8304
Fax: (573) 884-2227
Email: tindallr-at-missouri.edu
Web: http://www.emc.missouri.edu







==============================Original Headers==============================
15, 23 -- From TindallR-at-missouri.edu Tue May 2 14:26:14 2006
15, 23 -- Received: from um-exproto8.um.umsystem.edu (um-exproto8.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.48])
15, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42JQE72005637
15, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:26:14 -0500
15, 23 -- Received: from UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.31]) by um-exproto8.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
15, 23 -- Tue, 2 May 2006 14:26:11 -0500
15, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
15, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
15, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
15, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
15, 23 -- charset="US-ASCII"
15, 23 -- Subject: TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose
15, 23 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:26:11 -0500
15, 23 -- Message-ID: {BA876152E8653240BE8572E897083EE701849F8F-at-UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu}
15, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
15, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
15, 23 -- Thread-Topic: TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose
15, 23 -- thread-index: AcZuHkZUxNruEcQPRg2DlV4T+iVDcw==
15, 23 -- From: "Tindall, Randy D." {TindallR-at-missouri.edu}
15, 23 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
15, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2006 19:26:11.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[451CFE00:01C66E1E]
15, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
15, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42JQE72005637
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:27 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] time course experiment

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear microscopists

I have recently had a discussion with a colleague about the best
protocol to follow when staining cells during a time course experiment.
I don't think there is a single correct answer, however, would like to
know current thinking on the following issue:

Live cells were treated with a compound and observed at various time
points during a period of 48 hours. At each time point, cells were fixed
and immunofluorescently stained for the protein of interest.

Is it a less artefactual procedure to fix cells at each time point and
keep in a buffer until the end of 48 hours to stain them all at the same
time or fix and stain at each sampling time point? To stain at the same
time may would reduce staining differences, however, keeping cells in
buffer for different times may induce changes in the protein.

I look forward to hearing your opinions.
Thank you.
Judy

Judy Trogadis
Bio-Imaging Coordinator
St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen
30 Bond St.
Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
ph: 416-864-6060 x6337
pager: 416-685-9219
fax: 416-864-6043
trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 19 -- From trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca Tue May 2 14:59:26 2006
7, 19 -- Received: from smh.toronto.on.ca (mail.smh.toronto.on.ca [199.71.175.103])
7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42JxQwa015870
7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:26 -0500
7, 19 -- Received: from ([199.71.171.15])
7, 19 -- by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca with ESMTP id KP-GCT47.12851322;
7, 19 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400
7, 19 -- Received: from SMTPOUT-MTA by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca
7, 19 -- with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400
7, 19 -- Message-Id: {s45781c4.036-at-beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca}
7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2
7, 19 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:58:48 -0400
7, 19 -- From: "Judy Trogadis" {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca}
7, 19 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
7, 19 -- Subject: time course experiment
7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7, 19 -- Content-Disposition: inline
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: baskin-at-bio.umass.edu
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:20:40 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: time course experiment

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Judy,
An end run around the problem is to start off the treatments
at different times so they all end together and then fix and stain is
all done at the same time. This doesn't answer your question but
maybe a useful wrinkle?

Good luck,
Tobias
}
}
} Dear microscopists
}
} I have recently had a discussion with a colleague about the best
} protocol to follow when staining cells during a time course experiment.
} I don't think there is a single correct answer, however, would like to
} know current thinking on the following issue:
}
} Live cells were treated with a compound and observed at various time
} points during a period of 48 hours. At each time point, cells were fixed
} and immunofluorescently stained for the protein of interest.
}
} Is it a less artefactual procedure to fix cells at each time point and
} keep in a buffer until the end of 48 hours to stain them all at the same
} time or fix and stain at each sampling time point? To stain at the same
} time may would reduce staining differences, however, keeping cells in
} buffer for different times may induce changes in the protein.
}
} I look forward to hearing your opinions.
} Thank you.
} Judy
}
} Judy Trogadis
} Bio-Imaging Coordinator
} St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen
} 30 Bond St.
} Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
} ph: 416-864-6060 x6337
} pager: 416-685-9219
} fax: 416-864-6043
} trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca
}
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 7, 19 -- From trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca Tue May 2 14:59:26 2006
} 7, 19 -- Received: from smh.toronto.on.ca (mail.smh.toronto.on.ca
} [199.71.175.103])
} 7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
} ESMTP id k42JxQwa015870
} 7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:26 -0500
} 7, 19 -- Received: from ([199.71.171.15])
} 7, 19 -- by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca with ESMTP id
} KP-GCT47.12851322;
} 7, 19 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400
} 7, 19 -- Received: from SMTPOUT-MTA by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca
} 7, 19 -- with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400
} 7, 19 -- Message-Id: {s45781c4.036-at-beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca}
} 7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2
} 7, 19 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:58:48 -0400
} 7, 19 -- From: "Judy Trogadis" {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca}
} 7, 19 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 7, 19 -- Subject: time course experiment
} 7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
} 7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
} 7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
} 7, 19 -- Content-Disposition: inline
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================


--
_ ____ __ ____
/ \ / / \ / \ \ Tobias I. Baskin
/ / / / \ \ \ Biology Department
/_ / __ /__ \ \ \__ 611 N. Pleasant St.
/ / / \ \ \ University of Massachusetts
/ / / \ \ \ Amherst, MA, 01003
/ / ___ / \ \__/ \ ____
http://www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin/
Voice: 413 - 545 - 1533 Fax: 413 - 545 - 3243

==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 19 -- From baskin-at-bio.umass.edu Tue May 2 15:20:39 2006
4, 19 -- Received: from marlin.bio.umass.edu (marlin.bio.umass.edu [128.119.55.19])
4, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42KKdXS025810
4, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 15:20:39 -0500
4, 19 -- Received: from [172.30.55.79] (eutopia [128.119.55.30])
4, 19 -- by marlin.bio.umass.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k42KKZMp014977;
4, 19 -- Tue, 2 May 2006 16:20:35 -0400 (EDT)
4, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
4, 19 -- Message-Id: {p06230915c07d6f077720-at-[172.30.55.79]}
4, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022000.k42K01Fw016996-at-ns.microscopy.com}
4, 19 -- References: {200605022000.k42K01Fw016996-at-ns.microscopy.com}
4, 19 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:20:33 -0400
4, 19 -- To: TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca
4, 19 -- From: Tobias Baskin {baskin-at-bio.umass.edu}
4, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] time course experiment
4, 19 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
4, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
4, 19 -- X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (marlin.bio.umass.edu [128.119.55.19]); Tue, 02 May 2006 16:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
4, 19 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 128.119.55.19
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:42:50 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: time course experiment

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

There are some other things to consider. First off, a great deal of this
debate will depend on what you are looking for and how it reacts with
your fixative. If the cells are 'lightly fixed' there may be some
reversal of fixation with prolonged buffer storage. Does that effect the
staining? Tobias offered a good suggestion but there might be some
chrono effects, cells fixed at different times of the day or night
depending on your experimental design. I suggest avoiding all problems
and debate by keeping all of the fixation, buffer wash times and
staining times the same. Your staining proceedure should be sufficiently
standardized so that it is not a variable, or is the least problematic
of the potential variables. Finally, people looking for something to
criticize in your proceedures will always find something 'wrong'.

Geoff

TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca wrote:

} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


--
--
**********************************************
Geoff McAuliffe, Ph.D.
Neuroscience and Cell Biology
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854
voice: (732)-235-4583; fax: -4029
mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu
**********************************************



==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 35 -- From mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu Tue May 2 15:42:49 2006
8, 35 -- Received: from zix01.umdnj.edu (zix01.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.124])
8, 35 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42KgnJv003454
8, 35 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 15:42:49 -0500
8, 35 -- Received: from zix01.umdnj.edu (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1])
8, 35 -- by Outbound.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 2E3001C3292
8, 35 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:42:48 -0400 (EDT)
8, 35 -- Received: from umdnj.edu (imail2.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.139])
8, 35 -- by zix01.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id D37DCA7B42
8, 35 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:42:46 -0400 (EDT)
8, 35 -- Received: from ([130.219.34.131])
8, 35 -- by imail2.umdnj.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRCRF.12376868;
8, 35 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 16:42:19 -0400
8, 35 -- Received: from conversion-daemon.Polaris.umdnj.edu by Polaris.umdnj.edu
8, 35 -- (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004))
8, 35 -- id {0IYN00M01NR1C0-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} (original mail from mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu)
8, 35 -- for microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com; Tue, 02 May 2006 16:42:19 -0400 (EDT)
8, 35 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.138.2.123])
8, 35 -- by Polaris.umdnj.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21
8, 35 -- 2004)) with ESMTP id {0IYN008LMO5VGO-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} ; Tue,
8, 35 -- 02 May 2006 16:41:56 -0400 (EDT)
8, 35 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 16:42:52 -0400
8, 35 -- From: Geoff McAuliffe {mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu}
8, 35 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] time course experiment
8, 35 -- In-reply-to: {200605022000.k42K0PwK017876-at-ns.microscopy.com}
8, 35 -- To: TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca,
8, 35 -- MicroscopyListserver {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com}
8, 35 -- Message-id: {4457C44C.8030800-at-umdnj.edu}
8, 35 -- MIME-version: 1.0
8, 35 -- Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
8, 35 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
8, 35 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
8, 35 -- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
8, 35 -- Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
8, 35 -- References: {200605022000.k42K0PwK017876-at-ns.microscopy.com}
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Sven.Terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:36:50 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] time course experiment

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Judy,

I don't know in detail what you want to observe, but isn't there a
fluorescent tracker-molecule (such as a Lyso-tracker) available for your
purpose? Another more ideal solution might be creating a, for that one
protein GFP-positive cell-line?! Than you could make a continuous
time-lapse without the need of fixation etc., all depending on your
experiment's requests of course!

Anyway, if the fixation is strong enough, does the protein still show
activity / are changes still induced? To my opinion and experience, if
fixed strong enough and there are no/little changes, it should not matter
whether the cells are stained immediately or a few hours later, especially
when also stored cold.
Best regards,

Sven Terclavers

-----Original Message-----
X-from: TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca [mailto:TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca]
Sent: dinsdag 2 mei 2006 22:02
To: sven.terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be

Dear microscopists

I have recently had a discussion with a colleague about the best
protocol to follow when staining cells during a time course experiment.
I don't think there is a single correct answer, however, would like to
know current thinking on the following issue:

Live cells were treated with a compound and observed at various time
points during a period of 48 hours. At each time point, cells were fixed
and immunofluorescently stained for the protein of interest.

Is it a less artefactual procedure to fix cells at each time point and
keep in a buffer until the end of 48 hours to stain them all at the same
time or fix and stain at each sampling time point? To stain at the same
time may would reduce staining differences, however, keeping cells in
buffer for different times may induce changes in the protein.

I look forward to hearing your opinions.
Thank you.
Judy

Judy Trogadis
Bio-Imaging Coordinator
St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen
30 Bond St.
Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
ph: 416-864-6060 x6337
pager: 416-685-9219
fax: 416-864-6043
trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 19 -- From trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca Tue May 2 14:59:26 2006
7, 19 -- Received: from smh.toronto.on.ca (mail.smh.toronto.on.ca
[199.71.175.103])
7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
k42JxQwa015870
7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:26
-0500
7, 19 -- Received: from ([199.71.171.15])
7, 19 -- by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca with ESMTP id
KP-GCT47.12851322;
7, 19 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400
7, 19 -- Received: from SMTPOUT-MTA by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca
7, 19 -- with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400
7, 19 -- Message-Id: {s45781c4.036-at-beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca}
7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2
7, 19 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:58:48 -0400
7, 19 -- From: "Judy Trogadis" {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca}
7, 19 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
7, 19 -- Subject: time course experiment
7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7, 19 -- Content-Disposition: inline
==============================End of - Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
17, 26 -- From Sven.Terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be Tue May 2 16:36:50 2006
17, 26 -- Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.73])
17, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42LanKo014651
17, 26 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:36:49 -0500
17, 26 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
17, 26 -- by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
17, 26 -- id B58261243D6; Tue, 2 May 2006 23:36:48 +0200 (CEST)
17, 26 -- Received: from gwydion (d54C3B21A.access.telenet.be [84.195.178.26])
17, 26 -- by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
17, 26 -- id 196E9124519; Tue, 2 May 2006 23:36:48 +0200 (CEST)
17, 26 -- Reply-To: {Sven.Terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be}
17, 26 -- From: "Sven Terclavers" {Sven.Terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be}
17, 26 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
17, 26 -- Cc: {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca}
17, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] time course experiment
17, 26 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:36:46 +0200
17, 26 -- Organization: Home
17, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
17, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
17, 26 -- charset="US-ASCII"
17, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
17, 26 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
17, 26 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022002.k42K26IW021687-at-ns.microscopy.com}
17, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZuI0qIhRcgu4y2SSy9OSe9sNcMaQAC6iGA
17, 26 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
17, 26 -- Message-Id: {20060502213648.196E9124519-at-hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be}
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear TEM users,

This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical support, we are double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.

We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.

When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.

ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?

A thousand thanks in advance!

Danielle Crippen
Morphology and Imaging Core Manager
Buck Institute for Age Research
8001 Redwood Blvd.
Novato, CA 94945
415-209-2046
dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org



==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006
9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24])
9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42MidAD025692
9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 -0500
9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700
9, 20 -- Message-ID: {C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org}
9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw==
9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org}
9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:10:16 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Danielle,

Are you SURE it's lead citrate precip? There are many other sources of
precipitates and "pepper", as I'm sure you're aware. What kind of
sample are you preparing? What buffer is being used? Are you
osmicating your samples?

We fought a pepper problem for over two years, before finally
discovering that adding 2-mercaptoethanol to our buffer solved the
problem.

Feel free to email an image, if you like.

Randy

Randy Tindall
EM Specialist
Electron Microscopy Core Facility---We Do Small Well!
W125 Veterinary Medicine
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211
Tel: (573) 882-8304
Fax: (573) 884-2227
Email: tindallr-at-missouri.edu
Web: http://www.emc.missouri.edu



-----Original Message-----
X-from: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org [mailto:dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:47 PM
To: Tindall, Randy D.

Dear TEM users,

This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM
expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast
staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over
the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical support, we are
double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also
is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by
autoclaving and capping directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do
this the morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for
longer than it takes to cool down before we begin making up the
Reynolds.

We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch
5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g
lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled
water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over
the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of
particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from
EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1
unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water.
Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that
day.

When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well
before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to
surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In
addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to
use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.

ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can
we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?

A thousand thanks in advance!

Danielle Crippen
Morphology and Imaging Core Manager
Buck Institute for Age Research
8001 Redwood Blvd.
Novato, CA 94945
415-209-2046
dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org



==============================Original
Headers==============================
9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006 9, 20
-- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org
[64.84.58.24])
9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k42MidAD025692
9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006
17:44:40 -0500
9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 9, 20 --
MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 9, 20 --

Danielle,

I haven't worked in biological electron microscopy for over 25 years.
However, I vividly remember a colleague having a terrible time with
precipitates from lead citrate staining. Turned out that the problem was
his eye-sight. He was extremely near-sighted. To watch his work, his face
was only several inches from the staining grid and water rinse. The source
of the problem was CO2 from his breath. Another colleague happened to see
his proximity to the stain and suggested the source of the problem. The
precipitates disappeared once he isolated his exhaust from the process.

Food for thought.

Regards,

Gary M. Brown
ExxonMobil Chemical Company
Baytown Technology & Engineering - West
5200 Bayway Drive
Baytown, Texas 77520-2101
phone: 281 834 2387
fax: 281 834 2395
e-mail: Gary.M.Brown-at-ExxonMobil.com



dcrippen-at-bucki
nstitute.org
To
gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
05/02/06 05:48 cc
PM
Subject
[Microscopy] TEM--Lead
Please respond Citrate--HELP!!
to
dcrippen-at-bucki
nstitute.org










----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


Dear TEM users,

This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM expertise.
We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast staining.
Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over the specimen.
On the advice of EM science technical support, we are double distilling our
own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we
don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping
directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of
reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to
cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.

We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch 5
of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead
nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled
water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over
the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of
particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM
science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit.
Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly
with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.

When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well before
and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to surrounding
the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In addition, we
centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um
filter it into staining plate.

ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can we
change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?

A thousand thanks in advance!

Danielle Crippen
Morphology and Imaging Core Manager
Buck Institute for Age Research
8001 Redwood Blvd.
Novato, CA 94945
415-209-2046
dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org



==============================Original
Headers==============================
9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006
9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org
[64.84.58.24])
9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k42MidAD025692
9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006
17:44:40 -0500
9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700
9, 20 -- Message-ID:
{C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org}
9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw==
9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org}
9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692
==============================End of -
Headers==============================



==============================Original Headers==============================
28, 19 -- From gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com Tue May 2 18:10:15 2006
28, 19 -- Received: from hoespc01.exxonmobil.com (hoespc01.exxonmobil.com [192.67.48.38])
28, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42NAFLn013101
28, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:10:15 -0500
28, 19 -- Received: from hounmg03.NA.XOM.COM (hounmg03.na.xom.com [158.35.101.41])
28, 19 -- by hoespc01.exxonmobil.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k42N9roU006716;
28, 19 -- Tue, 2 May 2006 18:09:54 -0500 (CDT)
28, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022248.k42Mm0ti029416-at-ns.microscopy.com}
28, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
28, 19 -- Importance:
28, 19 -- To: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org, microscopy-at-microscopy.com
28, 19 -- X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004
28, 19 -- Message-ID: {OF1CB0C5B8.3466EB9F-ON86257162.007E1D3A-86257162.007F44B0-at-exxonmobil.com}
28, 19 -- From: gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
28, 19 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:10:07 -0500
28, 19 -- X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Hounmg03.na.xom.com/S/ExxonMobil(652FP1HF193|March
28, 19 -- 02, 2006) at 05/02/2006 06:10:12 PM
28, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
28, 19 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tivol-at-caltech.edu
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:22:22 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


On May 2, 2006, at 12:26 PM, TindallR-at-missouri.edu wrote:

} Today's challenge is trying to image platinum nanoparticles in an
} agarose matrix, in order to see how they distribute themselves and to
} get a size distribution. TEM and/or SEM are possibilities. So far, my
} check of the literature finds tons of stuff on nanoparticles in
} electrophoresis gels, but none of it is relevant, since the particles
} are removed from the gels and put back into a liquid medium. The one
} article I found that is comparable to our problem used thin-sectioning
} and we have tried that.
}
} We have also tried melting the agarose, dipping grids into the
} particle/agarose mix, then rinsing the grid in hot water to thin the
} gelatin out. We can get images in the TEM, but the results are
} inconsistent when repeating with the same sample. Also, there is the
} chance that the hot water and melting are re-arranging the particles.
}
} We have tried thin sectioning the dehydrated agarose with particles,
} but
} finding the particles in a given thin section is a crap shoot with long
} odds. Also, we may be cutting through aggregations we want to see.
}
} We have tried viewing carbon-coated dehydrated agarose with particles
} using backscattered electrons in our FESEM. This gives images with
} particles, but only those on or right at the surface are imaged clearly
} enough for good size data. Plus, we can't see far into the agarose for
} good distribution data.
}
} We are going to try increasing the concentration of the particles to
} increase chances of getting them reliably in thin sections, and we will
} also try putting the melted mixture on cover slips in a thin layer and
} re-trying the BSE imaging after carbon coating. (The latter still has
} the potential problem of redistributing the particles, however.) We
} could also try doing large thick or semi-thin sections and viewing them
} in BSE imaging.
}
} However, if someone out there has viewing nanos in agarose down to a
} fine art, we, as usual, would be delighted to hear about it. In the
} meantime, I will continue to search the databases.
}
Dear Randy,
Thick or semi-thick sections in TEM would be my choice--probably since
I have a 300 kV TEM. If you can get to a high-pressure freezer, I
would suggest using that to prepare your specimens, followed by
freeze-substitution and resin embedding. Assuming that you do not need
to image the strands of agarose, just section the embedded specimen and
observe.
Yours,
Bill Tivol, PhD
EM Scientist and Manager
Cryo-Electron Microscopy Facility
Broad Center, Mail Code 114-96
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena CA 91125
(626) 395-8833
tivol-at-caltech.edu


==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 22 -- From tivol-at-caltech.edu Tue May 2 18:22:21 2006
4, 22 -- Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19])
4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42NML6K022993
4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:22:21 -0500
4, 22 -- Received: from water-dog.caltech.edu (water-dog [192.168.1.26])
4, 22 -- by fire-ox-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP
4, 22 -- id 0412A361B2; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
4, 22 -- Received: from [192.168.157.234] (pix-1.caltech.edu [131.215.2.21])
4, 22 -- by earth-ox.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
4, 22 -- id F421210AB45; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
4, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
4, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605021926.k42JQQx1005807-at-ns.microscopy.com}
4, 22 -- References: {200605021926.k42JQQx1005807-at-ns.microscopy.com}
4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
4, 22 -- Message-Id: {550efc1d94e877099710308bf41bdfde-at-caltech.edu}
4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
4, 22 -- From: Bill Tivol {tivol-at-caltech.edu}
4, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose
4, 22 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:32:36 -0700
4, 22 -- To: "Randy D.Tindall" {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} , microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com
4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623)
4, 22 -- X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-ITS on water-dog by amavisd-2.3.3
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dianavd-at-eye.usyd.edu.au
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 20:37:34 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Reaching into my past......We used special analytical grade NaOH,
since it seemed to us that the NaOH was picking up carbonate from the
air. The analytical grade stuff came in a sealed glass vial, and
made quite a difference.

Joel

Date sent: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:45:41 -0500
To: jbs-at-temple.edu
X-from: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
Send reply to: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org

This may be shear luck, but I've never had trouble with precipitate
(other things yes, but ppte no) - I keep my lead citrate (made up
with ordinary distilled water, not specially CO2 free) in a
volumetric flask (50ml), which sits in the same place month after
month and is never moved. I don't use the stain for 24 hours after
it's prepared, but then just carefully take off what's needed from
close to the surface using a glass pipette. I wipe the end of the
pipette with a tissue before dispensing the stain and then discard
the first drop. I put the drops onto Parafilm in a covered glass
petri dish. No need for NaOH pellets. Finally wash the grids for 5
seconds in a gentle stream of water from a wash bottle. I probably
shouldn't admit this but I've had a bottle of stain last over 2 years
(the surface of the bottle becomes cloudy with ppte) and still
produce perfect results.

Cheers,

Diana


On 3 May 2006, at 8:47 AM, dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org wrote:

}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------
} ------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of
} America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/
} MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------
} ------
}
} Dear TEM users,
}
} This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM
} expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate
} contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates
} showing up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science
} technical support, we are double distilling our own water (they say
} Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for
} EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly
} upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent
} prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to
} cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.
}
} We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed
} in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition)
} (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free
} double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and
} then again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is
} milky white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially
} prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns
} clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to
} 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly with
} rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.
}
} When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash
} well before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in
} addition to surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH
} pellets. In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8
} minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.
}
} ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong??
} What can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?
}
} A thousand thanks in advance!
}
} Danielle Crippen
} Morphology and Imaging Core Manager
} Buck Institute for Age Research
} 8001 Redwood Blvd.
} Novato, CA 94945
} 415-209-2046
} dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
}
}
}
} ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006
} 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org
} (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24])
} 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP
} id k42MidAD025692
} 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40
} -0500
} 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
} 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
} 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
} 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
} 9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
} 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700
} 9, 20 -- Message-ID:
} {C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org}
} 9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
} 9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
} 9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
} 9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw==
} 9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org}
} 9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
} 9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
} ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692
} ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 19 -- From dianavd-at-eye.usyd.edu.au Tue May 2 20:37:34 2006
7, 19 -- Received: from galen.med.usyd.edu.au (nugalen.med.usyd.edu.au [129.78.36.39])
7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k431bXgq011889
7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 20:37:33 -0500
7, 19 -- Received: from [129.78.203.144] (helo=[129.78.203.144])
7, 19 -- by galen.med.usyd.edu.au with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
7, 19 -- id 1Fb6Ix-0001Sc-26; Wed, 03 May 2006 11:37:27 +1000
7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
7, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022247.k42MlH5w028230-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 19 -- References: {200605022247.k42MlH5w028230-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
7, 19 -- Message-Id: {04E1FDBE-5BAF-4337-B5E4-2C18ED258184-at-eye.usyd.edu.au}
7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7, 19 -- From: Diana van Driel {dianavd-at-eye.usyd.edu.au}
7, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
7, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:37:25 +1000
7, 19 -- To: Microscopy {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} , dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
7, 19 -- X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: shashis_99-at-yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:10:44 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Danielle,

We keep lead citrate prepared by reynold's method for
months in a volumetric flask, Use Whatman 1 to filter
and make drops on a parafilm in a petridish containing
NaOH pellets. After staining for 1-3 min, wash the
grids in water, then water with about 0.01% NaOH and
again water. Never had any precipitates.

regrads
shashi
--- dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org wrote:

}
}
}
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The
} Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help
}
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Dear TEM users,
}
} This is a specimen prep question for everyone out
} there with EM expertise. We are having terrible
} success with Lead Citrate contrast staining.
} Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up
} all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science
} technical support, we are double distilling our own
} water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is
} de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we
} make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly
} upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the
} morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the
} bottle for longer than it takes to cool down before
} we begin making up the Reynolds.
}
} We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the
} protocol listed in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's
} Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead
} nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free
} double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few
} minutes and then again 5-6 times over the next 30
} minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free
} of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared,
} titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns
} clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit.
} Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled
} water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and
} parafilm until use later that day.
}
} When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make
} sure to wash well before and after with CO2 free
} double distilled water in addition to surrounding
} the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets.
} In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg
} for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it
} into staining plate.
}
} ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we
} doing wrong?? What can we change about this
} protocol to ensure ppt free staining?
}
} A thousand thanks in advance!
}
} Danielle Crippen
} Morphology and Imaging Core Manager
} Buck Institute for Age Research
} 8001 Redwood Blvd.
} Novato, CA 94945
} 415-209-2046
} dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
}
}
}
} ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2
} 17:44:40 2006
} 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org
} (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24])
} 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com
} (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
} k42MidAD025692
} 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2
} May 2006 17:44:40 -0500
} 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
} 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
} 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
} 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange
} V6.5
} 9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
} 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700
} 9, 20 -- Message-ID:
}
{C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org}
} 9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
} 9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
} 9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
} 9, 20 -- Thread-Index:
} AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw==
} 9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen"
} {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org}
} 9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
} 9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable
} to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692
} ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================
}


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 20 -- From shashis_99-at-yahoo.com Tue May 2 23:10:44 2006
6, 20 -- Received: from web54613.mail.yahoo.com (web54613.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.183])
6, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k434AhDg024111
6, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 23:10:44 -0500
6, 20 -- Received: (qmail 76169 invoked by uid 60001); 3 May 2006 04:10:42 -0000
6, 20 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
6, 20 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
6, 20 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
6, 20 -- b=ptQ7cT0W7aXsSDn7d2ujxNFCzmYsX6OWtiAAqbMZ/lfsNfYQNavioZdPDA2ZFfZH2w6s0IGPQFg/+g7kAbfXmKCNf1sFjy01pjBnf5VypfnA6HFkr3O2WiHAMjSKPo9oZ+H/s7uzILZehFv4AK5MOshoI/Tuu8UhcnIIIJs9lp8= ;
6, 20 -- Message-ID: {20060503041042.76167.qmail-at-web54613.mail.yahoo.com}
6, 20 -- Received: from [203.200.217.180] by web54613.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 21:10:42 PDT
6, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 21:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
6, 20 -- From: shashi singh {shashis_99-at-yahoo.com}
6, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
6, 20 -- To: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org,
6, 20 -- "microscopy-at-microscopy.com" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
6, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022247.k42MlX9q028672-at-ns.microscopy.com}
6, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
6, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
6, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: mike.reedy-at-cellbio.duke.edu
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 00:14:39 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Doesn't anybody else use or recommend Sato's lead stain as a more
stable replacement for Reynolds Pb citrate? We've used it since the
1970s.
1968 Sato, T.: J. Electron Microsc. 17:158, 1968.
1968 Sato and others: Proc. XIth Int. Cong. on Electron Microscopy.
Kyoto. 1986, pp. 2181-2182. [

-mike reedy-

At 5:49 PM -0500 5/2/06, dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org wrote:
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


--
-mike reedy-

************************
Michael K. Reedy, M.D.
Duke Univ. Med. Center
Dept. Cell Biology, Box 3011 (for U.S. Mail)
458 Alex Sands Bldg, Research Dr (courier)
Durham, NC 27710

Office 919-668-2534
Lab 919-684-5674
Fax 919-681-9929
mike.reedy-at-cellbio.duke.edu
http://note.cellbio.duke.edu/Faculty/Research/Reedy.html

==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 18 -- From mike.reedy-at-cellbio.duke.edu Wed May 3 00:14:38 2006
7, 18 -- Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102])
7, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k435Ecpl002370
7, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 00:14:38 -0500
7, 18 -- Received: from [152.16.191.199] (cpe-024-163-088-059.nc.res.rr.com [24.163.88.59])
7, 18 -- by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k435EVWY028143;
7, 18 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 01:14:33 -0400 (EDT)
7, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 18 -- Message-Id: {p0621025ec07dea0ed231-at-[152.16.191.199]}
7, 18 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022249.k42MnT0K031920-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 18 -- References: {200605022249.k42MnT0K031920-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 18 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 01:14:22 -0400
7, 18 -- To: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
7, 18 -- From: Mike Reedy {mike.reedy-at-cellbio.duke.edu}
7, 18 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
7, 18 -- Cc: "Microscopy Listserver" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
7, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
7, 18 -- X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: W.Muss-at-salk.at
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 03:00:13 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Danielle,
dear Listers,

since it was not an issue in the replies so far, I would like to ask wether
your double distilling apparatus overall is made of quartz glass or does
have a destillate } container { bin made from metal (e. g. copper).

I only would like to add this since we had - several years ago - a problem
when our destillation apparatus was out of function and on repair for some
month and we used } bidistilled { water obtained from our hospital pharmacy.
We had a lot of precipitation problems then, which ended not before we
changed to the ddH2O from the repaired quartz-glass still used formerly.

When checking the quality of the "pharmacy"-water later on it turned out to
contain a high amount of copper-ions (storage bin was made from copper
sheets), which IMO perhaps might have had a detrimental precipitating
action on the lead-staining performance.

By the way: we use Lead Citrate according to Venable&Coggeshall (1965),
store solutions in "ultraclean" snap cap-glass-vials [and also ultraclean
plastic snap cap!] which are used only for that purpose, that means we take
care of any traces of cleaning substances by washing /cleaning also with
chrome-sulfuric acid or a modern substitute but take care by ourselves (not
a washing machine) to get rid of any resting traces of substances by
vigorously washing several times with bidistilled hot water and a final
step with ultrapure water (UHQ). We found also that intermittent air drying
of glass vial/bottle creates probably otherwise insoluble incrustations, so
we always keep the stuff in wet condition until the final step of cleaning.

Another point we found is that "freshly" made lead citrate solution
(Venable&Coggeshall) -if used the same day - will be "more aggressive/more
reactive", that means, we decrease staining times (say 30 sec when freshly
prepared instead of 2-3 min -at-room temperature, e.g. after one week storage
in the dark).

Avoiding or at least some sort of control for the CO2-reaction is
obligatory in our lab (NaOH-pellets in a petridish filled with dental wax,
the latter always being melted and } flamed/singed { after a staining cycle,
but perhaps use of virgin, clean? { {Parafilm} } sheets is the better choice)
knowing that some/severely disturbing precipitation nuclei also could be
present in previousely uncleaned, and therefore } oily { injection needles,
syringes, (plastic) tips, rubber stoppers (especially if always one and the
same is used) as well as the surface areas where you are staining/handling
your grids.

In general our experience is / was: the more steps you are introducing in
your schedule to reduce an anticipated precipitate (or to inhibit the
formation of such one) the more you (likely) will initiate precipitation
due to unexpected particle impurities.

All best wishes for an excellent result of your next staining series,

Wolfgang Muss
Salzburg Austria
----------
Von: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org[SMTP:dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org]
Antwort an: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Mai 2006 00:50
An: W.Muss-at-salk.at
Betreff: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America

Dear TEM users,

This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM expertise.
We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast staining.
Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over the specimen.
On the advice of EM science technical support, we are double distilling
our own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we
don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping
directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of
reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to
cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.

We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch 5
of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead
nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled
water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over
the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of
particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM
science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit.
Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper
tightly with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.

When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well before
and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to surrounding
the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In addition, we
centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um
filter it into staining plate.

ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can we
change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?

A thousand thanks in advance!

Danielle Crippen
Morphology and Imaging Core Manager
Buck Institute for Age Research
8001 Redwood Blvd.
Novato, CA 94945
415-209-2046
dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org



==============================Original
Headers==============================
9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006
9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org
[64.84.58.24])
9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
k42MidAD025692
9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 -0500
9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700
9, 20 -- Message-ID:
{C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org}
9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw==
9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org}
9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692
==============================End of -
Headers==============================



==============================Original Headers==============================
24, 28 -- From W.Muss-at-salk.at Wed May 3 03:00:12 2006
24, 28 -- Received: from Hermes.salk.at (hermes.lks.at [193.170.167.9])
24, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4380Bmm014853
24, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 03:00:11 -0500
24, 28 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
24, 28 -- by hermes.lks.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6518A5A901F;
24, 28 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
24, 28 -- Received: from hermes.lks.at ([127.0.0.1])
24, 28 -- by localhost (hermes.lks.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
24, 28 -- with ESMTP id 71716-05; Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
24, 28 -- Received: from c1pa003 (unknown [192.168.42.3])
24, 28 -- by hermes.lks.at (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FD325A900A;
24, 28 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
24, 28 -- Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:03 +0200
24, 28 -- Message-ID: {01C66E98.5941B2C0.W.Muss-at-salk.at}
24, 28 -- From: MUSS Wolfgang PhD {W.Muss-at-salk.at}
24, 28 -- Reply-To: "W.Muss-at-salk.at" {W.Muss-at-salk.at}
24, 28 -- To: "'dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org'" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org} ,
24, 28 -- "'microscopy-at-microscopy.com'" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
24, 28 -- Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
24, 28 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:01 +0200
24, 28 -- Return-Receipt-To: MUSS Wolfgang PhD {W.Muss-at-salk.at}
24, 28 -- Organization: SALK,Salzburger Landeskliniken, Pathologie, EM-Labor
24, 28 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
24, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
24, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
24, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
24, 28 -- X-Virii-Scanned: by Sophos/ClamAV at salk.at
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: richard.beanland-at-bookham.com
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 05:08:50 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Si wafers

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi folks,
Strictly this isn't a microscopy question but I think I have a
fair chance of catching someone who might be able to help!

I was looking through our boxes of 'historical' samples (there has been
a materials analysis lab here for more than 50 years), and I have
examples of 1", 2", 3", 4", 6" and 8" Si wafers. Since we stopped
getting Si samples to analyse about 5 years ago I don't have any 12" (or
300mm, I should say) wafers. Is there anyone out there willing to swap
a 12" wafer for a 1" one? I know it doesn't seem like good value for
the amount of material but I hope that would be more than compensated
for by the historical interest. Or I could swap odd bits of Ge, GaAs,
InP, sapphire, etc. etc. if Si isn't your bag. Perhaps I should start
up a little 'Caswell museum'..

Many thanks

Richard



________________________________________
Richard Beanland
Materials Analysis
Bookham
Caswell
Towcester
Northants
NN12 8EQ
United Kingdom
Tel. +44 1327 356362
Fax. +44 1327 356775
http://www.bookham.com
________________________________________


=======================================================================
This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only. The
information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must
not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any
person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have
received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use,
forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
No part of this message can be considered a request for goods or
services.
=======================================================================


==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 31 -- From richard.beanland-at-bookham.com Wed May 3 05:08:50 2006
9, 31 -- Received: from mail72.messagelabs.com (mail72.messagelabs.com [193.109.255.147])
9, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k43A8oWW029818
9, 31 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 05:08:50 -0500
9, 31 -- X-VirusChecked: Checked
9, 31 -- X-Env-Sender: richard.beanland-at-bookham.com
9, 31 -- X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-72.messagelabs.com!1146650928!34334684!1
9, 31 -- X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=bookham.com,-,-
9, 31 -- X-Originating-IP: [213.249.209.179]
9, 31 -- Received: (qmail 6827 invoked from network); 3 May 2006 10:08:48 -0000
9, 31 -- Received: from unknown (HELO cas-smx-brdg-01.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI) (213.249.209.179)
9, 31 -- by server-14.tower-72.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 3 May 2006 10:08:48 -0000
9, 31 -- Received: from cas-smx-02.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI ([10.4.0.223]) by cas-smx-brdg-01.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
9, 31 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 11:08:48 +0100
9, 31 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
9, 31 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
9, 31 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
9, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
9, 31 -- charset="us-ascii"
9, 31 -- Subject: Si wafers
9, 31 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:08:47 +0100
9, 31 -- Message-ID: {9645D3E33E4C6548B12A7B25F611533E083603-at-cas-smx-02.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI}
9, 31 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
9, 31 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
9, 31 -- Thread-Topic: Si wafers
9, 31 -- Thread-Index: AcZumZF7SpnmhpHcRrOQHPRrNC+AIA==
9, 31 -- From: "Richard Beanland" {richard.beanland-at-bookham.com}
9, 31 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
9, 31 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2006 10:08:48.0562 (UTC) FILETIME=[9206F920:01C66E99]
9, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
9, 31 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k43A8oWW029818
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: DusevichV-at-umkc.edu
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:18:33 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

} This may be shear luck, but I've never had trouble with
} precipitate (other things yes, but ppte no) - I keep my lead
} citrate (made up with ordinary distilled water, not specially
} CO2 free) in a volumetric flask (50ml), which sits in the
} same place month after month and is never moved. I don't use
} the stain for 24 hours after it's prepared, but then just
} carefully take off what's needed from close to the surface
} using a glass pipette. I wipe the end of the pipette with a
} tissue before dispensing the stain and then discard the first
} drop. I put the drops onto Parafilm in a covered glass petri
} dish. No need for NaOH pellets. Finally wash the grids for 5
} seconds in a gentle stream of water from a wash bottle. I
} probably shouldn't admit this but I've had a bottle of stain
} last over 2 years (the surface of the bottle becomes cloudy
} with ppte) and still produce perfect results.
}
} Cheers,
}
} Diana

I use similar protocol, but I do use DI-} distilled-} boiled water
and I do put NaOH pellets in the petry dish. Never tried to keep
stain for 2 years, but for 6 month it works fine.

Vladimir

Vladimir M. Dusevich, Ph.D.
Electron Microscope Lab Manager
371 School of Dentistry
650 E. 25th Street
Kansas City, MO 64108-2784

Phone: (816) 235-2072
Fax: (816) 235-5524
Web: http://www.umkc.edu/dentistry/microscopy



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------
} } ------
} } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of
} } America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/
} } MicroscopyListserver On-Line Help


==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 23 -- From DusevichV-at-umkc.edu Wed May 3 09:18:33 2006
9, 23 -- Received: from kc-msxproto3.kc.umkc.edu (exchange.umkc.edu [134.193.44.10])
9, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k43EIXjZ011623
9, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 09:18:33 -0500
9, 23 -- Received: from KC-MSX1.kc.umkc.edu ([134.193.32.11]) by kc-msxproto3.kc.umkc.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
9, 23 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 09:18:33 -0500
9, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
9, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
9, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
9, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
9, 23 -- charset="us-ascii"
9, 23 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 23 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:18:32 -0500
9, 23 -- Message-ID: {032EC4F75A527A4FA58C5B1B5DECFBB33ADC12-at-KC-MSX1.kc.umkc.edu}
9, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
9, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
9, 23 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
9, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZuUkF607FRWDc1TtCl4//Np/qEYQAaLHnw
9, 23 -- From: "Dusevich, Vladimir" {DusevichV-at-umkc.edu}
9, 23 -- To: {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com}
9, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2006 14:18:33.0065 (UTC) FILETIME=[757CAD90:01C66EBC]
9, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
9, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k43EIXjZ011623
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:27:11 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Lead Citrate

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I have been using "calcined lead citrate" (apparently a modification of
Sato's lead citrate) for a couple of years, and it certainly is much
more stable than traditional Reynold's lead citrate.
Takamasa Hanaichi et al. (1986) A Stable Lead by Modification of
Sato's Method. J. Electron Microsc., Vol. 35. No. 3. 304-306.
--Jan Factor

---------------------------------------
Jan Robert Factor, Ph.D.
Professor of Biology
---------------------------------------
Natural Sciences
Purchase College, State University of New York
735 Anderson Hill Rd.
Purchase, NY 10577
USA
---------------------------------------
Office Tel: 914-251-6659
Office Fax: 914-251-6635
E-mail: jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu
or- jan.factor-at-purchase.edu
---------------------------------------



mike.reedy-at-cellbio.duke.edu wrote:
--| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--| The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
--| To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
--| On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
--| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--|
--| Doesn't anybody else use or recommend Sato's lead stain as a more
--| stable replacement for Reynolds Pb citrate? We've used it since the
--| 1970s.
--| 1968 Sato, T.: J. Electron Microsc. 17:158, 1968.
--| 1968 Sato and others: Proc. XIth Int. Cong. on Electron Microscopy.
--| Kyoto. 1986, pp. 2181-2182. [
--|
--| -mike reedy-
--|
--| At 5:49 PM -0500 5/2/06, dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org wrote:
--|
--|--| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--|--| The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
--|--| To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
--|--| On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
--|--| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--|--|
--|--| Dear TEM users,
--|--|
--|--| This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM
--|--| expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate
--|--| contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing
--|--| up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical
--|--| support, we are double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is
--|--| too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then
--|--| we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly upon removal
--|--|
--| --|from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent prep--so it
--|
--|--| doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to cool down
--|--| before we begin making up the Reynolds.
--|--|
--|--| We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed
--|--| in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition)
--|--| (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free
--|--| double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few miutes and then
--|--| again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky
--|--| white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared,
--|--| titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust
--|--| pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free
--|--| double distilled water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and
--|--| parafilm until use later that day.
--|--|
--|--| When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well
--|--| before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to
--|--| surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In
--|--| addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior
--|--| to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.
--|--|
--|--| ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What
--|--| can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?
--|--|
--|--| A thousand thanks in advance!
--|--|
--|--| Danielle Crippen
--|--| Morphology and Imaging Core Manager
--|--| Buck Institute for Age Research
--|--| 8001 Redwood Blvd.
--|--| Novato, CA 94945
--|--| 415-209-2046
--|--| dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
--|--|
--|--|



==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 16 -- From jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu Wed May 3 17:27:11 2006
7, 16 -- Received: from zephyr.ns.purchase.edu (zephyr.ns.purchase.edu [199.79.168.193])
7, 16 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k43MRAVQ029989
7, 16 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:27:10 -0500
7, 16 -- Received: from [10.52.0.79] ([10.52.0.79])
7, 16 -- by zephyr.ns.purchase.edu (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id k43MV1520666;
7, 16 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 18:31:01 -0400
7, 16 -- Message-ID: {44592E41.5000605-at-ns.purchase.edu}
7, 16 -- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:27:13 -0400
7, 16 -- From: Jan Factor {jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu}
7, 16 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
7, 16 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 16 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 16 -- Subject: Re: Lead Citrate
7, 16 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
7, 16 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 19:02:13 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Calcined lead citrate

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I've had a couple of inquiries about calcined lead citrate, so I
thought I'd send this to the list in case anyone else is interested. (To
be fair, I learned about this method by perusing the EMS Catalog, which
has the formulation.) I've pasted the relevant page from my in-house lab
manual (below). To prepare the calcined the lead citrate, the unusual
step, I simply went up to our chemistry program and asked them to fire
up their high-temp oven (which is in a fume hood) for the day. Once you
get a successful batch of calcined lead citrate, and I suggest making a
good deal more than you need immediately, it can be stored as a powder
in a vial for some time (perhaps indefinitely?). This way, you only have
to bake it once, and you can make enough for multiple batches of lead
citrate stain. I still use the usual precautions when handling lead
stain, such as using NaOH pellets, and I spin down the stain in a
table-top centrifuge before each use.
Hope this is helpful.
--Jan

---------------------------------------
Jan Robert Factor, Ph.D.
Professor of Biology
---------------------------------------
Natural Sciences
Purchase College
State University of New York
735 Anderson Hill Rd.
Purchase, NY 10577
USA
---------------------------------------
Office Tel: 914-251-6659
Office Fax: 914-251-6635
E-mail: jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu
or- jan.factor-at-purchase.edu
---------------------------------------


Calcined lead citrate (Hanaichi et al., 1986)

Calcined lead citrate is a stable, non-precipitating replacement for
Reynolds’ lead citrate, which is reportedly free from precipitates for
over one year when kept at room temperature.
Takamasa Hanaichi et al. (1986) A Stable Lead by Modification of Sato's
Method. J. Electron Microsc., Vol. 35. No. 3. 304-306.
Calcined lead citrate: Heat crystal lead citrate for several hours in a
melting pot (200-300ÌŠC) until the color changes to a light brownish
yellow. This takes ~6.5 hrs at 250ÌŠC. Note: Check the color periodically,
as overheated lead citrate with a dark brownish or black color can't be
used. The calcined lead citrate can be stored and used for repeated
batches of stain.

The stock lead solution:
1. The following reagents are placed in a 50 ml volumetric flask and
mixed well to produce a yellowish milky solution:
CALCINED LEAD CITRATE........0.20 g Prepared from lead citrate
Lead nitrate......................................0.15 g
Lead acetate....................................0.15 g EMS #17600-25, 25g
Sodium citrate.................................1.00 g
Distilled water................................ 41.00 ml

2. Then, add: 1.0N NaOH.....................................9.0 ml
Carbonate free, EMS #21170-01, 225ml
Then 9.0 ml of 1N NaOH (use carbonate free solution) is added to the
solution and mixed well until the solution becomes clear with a light
yellowish color. The solution is then transferred to an amber glass with
screw cap bottle for storage, and can be stored at room temperature or
in the refrigerator (recommended) for over 1 year.

-





==============================Original Headers==============================
12, 19 -- From jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu Wed May 3 19:02:12 2006
12, 19 -- Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.198])
12, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4402Cd9008597
12, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 19:02:12 -0500
12, 19 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ool-4357e602.dyn.optonline.net [67.87.230.2])
12, 19 -- by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
12, 19 -- (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005))
12, 19 -- with ESMTP id {0IYP00FL8S34FY65-at-mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net} for
12, 19 -- microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com; Wed, 03 May 2006 20:01:53 -0400 (EDT)
12, 19 -- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 20:02:00 -0400
12, 19 -- From: Jan Factor {jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu}
12, 19 -- Subject: Calcined lead citrate
12, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com}
12, 19 -- Message-id: {44594478.8020707-at-ns.purchase.edu}
12, 19 -- MIME-version: 1.0
12, 19 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
12, 19 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
12, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
12, 19 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4402Cd9008597
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 22:56:05 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM?

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi, All-

I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed
Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need
to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks,
or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips
gratefully accepted!

Aloha,
Tina

****************************************************************************
* Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu *
* Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 *
* University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf*
****************************************************************************


==============================Original Headers==============================
5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Wed May 3 22:56:05 2006
5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7])
5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k443u4UL021598
5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:56:05 -0500
5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k443u0kp023231
5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:56:00 -1000 (HST)
5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k443txfE023228
5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST)
5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs
5, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST)
5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu}
5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia
5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
5, 19 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM?
5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605031752360.23000-100000-at-halia}
5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: nizets2-at-yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 05:44:45 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] quenching extracellular fluorescence

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear listers,

I am observing the internalization of a fluorescent
component in the cells. I thought it would be a good
idea to quench the extracellular fluorescence after
several hours of incubation. This way I would see only
the fluorescence coming from inside the cells.
Would you know a substance which quenches Alexa488
dyes and which is not toxic to the cells (and do not
enter the cells)?
Stéphane-without-an-i

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

==============================Original Headers==============================
3, 18 -- From nizets2-at-yahoo.com Thu May 4 05:44:45 2006
3, 18 -- Received: from web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.66])
3, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k44Aij0f004607
3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 05:44:45 -0500
3, 18 -- Received: (qmail 1686 invoked by uid 60001); 4 May 2006 10:44:45 -0000
3, 18 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
3, 18 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
3, 18 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
3, 18 -- b=nqm/XzURMI3axvbmJZsvwkIBQ/KWvp7vwWzV66J26ivZKNEbGL+t4EtML2piRt2x+fsuORpYb9WXbSAqyni8b1Ok2ZWbjYfcwVq3Fb/bXNgmLACLGSGYC7RTq4WHmfsNfE3pR0v7ZMhk/BbD3jqLwcQQOlilu+MaLkA0l22SBw8= ;
3, 18 -- Message-ID: {20060504104445.1684.qmail-at-web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com}
3, 18 -- Received: from [80.122.101.102] by web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 04 May 2006 03:44:45 PDT
3, 18 -- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 03:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
3, 18 -- From: Stephane Nizet {nizets2-at-yahoo.com}
3, 18 -- Subject: quenching extracellular fluorescence
3, 18 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
3, 18 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
3, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
3, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: M_Jarnik-at-fccc.edu
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:20:26 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Anti-GFP for TEM?

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Tina,

I am not aware of anti-GFP gold conjugate (although it may be somewhere
out there), but you can use the indirect method, i.e. primary
antibody/secondary conjugate (protein A/gold or secondary
antibody/gold). For the primary, we use Torrey Pines Biolabs purified
rabbit Anti-GFP, that works well even after 2% formaldehyde/0.2%
glutaraldehyde (that is what we use for Tokuyashu's technique).

Hope this helps,

Michal

tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu wrote:
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Hi, All-
}
} I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed
} Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need
} to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks,
} or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips
} gratefully accepted!
}
} Aloha,
} Tina
}
} ****************************************************************************
} * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu *
} * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 *
} * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf*
} ****************************************************************************
}
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Wed May 3 22:56:05 2006
} 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7])
} 5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k443u4UL021598
} 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:56:05 -0500
} 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
} 5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k443u0kp023231
} 5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
} 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:56:00 -1000 (HST)
} 5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k443txfE023228
} 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST)
} 5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs
} 5, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST)
} 5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu}
} 5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia
} 5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
} 5, 19 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM?
} 5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605031752360.23000-100000-at-halia}
} 5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================
}


==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 20 -- From M_Jarnik-at-fccc.edu Thu May 4 07:20:26 2006
6, 20 -- Received: from azah.fccc.edu (azah.fccc.edu [131.249.4.237])
6, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44CKQZn015740
6, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 07:20:26 -0500
6, 20 -- Received: from [131.249.8.162] (macloan2.fccc.edu [131.249.8.162])
6, 20 -- by azah.fccc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k44CKPHb019420
6, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 08:20:26 -0400 (EDT)
6, 20 -- Message-ID: {4459F2D9.5010705-at-fccc.edu}
6, 20 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 08:26:01 -0400
6, 20 -- From: Michal Jarnik {M_Jarnik-at-fccc.edu}
6, 20 -- Reply-To: M_Jarnik-at-fccc.edu
6, 20 -- Organization: Fox Chase Cancer Center
6, 20 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201)
6, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
6, 20 -- To: Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com
6, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM?
6, 20 -- References: {200605040356.k443usWD022646-at-ns.microscopy.com}
6, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605040356.k443usWD022646-at-ns.microscopy.com}
6, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
6, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:35:59 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Anti-GFP for TEM?

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com
Name: Rick Powell

Organization: Nanoprobes, Incorporated

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Re: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM?

Question: Hello Tina and Everyone:

We don't have a gold probe for this (yet), and can't comment on the best antibodies, but the question comes up occasionally, and we keep an eye out for references. We have reported on several that might be helpful in back issues of our newsletter:

http://www.nanoprobes.com/Newsletter_Archive.html

(1) Follet‚Gueye and co-workers have reported an improved fixation method for the immunogold localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP). The method is a simple one-step procedure which consists of fixing in the dark for 30 min, 60 min, or 120 min at 4ƒC in a solution consisting of 1% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M Na cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2. This mixture was prepared and used immediately. After washing in distilled water, the samples were gradually dehydrated in 10%, 20%, and 40% aqueous ethanol (10 min in each bath), then in 60% and 80% (20 min in each bath), and finally in anhydrous ethanol for 30 min, and embedded in LR White or Spurr resin. GFP-tagged Golgi glycosyltransferase was localized in transgenic BY-2 cells using rabbit anti-GFP primary and 10 nm gold anti-rabbit secondary antibodies; this method allowed improved structural preservation of the endomembrane system, and anti-GFP antibodies bound with high specificity, allowing the localization of GFP-tagged glycosyltransferases within individual Golgi cisternae.

Reference:

Follet-Gueye, M. L.; Pagny, S.; Faye, L.; Gomord, V., and Driouich, A.: An improved chemical fixation method suitable for immunogold localization of green fluorescent protein in the Golgi apparatus of tobacco Bright Yellow (BY-2) cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 51, 931-940 (2003).

Abstract (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry):
http://www.jhc.org/cgi/content/abstract/51/7/931

Reprint (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry):
http://www.jhc.org/cgi/reprint/51/7/931


(2) Luby-Phelps and co-workers describe a procedure for labeling green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing cells in 1-micron zebrafish sections for fluorescence and electron microscope observation using a 10 nm gold-labeled secondary antibody. GFP fluorescence survived fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde and can be visualized directly by fluorescence microscopy. For electron microscopy, thin sections of silver‚gold color were collected on nickel grids and were incubated in anti-GFP antibody at a 1:25 dilution for 2 hr at room temperature, followed by 10-nm immunogold-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG for 1 hr. After contrasting with 3% aqueous uranyl acetate solution, the grids were dried and viewed with a Hitachi 600 transmission electron microscope operated at 75 kV.

Reference:

Luby‚Phelps, K.; Ning, G.; Fogerty, J., and Besharse, J. C.: Visualization of Identified GFP-expressing Cells by Light and Electron Microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 51, 271-274 (2003).

Abstract (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry):
http://www.jhc.org/cgi/content/abstract/51/3/271

Reprint (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry):
http://www.jhc.org/cgi/reprint/51/3/271


(3) Joanne Buchanan and co-workers investigated immuno-EM of GFP with NanogoldÆ secondary antibody conjugates, and described some results at Microscopy & Microanalysis 2002: use of microwave processing greatly shortened all the steps.

Reference:

Buchanan, J.; Micheva, K. D., and Smith, S. J.; Microwave Processing and Pre-embedding Nanogold Immunolabeling for Electron Microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 8, (Suppl. 2: Proceedings); Lyman, C. E.; Albrecht, R. M.; Carter, C. B.; Dravid, V. P.; Herman, B., and Schatten, H. (Eds.); Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2002, 160.


Prior and co-workers prepared their own 5nm gold anti-GFP:

Prior, I. A.; Muncke, C.; Parton, R. G., and Hancock J. F.: Direct visualization of Ras proteins in spatially distinct cell surface microdomains. J. Cell. Biol., 160, 165-170 (2003).

Reprint (Journal of Cell Science):
http://www.jcb.org/cgi/reprint/160/2/165


Hope some of this is helpful,

Rick Powell


********************************************************
Richard D. Powell
rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com * www.nanoprobes.com
NANOPROBES, Incorporated
US Toll-free: (877) 447-6266 * Tel: (919) 845-6324
********************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


At 11:57 PM 5/3/2006, you wrote:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America

Hi, All-

I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed
Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need
to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks,
or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips
gratefully accepted!

Aloha,
Tina

****************************************************************************
* Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu *
* Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 *
* University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf*
****************************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------------


==============================Original Headers==============================
42, 14 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Thu May 4 08:35:59 2006
42, 14 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
42, 14 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44DZwXN026710
42, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 08:35:58 -0500
42, 14 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
42, 14 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
42, 14 -- Message-Id: {p06110403c07fb3b05465-at-[206.69.208.22]}
42, 14 -- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:35:57 -0500
42, 14 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
42, 14 -- From: rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
42, 14 -- Subject: viaWWW: Anti-GFP for TEM?
42, 14 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
42, 14 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
42, 14 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k44DZwXN026710
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gwe-at-ufl.edu
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:17:48 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] [Fwd: Re: Anti-GFP for TEM?]

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


Hi Tina,
I have not had very good luck with localizing GFP for on TEM sectios.
Hope you will share any good suggestions that you get

Greg

tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu wrote:
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Hi, All-
}
} I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed
} Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need
} to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks,
} or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips
} gratefully accepted!
}
} Aloha,
} Tina
}
} ****************************************************************************
} * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu *
} * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 *
} * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf*
} ****************************************************************************
}
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Wed May 3 22:56:05 2006
} 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7])
} 5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k443u4UL021598
} 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:56:05 -0500
} 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
} 5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k443u0kp023231
} 5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
} 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:56:00 -1000 (HST)
} 5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k443txfE023228
} 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST)
} 5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs
} 5, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST)
} 5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu}
} 5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia
} 5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
} 5, 19 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM?
} 5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605031752360.23000-100000-at-halia}
} 5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================
}

--
Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program
Scientific Director, EM Core Lab
P.O. Box 118525
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
gwe-at-ufl.edu
Phone: 352-392-1295
Fax: 352-846-0251


--
Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program
Scientific Director, EM Core Lab
P.O. Box 118525
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
gwe-at-ufl.edu
Phone: 352-392-1295
Fax: 352-846-0251

==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 24 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Thu May 4 10:17:48 2006
7, 24 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165])
7, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44FHmNN006072
7, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 10:17:48 -0500
7, 24 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63] (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63])
7, 24 -- (authenticated bits=0)
7, 24 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id k44FHk3S1302702;
7, 24 -- Thu, 4 May 2006 11:17:46 -0400
7, 24 -- Message-ID: {445A1B19.3060508-at-ufl.edu}
7, 24 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:17:45 -0400
7, 24 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu}
7, 24 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
7, 24 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
7, 24 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
7, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 24 -- To: tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu,
7, 24 -- "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com" {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
7, 24 -- Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM?]
7, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
7, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7, 24 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
7, 24 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
7, 24 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
7, 24 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: stefan.diller-at-t-online.de
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:41:00 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] KEVEX flange for Philips 525 SEM

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear All,
I am looking for a flange to mount a KEVEX EDS detector on my Philips 525
SEM (conical lens).
Or for a drawing to help manufacturing the flange.

Thanks,
Stefan Diller



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Stefan Diller - Photography
Arndtstrasse 22
D - 97072 Wuerzburg Germany
++49 - 931 - 7848700 Phone
++49 - 931 - 7848701 Fax
++49 - 175 - 717 70 51 Cell-Phone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------



==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 24 -- From stefan.diller-at-t-online.de Thu May 4 12:40:59 2006
7, 24 -- Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80])
7, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44Hex4T018817
7, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 12:40:59 -0500
7, 24 -- Received: from fwd29.aul.t-online.de
7, 24 -- by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp
7, 24 -- id 1Fbhow-00087n-04; Thu, 04 May 2006 19:40:58 +0200
7, 24 -- Received: from dose (Sx7TaZZf8eCbGAckhc5MpaCRY6kOmfAbyFBAC4KmFNxmdpMb2fYGkT-at-[217.228.87.60]) by fwd29.sul.t-online.de
7, 24 -- with smtp id 1Fbhos-0gg9dQ0; Thu, 4 May 2006 19:40:54 +0200
7, 24 -- Message-ID: {001201c66fa1$e54bdd90$7900a8c0-at-dose}
7, 24 -- From: "Stefan Diller" {stefan.diller-at-t-online.de}
7, 24 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
7, 24 -- Subject: KEVEX flange for Philips 525 SEM
7, 24 -- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 19:40:54 +0200
7, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
7, 24 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
7, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7, 24 -- X-Priority: 3
7, 24 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
7, 24 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
7, 24 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
7, 24 -- X-ID: Sx7TaZZf8eCbGAckhc5MpaCRY6kOmfAbyFBAC4KmFNxmdpMb2fYGkT
7, 24 -- X-TOI-MSGID: 53557563-5900-4ca4-8a57-66d7de85b89e
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: redhair-at-stanford.edu
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:09:07 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi Tina. We published a detailed protocol : Micheva, Buchanan, Hotz
and Smith Nature Neuroscience 2003 Vol 6 #9 p925-32.
I have had some good results with anti GFP antibodies from MBL and
Roche for TEM. We used Fluro-Nanogold secondaries and silver enhanced
and looked at hippocampal neurons in culture, Drosophila salivary
glands and mouse brain -all pre-embedding labeling.
I don't have any experience with aradadopsis.
Good luck let me know if you need more info.
JoAnn Buchanan

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, CA 94305
650-723-5856


==============================Original Headers==============================
3, 18 -- From redhair-at-stanford.edu Thu May 4 13:09:06 2006
3, 18 -- Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu (smtp1.Stanford.EDU [171.67.22.28])
3, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44I964k029103
3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 13:09:06 -0500
3, 18 -- Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
3, 18 -- by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id DDAF24BED1
3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 11:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
3, 18 -- Received: from Bucky.stanford.edu (B135-WinXP.Stanford.EDU [171.65.21.62])
3, 18 -- by smtp1.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47724C16D
3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 11:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
3, 18 -- Message-Id: {6.2.5.6.2.20060504110100.06cdd770-at-stanford.edu}
3, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
3, 18 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:09:01 -0700
3, 18 -- To: "Microscopy Listserver" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
3, 18 -- From: JoAnn Buchanan {redhair-at-stanford.edu}
3, 18 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM
3, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
3, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: larry.ackerman-at-ucsf.edu
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:35:17 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Type IIB skeletal muscle

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I am looking for a method to identify Type IIB skeletal muscle fibers at
the electron microscopy level in human muscle biopsies. There are well
established techniques for light microscopy, typically detecting ATPase,
but I need good fixation and embedding for immunoelectron microscopy. A
reasonable fixation compromise is 2% formaldehyde and 0.1% --0.2%
glutaraldehyde with embedding in LR White/Gold or one of the Lowicryl
resins. Any suggestions? Any experience with a particular antibody for
human type IIB fibers?

--
Larry Ackerman, Associate Specialist
UCSF, Dept. of Anatomy, Rm S1347
513 Parnassus Ave., Box 0452
San Francisco, CA 94143

larry.ackerman-at-ucsf.edu


==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 28 -- From Larry.Ackerman-at-ucsf.edu Thu May 4 14:35:17 2006
4, 28 -- Received: from emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org (emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org [64.54.46.98])
4, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44JZGEP007901
4, 28 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 14:35:16 -0500
4, 28 -- Received: from 64.54.128.152 by emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org with
4, 28 -- ESMTP (Tumbleweed Email Firewall SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.1.0));
4, 28 -- Thu, 04 May 2006 12:44:27 -0700
4, 28 -- X-Server-Uuid: 44B63953-633F-4500-B2DA-A3E478718104
4, 28 -- Received: from [128.218.123.88] ([128.218.123.88]) by
4, 28 -- exvs06.net.ucsf.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 4 May
4, 28 -- 2006 12:35:03 -0700
4, 28 -- Message-ID: {445A5767.7030601-at-ucsf.edu}
4, 28 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 12:35:03 -0700
4, 28 -- From: "Larry Ackerman" {larry.ackerman-at-ucsf.edu}
4, 28 -- Reply-to: larry.ackerman-at-ucsf.edu
4, 28 -- Organization: UCSF, NeuroAnatomy
4, 28 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)
4, 28 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
4, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
4, 28 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
4, 28 -- Subject: Type IIB skeletal muscle
4, 28 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2006 19:35:03.0740 (UTC)
4, 28 -- FILETIME=[D73977C0:01C66FB1]
4, 28 -- X-WSS-ID: 684486111G81226191-01-01
4, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
4, 28 -- charset=iso-8859-1;
4, 28 -- format=flowed
4, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: bschneid-at-fhcrc.org
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:05:06 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Independent microscope service engineers for JEOL

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both bschneid-at-fhcrc.org as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: bschneid-at-fhcrc.org
Name: Bobbie S.

Organization: FHCRC

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Independent microscope service engineers for JEOL microsocpes

Question: Is there an independent person servicing JEOL microscopes who on the west coast,specifically Washington.

Bobbie S.
FHCRC
Seattle, WA

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 13 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Fri May 5 08:05:06 2006
7, 13 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
7, 13 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k45D55GZ001076
7, 13 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:05:06 -0500
7, 13 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 13 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
7, 13 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c080fdefbc9f-at-[206.69.208.22]}
7, 13 -- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:05:04 -0500
7, 13 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 13 -- From: bschneid-at-fhcrc.org (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
7, 13 -- Subject: viaWWW: Independent microscope service engineers for JEOL
7, 13 -- microsocpes
7, 13 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:05:30 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Breakage of section under the beam of TEM H7600 EM

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov
Name: Ferri

Organization: NCI

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Breakage of section under the beam of TEM H7600 EM

Question: Dear All,

We're recently experiencing breakage of our sections (no matter what the thickness is) while imaging our samples under TEM H7600 Electron Microscope.

The section's thickness is usually 70-90 nm and spread nicely on a 200 mesh square Cu grid.

Our TEM H7600 is only two years old and works very well except for breaking the section. Even though we changed HV from 80 to 100 (Acc. Voltage Control, it didn't help and still broke the section.

We most likely experience this problem while imaging with the BottomMount of AMT542 camera, which used for high magnification samples.

Any comment on how to solve this problem or to control the beam from breaking the sections?

Best Regards,
-Ferri


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
13, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Fri May 5 08:05:29 2006
13, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
13, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k45D5TsL001449
13, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:05:29 -0500
13, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
13, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
13, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110402c080fe09c2b1-at-[206.69.208.22]}
13, 12 -- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:05:27 -0500
13, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
13, 12 -- From: fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
13, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Breakage of section under the beam of TEM H7600 EM
13, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: staffan-at-physto.se
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:06:30 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: TEM EELS; any old/used spectrometer available?

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both staffan-at-physto.se as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: staffan-at-physto.se
Name: Staffan Wachtmeister

Organization: Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Title-Subject: [Filtered] TEM EELS; any old/used spectrometer available?

Question: Hello everyone!

I have a question that I would like to ask and Gerald Kothleitner at Graz recommended this forum to me, i.e. this is my first posting here.

At Stockholm University, we are buying some new TEM and spectrometer equipment. In the purchase process, however, we have an extra microscope. My idea is, if possible, to buy an additional spectrometer, a used one, for example GIF or PEELS to use together with our extra microscope (our old JEOL 3010 LaB6 instrument) so that young scientists can get more access to the instruments as well. So my question is, if you have, or if you know someone who has an old GIF or PEELS or similar that is not or will not be needed anymore at your lab due to for example an upgrade, or if is not needed anymore for any reason. Then "I" would be very interested in somehow purchasing this old/used spectrometer system for an affordable price (because it is not part of our current budget). I am asking this question as a PhD student, but I will happily forward your proposals or give you the contact information to the people who are making the decisions at my university.

With kind regards

Staffan Wachtmeister


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
11, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Fri May 5 08:06:30 2006
11, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
11, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k45D6Sh7003906
11, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:06:28 -0500
11, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
11, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
11, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110403c080fe21c847-at-[206.69.208.22]}
11, 12 -- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:06:27 -0500
11, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
11, 12 -- From: staffan-at-physto.se (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
11, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: TEM EELS; any old/used spectrometer available?
11, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: ac.richardson2-at-btinternet.com
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:01:59 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Breakage of section under the beam of TEM H7600 EM

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Ferri,
We have the same instrument and I have seen the
problem you are experiencing. We have found it is
usually a no more than a specimen clamping problem.You
must make sure that the clamping mechanism is
correctly located over the grid hole. We always use a
pointed wooden spill to gently push it into place ,
you will hear a 'click' as it
locates. It could be that the holder and clamping
mechanism just need cleaning so that a good contact
can be made.. This is not a unique
problem to the H7600 in any TEM if the grid is not
firmly clamped this will happen.
Hope this solves it for you.
Regards

Christine.


Christine Richardson
Experimental Officer
School of Biological and Biomedical Science
Centre for Molecular Imaging
University of Durham
Science site
South Rd
Durham
England
DH1 3LE
Tel: 0191 3341285\3341321
Fax:0191 3341201
E-mail: a.c.richardson-at-dur.ac.uk




==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 19 -- From ac.richardson2-at-btinternet.com Fri May 5 09:01:59 2006
7, 19 -- Received: from web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.60])
7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k45E1v4F031181
7, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:01:58 -0500
7, 19 -- Received: (qmail 39272 invoked by uid 60001); 5 May 2006 14:01:56 -0000
7, 19 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
7, 19 -- s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
7, 19 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
7, 19 -- b=lnecs6ps7yNpne0eGWewOguxBALIBSF+UESue92Nz9lFrRgvkRH2d+qCAqd/OuvNd3wHjoAECO5q0aMXLD8AJaez+HxbaYKhb9ekD6HEzsWsGuYhX+fVG9oHalEDdUOoHJDvYxaSp3nHYscTqlqI4yEi+qV0oV1mDFm9Ah7+yd0= ;
7, 19 -- Message-ID: {20060505140156.39270.qmail-at-web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com}
7, 19 -- Received: from [86.137.69.9] by web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:01:56 BST
7, 19 -- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:01:56 +0100 (BST)
7, 19 -- From: Christine Richardson {ac.richardson2-at-btinternet.com}
7, 19 -- Subject: Breakage of section under the beam of TEM H7600 EM
7, 19 -- To: fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov
7, 19 -- Cc: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:54:00 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Thanks- Anti-GFP for TEM

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi, All-

Thanks to all who responded with tips. We will try an indirect labeling
process, and I will fix more lightly than usual. If we are dramatically
successful, I'll post our procedure!

Mahalo,
Tina

****************************************************************************
* Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu *
* Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 *
* University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf*
****************************************************************************



==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Fri May 5 13:54:00 2006
6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7])
6, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k45IrxDX012977
6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 13:53:59 -0500
6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
6, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k45IrtUn008540
6, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:53:55 -1000 (HST)
6, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k45Irs2g008537
6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:53:54 -1000 (HST)
6, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs
6, 19 -- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:53:53 -1000 (HST)
6, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu}
6, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia
6, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
6, 19 -- Subject: Thanks- Anti-GFP for TEM
6, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605050850340.8459-100000-at-halia}
6, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
6, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: microscopytoday-at-tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:51:41 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Microscopy Today May 2006 Table of Contents

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Listers,

Here is the May 2006 Microscopy Today table of contents. I will close
the subscription list for this issue on Thursday May 11, 2006.

Microscopists in North America and MSA members anywhere can subscribe
for free. Anyone else may subscribe for US$50 per year (to PARTIALLY
cover postage). All subscriptions at http://www.microscopy-today.com
Thank you.

Ron Anderson, Editor
=======================================================

Teaching Old Microscopes New Tricks
Stephen W. Carmichael, Mayo Clinic

VisBio: a Flexible Open-Source Visualization Package for
Multidimensional Image Data
Curtis T. Rueden and Kevin W. Eliceiri, U. Wisconsin-Madison

BioImageXD – New Open Source Free Software for the Processing, Analysis
and Visualization of Multidimensional Microscopic Images
P. Kankaanpää1, K. Pahajoki1, V. Marjomäki2, J. Heino2, D. White2
1University Turku, 2University Jyväskylä, Finland

Novel Developments in High-Frequency Micro-Ultrasound Imaging
Tom Little, VisualSonics Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Precise SEM Cross Section Polishing via Argon Beam Milling
N. Erdman, R. Campbell, and S. Asahina,* JEOL USA Inc., Peabody,
Massachusetts, *JEOL Ltd., Japan

Perfusion Fixation of Research Animals
C. W. Scouten,* R. O’Connor,** & M. Cunningham** *MyNeuroLab.com, St
Louis, MO, ** Harvard U., Belmont, MA

Three-Dimensional Crystallographic Analysis Beyond EBSD Mapping: The
Next Dimension
J.J.L. Mulders*, and A. Gholinia**, * FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands,
** HKL Technology, Hobro, Denmark

Improved Cutting of One-Micron Plastic Sections using Qwick Glass Knives
J. T. McMahon and J. Alsouss, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio

The Scanning of Colour and B&W Film and Photographs for Image
Processing, Analysis and Archiving - On a Tight Budget
Keith J. Morris, The Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, UK

A Comment on AFM vs. Replicas for High Resolution Imaging
Don Chernoff, Advanced Surface Microscopy, Inc.

Embedding Cultured Cells Grown in Well Plates
Leona Cohen-Gould, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

Flies in a Box
P. S. Connelly & L. Ruggiero,* *Oregon Health and Science U. Portland, OR

A Comment on using FLIM with FRET
Karl Garsha, Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ

Microscopy for Children
Carolyn Schooley, MSA Project MICRO

New and Interesting at PITTCON & Industry News

NetNotes Topics

--LM - floaters

--SAMPLE PREPARATION - viral particles

--SAMPLE PREPARATION – cell culture preparation

--SAMPLE PREPARATION - propylene oxide

--SAMPLE PREPARATION - MgO preparation and Fe oxidation

--MICROTOMY – cleaning grids

--MICROTOMY - section thickness

--IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY - nanogold in semithin sections

--EM - microscope cooling lines

--EM – operating voltage

--TEM - Replicas

--TEM - carbon post-coating

--EDS - Low Z peak pileup

Index of Advertisers


==============================Original Headers==============================
35, 18 -- From microscopytoday-at-tampabay.rr.com Fri May 5 14:51:40 2006
35, 18 -- Received: from ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.135])
35, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k45Jpej7023464
35, 18 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 14:51:40 -0500
35, 18 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rrcs-24-73-73-214.se.biz.rr.com [24.73.73.214])
35, 18 -- by ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k45JpZZh000413;
35, 18 -- Fri, 5 May 2006 15:51:38 -0400 (EDT)
35, 18 -- Message-ID: {445BACC4.1020406-at-tampabay.rr.com}
35, 18 -- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:51:32 -0400
35, 18 -- From: Microscopy Today {microscopytoday-at-tampabay.rr.com}
35, 18 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
35, 18 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
35, 18 -- To: Listserver {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.Com} ,
35, 18 -- Confocal Listserver {confocal-at-listserv.buffalo.edu}
35, 18 -- Subject: Microscopy Today May 2006 Table of Contents
35, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
35, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
35, 18 -- X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: fmdixon-at-comcast.net
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 09:42:15 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] LM - hair sample prep

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I am new to the listserve and was hoping somebody could give me some advise
and/or guidance. I am looking for the best way to embed, cut, and adhere to
microscope slides wool/hair fibers. I have tried nitrocellulose/paraffin,
Spurr's Resin, Epon, and LR white. I am having an issue with the fibers popping
out of the resin during sectioning and/or during the sample processing. I have
tried cutting the resin dry and wet - floating off into water. I have tried
infiltrating with acetone/resin and ethanol/resin mixtures with the Spurr's
resin, acetone/resin infiltration with the Epon and LR white. I seem to get the
best cuts with LR white (5 microns) dry but then I have a problem adhering them
to a slide for processing. To improve sample adhesion, I have tried albumin, gelatin, and neoprene. Of the three, neoprene seems to work the best. If anybody can offer advice for any or all of these
issues, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you,
Felicia Dixon

==============================Original Headers==============================
2, 16 -- From fmdixon-at-comcast.net Sat May 6 09:42:14 2006
2, 16 -- Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153])
2, 16 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k46EgEtL023443
2, 16 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Sat, 6 May 2006 09:42:14 -0500
2, 16 -- Received: from rmailcenter06.comcast.net ([204.127.197.116])
2, 16 -- by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP
2, 16 -- id {20060506144213m1300pbq3se} ; Sat, 6 May 2006 14:42:13 +0000
2, 16 -- Received: from [67.167.241.97] by rmailcenter06.comcast.net;
2, 16 -- Sat, 06 May 2006 14:42:13 +0000
2, 16 -- From: fmdixon-at-comcast.net
2, 16 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
2, 16 -- Subject: LM - hair sample prep
2, 16 -- Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 14:42:13 +0000
2, 16 -- Message-Id: {050620061442.29057.445CB5C500084791000071812200734830020198070B0300-at-comcast.net}
2, 16 -- X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Apr 11 2006)
2, 16 -- X-Authenticated-Sender: Zm1kaXhvbkBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:23:28 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Microscopy can be used for investigation? Really?

If I recall my history of optics properly, people in the Middle Ages knew
precisely what things looked like at the microscopical level but just
couldn't draw accurate pictures of them. So they made the technological
decision to develop the microscope so they could show each other what they
already knew God had created. Really, it wasn't investigation, it was just
confirmation of what they already knew was there. Thus, they were able to
illustrate that ontogeny really does recapitulate philogeny. They
"illustrated", not "investigated".

I hope we've settled this issue.

-Michael the OHR (Optics Historian of Record)


At 03:22 PM 04/20/06 -0500, you wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America

____________________________________________________________________________
Michael Cammer Analytical Imaging Facility Albert Einstein Coll. of Med.
URL: http://www.aecom.yu.edu/aif/


==============================Original Headers==============================
11, 23 -- From cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu Mon May 8 10:23:27 2006
11, 23 -- Received: from mailgw.aecom.yu.edu (mailgw.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.1.16])
11, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k48FNQJO025529
11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:23:27 -0500
11, 23 -- Received: from mailvx.aecom.yu.edu (mailvx.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.1.17])
11, 23 -- by mailgw.aecom.yu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k48FNHvV019156
11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:23:24 -0400
11, 23 -- Received: from post.aecom.yu.edu ([129.98.1.100])
11, 23 -- by mailvx.aecom.yu.edu (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2006050811232026666
11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 08 May 2006 11:23:20 -0400
11, 23 -- Received: from AIF3.aecom.yu.edu (aif3.aif.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.30.137])
11, 23 -- by post.aecom.yu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B801A
11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:23:19 -0400 (EDT)
11, 23 -- Message-Id: {5.2.1.1.2.20060508111658.011768c8-at-mailserver.aecom.yu.edu}
11, 23 -- X-Sender: cammer-at-mailserver.aecom.yu.edu
11, 23 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1
11, 23 -- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:23:24 -0400
11, 23 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
11, 23 -- From: Michael Cammer {cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu}
11, 23 -- Subject: Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration
11, 23 -- In-Reply-To: {200604202022.k3KKMNNG012581-at-ns.microscopy.com}
11, 23 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
11, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: baskin-at-bio.umass.edu
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:22:04 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

What!? There are several ideas in there that are hard for me to swallow.
Of course, I know that my ability to swallow alone does not determine
the truth of concept.

I am not so familiar with the early history of microscopy and the
thinking surrounding it. (I would not think of challenging you for the
position of OHR.) I doubt there was a decision made to develop
microscopy to only verify what was suspected of being there. Their
preconceptions might be considered hypotheses in need of verification,
but we certainly get surprised enough about hypotheses on a macro scale.
Microscopy would hardly be more of a sure thing.

I thought that microscopy would have developed more out of a desire to
explore. I can guess what might be out there on a microscopic scale, but
until I actually go and take a look, it is only conjecture - no matter
how accurate the conjecture might be.

Maybe I am misunderstanding Mr. Cammer's point on Ontogeny
recapitulating phylogeny. Are you saying that _those_ folks used
microscopy to "prove" it? Perhaps they "proved" it to themselves. Or
are you saying you still accept the idea yourself? If so, my
understanding is that the concept has been discredited for some time. I
am not a great fan of Stephen Gould but I found the following comment in
an Amazon review of his book, _Ontogeny and Phylogeny_.

"Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" was Haeckel's answer--the wrong
one--to the most vexing question of nineteenth-century biology: what is
the relationship between individual development (ontogeny) and the
evolution of species and lineages (phylogeny)? In this, the first major
book on the subject in fifty years, Stephen Gould documents the history
of the idea of recapitulation from its first appearance among the
pre-Socratics to its fall in the early twentieth century. -Ernst Mayr.

FWIW, I consider microscopy an important tool for investigation.
However, it must be used carefully as many of our observations are quite
few. We need to pay attention to the statistics if we are going to
generalize.

Warren Straszheim
Iowa State University

-----Original Message-----
X-from: cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu [mailto:cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 10:26 AM
To: wesaia-at-iastate.edu

Microscopists,
Please please forgive me for leaving out the word "only"
in my original post. I meant to write ..."it is worth remembering
that microscopy can be used for demonstration not ONLY investigation.

I was simply trying to point out that it is reasonable to
demand one kind of thing when we are investigating but also have room
for another purpose, namely the demonstration, for which demands are
different. In no way shape or form was I meaning to suggest that
microscopy cannot be used to investigate. Indeed, that suggestion is
ludicrous.

I did send an apology after my post and it seems once is not
enough. So once more, I am sorry to have wasted time and bandwith
with my failure to proofread.

As ever,
Tobias


} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


--
_ ____ __ ____
/ \ / / \ / \ \ Tobias I. Baskin
/ / / / \ \ \ Biology Department
/_ / __ /__ \ \ \__ 611 N. Pleasant St.
/ / / \ \ \ University of Massachusetts
/ / / \ \ \ Amherst, MA, 01003
/ / ___ / \ \__/ \ ____
http://www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin/
Voice: 413 - 545 - 1533 Fax: 413 - 545 - 3243

==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 19 -- From baskin-at-bio.umass.edu Mon May 8 12:22:04 2006
8, 19 -- Received: from marlin.bio.umass.edu (marlin.bio.umass.edu [128.119.55.19])
8, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k48HM4pm014741
8, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 12:22:04 -0500
8, 19 -- Received: from [172.30.55.79] (eutopia [128.119.55.30])
8, 19 -- by marlin.bio.umass.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k48HLqZm024640;
8, 19 -- Mon, 8 May 2006 13:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
8, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
8, 19 -- Message-Id: {p0623090ac0852d591792-at-[172.30.55.79]}
8, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605081525.k48FPZw4026652-at-ns.microscopy.com}
8, 19 -- References: {200605081525.k48FPZw4026652-at-ns.microscopy.com}
8, 19 -- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:21:51 -0400
8, 19 -- To: cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu
8, 19 -- From: Tobias Baskin {baskin-at-bio.umass.edu}
8, 19 -- Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration
8, 19 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com, wesaia-at-iastate.edu
8, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
8, 19 -- X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (marlin.bio.umass.edu [128.119.55.19]); Mon, 08 May 2006 13:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
8, 19 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 128.119.55.19
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary-at-gaugler.com
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:01:34 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Re: Ethical question; investigation vs.

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


I agree that EM or LM can and are used for investigation.
They are also used for discovery. In the context of IC
reverse engineering and technology evaluation, discovery
and investigation are biggies. For failure analysis, I
suspect that investigation fits the bill better than
does discovery--unless investigation leads to the discovery
of the failure mechanism.

IMO, I suspect that the early scientists and researchers
had a clue that microbes existed but did not know what they
looked like. Along comes the microscope. Now they could get
a good idea of what they looked like and confirm that they
existed. Is this investigation, discovery or both?

gary g.



At 10:23 AM 5/8/2006, you wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


==============================Original Headers==============================
11, 21 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Mon May 8 13:01:33 2006
11, 21 -- Received: from qsmtp2.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145])
11, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k48I1Xf1025048
11, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:01:33 -0500
11, 21 -- Received: (qmail 29671 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 11:01:32 -0700
11, 21 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 29668, pid: 29669, t: 0.2843s
11, 21 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0
11, 21 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211)
11, 21 -- by qsmtp2 with SMTP; 8 May 2006 11:01:32 -0700
11, 21 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060508105621.024f5678-at-gaugler.com}
11, 21 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
11, 21 -- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:01:34 -0700
11, 21 -- To: baskin-at-bio.umass.edu
11, 21 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com}
11, 21 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: Ethical question; investigation vs.
11, 21 -- illustration
11, 21 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
11, 21 -- In-Reply-To: {200605081723.k48HND4g017893-at-ns.microscopy.com}
11, 21 -- References: {200605081723.k48HND4g017893-at-ns.microscopy.com}
11, 21 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
11, 21 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: jbs-at-temple.edu
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:04:34 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Sorry Mike,

You're too clever by half. I assume that "philogeny" was not a
misspelling.

Now, where did I hear that ontology recapitulates phylogeny?

Joel

}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------
} ------ The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society
} of America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver On-Line Help
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------
} ------
}
} Microscopy can be used for investigation? Really?
}
} If I recall my history of optics properly, people in the Middle Ages
} knew precisely what things looked like at the microscopical level but
} just couldn't draw accurate pictures of them. So they made the
} technological decision to develop the microscope so they could show
} each other what they already knew God had created. Really, it wasn't
} investigation, it was just confirmation of what they already knew was
} there. Thus, they were able to illustrate that ontogeny really does
} recapitulate philogeny. They "illustrated", not "investigated".
}
} I hope we've settled this issue.
}
} -Michael the OHR (Optics Historian of Record)
}
}
} At 03:22 PM 04/20/06 -0500, you wrote:
}
}
}
} } ---------------------------------------------------------------------
} } ------- The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy
} } Society of America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver On-Line Help
} } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html

Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D.
Biology Department, Temple University
1900 North 12th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
jbs-at-temple.edu
(215) 204 8839, fax (215) 204 0486
http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 27 -- From jbs-at-temple.edu Mon May 8 13:04:33 2006
7, 27 -- Received: from po-smtp3.temple.edu (po-smtp3.temple.edu [155.247.166.231])
7, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k48I4XhC028812
7, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:04:33 -0500
7, 27 -- Received: from [155.247.98.40] (jbs.bio.temple.edu [155.247.98.40])
7, 27 -- by po-smtp3.temple.edu (MOS 3.7.5-GA)
7, 27 -- with ESMTP id CPU52947 (AUTH jbs);
7, 27 -- Mon, 8 May 2006 14:04:08 -0400 (EDT)
7, 27 -- From: "Joel Sheffield" {jbs-at-temple.edu}
7, 27 -- To: cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu, cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu, microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 27 -- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:41 -0400
7, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 27 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration
7, 27 -- Reply-to: jbs-at-temple.edu
7, 27 -- Message-ID: {445F4FF9.1379.3AFE2A1D-at-jbs.temple.edu}
7, 27 -- Priority: normal
7, 27 -- In-reply-to: {200605081524.k48FOBBI025741-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 27 -- X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.30 public beta 1)
7, 27 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
7, 27 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
7, 27 -- Content-description: Mail message body
7, 27 -- X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=po-smtp3.temple.edu
7, 27 -- X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown,
7, 27 -- refid=str=0001.0A090209.445F8635.0065,ss=1,fgs=0,
7, 27 -- ip=155.247.98.40,
7, 27 -- so=2006-03-30 10:46:40,
7, 27 -- dmn=5.1.5/2006-04-27
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dotys-at-hss.edu
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:15 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Tracking system for Billing for core services

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both dotys-at-hss.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: dotys-at-hss.edu
Name: Steve Doty

Organization: Hospital for Special Surgery

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Billing for core services.

Question: As director of a microscopy core, I am also responsible for sending bills/invoices for services provided by core. We have external as well as internal users. We provide TEM, SEM, LM, morphometric analysis, paraffin embedding and methacrylate embedding and sectioning, immuno and enzyme histochemistry. And we have a mix of clinical and basic research to accomodate. My problem is trying to keep the user and techniques together for billing purposes since any particular technique may take several days and different technician's support. Does anyone have a "system" that will help me keep track of everything that is happening around me!
Many thanks, Steve Doty, PhD.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 8 19:32:15 2006
6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k490WEwO031426
6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:14 -0500
6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110402c0859373dd79-at-[206.69.208.22]}
6, 12 -- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:12 -0500
6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 12 -- From: dotys-at-hss.edu (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Tracking system for Billing for core services
6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:38 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com
Name: Corneliu Sarbu

Organization: Natl.Inst.for Materials Physics, Bucharest, Romania

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid dissolved

Question: Dear colleagues,

Is there anybody who could give me a hint concerning the acid or acid mixture that would be effective in surface etching a piece of ternary metallic glass having the composition Zr70Ni10Pd20 ? I need to reveal the dimensions of grains which are most probably formed in the material after a short aannealing during which an icosahedral quasicrystalline phase was formed (it was revealed by X-ray diffraction). Any suggestion will be very welcome.

Thank you in advance.

Dr. Corneliu Sarbu
National Institute for Materials Physics
Magurele-Bucharest
Romania

e-mail: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
11, 13 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 8 19:32:38 2006
11, 13 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
11, 13 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k490WbBA031859
11, 13 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:38 -0500
11, 13 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
11, 13 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
11, 13 -- Message-Id: {p06110403c0859396e5cc-at-[206.69.208.22]}
11, 13 -- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:36 -0500
11, 13 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
11, 13 -- From: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
11, 13 -- Subject: viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid
11, 13 -- dissolved
11, 13 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dainis-at-red5wood.com
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:33:00 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Porter - Blum Microtome JB-4

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both dainis-at-red5wood.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: dainis-at-red5wood.com
Name: Dainis Dauksta

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Porter - Blum Microtome JB-4

Question: Does anyone have an operators manual for the
SORVALL Porter - Blum JB-4 Microtome please?
Thank you
Dainis


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 8 19:32:59 2006
6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k490WwYV000602
6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:59 -0500
6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110404c08593aceaec-at-[206.69.208.22]}
6, 12 -- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:58 -0500
6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 12 -- From: dainis-at-red5wood.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Porter - Blum Microtome JB-4
6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tonygr-at-MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 08:27:53 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: viaWWW: Tracking system for Billing for core

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Although we are an academic lab in materials, our problems with
billing are very similar. The data, of course, has to feed into the
corporate financial management system (SAP, in our case).

After a long period of wondering what to do, and a false start with
an almost institute-wide system that promised to be totally
comprehensive but was in fact far too ambitious for our resources, we
are currently developing an in-house system which will enable us to
track usage by instrument, user, date, project, etc. etc., as well,
of course, as providing the data for our billing.

It has a MySQL heart, with Visual Basic and Filemaker Pro front-ends
(for historical reasons). The data collection part of the system is
up and running, and in use for most of our systems. All the
instruments should be using it by the end of next month. Then we
have to develop the interface to the billing system, and the analysis
tools (currently we extract the data from the database by manual SQL
calls and generate a text file).

Tony

At 08:40 PM 5/8/2006, you wrote:
Email: dotys-at-hss.edu
Name: Steve Doty

Organization: Hospital for Special Surgery

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Billing for core services.

Question: As director of a microscopy core, I am also responsible for
sending bills/invoices for services provided by core. We have
external as well as internal users. We provide TEM, SEM, LM,
morphometric analysis, paraffin embedding and methacrylate embedding
and sectioning, immuno and enzyme histochemistry. And we have a mix
of clinical and basic research to accomodate. My problem is trying
to keep the user and techniques together for billing purposes since
any particular technique may take several days and different
technician's support. Does anyone have a "system" that will help me
keep track of everything that is happening around me!
Many thanks, Steve Doty, PhD.


***********************************************
Anthony J. Garratt-Reed, M.A., D.Phil.
MIT Room 13-1027
77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
USA

Tel: 617-253-4622
Fax: 617-258-6478
************************************************


==============================Original Headers==============================
12, 28 -- From tonygr-at-MIT.EDU Tue May 9 08:27:53 2006
12, 28 -- Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.80])
12, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k49DRqI5010412
12, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:27:53 -0500
12, 28 -- Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103])
12, 28 -- by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id k49DPmjI021516;
12, 28 -- Tue, 9 May 2006 09:25:49 -0400 (EDT)
12, 28 -- Received: from emlab.mit.edu (EMLAB.MIT.EDU [18.82.0.121])
12, 28 -- (authenticated bits=0)
12, 28 -- (User authenticated as tonygr-at-ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
12, 28 -- by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id k49DPc2b011935
12, 28 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
12, 28 -- Tue, 9 May 2006 09:25:42 -0400 (EDT)
12, 28 -- Message-Id: {6.2.3.4.2.20060509090506.01ea7608-at-po9.mit.edu}
12, 28 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
12, 28 -- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:25:30 -0400
12, 28 -- To: dotys-at-hss.edu, microscopy-at-microscopy.com
12, 28 -- From: Anthony Garratt-Reed {tonygr-at-MIT.EDU}
12, 28 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Tracking system for Billing for core
12, 28 -- services
12, 28 -- In-Reply-To: {200605090040.k490ehIs025294-at-ns.microscopy.com}
12, 28 -- References: {200605090040.k490ehIs025294-at-ns.microscopy.com}
12, 28 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
12, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
12, 28 -- X-Spam-Score: 1.217
12, 28 -- X-Spam-Level: * (1.217)
12, 28 -- X-Spam-Flag: NO
12, 28 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Rob.Bowen-at-caddock.com
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:39:17 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Good day, Corneliu,
Considering Ti as chemically similar to Zr, I found some etchant
solutions for Ti alloys in Metals Handbook from ASM. That these might
work for Zr alloys is supported by comments in Cotton and Wilkinson, Adv.
Inorg. Chem. Anyway, here are a couple that ASM suggests as general purpose
etchants:

10 ml HF, 5 ml HNO3, 85ml water
1-3 ml HF, 2-6 ml HNO3, water to 1000 ml

You can also try contacting ATI Wah Chang in Oregon, USA. They've been
producing Zr alloys for decades and have plenty of expertise in that area.
phone: 1-541-926-4211
www.wahchang.com

Good luck, and BE CAREFUL if you use HF.

Rob Bowen

--
Robert C. Bowen
Research Scientist
Caddock Electronics, Inc
rob.bowen-at-caddock.com
http://www.caddock.com




} From: {crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com}
} Reply-To: {crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com}
} Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:37:44 -0500
} To: {rob.bowen-at-caddock.com}
} Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be
} acid
}
}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
} using the WWW based Form at
} http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
} Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
} please copy both crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Email: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com
} Name: Corneliu Sarbu
}
} Organization: Natl.Inst.for Materials Physics, Bucharest, Romania
}
} Title-Subject: [Filtered] Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid
} dissolved
}
} Question: Dear colleagues,
}
} Is there anybody who could give me a hint concerning the acid or acid mixture
} that would be effective in surface etching a piece of ternary metallic glass
} having the composition Zr70Ni10Pd20 ? I need to reveal the dimensions of
} grains which are most probably formed in the material after a short aannealing
} during which an icosahedral quasicrystalline phase was formed (it was revealed
} by X-ray diffraction). Any suggestion will be very welcome.
}
} Thank you in advance.
}
} Dr. Corneliu Sarbu
} National Institute for Materials Physics
} Magurele-Bucharest
} Romania
}
} e-mail: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com
}
}
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 11, 13 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 8 19:32:38 2006
} 11, 13 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
} 11, 13 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
} k490WbBA031859
} 11, 13 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:38 -0500
} 11, 13 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
} 11, 13 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
} 11, 13 -- Message-Id: {p06110403c0859396e5cc-at-[206.69.208.22]}
} 11, 13 -- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:36 -0500
} 11, 13 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
} 11, 13 -- From: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
} 11, 13 -- Subject: viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid
} 11, 13 -- dissolved
} 11, 13 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================



==============================Original Headers==============================
11, 20 -- From Rob.Bowen-at-caddock.com Tue May 9 10:39:16 2006
11, 20 -- Received: from msg.caddock.com (69-29-3-221.stat.centurytel.net [69.29.3.221])
11, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k49FdFhP022433
11, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:39:16 -0500
11, 20 -- Received: from [10.1.2.107] ([10.1.2.107])
11, 20 -- by msg.caddock.com (Merak 8.3.8) with ESMTP id NUW63907;
11, 20 -- Tue, 9 May 2006 08:39:07 -0700
11, 20 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405
11, 20 -- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:32:54 -0700
11, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can
11, 20 -- they be acid
11, 20 -- From: Rob Bowen {Rob.Bowen-at-caddock.com}
11, 20 -- To: {crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com}
11, 20 -- CC: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
11, 20 -- Message-ID: {C0860436.2FF3%Rob.Bowen-at-caddock.com}
11, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605090037.k490biw6016005-at-ns.microscopy.com}
11, 20 -- Mime-version: 1.0
11, 20 -- Content-type: text/plain;
11, 20 -- charset="US-ASCII"
11, 20 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: mmcheath-at-mailbox.syr.edu
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:45:08 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] EPMA: P-10 gas and polyurethane tubing

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi,
Might any of you know if polyurethane (Festo blue PU) tubing
is compatible with P-10 gas. I currently have blue PU 3/16" tubing
plumbed from the P-10 tank regulator to the first gfpc WDS on my
uProbe. Is anyone 100% sure that this type of tubing should not be
used to delivered P-10 gas to gas floow proportional counter
detectors?

TIA
Mike
--
********************************************************************
Michael M. Cheatham
312 Heroy Geology Laboratory Phone (315)-443-1261
Syracuse University Fax (315)-443-3363
Syracuse, NY 13244-1070

email:mmcheath-at-mailbox.syr.edu
http://www.geochemistry.syr.edu/cheatham/InstrPages.html

owner of PLASMACHEM-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/plasmachem-l.html
owner of XRF-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/xrf-l.html
owner of TIMS-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/tims-l.html
owner of SIRIS-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/siris-l.html
********************************************************************
--

==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 12 -- From mmcheath-at-mailbox.syr.edu Tue May 9 16:45:07 2006
4, 12 -- Received: from mailer.syr.edu (mailer.syr.edu [128.230.18.29])
4, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k49Lj7e5001406
4, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-ns.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:45:07 -0500
4, 12 -- Received: from [128.230.24.90] (www.geochemistry.syr.edu) by mailer.syr.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id {0.1534C967-at-mailer.syr.edu} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:25:54 -0400
4, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
4, 12 -- Message-Id: {a06230902c086aa40f639-at-[128.230.24.90]}
4, 12 -- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:25:52 -0400
4, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-ns.microscopy.com
4, 12 -- From: Michael Cheatham {mmcheath-at-mailbox.syr.edu}
4, 12 -- Subject: [Microscopy] EPMA: P-10 gas and polyurethane tubing
4, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: jquinn-at-www.matscieng.sunysb.edu
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:00:19 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] StereoScan260

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


Folks

StereoScan260 up for grabs.
Contact Gary Halada at:
ghalada-at-ms.cc.sunysb.edu

I shall not be acting as a "go between".

You pack.......you ship....looking for good home.

regards,

JQuinn

==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 13 -- From jquinn-at-www.matscieng.sunysb.edu Tue May 9 18:00:19 2006
7, 13 -- Received: from www.matscieng.sunysb.edu (www.matscieng.sunysb.edu [129.49.36.33])
7, 13 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k49N0I7a012295
7, 13 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:00:19 -0500
7, 13 -- Received: (from jquinn-at-localhost)
7, 13 -- by www.matscieng.sunysb.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k49MrwS08332;
7, 13 -- Tue, 9 May 2006 18:53:58 -0400
7, 13 -- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:53:58 -0400
7, 13 -- From: Jim Quinn {jquinn-at-www.matscieng.sunysb.edu}
7, 13 -- Message-Id: {200605092253.k49MrwS08332-at-www.matscieng.sunysb.edu}
7, 13 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 13 -- Subject: StereoScan260
7, 13 -- Cc: ghalada-at-ms.cc.sunysb.edu
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:16:45 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] position available

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

TECHNICAL OFFICER

CSIRO Plant Industry
Black Mountain, Canberra
Australia

Reference: 2006/411

We require an experienced microscopist with demonstrated knowledge of plant
structure and developmental biology to assist in the Microscopy Centre in
the Division of Plant Industry. Ideally, the appointee would have skills in
preparation of plant material for light and electron microscopy, especially
in cryo-scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis. The
Microscopy Centre currently has light, fluorescence and confocal
microscopes, a cryo-SEM with EDX, image analysis software and other
ancilliary equipment.

The successful applicant will assist the Manager in training other staff in
use of the instruments and in microscopy techniques, and in carrying out
microscopy work for specific research projects. He/she will have at least a
Bachelor's degree or equivalent training in plant structure and functional
plant anatomy and experience in working in a research laboratory.
Additional skills required are the ability to collaborate effectively with
scientists and members of a research team and strong communication and
computer skills.

This position is indefinite after a probationary period, salary $44K - $57K
p.a plus Superannuation .
To obtain selection documentation or details on how to apply visit
http://recruitment.csiro.au/asp/job_details.asp?RefNo=2006%2F411. For
further information contact Dr Rosemary White - rosemary.white-at-csiro.au .
Responses to the selection criteria accompanied by a CV, must be received by
close of business 4 June 2006.

Unfortunately, the powers-that-be have decided it's open to Australian
residents only, largely so they don't have to fly people in for interviews.
However, if you're interested, or know anyone who might be, contact me
anyway.

cheers,
Rosemary

Dr. Rosemary White rosemary.white-at-csiro.au
CSIRO Plant Industry ph. 02-6246 5475
GPO Box 1600 mob. 0402 835 973
Canberra, ACT 2601 fax. 02-6246 5334
Australia

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 21 -- From Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au Tue May 9 22:16:44 2006
6, 21 -- Received: from act-MTAout4.csiro.au (act-MTAout4.csiro.au [150.229.7.41])
6, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4A3Gfjj025723
6, 21 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:16:43 -0500
6, 21 -- DomainKey-Signature: s=email; d=csiro.au; c=nofws; q=dns; b=bC6HYyfTUYh9CaPTvDUc3AjFXzW/zu8QZjKb+0k9l/CW8i5tvKSN+QHvOhErmGLrka3ACr9POWuOgf3jKrLizs3RXMNq5812A6CeLM2dzlUjk76BvvPASlMoyhkE+SAC;
6, 21 -- Received: from exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au ([138.194.3.56])
6, 21 -- by act-MTAout4.csiro.au with ESMTP; 10 May 2006 13:16:39 +1000
6, 21 -- X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,107,1146405600";
6, 21 -- d="scan'208"; a="93509110:sNHT29987620"
6, 21 -- Received: from [152.83.167.45] ([152.83.167.45]) by exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
6, 21 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 13:16:38 +1000
6, 21 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
6, 21 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:18:17 +1000
6, 21 -- Subject: position available
6, 21 -- From: Rosemary White {Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au}
6, 21 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
6, 21 -- Message-ID: {C0879899.16529%Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au}
6, 21 -- Mime-version: 1.0
6, 21 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
6, 21 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
6, 21 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2006 03:16:38.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[26F0C660:01C673E0]
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 05:31:44 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] EDS_EBSD system

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi,

We are considering buying EDX system integrated with EBSD for
elemental and "structural" analysis of inorganic materials in SEM. I hope
therefore that vendors of such equipment will contact me off the list.
However, I would be grateful also for any comments from listers on the
possibilities of EBSD as the method of structure identification of
individual nanocrystals in composite materials.

Thank you,



Leszek





Leszek Kepinski
Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research,
Polish Academy of Sciences,
P.O.Box 1410,
50-950 Wroclaw, Poland
e-mail: L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl



==============================Original Headers==============================
13, 33 -- From L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl Wed May 10 05:31:44 2006
13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.6])
13, 33 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4AAVh7k009241
13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:31:43 -0500
13, 33 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with ESMTP id 7143C134196
13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:43:45 +0200 (CEST)
13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl ([127.0.0.1])
13, 33 -- by localhost (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
13, 33 -- with LMTP id 06540-02-6 for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ;
13, 33 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 12:43:43 +0200 (CEST)
13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanner: This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus system
13, 33 -- NOD32 for Linux Mail Server.
13, 33 -- For more information on NOD32 Antivirus System,
13, 33 -- please, visit our website: http://www.nod32.com/.
13, 33 -- Received: from b8p020 (sqd.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.20])
13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with SMTP id 2ED7B134276
13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:36:15 +0200 (CEST)
13, 33 -- Message-ID: {006101c6741b$d020fe40$7f01a8c0-at-b8p020}
13, 33 -- From: =?iso-8859-2?B?TC4gS+pwafFza2k=?= {L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl}
13, 33 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
13, 33 -- Subject: EDS_EBSD system
13, 33 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:23:43 +0200
13, 33 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
13, 33 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
13, 33 -- charset="iso-8859-2"
13, 33 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
13, 33 -- X-Priority: 3
13, 33 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
13, 33 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
13, 33 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
13, 33 -- X-Scan-Module: SMTP[2006.04.28 (2006.01.25)]
13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at int.pan.wroc.pl
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:04:35 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] cpd pains

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hello,
I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this? It
has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves. Controlling
the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your skin.
Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to
make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run?

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron Microscope Lab
AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini Hall
gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley
phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA 94720-3330
fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793

==============================Original Headers==============================
2, 24 -- From gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu Wed May 10 18:04:34 2006
2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU (nature.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.253.219])
2, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4AN4YCx001108
2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:04:34 -0500
2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26521C1E40
2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1])
2, 24 -- by localhost (nature.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
2, 24 -- with ESMTP id 02522-01 for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ;
2, 24 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
2, 24 -- Received: by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix, from userid 7458)
2, 24 -- id F2661C1E4F; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB150C1E43
2, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
2, 24 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
2, 24 -- From: Gordon Vrololjak {gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu}
2, 24 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
2, 24 -- Subject: cpd pains
2, 24 -- Message-ID: {Pine.SOC.4.64.0605101602510.1811-at-nature.Berkeley.EDU}
2, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
2, 24 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
2, 24 -- X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gwe-at-ufl.edu
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:59:01 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: cpd pains

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

When we had one of those we used pliers to turn the knobs.

gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu wrote:
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Hello,
} I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this? It
} has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves. Controlling
} the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your skin.
} Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to
} make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run?
}
} \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
} Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron Microscope Lab
} AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini Hall
} gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley
} phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA 94720-3330
} fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 2, 24 -- From gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu Wed May 10 18:04:34 2006
} 2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU (nature.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.253.219])
} 2, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4AN4YCx001108
} 2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:04:34 -0500
} 2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
} 2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26521C1E40
} 2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
} 2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1])
} 2, 24 -- by localhost (nature.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
} 2, 24 -- with ESMTP id 02522-01 for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ;
} 2, 24 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
} 2, 24 -- Received: by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix, from userid 7458)
} 2, 24 -- id F2661C1E4F; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
} 2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
} 2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB150C1E43
} 2, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
} 2, 24 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
} 2, 24 -- From: Gordon Vrololjak {gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu}
} 2, 24 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
} 2, 24 -- Subject: cpd pains
} 2, 24 -- Message-ID: {Pine.SOC.4.64.0605101602510.1811-at-nature.Berkeley.EDU}
} 2, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 2, 24 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
} 2, 24 -- X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================
}

--
Greg Erdos
5410 SE 185th Ave.
Micanopy, FL 32667

==============================Original Headers==============================
3, 24 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Wed May 10 20:59:01 2006
3, 24 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165])
3, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4B1x0jY013536
3, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:59:00 -0500
3, 24 -- Received: from [10.228.8.36] (ssrb-vpn2-8-36.vpn.ufl.edu [10.228.8.36])
3, 24 -- (authenticated bits=0)
3, 24 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id k4B1wvei508066;
3, 24 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 21:58:58 -0400
3, 24 -- Message-ID: {44629A6A.7050902-at-ufl.edu}
3, 24 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:59:06 -0400
3, 24 -- From: greg erdos {gwe-at-ufl.edu}
3, 24 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
3, 24 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
3, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
3, 24 -- To: gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu, microscopy-at-microscopy.com
3, 24 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] cpd pains
3, 24 -- References: {200605102306.k4AN68TT002400-at-ns.microscopy.com}
3, 24 -- In-Reply-To: {200605102306.k4AN68TT002400-at-ns.microscopy.com}
3, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
3, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
3, 24 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
3, 24 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
3, 24 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
3, 24 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary-at-gaugler.com
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:17:49 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: EDS_EBSD system

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Sending to list--direct msgs bounce. If you
have a better address, please advise and I will
send any other material off-list.

-------

What SEM do you plan on using? What type of
gun does it use?

What feature sizes are you interested in resolving?
Ta and Cu seed layers are not possible to resolve
even at .01u step size. I think that this is because
no discernable grains have formed as yet. The electrodep Cu for
damascene interconnects works well.

I've done single crystal Sapphire, Silicon and micro
crystal Si. What would your nano crystals be made of?
If the material is non-conductive, this may pose a
charging issue. Since EBSD penetrates only about 50nm,
this does not leave much depth for coating. The
preferred coating is C. However, I rarely coat any
insulating material even at 20KV.

There are basically two EBSD choices. TSL/EDAX or
HKL/PGT. TSL and EDAX have been integrated for much
longer than HKL and PGT (I think HKL connected just this
year). TSL's camera/phosphor is round while HKL's camera end
is square. This allows the HKL camera screen to get
closer to the specimen. But I think that the TSL
software complement is much better. AFAIK, only TSL
has drift correction during data collection. At high
mag and small step size, this is critical. However TSL's
drift correction is not always repeatable and its own
set of problems. But at least it is there and does
usually work.

The SEM is going to be at issue too since higher frames
per second need more probe current. However, this is
at the expense of probe diameter and lattice resolution.

I'm using EDAX/TSL Pegasus with EDAX Genesis EDS and like it.
The SEM is a Zeiss Supra 55VP, which has its own set
of issues.

gary g.


At 03:34 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


==============================Original Headers==============================
15, 19 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Thu May 11 11:17:49 2006
15, 19 -- Received: from qsmtp3.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145])
15, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4BGHmMP004357
15, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:17:48 -0500
15, 19 -- Received: (qmail 26316 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700
15, 19 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 26311, pid: 26312, t: 0.1909s
15, 19 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0
15, 19 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211)
15, 19 -- by qsmtp3 with SMTP; 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700
15, 19 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060511090631.02476f70-at-gaugler.com}
15, 19 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
15, 19 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700
15, 19 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
15, 19 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com}
15, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] EDS_EBSD system
15, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com}
15, 19 -- References: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com}
15, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
15, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: hugo-at-pdx.edu
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:40:55 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: cpd pains

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi Gordon - we have that same unit and have well developed calluses!
Two simple tricks to keep your skin more or less intact:
- I never adjust the coarse vent valve. Permanently leave it
halfway open and control venting with the needle valve.
- When going through the fill-drain cycles - open the fill valve
one-half turn or so and leave it there until you're finished. Then you
just open the drain valve to let fluid out, and close it to let fluid
in. This cuts the number of knob-turning operations down by half. On
our unit, the fill valve is the hardest to operate so this trick is very
helpful.

I'd avoid pliers unless you absolutely can't get the knobs to turn.
Pliers can strip the knurled texture and just make things harder in the
future. And too much force can damage the valves. I do have one user
that uses vise-grip pliers on the fill valve, but she is under stern
warnings to pad the knob with cloth and not use force to close the valve.

Rick

gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu wrote:
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Hello,
} I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this? It
} has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves. Controlling
} the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your skin.
} Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to
} make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run?
}
} \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
} Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron Microscope Lab
} AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini Hall
} gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley
} phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA 94720-3330
} fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793
}
}

--
{} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {}
Richard C. Hugo, Ph.D
Geomicrobiology and Electron Microscopy Laboratory
Portland State University
Ph# 503-725-3356
FAX 503-725-3025
{} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {}


==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 23 -- From hugo-at-pdx.edu Thu May 11 11:40:54 2006
6, 23 -- Received: from fafnir.oit.pdx.edu (fafnir.oit.pdx.edu [131.252.120.58])
6, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BGerPO014461
6, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:40:53 -0500
6, 23 -- Received: from [131.252.193.7] (host-193-7.dhcp.pdx.edu [131.252.193.7])
6, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0)
6, 23 -- by fafnir.oit.pdx.edu (8.13.3+/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BGeo6r025730
6, 23 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
6, 23 -- Thu, 11 May 2006 09:40:51 -0700
6, 23 -- X-Authentication-Warning: fafnir.oit.pdx.edu: Host host-193-7.dhcp.pdx.edu [131.252.193.7] claimed to be [131.252.193.7]
6, 23 -- Message-ID: {44636912.8020908-at-pdx.edu}
6, 23 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:40:50 -0700
6, 23 -- From: Rick Hugo {hugo-at-pdx.edu}
6, 23 -- Organization: Portland State University
6, 23 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
6, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
6, 23 -- To: gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu,
6, 23 -- Microscopy List {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
6, 23 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] cpd pains
6, 23 -- References: {200605102307.k4AN7rwa004554-at-ns.microscopy.com}
6, 23 -- In-Reply-To: {200605102307.k4AN7rwa004554-at-ns.microscopy.com}
6, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
6, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary-at-gaugler.com
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:23:11 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] EDS_EBSD system

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

All this talk of forcing needle valves and pliers, etc. on CPD systems
is scaring me. There used to be a homemade CPD in the Berkeley Microlab
which sounds very similar to the unit currently being discussed. It was
retired in favor of a Tousimis unit chiefly because of safety concerns.
The pressures and explosive-release volumes on these systems are
sufficient to cause serious injury in the event of a failed valve or
fitting. Trust me - It's Not Worth It. If you find you are using hand
tools to adjust needle valves on these systems, you DO have a safety
problem.

-------- Original Message --------

Right, it is HKL+Oxford now. Thanks for the correction.

TSL uses a Digiview 1612 Firewire camera that does
a good job.

Depending on the grain size you are examining, probe
diameter will be critical. Too large and small grains
will be missed. Probe current increases frames per
second--which is good.

TSL will do multi-phase EBSD. Their expansion of this
is their Delphi option. I do not have this. I figure
it is more for those trying to discover new things than
sorting out what is basically known but not quantified.
The plain OIM system comes with the TSL database and
accepts the AMCS database....a very huge set of materials
indeed.

EDAX EDS has drift correction (maps). This is the same basic
shell used by TSL. Without correction, long scans at
high mag are IMO useless and impossible. These are easy
to spot since the resulting scans are wavy rather than
consistent. Coating with C pretty much eliminates that
element from analysis and also reduces signal by about
20-30%. High Z coating is not in the cards--too much
absorption to produce diffraction patterns. VP is
workable. Since one is not doing EDS maps, drift correction
during EBSD collection is the key. EDAX/TSL also offers
off-line dataset analysis for EBSD like they do for EDS.
I'm not sure if HKL has the same option. I would ask
about this when shopping.

gary g.



At 10:11 AM 5/11/2006, you wrote:
} Gary,
}
} We're also considering a new EBSD system for an old LaB6 JEOL 840 that
} delivers lots of beam current. It's to replace an old TSL system with a
} deteriorated SIT camera. We're interested in the phase ID capabilities as
} well as grain orientation analysis.
}
} Your comments on drift correction are especially interesting. I don't know
} that a PGT/HKL connection exists any more. (Is PGT still in business?) HKL
} is now part of Oxford, and they have at least partially integrated the EBSD
} operation with Oxford's EDS software (INCA). INCA does has drift
} correction, but I don't believe the combined system does yet.
}
} Larry
}
}
} Larry Thomas
} Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
} Richland, WA 99352
}
} email: Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov
} phone: 509 372-0793
} --
}
}
}
}
} On 5/11/06 9:23 AM, "gary-at-gaugler.com" {gary-at-gaugler.com} wrote:
}
} }
} }
} }
} }
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} }
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} }
} } Sending to list--direct msgs bounce. If you
} } have a better address, please advise and I will
} } send any other material off-list.
} }
} } -------
} }
} } What SEM do you plan on using? What type of
} } gun does it use?
} }
} } What feature sizes are you interested in resolving?
} } Ta and Cu seed layers are not possible to resolve
} } even at .01u step size. I think that this is because
} } no discernable grains have formed as yet. The electrodep Cu for
} } damascene interconnects works well.
} }
} } I've done single crystal Sapphire, Silicon and micro
} } crystal Si. What would your nano crystals be made of?
} } If the material is non-conductive, this may pose a
} } charging issue. Since EBSD penetrates only about 50nm,
} } this does not leave much depth for coating. The
} } preferred coating is C. However, I rarely coat any
} } insulating material even at 20KV.
} }
} } There are basically two EBSD choices. TSL/EDAX or
} } HKL/PGT. TSL and EDAX have been integrated for much
} } longer than HKL and PGT (I think HKL connected just this
} } year). TSL's camera/phosphor is round while HKL's camera end
} } is square. This allows the HKL camera screen to get
} } closer to the specimen. But I think that the TSL
} } software complement is much better. AFAIK, only TSL
} } has drift correction during data collection. At high
} } mag and small step size, this is critical. However TSL's
} } drift correction is not always repeatable and its own
} } set of problems. But at least it is there and does
} } usually work.
} }
} } The SEM is going to be at issue too since higher frames
} } per second need more probe current. However, this is
} } at the expense of probe diameter and lattice resolution.
} }
} } I'm using EDAX/TSL Pegasus with EDAX Genesis EDS and like it.
} } The SEM is a Zeiss Supra 55VP, which has its own set
} } of issues.
} }
} } gary g.
} }
} }
} } At 03:34 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:
} }
} }
} }
} } }
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} } } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} } } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} } } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} } }
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} } }
} } } Hi,
} } }
} } } We are considering buying EDX system integrated with EBSD for
} } } elemental and "structural" analysis of inorganic materials in SEM. I hope
} } } therefore that vendors of such equipment will contact me off the list.
} } } However, I would be grateful also for any comments from listers on the
} } } possibilities of EBSD as the method of structure identification of
} } } individual nanocrystals in composite materials.
} } }
} } } Thank you,
} } }
} } }
} } }
} } } Leszek
} } }
} } }
} } }
} } }
} } }
} } } Leszek Kepinski
} } } Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research,
} } } Polish Academy of Sciences,
} } } P.O.Box 1410,
} } } 50-950 Wroclaw, Poland
} } } e-mail: L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl
} } }
} } }
} } }
} } } ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} } } 13, 33 -- From L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl Wed May 10 05:31:44 2006
} } } 13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl
} } } (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.6])
} } } 13, 33 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
} } } ESMTP id k4AAVh7k009241
} } } 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006
} } } 05:31:43 -0500
} } } 13, 33 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
} } } 13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with ESMTP
} } } id 7143C134196
} } } 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006
} } } 12:43:45 +0200 (CEST)
} } } 13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl ([127.0.0.1])
} } } 13, 33 -- by localhost (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [127.0.0.1])
} } } (amavisd-new, port 10025)
} } } 13, 33 -- with LMTP id 06540-02-6 for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ;
} } } 13, 33 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 12:43:43 +0200 (CEST)
} } } 13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanner: This message was checked by NOD32
} Antivirus system
} } } 13, 33 -- NOD32 for Linux Mail Server.
} } } 13, 33 -- For more information on NOD32 Antivirus System,
} } } 13, 33 -- please, visit our website: http://www.nod32.com/.
} } } 13, 33 -- Received: from b8p020 (sqd.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.20])
} } } 13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with SMTP
} } } id 2ED7B134276
} } } 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006
} } } 12:36:15 +0200 (CEST)
} } } 13, 33 -- Message-ID: {006101c6741b$d020fe40$7f01a8c0-at-b8p020}
} } } 13, 33 -- From: =?iso-8859-2?B?TC4gS+pwafFza2k=?=
} } } {L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl}
} } } 13, 33 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} } } 13, 33 -- Subject: EDS_EBSD system
} } } 13, 33 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:23:43 +0200
} } } 13, 33 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} } } 13, 33 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
} } } 13, 33 -- charset="iso-8859-2"
} } } 13, 33 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
} } } 13, 33 -- X-Priority: 3
} } } 13, 33 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
} } } 13, 33 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
} } } 13, 33 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
} } } 13, 33 -- X-Scan-Module: SMTP[2006.04.28 (2006.01.25)]
} } } 13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at int.pan.wroc.pl
} } } ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================
} }
} }
} } ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} } 15, 19 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Thu May 11 11:17:49 2006
} } 15, 19 -- Received: from qsmtp3.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net
} } [66.60.130.145])
} } 15, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id
} } k4BGHmMP004357
} } 15, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:17:48 -0500
} } 15, 19 -- Received: (qmail 26316 invoked from network); 11 May
} 2006 09:17:46
} } -0700
} } 15, 19 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 26311, pid: 26312, t: 0.1909s
} } 15, 19 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0
} } 15, 19 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211)
} } 15, 19 -- by qsmtp3 with SMTP; 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700
} } 15, 19 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060511090631.02476f70-at-gaugler.com}
} } 15, 19 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
} } 15, 19 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700
} } 15, 19 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} } 15, 19 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com}
} } 15, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] EDS_EBSD system
} } 15, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com}
} } 15, 19 -- References: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com}
} } 15, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
} } 15, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
} } ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 21 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Thu May 11 13:23:11 2006
10, 21 -- Received: from qsmtp1.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145])
10, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4BINAVK003464
10, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:23:10 -0500
10, 21 -- Received: (qmail 3963 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 11:23:10 -0700
10, 21 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 3960, pid: 3961, t: 0.1827s
10, 21 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0
10, 21 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211)
10, 21 -- by qsmtp1 with SMTP; 11 May 2006 11:23:09 -0700
10, 21 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060511110407.02424110-at-gaugler.com}
10, 21 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
10, 21 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:23:09 -0700
10, 21 -- To: "Thomas, Larry (PNNL)" {Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov}
10, 21 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com}
10, 21 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: EDS_EBSD system
10, 21 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
10, 21 -- In-Reply-To: {C088BE6F.7E5%Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov}
10, 21 -- References: {200605111623.k4BGN9cK010183-at-ns.microscopy.com}
10, 21 -- {C088BE6F.7E5%Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov}
10, 21 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
10, 21 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:29:35 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] cpd pains

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

The first question I would ask:
WHY are the knobs hard to turn?

Generally it's a couple reasons.

#1 If the threads are lubricated and the grease/oil and enough of the
VOCs (even if they aren't very volatile) dissipate the lubricant can
turn to glue.
-Solution:
Disassemble, clean (with WD-40, CRC or other solvating
lubricants), and re-apply some lightweight grease (lithium or wheel
bearing would be fine), or a touch of heavy oil.

#2 If the threads/valve are damaged, you probably should replace the
valve.

These all are extremely simple devices. And as such parts are
relatively easy to repair/replace or fix. Assuming you have the
patience to source the proper valves. The pressures the CPDs the
microscopy community utilizes are relatively insignificant to some of
the devices folks in Physics and engineering play with daily, not to
mention, McMaster-Carr has a great selection of valves and what not that
are rated well above the typical 1500-3000 psi burst limit (safety) on
the CPDs.

If the valve was always hard to turn that's one thing, if it is now,
make it easy to turn.

Try even spraying the threads with some WD-40 or liquid Wrench and run a
cycle or two and see if that helps anything.

I am a big fan of the Polaron type CPD. I've never been let down by
one, and it is the best model for 'teaching' the principles... no black
boxes and although manual, no sane minded individual should start a CPD
run and let it go un-attended... so why not be manual? My apologies to
those who sell automatic ones, this is just my opinion.

Geoff Williams
Leduc Bioimaging Facility Manager
Brown University

http://www.brown.edu/Facilities/Leduc_Bioimaging_Facility/

-----Original Message-----
X-from: gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu [mailto:gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu]

Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:10 PM
To: Williams, Geoffrey

Hello,
I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this?
It
has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves.
Controlling
the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your
skin.
Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to
make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run?

\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
\/\/\
Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron
Microscope Lab
AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini
Hall
gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley
phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA
94720-3330
fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793



==============================Original Headers==============================
19, 29 -- From Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu Thu May 11 14:29:30 2006
19, 29 -- Received: from pyxis.services.brown.edu (pyxis.services.brown.edu [128.148.106.154])
19, 29 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BJTUwW014301
19, 29 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:29:30 -0500
19, 29 -- Received: from ex-gateway2-out.AD.Brown.Edu (ex-gateway2.ad.brown.edu [128.148.21.53])
19, 29 -- by pyxis.services.brown.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7/) with ESMTP id k4BJTT1G029302
19, 29 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:29:30 -0400 (EDT)
19, 29 -- Received: from mail1.AD.Brown.Edu ([128.148.21.31]) by ex-gateway2-out.AD.Brown.Edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
19, 29 -- Thu, 11 May 2006 15:29:29 -0400
19, 29 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
19, 29 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
19, 29 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
19, 29 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
19, 29 -- charset="US-ASCII"
19, 29 -- Subject: RE: cpd pains
19, 29 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:29:27 -0400
19, 29 -- Message-ID: {A1A84D541C161C4C988B4E0FB38F5A0F044FFAB6-at-MAIL1.AD.Brown.Edu}
19, 29 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
19, 29 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
19, 29 -- Thread-Topic: cpd pains
19, 29 -- Thread-Index: AcZ0hu6v536bZuTJRHefGkmGyiABXgAp6KHg
19, 29 -- From: "Williams, Geoffrey" {Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu}
19, 29 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
19, 29 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2006 19:29:29.0855 (UTC) FILETIME=[391AE8F0:01C67531]
19, 29 -- X-Brown-Proofpoint: Not Infected
19, 29 -- X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051106
19, 29 -- X-Brown-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051106
19, 29 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
19, 29 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4BJTUwW014301
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dlowry-at-asu.edu
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:13:41 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy]

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Colleagues,

I am writing to get information on web-pages which have compiled links to bio-imaging and microscopy facilities both within the US and internationally.

I have searched and located a few such web-sites, but they are not very comprehensive and many of the links are dead.

If anyone in the community may have web-addresses or information on sites of this nature, I would appreciate their input.

Thank you,



David Lowry
School of Life Sciences
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-4501
office: 480-727-0725
lab: 480-965-2463



==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 26 -- From dlowry-at-asu.edu Thu May 11 15:13:41 2006
10, 26 -- Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120])
10, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BKDeKs025039
10, 26 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:13:40 -0500
10, 26 -- Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769)
10, 26 -- id {0IZ400A01AOYKN-at-asu.edu} for Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu,
10, 26 -- 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700 (MST)
10, 26 -- Received: from EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu
10, 26 -- (excl1-a0.asurite.ad.asu.edu [129.219.12.199])
10, 26 -- by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) with ESMTP id {0IZ40094UAOXGF-at-asu.edu} for
10, 26 -- Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:09 -0700 (MST)
10, 26 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700
10, 26 -- From: David Lowry {dlowry-at-asu.edu}
10, 26 -- Subject:
10, 26 -- To: Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com
10, 26 -- Cc: Douglas Chandler {d.chandler-at-asu.edu} , Robert Roberson {robby2-at-asu.edu}
10, 26 -- Message-id: {B9366E69DACF09458B402E4C4385012601188099-at-EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu}
10, 26 -- MIME-version: 1.0
10, 26 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
10, 26 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
10, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ1NueqXPUlUZH9SzS8YvyHUcm0cw==
10, 26 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
10, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
10, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
10, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
10, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4BKDeKs025039
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: cheetham.3-at-osu.edu
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:52:18 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] AskAMicroscopist: question on photomicrophotography

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (cheetham.3-at-osu.edu)
from http://www.microscopy.org/Ask-A-Microscopist/Ask-A-Microscopist.html on Thursday, May 11, 2006 at 16:42:15
Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to both cheetham.3-at-osu.edu as well as to the Microscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: cheetham.3-at-osu.edu
Name: Sonia Cheetham

Organization: The Ohio State University

Education: Graduate College

Location: Wooster , Ohio

Title: question on photomicrophotography

Question: I have being trying to find out what photomicrophotography is about. I came across this term in a paper regarding confirmation of PMO getting into the cells. Can you give me a brief exlanation of what is this technique? Thanks


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com Thu May 11 18:52:18 2006
9, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
9, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BNqE3f006922
9, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:52:18 -0500
9, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
9, 12 -- X-Sender: zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com (Unverified)
9, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110400c0897e9b2987-at-[206.69.208.22]}
9, 12 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:52:14 -0500
9, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
9, 12 -- From: cheetham.3-at-osu.edu (by way of Ask-A-Microscopist)
9, 12 -- Subject: AskAMicroscopist: question on photomicrophotography
9, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: junhe-at-unmc.edu
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:52:39 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Freon113 in Dehydration and Critical Point Drying

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both junhe-at-unmc.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: junhe-at-unmc.edu
Name: Jun

Organization: unmc

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Freon113 in Dehydration and Critical Point Drying

Question: I have a question on the role of Froen 113 in the common route of:
wet specimen---70% to 100% Ethanol----Freon113--Liduid CO2

CO2 is the common transitional fluid. Ethanol is the dehydration fluid. I know that in some cases
people go from Ethanol to CO2 directely. But, Since the above route is also mentioned, I wonder what advantage Froen113 brings to the preparation process.

Your help is much appreciated.


Eugene

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Thu May 11 18:52:39 2006
10, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
10, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BNqc9K007183
10, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:52:39 -0500
10, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
10, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
10, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c0897eb9308f-at-[206.69.208.22]}
10, 12 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:52:38 -0500
10, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
10, 12 -- From: junhe-at-unmc.edu (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
10, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Freon113 in Dehydration and Critical Point Drying
10, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:29:30 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy]

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Try this one. http://www.magma.ca/~scimat/

Ann Fook Yang
EM Unit/ Unite EM
AAFC/AAC
960 Carling Ave,
Ottawa,Ontario
Canada K1A 0C6
yanga-at-agr.gc.ca
Telephone/Téléphone: 613-759-1638
Facsimile/Télécopieur: 613-759-1701

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada


-----Original Message-----
X-from: dlowry-at-asu.edu [mailto:dlowry-at-asu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:18 PM
To: Yang, Ann-Fook

Colleagues,

I am writing to get information on web-pages which have compiled links to bio-imaging and microscopy facilities both within the US and internationally.

I have searched and located a few such web-sites, but they are not very comprehensive and many of the links are dead.

If anyone in the community may have web-addresses or information on sites of this nature, I would appreciate their input.

Thank you,



David Lowry
School of Life Sciences
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-4501
office: 480-727-0725
lab: 480-965-2463



==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 26 -- From dlowry-at-asu.edu Thu May 11 15:13:41 2006
10, 26 -- Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120])
10, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BKDeKs025039
10, 26 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:13:40 -0500
10, 26 -- Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769)
10, 26 -- id {0IZ400A01AOYKN-at-asu.edu} for Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu,
10, 26 -- 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700 (MST)
10, 26 -- Received: from EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu
10, 26 -- (excl1-a0.asurite.ad.asu.edu [129.219.12.199])
10, 26 -- by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) with ESMTP id {0IZ40094UAOXGF-at-asu.edu} for
10, 26 -- Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:09 -0700 (MST)
10, 26 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700
10, 26 -- From: David Lowry {dlowry-at-asu.edu}
10, 26 -- Subject:
10, 26 -- To: Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com
10, 26 -- Cc: Douglas Chandler {d.chandler-at-asu.edu} , Robert Roberson {robby2-at-asu.edu}
10, 26 -- Message-id: {B9366E69DACF09458B402E4C4385012601188099-at-EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu}
10, 26 -- MIME-version: 1.0
10, 26 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
10, 26 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
10, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ1NueqXPUlUZH9SzS8YvyHUcm0cw==
10, 26 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
10, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
10, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
10, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
10, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4BKDeKs025039
==============================End of - Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
20, 26 -- From YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA Fri May 12 07:29:30 2006
20, 26 -- Received: from agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca [192.197.71.137])
20, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4CCTUYt006840
20, 26 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:29:30 -0500
20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA ([192.168.122.1])
20, 26 -- by agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CCSAAN000796;
20, 26 -- Fri, 12 May 2006 08:28:20 -0400
20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxms3.AGR.GC.CA ([10.117.15.30]) by onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
20, 26 -- Fri, 12 May 2006 08:29:01 -0400
20, 26 -- x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
20, 26 -- content-class: urn:content-classes:message
20, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
20, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
20, 26 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
20, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy]
20, 26 -- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:29:00 -0400
20, 26 -- Message-ID: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334E7-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca}
20, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
20, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
20, 26 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy]
20, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ1N/gepqIvATEgTJuQuG904vfthgAh0jrg
20, 26 -- From: "Yang, Ann-Fook" {YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA}
20, 26 -- To: {dlowry-at-asu.edu} , {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
20, 26 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2006 12:29:01.0678 (UTC) FILETIME=[A65A58E0:01C675BF]
20, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
20, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4CCTUYt006840
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:41:53 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Cutting latex for TEM

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr
Name: nejat yilmaz

Organization: mersin university medical school

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Cutting latex for TEM

Question: Hello Everybody...

We're trying to investigate bacteria biofilms on a latex material (like surgical gloves) with TEM. We couldn't cut the latex material with our regular glass knives. Is there any suggestion about this problem?

Thanks for any comment...

Dr. Necat Yilmaz
Mersin University Medical School
Histology & Embryolgy Dept.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Fri May 12 07:41:53 2006
6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4CCfqCT016870
6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:41:53 -0500
6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110405c08a32f97075-at-[206.69.208.22]}
6, 12 -- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:41:52 -0500
6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 12 -- From: nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Cutting latex for TEM
6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:40:54 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] GMA/JB4 Contract work

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Listers:

We are looking for a lab to do some contract work, embedding,
sectioning and H&E staining of zebrafish using JB4/GMA plastics. We will
provide fixed specimens. Ultimately we would like serial sections but
for now we just want to see what sort of results we can expect. Please
contact me directly. Nothe that I will be out of the office next week
(15th-19th) so my response may be delayed.
Thanks.

Geoff

--
--
**********************************************
Geoff McAuliffe, Ph.D.
Neuroscience and Cell Biology
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854
voice: (732)-235-4583; fax: -4029
mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu
**********************************************



==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 33 -- From mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu Fri May 12 12:40:53 2006
6, 33 -- Received: from zix02.umdnj.edu (zix02.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.125])
6, 33 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4CHeq10031341
6, 33 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:40:52 -0500
6, 33 -- Received: from zix02.umdnj.edu (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1])
6, 33 -- by Outbound.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 9E1464BE1E
6, 33 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:40:51 -0500 (CDT)
6, 33 -- Received: from umdnj.edu (imail2.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.139])
6, 33 -- by zix02.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id C8ECC4BDAD
6, 33 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:40:49 -0500 (CDT)
6, 33 -- Received: from ([130.219.34.131])
6, 33 -- by imail2.umdnj.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRCRF.13635540;
6, 33 -- Fri, 12 May 2006 13:40:20 -0400
6, 33 -- Received: from conversion-daemon.Polaris.umdnj.edu by Polaris.umdnj.edu
6, 33 -- (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004))
6, 33 -- id {0IZ500F01XNDSY-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} (original mail from mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu)
6, 33 -- for microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:40:20 -0400 (EDT)
6, 33 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.138.2.123])
6, 33 -- by Polaris.umdnj.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21
6, 33 -- 2004)) with ESMTP id {0IZ5006KPYF739-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} ; Fri,
6, 33 -- 12 May 2006 13:40:20 -0400 (EDT)
6, 33 -- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:41:17 -0400
6, 33 -- From: Geoff McAuliffe {mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu}
6, 33 -- Subject: GMA/JB4 Contract work
6, 33 -- To: Histonet {histonet-at-pathology.swmed.edu} ,
6, 33 -- MicroscopyListserver {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com}
6, 33 -- Message-id: {4464C8BD.7090000-at-umdnj.edu}
6, 33 -- MIME-version: 1.0
6, 33 -- Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
6, 33 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
6, 33 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
6, 33 -- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2)
6, 33 -- Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: frank.karl-at-degussa.com
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:08:57 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: viaWWW: Cutting latex for TEM

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

At the risk of putting my foot in my oversized mouth - - - You need a
cryo-microtome and work around -40. This gets you below the glass
transistion temperature for most elastomers and the latex will no longer
behave like an elastic material, but a hard brittle glass. You may need to
fiddle with temperature and pick-up technique. I've sectioned polymer and
and used both glycerin/water, mineral spirits/xylene and DMSO/water
depending on the temperature and my end goal (Light, SEM or TEM). A
diamond knife and boat would be my prefered method. I like to pick up with
a "perfect loop" and place on carbon coated grid.

good luck and have fun........

Frank Karl
Degussa Corporation
Akron Technical Center
3500 Embassy Parkway
Suite 100
Akron, Ohio 44333


330-668-2235 Ext. 238


This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail
messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure,
copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained
in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have
received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender
by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its
attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you.



nyilmaz-at-mersin.ed
u.tr To: frank.karl-at-degussa.com
cc:
05/12/2006 08:44 Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Cutting latex for TEM
AM
Please respond to
nyilmaz







Title-Subject: [Filtered] Cutting latex for TEM

Question: Hello Everybody...

We're trying to investigate bacteria biofilms on a latex material (like
surgical gloves) with TEM. We couldn't cut the latex material with our
regular glass knives. Is there any suggestion about this problem?

Thanks for any comment...

Dr. Necat Yilmaz
Mersin University Medical School
Histology & Embryolgy Dept.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================End of -
Headers==============================




==============================Original Headers==============================
24, 18 -- From frank.karl-at-degussa.com Fri May 12 13:08:57 2006
24, 18 -- Received: from framailout1.rz.itson.com (mailout2.degussa.com [149.216.91.173])
24, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4CI8uhx009046
24, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:08:56 -0500
24, 18 -- Received: from mobuscomm01.mail.degussa.com (uss1026.applications.degussanet.com [172.20.6.74])
24, 18 -- by framailout1.rz.itson.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with SMTP id k4CI5ef3024968;
24, 18 -- Fri, 12 May 2006 20:08:48 +0200
24, 18 -- In-Reply-To: {200605121244.k4CCicWi019245-at-ns.microscopy.com}
24, 18 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Cutting latex for TEM
24, 18 -- To: nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr, microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com
24, 18 -- X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004
24, 18 -- Message-ID: {OFF36C9776.4C39F80C-ON8525716C.00624DFC-8525716C.0063429E-at-degussa.com}
24, 18 -- From: frank.karl-at-degussa.com
24, 18 -- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:04:11 -0400
24, 18 -- X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on MOBUSComm01/DHexternal/US(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at
24, 18 -- 05/12/2006 01:08:49 PM
24, 18 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
24, 18 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dyel-at-mail.nih.gov
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 08:53:43 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Locust brain

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both dyel-at-mail.nih.gov as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: dyel-at-mail.nih.gov
Name: Chip Dye

Organization: NIH

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Locust brain

Question: Hello ListServers,

Does anyone have a good reference or two for images of the locust brain? It would be great if I could find both LM and TEM images.

Thank you!

Chip Dye


Microscopy & Imaging Core, NICHD, NIH http://mic.nichd.nih.gov
Building 49, Room 5W-14
49 Convent Drive, MSC 4495, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4495
Phone: 301-496-3627
E-mail: dyel-at-mail.nih.gov



---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
13, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Sat May 13 08:53:43 2006
13, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
13, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4DDrg0j013430
13, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Sat, 13 May 2006 08:53:43 -0500
13, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
13, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
13, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110400c08b95557fb4-at-[206.69.208.22]}
13, 12 -- Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 08:53:41 -0500
13, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
13, 12 -- From: dyel-at-mail.nih.gov (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
13, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Locust brain
13, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dgmorgan-at-ucdavis.edu
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:47:17 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: polymer microtomy

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both dgmorgan-at-ucdavis.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: dgmorgan-at-ucdavis.edu
Name: David Morgan

Organization: University of California, Davis

Title-Subject: [Filtered] polymer microtomy

Question: I am forwarding two different questions regarding the microtomy of polymers from associates, and if additional information would be useful, please let me know and I will find out what else I can.

1) polymer embedded ZnO nano-rods. I do not know what type of polymer this specimen contains, which is probably critical to any advice that might be offered. I suspect that we will need to use a cryo-microtome and simply experiment to determine the best temperature to use. Any and all suggestions would be most welcome. Also, does anyone have experience with ZnO nano-rods, especially with regard to whether this material is capable of damaging a diamond knife?

2) poly-styrene beads. Another colleague is potentially interested in sectioning ~6 micron beads. Suggestions about the best way to handle such a sample would be welcome - the proper embedding material, sectioning temperature, etc.

Thanks in advance.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Sat May 13 20:47:16 2006
9, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
9, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4E1lFgC032501
9, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Sat, 13 May 2006 20:47:15 -0500
9, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
9, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
9, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110400c08c3c879ab7-at-[206.69.208.22]}
9, 12 -- Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:47:15 -0500
9, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
9, 12 -- From: dgmorgan-at-ucdavis.edu (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
9, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: polymer microtomy
9, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 01:32:51 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Thanks for "Cutting latex for TEM"

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Colleagues...

Thanks for your kindly helps about our latex cutting problem.
Best regards...

Dr. Necat Yýlmaz
Mersin Üniversitesi Týp Fakültesi
Histoloji ve Embriyoloji Anabilim Dalý


==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 31 -- From nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr Mon May 15 01:32:51 2006
4, 31 -- Received: from mail.mersin.edu.tr (mail.mersin.edu.tr [193.255.128.3])
4, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4F6WoeF014898
4, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 01:32:50 -0500
4, 31 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.mersin.edu.tr [127.0.0.1])
4, 31 -- by mail.mersin.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A9B47F58
4, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:32:59 +0300 (EEST)
4, 31 -- Received: from mail.mersin.edu.tr ([127.0.0.1])
4, 31 -- by localhost (mail.mersin.edu.tr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
4, 31 -- with ESMTP id 94040-30 for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ;
4, 31 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 09:32:45 +0300 (EEST)
4, 31 -- Received: from NEJAT1 (unknown [193.255.128.132])
4, 31 -- by mail.mersin.edu.tr (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B0D347F47
4, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:32:39 +0300 (EEST)
4, 31 -- Message-ID: {004801c677e9$59f3e800$1001a8c0-at-NEJAT1}
4, 31 -- From: "Nejat" {nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr}
4, 31 -- To: "EM-Mail Group" {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
4, 31 -- Subject: Thanks for "Cutting latex for TEM"
4, 31 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:30:14 +0300
4, 31 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
4, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
4, 31 -- format=flowed;
4, 31 -- charset="windows-1254";
4, 31 -- reply-type=original
4, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
4, 31 -- X-Priority: 3
4, 31 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
4, 31 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
4, 31 -- Disposition-Notification-To: "Nejat" {nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr}
4, 31 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
4, 31 -- X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mersin.edu.tr
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: AMCGroup2-at-aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:09:06 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: TEM Contractor

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both AMCGroup2-at-aol.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: AMCGroup2-at-aol.com
Name: James Glossinger

Organization: AMC Group

Title-Subject: TEM Contractor


We are currently seeking an independent TEM analyst, academic/non-profit TEM facility or, commercial TEM lab for contracting ongoing advanced TEM imaging and AEM projects, involving semiconductor materials and devices.

If interested and qualified, please contact me off-line via email.

Thanks,
Jim

---------------------
James Glossinger, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist
AMC Group


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 15 08:09:06 2006
6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FD95Wr030746
6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:09:05 -0500
6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110400c08e2dc3ed0e-at-[206.69.208.22]}
6, 12 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:09:04 -0500
6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 12 -- From: AMCGroup2-at-aol.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: TEM Contractor
6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: palladineus-at-yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:10:14 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Masson-Fontana staining for melanin

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both palladineus-at-yahoo.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: palladineus-at-yahoo.com
Name: Randy Khoo

Title-Subject: [Filtered] Masson-Fontana staining for melanin

Question: I am wondering if anybody can help me out on a poser that I have.

Melanin is able to reduce the ammoniacal silver nitrate solution without the addition of an external reducing agent. However, as I understand it, melanin exists in 2 forms, both in oxidized form and reduced form. So, is the reduced form only responsible for reducing the silver nitrate? If so, can the addition of a reducing agent result in both forms reducing the silver nitrate and show a better staining profile? Can this method be used to semi-quantify both the reduced and oxidized forms?

Thanks in advance.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 15 08:10:14 2006
9, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
9, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDACY5031849
9, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:10:13 -0500
9, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
9, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
9, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c08e2e1b01bd-at-[206.69.208.22]}
9, 12 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:10:10 -0500
9, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
9, 12 -- From: palladineus-at-yahoo.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
9, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: Masson-Fontana staining for melanin
9, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gwe-at-ufl.edu
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:18:13 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I have a project where I need to positively identify human cells that
may have mouse cells mixed with them in a tumor. Does anyone have a
suggestion for a protocol that will positively identify a cell as mouse
or as human. Antibodies that I have tried so far have not worked,
post-embedding.

Thanks, Greg
--
Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program
Scientific Director, EM Core Lab
P.O. Box 118525
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
gwe-at-ufl.edu
Phone: 352-392-1295
Fax: 352-846-0251

==============================Original Headers==============================
2, 23 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Mon May 15 08:18:13 2006
2, 23 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165])
2, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDID2j018130
2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:18:13 -0500
2, 23 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63] (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63])
2, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0)
2, 23 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id k4FDIB1j1122394
2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:12 -0400
2, 23 -- Message-ID: {44687F92.8060003-at-ufl.edu}
2, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:10 -0400
2, 23 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu}
2, 23 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
2, 23 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
2, 23 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
2, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
2, 23 -- To: "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com" {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
2, 23 -- Subject: Mouse -vs-Human
2, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
2, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2, 23 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
2, 23 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
2, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
2, 23 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:29:50 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Ah... I'm disappointed. I thought we were going to have a nice
discussion about the transition from human adjustments (knobs) to using
the mouse (bar sliders)....

I was already to pull out the link to
http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/powermate/
... suggesting that maybe it is the answer we old school knob
aficionados have been waiting for.

Alas I have no suggestions relating to the topic. So please accept or
excuse this mild attempt at being funny on a Monday morning.

Geoff Williams
Leduc Bioimaging Facility Manager
Brown University

http://www.brown.edu/Facilities/Leduc_Bioimaging_Facility/

-----Original Message-----
X-from: gwe-at-ufl.edu [mailto:gwe-at-ufl.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:22 AM
To: Williams, Geoffrey

I have a project where I need to positively identify human cells that
may have mouse cells mixed with them in a tumor. Does anyone have a
suggestion for a protocol that will positively identify a cell as mouse
or as human. Antibodies that I have tried so far have not worked,
post-embedding.

Thanks, Greg
--
Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program
Scientific Director, EM Core Lab
P.O. Box 118525
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
gwe-at-ufl.edu
Phone: 352-392-1295
Fax: 352-846-0251

==============================Original
Headers==============================
2, 23 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Mon May 15 08:18:13 2006
2, 23 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu
[128.227.74.165])
2, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k4FDID2j018130
2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006
08:18:13 -0500
2, 23 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63] (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu
[10.227.60.63])
2, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0)
2, 23 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id
k4FDIB1j1122394
2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006
09:18:12 -0400
2, 23 -- Message-ID: {44687F92.8060003-at-ufl.edu}
2, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:10 -0400
2, 23 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu}
2, 23 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
2, 23 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
2, 23 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
2, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
2, 23 -- To: "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com"
{Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
2, 23 -- Subject: Mouse -vs-Human
2, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
2, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2, 23 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
2, 23 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED
2, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
(http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
2, 23 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
(http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
==============================End of -
Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
12, 29 -- From Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu Mon May 15 08:29:50 2006
12, 29 -- Received: from pyxis.services.brown.edu (pyxis.services.brown.edu [128.148.106.154])
12, 29 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDToxx028190
12, 29 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:29:50 -0500
12, 29 -- Received: from ex-gateway1-out.AD.Brown.Edu (ex-gateway1.ad.brown.edu [128.148.21.51])
12, 29 -- by pyxis.services.brown.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7/) with ESMTP id k4FDTdO1011626;
12, 29 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 09:29:49 -0400 (EDT)
12, 29 -- Received: from mail1.AD.Brown.Edu ([128.148.21.31]) by ex-gateway1-out.AD.Brown.Edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
12, 29 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 09:29:47 -0400
12, 29 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
12, 29 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
12, 29 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
12, 29 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
12, 29 -- charset="US-ASCII"
12, 29 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human
12, 29 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:29:47 -0400
12, 29 -- Message-ID: {A1A84D541C161C4C988B4E0FB38F5A0F044FFC0C-at-MAIL1.AD.Brown.Edu}
12, 29 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
12, 29 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
12, 29 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human
12, 29 -- Thread-Index: AcZ4IoOHi5Mh71SqR4y2kC4rjGtdoAAALxag
12, 29 -- From: "Williams, Geoffrey" {Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu}
12, 29 -- To: {gwe-at-ufl.edu} , {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
12, 29 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 13:29:47.0713 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2CC6310:01C67823]
12, 29 -- X-Brown-Proofpoint: Not Infected
12, 29 -- X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051209
12, 29 -- X-Brown-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051209
12, 29 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
12, 29 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4FDToxx028190
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dhitrys-at-qimaging.com
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:39:54 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Spatial Calibration Slide from Richardson Technologies

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Does anyone where to find one of the spatial calibration slides that used to
be sold by a company called Richardson Technologies? The company appears to
be gone but I'm trying to get hold of one the slides.

Thank you!


--David Hitrys
QImaging Corporation

==============================Original Headers==============================
1, 20 -- From dhitrys-at-qimaging.com Mon May 15 08:39:54 2006
1, 20 -- Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11])
1, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDdsFA005775
1, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:39:54 -0500
1, 20 -- Received: from 209-6-80-225.c3-0.frm-ubr2.sbo-frm.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO DHPC) ([209.6.80.225])
1, 20 -- by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 May 2006 09:40:40 -0400
1, 20 -- X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,130,1146456000";
1, 20 -- d="scan'208"; a="203995933:sNHT1448836834"
1, 20 -- From: "David Hitrys" {dhitrys-at-qimaging.com}
1, 20 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
1, 20 -- Subject: Spatial Calibration Slide from Richardson Technologies
1, 20 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:39:39 -0400
1, 20 -- Message-ID: {003401c67825$03e01ce0$0302a8c0-at-DHPC}
1, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
1, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
1, 20 -- charset="us-ascii"
1, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
1, 20 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
1, 20 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
1, 20 -- Thread-index: AcZ4JQOdwz3Z0tRTQpK666aP0DxGaQ==
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: bfoster-at-mme1.com
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:08:05 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Spatial Calibration Slide from Richardson

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi, Dave

Try EMS. They were selling Richardson's products.

Best regards,
Barbara Foster

Microscopy/Microscopy Education
313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100
Allen, TX 75002
P: 972-954-8011
W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com


MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.

P. S.
Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.



At 08:42 AM 5/15/2006, dhitrys-at-qimaging.com wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


==============================Original Headers==============================
14, 18 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Mon May 15 11:08:05 2006
14, 18 -- Received: from 5starpro.com (enterprise.5starpro.com [207.44.136.95])
14, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FG85cl022948
14, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:08:05 -0500
14, 18 -- Received: (qmail 12441 invoked by uid 2020); 15 May 2006 11:24:05 -0500
14, 18 -- Received: from host57-99.rancor.birch.net (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (65.17.57.99)
14, 18 -- by enterprise.5starpro.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 15 May 2006 11:24:05 -0500
14, 18 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060515110734.02067758-at-mme1.com}
14, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
14, 18 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:08:15 -0500
14, 18 -- To: dhitrys-at-qimaging.com, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
14, 18 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com}
14, 18 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Spatial Calibration Slide from Richardson
14, 18 -- Technologies
14, 18 -- In-Reply-To: {200605151342.k4FDgKaa009921-at-ns.microscopy.com}
14, 18 -- References: {200605151342.k4FDgKaa009921-at-ns.microscopy.com}
14, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
14, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Doug.Skinner-at-bruker-axs.com
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:34:01 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Status of Princeton Gamma-Tech Microanalysis (PGT)

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


ListServer Subscribers:

In response to a recent question on the ListServer which, in part, asked about the status of PGT Microanalysis, I would like to reply:

On Nov 17, 2005 Bruker AXS announced the acquisition of Princeton Gamma-Tech Microanalysis and Röntec AG. These two organizations were merged to form Bruker AXS Microanalysis. Bruker AXS develops and manufactures a broad range of analytical X-ray systems including XRF, XRD and now, X-ray Microanalysis.

Customer service and support for both PGT Microanalysis and Röntec have been expanded as part of the Bruker AXS worldwide operation. PGT and Röntec customers should contact Bruker AXS for continued product and applications support.

Bruker AXS Microanalysis is a proud Sustaining Member of MSA and MAS, carrying on the long time support given by PGT Microanalysis and Röntec to these fine professional organizations.


Doug Skinner
Assistant Vice President
Bruker-AXS Microanalysis
609-771-4400
Doug.Skinner-at-Bruker-AXS.com
www.bruker-axs-ma.com



==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 23 -- From Doug.Skinner-at-bruker-axs.com Mon May 15 12:34:01 2006
10, 23 -- Received: from isa1.bruker-axs.com (68-22-68-158.ded.ameritech.net [68.22.68.158])
10, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FHY0Gf001851
10, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:34:01 -0500
10, 23 -- Received: from mail1.bruker-axs.com ([172.16.0.32]) by isa1.bruker-axs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
10, 23 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 12:34:42 -0500
10, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
10, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
10, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
10, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
10, 23 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
10, 23 -- Subject: Status of Princeton Gamma-Tech Microanalysis (PGT)
10, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:34:42 -0500
10, 23 -- Message-ID: {235D0F9F0400B3449E8C229D9D24CC57024C2EE3-at-mail1.bruker-axs.com}
10, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
10, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
10, 23 -- Thread-Topic: Status of Princeton Gamma-Tech Microanalysis (PGT)
10, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZ4RdBgdQwFFMgTR4CD5qIjFruOCw==
10, 23 -- From: "Skinner, Doug" {Doug.Skinner-at-bruker-axs.com}
10, 23 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
10, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 17:34:42.0631 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9A6ED70:01C67845]
10, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
10, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4FHY0Gf001851
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:14:10 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Polaroid DMC2

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Listers,

Does anybody have any experience with this digital microscope camera?
I don't see on the webpage I found that the chip is cooled.
How opinions about the image quality? Reliability? The price is attractive.
Thanks.

Phil
--
Philip Oshel
Microscopy Facility Supervisor
Department of Biology
Central Michigan University
024C Brooks Hall
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
(989) 774-3576

==============================Original Headers==============================
3, 20 -- From oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu Mon May 15 16:14:10 2006
3, 20 -- Received: from ob2.cmich.edu (ob2.cmich.edu [141.209.20.21])
3, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FLE9wk016011
3, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:14:09 -0500
3, 20 -- Received: from egateb.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85])
3, 20 -- by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4FLo84l006919
3, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:50:08 -0400
3, 20 -- Received: from [141.209.160.132] ([141.209.160.132]) by egateb.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
3, 20 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 17:14:05 -0400
3, 20 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
3, 20 -- Message-Id: {f06230916c08e9f8899eb-at-[141.209.160.132]}
3, 20 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:14:07 -0400
3, 20 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
3, 20 -- From: Philip Oshel {oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu}
3, 20 -- Subject: Polaroid DMC2
3, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
3, 20 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 21:14:05.0814 (UTC) FILETIME=[7F854160:01C67864]
3, 20 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
3, 20 -- X-Spam-Score: -4 () L_EXCH_MF
3, 20 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 141.209.20.21
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: lewryan-at-gmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:03:46 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both lewryan-at-gmail.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: lewryan-at-gmail.com
Name: Ryan

Organization: Dalhousie University

Title-Subject: [Filtered] SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate

Question: I have a saple with deposits of an alloy of Sn-Co-C on a magnetic stainless steel substrate (430 stainless steel). I'm using a cold field emission microscope and am having trouble getting high resolution images. Could you suggest what setting I should use to get started?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 15 17:03:45 2006
6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FM3ipN026657
6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:03:44 -0500
6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c08eab2f530f-at-[206.69.208.22]}
6, 12 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:03:44 -0500
6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 12 -- From: lewryan-at-gmail.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate
6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: r.sims-at-auckland.ac.nz
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:29:41 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Polaroid DMC2

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


No experience, but it looks good, except that on the polaroid website:

http://www.polaroid.com/global/detail.jsp;jsessionid=Eo1VHNEfv4zBiHQO811vhkPjhU2i
9bsgrpjdBKtwD1ZlyI25lSFe!191862641!-1979950386!7005!8005!1446422789!-
1979950377!7005!8005?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524441760112&FOLDER%3
C%3Efolder_id=2534374302028681&bmUID=1147731925565&bmLocale=en_US


(honest, that's the page URL, I got it from Googling polaroid dmc2)

is says that it's no longer manufactured.

seems a pity

cheers

rtch




On 15 May 2006 at 16:16, oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu wrote:

}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Listers,
}
} Does anybody have any experience with this digital microscope camera?
} I don't see on the webpage I found that the chip is cooled.
} How opinions about the image quality? Reliability? The price is attractive.
} Thanks.
}
} Phil
} --
} Philip Oshel
} Microscopy Facility Supervisor
} Department of Biology
} Central Michigan University
} 024C Brooks Hall
} Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
} (989) 774-3576
}

--
Ritchie Sims Ph D Phone : 64 9 3737599 ext 87713
Microanalyst Fax : 64 9 3737435
Department of Geology email : r.sims-at-auckland.ac.nz
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019
Auckland
New Zealand


==============================Original Headers==============================
16, 27 -- From r.sims-at-auckland.ac.nz Mon May 15 17:29:41 2006
16, 27 -- Received: from zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz (zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.190.14])
16, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FMTeeX004396
16, 27 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:29:41 -0500
16, 27 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
16, 27 -- by zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF93A3546E;
16, 27 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 10:29:39 +1200 (NZST)
16, 27 -- Received: from zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz ([127.0.0.1])
16, 27 -- by localhost (smtpd.itss.auckland.ac.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
16, 27 -- with ESMTP id 21284-30; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:29:39 +1200 (NZST)
16, 27 -- Received: from rs (r.sims.glg.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.59.18])
16, 27 -- by zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15BD353A5;
16, 27 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 10:29:39 +1200 (NZST)
16, 27 -- From: "Ritchie Sims" {r.sims-at-auckland.ac.nz}
16, 27 -- To: oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu
16, 27 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:33:26 +1200
16, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
16, 27 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Polaroid DMC2
16, 27 -- Cc: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
16, 27 -- Message-ID: {4469AA76.24160.7DE2DE-at-localhost}
16, 27 -- Priority: normal
16, 27 -- In-reply-to: {200605152116.k4FLGVBG017899-at-ns.microscopy.com}
16, 27 -- X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c)
16, 27 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
16, 27 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
16, 27 -- Content-description: Mail message body
16, 27 -- X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailhost.auckland.ac.nz
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: shashis_99-at-yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:00:09 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Mouse -vs-Human

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Greg,
If you could culture and clone these cells. do
karyotyping.
shashi

--- gwe-at-ufl.edu wrote:

}
}
}
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The
} Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help
}
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} I have a project where I need to positively identify
} human cells that
} may have mouse cells mixed with them in a tumor.
} Does anyone have a
} suggestion for a protocol that will positively
} identify a cell as mouse
} or as human. Antibodies that I have tried so far
} have not worked,
} post-embedding.
}
} Thanks, Greg
} --
} Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D.
} Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program
} Scientific Director, EM Core Lab
} P.O. Box 118525
} University of Florida
} Gainesville, FL 32611
} gwe-at-ufl.edu
} Phone: 352-392-1295
} Fax: 352-846-0251
}
} ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} 2, 23 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Mon May 15 08:18:13 2006
} 2, 23 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu
} (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165])
} 2, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com
} (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
} k4FDID2j018130
} 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon,
} 15 May 2006 08:18:13 -0500
} 2, 23 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63]
} (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63])
} 2, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0)
} 2, 23 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with
} ESMTP id k4FDIB1j1122394
} 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon,
} 15 May 2006 09:18:12 -0400
} 2, 23 -- Message-ID: {44687F92.8060003-at-ufl.edu}
} 2, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:10 -0400
} 2, 23 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu}
} 2, 23 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
} 2, 23 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7
} (Windows/20050923)
} 2, 23 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
} 2, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 2, 23 -- To: "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com"
} {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
} 2, 23 -- Subject: Mouse -vs-Human
} 2, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
} charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
} 2, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
} 2, 23 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5,
} tests=ALL_TRUSTED
} 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5,
} tests=ALL_TRUSTED
} 2, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
} (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
} 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
} (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
} ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================
}


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

==============================Original Headers==============================
5, 20 -- From shashis_99-at-yahoo.com Mon May 15 23:00:09 2006
5, 20 -- Received: from web54601.mail.yahoo.com (web54601.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.171])
5, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4G408xW019488
5, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:00:09 -0500
5, 20 -- Received: (qmail 32449 invoked by uid 60001); 16 May 2006 04:00:08 -0000
5, 20 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
5, 20 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
5, 20 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
5, 20 -- b=b3HoIPjcecrI7jPylPJbemBQfCpwz6KL3Nl2SLwRl0vPQKLJTSqoJRJsXUJBJxlJFVuVf0Njc63DG2tQas4B2EhJ0/KGXLxEi8qftX9G5E43PRjzwVm6sJOnaXeDf0H+btRz7jiwuQAloZaxeJkZ4yLCvhiVwxQfHM2VGvLSdOc= ;
5, 20 -- Message-ID: {20060516040008.32447.qmail-at-web54601.mail.yahoo.com}
5, 20 -- Received: from [203.200.217.180] by web54601.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 21:00:08 PDT
5, 20 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
5, 20 -- From: shashi singh {shashis_99-at-yahoo.com}
5, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human
5, 20 -- To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
5, 20 -- Cc: Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com
5, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605151319.k4FDJI5r021088-at-ns.microscopy.com}
5, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
5, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
5, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: nizets2-at-yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:56:59 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Mouse -vs-Human

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi!

If your purpose is just to identify mouse cells in a
human culture, you don't need EM. Actually it would be
much easier in LM. Any way, you could think about
using HLA marker, they are external (it's just an idea
I have no experience with that).

regards,

Stephane

--- gwe-at-ufl.edu wrote:

}
}
}
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The
} Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help
}
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} I have a project where I need to positively identify
} human cells that
} may have mouse cells mixed with them in a tumor.
} Does anyone have a
} suggestion for a protocol that will positively
} identify a cell as mouse
} or as human. Antibodies that I have tried so far
} have not worked,
} post-embedding.
}
} Thanks, Greg
} --
} Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D.
} Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program
} Scientific Director, EM Core Lab
} P.O. Box 118525
} University of Florida
} Gainesville, FL 32611
} gwe-at-ufl.edu
} Phone: 352-392-1295
} Fax: 352-846-0251
}
} ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} 2, 23 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Mon May 15 08:18:13 2006
} 2, 23 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu
} (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165])
} 2, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com
} (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
} k4FDID2j018130
} 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon,
} 15 May 2006 08:18:13 -0500
} 2, 23 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63]
} (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63])
} 2, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0)
} 2, 23 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with
} ESMTP id k4FDIB1j1122394
} 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon,
} 15 May 2006 09:18:12 -0400
} 2, 23 -- Message-ID: {44687F92.8060003-at-ufl.edu}
} 2, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:10 -0400
} 2, 23 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu}
} 2, 23 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
} 2, 23 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7
} (Windows/20050923)
} 2, 23 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
} 2, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 2, 23 -- To: "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com"
} {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
} 2, 23 -- Subject: Mouse -vs-Human
} 2, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
} charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
} 2, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
} 2, 23 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5,
} tests=ALL_TRUSTED
} 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5,
} tests=ALL_TRUSTED
} 2, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
} (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
} 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group
} (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/)
} ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================
}


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 20 -- From nizets2-at-yahoo.com Tue May 16 03:56:59 2006
9, 20 -- Received: from web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.62])
9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4G8uxm1001022
9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 03:56:59 -0500
9, 20 -- Received: (qmail 62761 invoked by uid 60001); 16 May 2006 08:56:58 -0000
9, 20 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
9, 20 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
9, 20 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
9, 20 -- b=vkjIObXA9f/aAyD94BBUxAzib2BM5EVypr+zAyrZbcJXw3DbTY9XHamLv+w8EwXUZoBveEPbQFuW/7B/ntgqlD4+vmHjziXn81Df70FmpPXvsfoVxU2WCHF7S12cpP3LehOC+8BkcXw+b1m1HCfeSsveM+1eEKv6JU7u7TmFRtc= ;
9, 20 -- Message-ID: {20060516085658.62759.qmail-at-web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com}
9, 20 -- Received: from [80.122.101.102] by web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:56:58 PDT
9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 01:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
9, 20 -- From: Stephane Nizet {nizets2-at-yahoo.com}
9, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human
9, 20 -- To: gwe-at-ufl.edu
9, 20 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
9, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605151322.k4FDMVbw027060-at-ns.microscopy.com}
9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: michael-at-shaffer.net
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:43:56 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Image analysis

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

We are considering Fovea Pro as a set of quantitation plug-ins for
Photoshop. Can I ask those who use FP, and who also teach IA, to contact me
off list? I'd like to get an idea of the user base, and accumulate any
thoughts on re-establishing an FP forum.

Genuinely, Michael Shaffer :o)

SEM/MLA Research Coordinator
(709) 737-6799 (ofc)
(709) 737-6790 (lab)
(709) 737-6193 (FAX)
http://www.mun.ca/creait/maf/
http://www.esd.mun.ca/epma/

Inco Innovation Centre
c/o Memorial University
230 Elizabeth Avenue
P.O. Box 4200
St. John's, NL A1C 5S7


==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 19 -- From michael-at-shaffer.net Tue May 16 04:43:56 2006
4, 19 -- Received: from ws6-4.us4.outblaze.com (ws6-4.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.107])
4, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4G9htue011779
4, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:43:55 -0500
4, 19 -- Received: (qmail 14552 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 09:43:53 -0000
4, 19 -- Received: from unknown (HELO rarewolf1) (michael-at-shaffer.net-at-205.251.84.119)
4, 19 -- by ws6-4.us4.outblaze.com with SMTP; 16 May 2006 09:43:53 -0000
4, 19 -- From: "michael shaffer" {michael-at-shaffer.net}
4, 19 -- To: "MSA Microscopy list" {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
4, 19 -- Subject: Image analysis
4, 19 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:13:34 -0230
4, 19 -- Message-ID: {002b01c678cd$342b9ca0$4f01a8c0-at-rarewolf1}
4, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
4, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
4, 19 -- charset="us-ascii"
4, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
4, 19 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
4, 19 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
4, 19 -- Thread-Index: AcZ4zTLthaxrS1XIRIyCk7yB7AuRzg==
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: opmills-at-mtu.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:48:57 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Several years ago many (most?) of the EM supply vendors switched the
formula for carbon tabs to a "stiff", non-flexible formula. I was
told at that time that the old formula used typewriter tape as a
component.

These new stiff tabs are unsuitable for many of the preps we do. I
was able to find the old formula at Fullam and now they have switched
too.

Does anyone know where to find truly flexible carbon tabs. The ones
Fullam had were from Nisshin EM, very expensive but quite high quality.

Thanks in advance.

Owen Mills
MTU, Houghton MI

==============================Original Headers==============================
5, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Tue May 16 07:48:57 2006
5, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7])
5, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmvf9024068
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:48:57 -0500
5, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5])
5, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4GCmu39024410
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400
5, 31 -- Received: from node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node34.mtu.edu [141.219.69.34])
5, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmuco022544
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400
5, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4])
5, 31 -- by node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GCmu6b023709
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400
5, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu)
5, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6])
5, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4GCmtjx010574
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
5, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45])
5, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4GCmtRx016397
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400
5, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
5, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
5, 31 -- Message-Id: {E9327AEB-33E3-4E6C-9DA6-F2AA87734FF8-at-mtu.edu}
5, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
5, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
5, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu}
5, 31 -- Subject: dbl stick carbon tab blues
5, 31 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:49:15 -0400
5, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
5, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.16.53106
5, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_MEDIA_2_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:26:15 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

http://www.pelcoint.com/technote_html/Conductive%20Tab%20Form%20Letter.p
df

Have you looked at Ted Pella's assortment (Pelco)?
Some answers to your questions may be found in his letter above.
Best wishes,

Jim


-----Original Message-----
X-from: opmills-at-mtu.edu [mailto:opmills-at-mtu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:56 PM
To: James Chalcroft

Several years ago many (most?) of the EM supply vendors switched the
formula for carbon tabs to a "stiff", non-flexible formula. I was
told at that time that the old formula used typewriter tape as a
component.

These new stiff tabs are unsuitable for many of the preps we do. I
was able to find the old formula at Fullam and now they have switched
too.

Does anyone know where to find truly flexible carbon tabs. The ones
Fullam had were from Nisshin EM, very expensive but quite high quality.

Thanks in advance.

Owen Mills
MTU, Houghton MI



==============================Original Headers==============================
16, 23 -- From jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de Tue May 16 08:26:15 2006
16, 23 -- Received: from neuro.mpg.de (mail.neuro.mpg.de [130.183.250.1])
16, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GDQEre001944
16, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:26:15 -0500
16, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
16, 23 -- Return-Receipt-To: "James Chalcroft" {jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de}
16, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
16, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
16, 23 -- charset="US-ASCII"
16, 23 -- Disposition-Notification-To: "James Chalcroft" {jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de}
16, 23 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues
16, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
16, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:26:13 +0200
16, 23 -- Message-ID: {6BBC089D4E1E87459875FB80D8030031BE21D2-at-s6.neuro.mpg.de}
16, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
16, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
16, 23 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues
16, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZ46A6qIDfGYibgSqi1YHWKtSO+WwAA5z8g
16, 23 -- From: "James Chalcroft" {jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de}
16, 23 -- To: {opmills-at-mtu.edu}
16, 23 -- Cc: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
16, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
16, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4GDQEre001944
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: j.bilde-at-risoe.dk
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:29:28 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Conductive double sided carbon adhesive tape is more flexible and could perhaps solve your problem. This tape can be obtained from several vendors.

Best regards,
Jørgen.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Joergen B. Bilde-Soerensen
Senior Research Scientist, Ph. D.
Materials Research Department
Risoe National Laboratory
DK-4000 Roskilde
Denmark

e-mail: j.bilde-at-risoe.dk
phone: +45 4677 5802 (direct)
phone: +45 4677 4677 (switchboard)
fax: +45 4677 5758
website: http://www.risoe.dk/afm/Personal/jqbi/jqbi.htm

-----Original Message-----
X-from: opmills-at-mtu.edu [mailto:opmills-at-mtu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:50 PM
To: j.bilde-at-risoe.dk

Several years ago many (most?) of the EM supply vendors switched the
formula for carbon tabs to a "stiff", non-flexible formula. I was
told at that time that the old formula used typewriter tape as a
component.

These new stiff tabs are unsuitable for many of the preps we do. I
was able to find the old formula at Fullam and now they have switched
too.

Does anyone know where to find truly flexible carbon tabs. The ones
Fullam had were from Nisshin EM, very expensive but quite high quality.

Thanks in advance.

Owen Mills
MTU, Houghton MI

==============================Original Headers==============================
5, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Tue May 16 07:48:57 2006
5, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7])
5, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmvf9024068
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:48:57 -0500
5, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5])
5, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4GCmu39024410
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400
5, 31 -- Received: from node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node34.mtu.edu [141.219.69.34])
5, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmuco022544
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400
5, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4])
5, 31 -- by node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GCmu6b023709
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400
5, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu)
5, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6])
5, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4GCmtjx010574
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
5, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45])
5, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4GCmtRx016397
5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400
5, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
5, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
5, 31 -- Message-Id: {E9327AEB-33E3-4E6C-9DA6-F2AA87734FF8-at-mtu.edu}
5, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
5, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
5, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu}
5, 31 -- Subject: dbl stick carbon tab blues
5, 31 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:49:15 -0400
5, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
5, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.16.53106
5, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_MEDIA_2_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
==============================End of - Headers==============================




==============================Original Headers==============================
18, 24 -- From j.bilde-at-risoe.dk Tue May 16 08:29:28 2006
18, 24 -- Received: from mail.risoe.dk (mail.risoe.dk [130.226.48.21])
18, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GDTS2l007866
18, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:29:28 -0500
18, 24 -- Received: from EXCHG-VS1.risoe.dk (exchg-01.risoe.dk [10.0.0.26])
18, 24 -- by risoe.dk (PMDF V6.2-X26 #31094) with ESMTP id {ZHVS08QY0HQOW604L8-at-risoe.dk}
18, 24 -- for Microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Tue,
18, 24 -- 16 May 2006 15:29:05 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
18, 24 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:28:16 +0200
18, 24 -- From: j.bilde-at-risoe.dk
18, 24 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues
18, 24 -- To: opmills-at-mtu.edu
18, 24 -- Cc: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
18, 24 -- Message-id: {6463F256A85DC14CAB07F087A247997232D4E0-at-EXCHG-VS1.risoe.dk}
18, 24 -- MIME-version: 1.0
18, 24 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
18, 24 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
18, 24 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues
18, 24 -- Thread-Index: AcZ454gbgA//L9RHSESEcXhV+9r4twAA62Ug
18, 24 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
18, 24 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
18, 24 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
18, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
18, 24 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4GDTS2l007866
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:50:34 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi Ryan

I suppose that you have not only a cold FEG SEM, but a so called
"semi-in-lens" type of OL on it too. In fact the cold or schottky type
of FEG doesn't play a role in the problem. It's only a OL question. That
type of OL has a strong magnetic field coming out of it, which enveloppe
the sample at short working distance, alouding to work virtuusely at WD0
and to get nice high res images of ..... non magnetic materials, with
the "trough the lens" SE detector. The field coming out of the OL can be
very strong ; I have measured values such as 3kG at WD2 and 10keV
primary energie. With lower beam energy the field decreases and at 3keV,
I measured a value of 1.2kG at WD3 mm, and 0.3kG at WD8 mm.

Pratically, you have a few solutions, but all are half solutions.

First, you must avoid to work with short WD. Look at the shortes WD
possible without too much astigmatisme. Ask the SEM manufacturer at
which WD the sample is quite out of the field. If your shortest WD is
2mm or so, it will bee something like 6-8mm.

Second, you must find a primary energie not to low, which would give
a poor resolution, due to the perturbation of the primary beam by the
field lignes in the sample, and not too high, to minimase the filed
coming out of the OL, wich increases with increasing primary energy. In
most cases, you 'll find a good compromise between 5 and 10 keV.

Third, you must play very very much with the astigmatism
corrections, at replay again if you move your sample a little bit. And
depending of the electronic, you may touch the range limits of the
astigmatism corrections. In that case, if you have a CL astigmatism
correction setting, you can play on it a little bit, puting
astigmatisme at the Cl, in the opposit direction, to gain some margin of
the OL astigmatism settings. It's not a clean way to work, but in may help.

Fourth, take the smalest sample possible, not too thick, not too
wide, and fix it very securly on the holder. It may land from it and
stick to the OL !

Fifth solutions : buy an other SEM for that kind of samples !!!

Don't wait as well resolved images than with ..... gold particles on
silicon. If you have a nice picture at x50000, you can be satisfied !
More depends on your particular situation, sample and SEM.


Hope it helps

J. Faerber
IPCMS-GSI
(Institut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg
Groupe Surface et Interfaces)
23, rue de Loess ; BP43
67034 Strasbourg CEDEX 2
France

Tel 00 33(0)3 88 10 71 01
Fax 00 33(0)3 88 10 72 48
E-mail Jacques.Faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr



lewryan-at-gmail.com a écrit :

} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America

==============================Original Headers==============================
17, 30 -- From jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr Tue May 16 08:50:33 2006
17, 30 -- Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.157])
17, 30 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GDoX8l022053
17, 30 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:50:33 -0500
17, 30 -- Received: from ipcms.u-strasbg.fr (ipcms.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.2])
17, 30 -- by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.4/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id k4GDoRKQ074518
17, 30 -- ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:27 +0200 (CEST)
17, 30 -- Received: from [130.79.54.3] (odhinn.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.54.3])
17, 30 -- by ipcms.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA41810000E6;
17, 30 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:15 +0200 (CEST)
17, 30 -- Message-ID: {4469D88A.7030305-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr}
17, 30 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:02 +0200
17, 30 -- From: "j.faerber" {jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr}
17, 30 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060503)
17, 30 -- X-Accept-Language: fr, en
17, 30 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
17, 30 -- To: lewryan-at-gmail.com, Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
17, 30 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate
17, 30 -- References: {200605152208.k4FM88SO002253-at-ns.microscopy.com}
17, 30 -- In-Reply-To: {200605152208.k4FM88SO002253-at-ns.microscopy.com}
17, 30 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
17, 30 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
17, 30 -- X-IPCMS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
17, 30 -- X-IPCMS-MailScanner-From: jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr
17, 30 -- X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.157]); Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:27 +0200 (CEST)
17, 30 -- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.1/1464/Tue May 16 11:36:19 2006 on mr7.u-strasbg.fr
17, 30 -- X-Virus-Status: Clean
17, 30 -- X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL
17, 30 -- autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1
17, 30 -- X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on mr7.u-strasbg.fr
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: nicholls-at-uic.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:53:07 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Rotary Shadowing

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear List

I have a faculty member at UIC who is looking for a one off image of a
purified protein. She has seen this done by rotary shadowing and while we
have the instrumentation at the university we do not have the necessary
experience. As it is a one off experiment (she needs an image showing to
confirm if there is bend in the middle of a mutant) I was wondering if
there was a lab out there that regularly uses rotary shadowing who could
help us?

Alan

Alan W Nicholls, PhD
Director of Research Service Facility (Electron Microscopy)
Research Resources Center - East (M/C 337)
Room 100 Science and Engineering South Building
The University of Illinois at Chicago
845 West Taylor St
Chicago, IL 60607-7058

Tel: 312 996 1227
Fax: 312 996 8091
Office: Room 110

Web site www.rrc.uic.edu


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 16 -- From nicholls-at-uic.edu Tue May 16 08:53:07 2006
7, 16 -- Received: from smtpout-1.priv.cc.uic.edu (smtpout-1.cc.uic.edu [128.248.155.232])
7, 16 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4GDr7v1026744
7, 16 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:53:07 -0500
7, 16 -- Received: (qmail 3519 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 08:53:06 -0500
7, 16 -- Received: from emf2.rrc.uic.edu (HELO emf2.uic.edu) (131.193.156.241)
7, 16 -- by smtpout-1.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 May 2006 08:53:06 -0500
7, 16 -- Message-Id: {5.0.2.1.2.20060516085404.026f36b8-at-mailserv.uic.edu}
7, 16 -- X-Sender: nicholls-at-mailserv.uic.edu
7, 16 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
7, 16 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:58:21 -0500
7, 16 -- To: "Microscopy Listserver" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
7, 16 -- From: Alan Nicholls {nicholls-at-uic.edu}
7, 16 -- Subject: Rotary Shadowing
7, 16 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 16 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: bfoster-at-mme1.com
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:18:21 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Rotary Shadowing

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi, Allen

We have used the AFM to image DNA conformation and think that it might also work for your protein, without all the elaborate preparation.

If you are interested in having us give it a try, contact Dr. Kim Kangasniemi (just call him "Kim") at (972)954-8014 or kim-at-nt-america.com

Hope this was helpful,

Best regards,
Barbara Foster

Microscopy/Microscopy Education
313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100
Allen, TX 75002
P: 972-954-8011
W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com


MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.

P. S.
Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.


At 08:54 AM 5/16/2006, nicholls-at-uic.edu wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


==============================Original Headers==============================
15, 17 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Tue May 16 10:18:21 2006
15, 17 -- Received: from 5starpro.com (enterprise.5starpro.com [207.44.136.95])
15, 17 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GFIKxw011149
15, 17 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:18:20 -0500
15, 17 -- Received: (qmail 9713 invoked by uid 2020); 16 May 2006 10:34:25 -0500
15, 17 -- Received: from host57-99.rancor.birch.net (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (65.17.57.99)
15, 17 -- by enterprise.5starpro.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 May 2006 10:34:24 -0500
15, 17 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060516101501.020b2278-at-mme1.com}
15, 17 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
15, 17 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:18:26 -0500
15, 17 -- To: nicholls-at-uic.edu, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
15, 17 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com}
15, 17 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Rotary Shadowing
15, 17 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161354.k4GDssi4001193-at-ns.microscopy.com}
15, 17 -- References: {200605161354.k4GDssi4001193-at-ns.microscopy.com}
15, 17 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
15, 17 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary-at-gaugler.com
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:27:57 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: dbl stick carbon tab blues

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


Check the MSA list archives for sticky tabs.

Ted Pella has good ones as does EMS. No experience
with SPI tabs.

gary g.


At 05:51 AM 5/16/2006, you wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 20 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Tue May 16 11:27:57 2006
10, 20 -- Received: from qsmtp3.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145])
10, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4GGRu3l022232
10, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 11:27:57 -0500
10, 20 -- Received: (qmail 704 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 09:27:56 -0700
10, 20 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 701, pid: 702, t: 0.1669s
10, 20 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0
10, 20 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211)
10, 20 -- by qsmtp3 with SMTP; 16 May 2006 09:27:56 -0700
10, 20 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060516092606.023c7328-at-gaugler.com}
10, 20 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
10, 20 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:27:33 -0700
10, 20 -- To: opmills-at-mtu.edu
10, 20 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com}
10, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues
10, 20 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
10, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161251.k4GCpEVf027234-at-ns.microscopy.com}
10, 20 -- References: {200605161251.k4GCpEVf027234-at-ns.microscopy.com}
10, 20 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
10, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: meulia.1-at-osu.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:06 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations
incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide.

I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant
tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using
MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any
reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the
em work?

Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save
me trial time.

Thanks.

Tea



--
***************************************
Tea Meulia, PhD
Director
Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center
Ohio State University/OARDC
1680 Madison Ave.
Wooster OH 44691

tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828
fax: 330-202-3563

http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic

*****************************************

==============================Original Headers==============================
11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006
11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78])
11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GIH5xS001081
11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:05 -0500
11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164] (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164])
11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4GIH5AC031731
11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:05 -0400
11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu
11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]}
11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400
11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu}
11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations
11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled
11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound
11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.12
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: baskin-at-bio.umass.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:49:42 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: em immunolocalizations

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi,
In dealing with plant tissue, EGTA is included in buffers
because calcium chelation removes calcium cross bridges and probably
some pectin from the cell wall and allows antiboody access. Although
protocols for doing this originally called for having EGTA in the
fixation buffer, in our hands, we get better preservation if the EGTA
is included after the fixation as a separate incubation. The removal
of the calcium by the same token makes the cell wall weaker. You may
find quite distorted tissue. It may be possible to minimize this
distortion by including an incubation in mM CaCl2 after the 2nd
antibody and before dehydration.

Note that buffers with pipes, magnesium, and EGTA are not
microtubule stablizing (if that is what you mean by MTSB). They are
the standard buffers for studying microtubule dynamics in vitro.

Hope this helps.

Tobias
}
}
} We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations
} incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide.
}
} I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant
} tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using
} MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any
} reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the
} em work?
}
} Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save
} me trial time.
}
} Thanks.
}
} Tea
}
}
}
} --
} ***************************************
} Tea Meulia, PhD
} Director
} Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center
} Ohio State University/OARDC
} 1680 Madison Ave.
} Wooster OH 44691
}
} tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828
} fax: 330-202-3563
}
} http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic
}
} *****************************************
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006
} 11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu
} (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78])
} 11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
} ESMTP id k4GIH5xS001081
} 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
} 13:17:05 -0500
} 11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164]
} (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164])
} 11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with
} ESMTP id k4GIH5AC031731
} 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
} 14:17:05 -0400
} 11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
} 11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu
} 11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]}
} 11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400
} 11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu}
} 11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations
} 11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
} 11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled
} 11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound
} 11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.12
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================


--
_ ____ __ ____
/ \ / / \ / \ \ Tobias I. Baskin
/ / / / \ \ \ Biology Department
/_ / __ /__ \ \ \__ 611 N. Pleasant St.
/ / / \ \ \ University of Massachusetts
/ / / \ \ \ Amherst, MA, 01003
/ / ___ / \ \__/ \ ____
http://www.bio.umass.edu/biology/baskin/
Voice: 413 - 545 - 1533 Fax: 413 - 545 - 3243

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 19 -- From baskin-at-bio.umass.edu Tue May 16 13:49:41 2006
6, 19 -- Received: from marlin.bio.umass.edu (marlin.bio.umass.edu [128.119.55.19])
6, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GIneAg011467
6, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:49:40 -0500
6, 19 -- Received: from [172.30.55.79] (eutopia [128.119.55.30])
6, 19 -- by marlin.bio.umass.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4GInX2J014721;
6, 19 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 14:49:34 -0400 (EDT)
6, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 19 -- Message-Id: {p06230910c08fcda1fa6d-at-[172.30.55.79]}
6, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161817.k4GIHpce002224-at-ns.microscopy.com}
6, 19 -- References: {200605161817.k4GIHpce002224-at-ns.microscopy.com}
6, 19 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:49:32 -0400
6, 19 -- To: meulia.1-at-osu.edu
6, 19 -- From: Tobias Baskin {baskin-at-bio.umass.edu}
6, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations
6, 19 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
6, 19 -- X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (marlin.bio.umass.edu [128.119.55.19]); Tue, 16 May 2006 14:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
6, 19 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 128.119.55.19
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: phillipst-at-missouri.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:11 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi

I would suggest setting the specimen at a working distance of at least 15mm
so as to be outside the field of the lens. What may also help is to lower
the kV as this will also lower the lens field. Of course the kV level will
depend upon what you are asking of the specimen?

If you wish to examine the TRUE surface {5kV will be ideal. If you wish to
investigate the sub surface detail 15kV backscatter would probably be a good
starting point.

Do not try to use an upper detector if fitted tot he instrument as this will
require you being close to the lens. Lower detectors in a twin detector
system require a higher probe current (weaker C1) than that used for an
upper detector.

Good luck

Steve Chapman
Senior Consultant Protrain
For electron microscopy consultancy and training world wide
Tel +44 1280 816512 Fax +44 1280 814007
Mobile +44 7711 606967 Web www.emcourses.com


----- Original Message -----
X-from: {lewryan-at-gmail.com}
To: {protrain-at-emcourses.com}
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:04 PM

I need to look at some RBC's using SEM. anyone have a favorite protocol for
preparing them? Thanks, Tom



Thomas E. Phillips, PhD
Professor of Biological Sciences
Director, Molecular Cytology Core
2 Tucker Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211-7400

573-882-4712 (office)
573-882-0123 (fax)
PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu



==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 18 -- From PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu Tue May 16 13:54:11 2006
7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu (um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.49])
7, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GIsAWG019726
7, 18 -- for {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:10 -0500
7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.148]) by um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:07 -0500
7, 18 -- Received: from phillips-dell.missouri.edu ([128.206.81.132]) by um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500
7, 18 -- Message-Id: {6.0.0.22.2.20060516135251.01cc6e50-at-pop.missouri.edu}
7, 18 -- X-Sender: phillipst-at-pop.missouri.edu
7, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
7, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500
7, 18 -- To: Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com
7, 18 -- From: Tom Phillips {phillipst-at-missouri.edu}
7, 18 -- Subject: SEM of RBC's
7, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
7, 18 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 18:54:06.0810 (UTC) FILETIME=[1BBCB3A0:01C6791A]
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: TindallR-at-missouri.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:17 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Tom,

We've used poly-l-lysine cover slips and standard fixation/dehydration
procedures with good success. I believe some people have used HMDS
successfully, too.

Randy

-----Original Message-----
X-from: phillipst-at-missouri.edu [mailto:phillipst-at-missouri.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:55 PM
To: Tindall, Randy D.

I need to look at some RBC's using SEM. anyone have a favorite protocol
for preparing them? Thanks, Tom



Thomas E. Phillips, PhD
Professor of Biological Sciences
Director, Molecular Cytology Core
2 Tucker Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211-7400

573-882-4712 (office)
573-882-0123 (fax)
PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu



==============================Original
Headers==============================
7, 18 -- From PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu Tue May 16 13:54:11 2006
7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu
(um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.49])
7, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k4GIsAWG019726
7, 18 -- for {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
13:54:10 -0500
7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.148])
by um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:07 -0500
7, 18 -- Received: from phillips-dell.missouri.edu ([128.206.81.132]) by
um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500
7, 18 -- Message-Id:
{6.0.0.22.2.20060516135251.01cc6e50-at-pop.missouri.edu}
7, 18 -- X-Sender: phillipst-at-pop.missouri.edu
7, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
7, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500
7, 18 -- To: Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com
7, 18 -- From: Tom Phillips {phillipst-at-missouri.edu}
7, 18 -- Subject: SEM of RBC's
7, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
7, 18 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 18:54:06.0810 (UTC)
FILETIME=[1BBCB3A0:01C6791A]
==============================End of -
Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
16, 24 -- From TindallR-at-missouri.edu Tue May 16 14:08:17 2006
16, 24 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu (um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.49])
16, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GJ8GxK008815
16, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:17 -0500
16, 24 -- Received: from UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.31]) by um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
16, 24 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:16 -0500
16, 24 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
16, 24 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
16, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
16, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
16, 24 -- charset="US-ASCII"
16, 24 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's
16, 24 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:16 -0500
16, 24 -- Message-ID: {BA876152E8653240BE8572E897083EE701849FC4-at-UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu}
16, 24 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
16, 24 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
16, 24 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's
16, 24 -- thread-index: AcZ5Gj/IXaM4jxnBT36YosCHI/gn+wAAa8yQ
16, 24 -- From: "Tindall, Randy D." {TindallR-at-missouri.edu}
16, 24 -- To: "Phillips, Thomas E." {PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu}
16, 24 -- Cc: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
16, 24 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 19:08:16.0800 (UTC) FILETIME=[165EE200:01C6791C]
16, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
16, 24 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4GJ8GxK008815
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:32:01 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Rhinovirus negative stain

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi, All-

Someone wants to send me isolated, fixed rhinovirus on a grid for negative
staining and imaging. I have not worked with rhinovirus before. Does
anyone have a favorite protocol for fixation and staining? Glut or
PFA? Uranyl acetate or PTA?

Mahalo!
Tina

****************************************************************************
* Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu *
* Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 *
* University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf*
****************************************************************************


==============================Original Headers==============================
5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Tue May 16 14:32:01 2006
5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7])
5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GJVxtS019267
5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:32:00 -0500
5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GJVs2a020635
5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 09:31:55 -1000 (HST)
5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k4GJVrsk020630
5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 09:31:53 -1000 (HST)
5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs
5, 19 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:31:52 -1000 (HST)
5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu}
5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia
5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
5, 19 -- Subject: Rhinovirus negative stain
5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605160929390.20461-100000-at-halia}
5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:22:12 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] TEM water recirculator additives

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Sorry to bring this topic up again. I know it has been discussed:

What are the additives that can go in a water recirculator for a TEM?
I use to use a product called cool-prep and someone said ethylene
glycol in the same ratio.
Any thoughts on that?

thanks,
Beth

**********************************************************************
Beth Richardson
EM Lab Coordinator
Plant Biology Department
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602-7271

Phone - (706) 542-1790 & FAX - (706) 542-1805
http://www.plantbio.uga.edu/emlab

"Between the two evils,
I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980)
*******************************************************************

"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are".
Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)

************************************************************************
***



==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 18 -- From beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu Tue May 16 15:22:12 2006
10, 18 -- Received: from dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu (dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu [128.192.26.2])
10, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKMCnt030129
10, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:22:12 -0500
10, 18 -- Received: from plantbio.uga.edu ([128.192.26.46])
10, 18 -- by dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu
10, 18 -- (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits))
10, 18 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com;
10, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 16:22:08 -0400
10, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:22:10 -0400
10, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
10, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
10, 18 -- Subject: TEM water recirculator additives
10, 18 -- From: Beth Richardson {beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
10, 18 -- To: microscopy microscopy {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
10, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
10, 18 -- Message-Id: {A74986B8-E519-11DA-BE3A-000393137C00-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
10, 18 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:28:59 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Hmmm... what is RBC

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Colleagues....

For those few of us that are not in the life science arena
what is an RBC?

I'm just curious as to what the abrievations mean.

Your Friendly Neighborhood SysOp.

Nestor
--
===========================================
Dr. Nestor J. Zaluzec
Argonne National Lab
Electron Microscopy Center
Materials Science Division/Bldg 212
9700 S. Cass Ave
Argonne, Illinois 60439 USA
Tel: 630-252-7901, Fax: 630-252-4798
Email: Zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov
===========================================
TPMLab: http://tpm.amc.anl.gov
MMSite: http://www.amc.anl.gov
===========================================

The box said ...
"This program requires Win 95/98/NT or better..."
So I bought a Mac !

===========================================

==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 14 -- From zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov Tue May 16 15:28:59 2006
7, 14 -- Received: from aaem.amc.anl.gov (aaem.amc.anl.gov [146.139.72.3])
7, 14 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKSxYv007613
7, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:28:59 -0500
7, 14 -- Received: from [146.139.72.105] (aem105.amc.anl.gov [146.139.72.105])
7, 14 -- by aaem.amc.anl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4GKSvQ4019849
7, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:28:58 -0500
7, 14 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 14 -- Message-Id: {p06110404c08fe5ae32a9-at-[146.139.72.105]}
7, 14 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:28:56 -0500
7, 14 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 14 -- From: "Nestor J. Zaluzec" {zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov}
7, 14 -- Subject: Hmmm... what is RBC
7, 14 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: edelmare-at-muohio.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:32:16 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Sizing 60-atom bucky balls

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

O.k., folks here's an odd problem:

I've got a user who wants to characterize 60-atom Carbon
Buckyballs. Now He wants to start by determining if they clump,
form larger groupsing etc. when mixed into ultra pure water (Q-
water), and then other quality waters. So, any one out there have
any idea on how to determine simple sizing? In a hydrated state?
In suspension? At potentially nanoscale? Obviously, going EM
requires drying them down - which artifically modifys the samples.
Cryo- might work but we don't have the capability here. SPM might
work but how to adhere to a surface for imaging? Diffraction of
some sort?

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance!

Richard E. Edelmann, Ph.D.
Associate Editor of EXPO, Microscopy and Microanalysis Supplement
Electron Microscopy Facility Director
364 Pearson Hall
Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056
Ph: 513.529.5712 Fax: 513.529.4243
E-mail: edelmare-at-muohio.edu
http://www.emf.muohio.edu

==============================Original Headers==============================
5, 23 -- From edelmare-at-muohio.edu Tue May 16 15:32:16 2006
5, 23 -- Received: from mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.6.67])
5, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKWG5v013777
5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:32:16 -0500
5, 23 -- Received: from mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.6.11])
5, 23 -- by mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4GKWEox022092
5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:14 -0400
5, 23 -- Received: from emf03 ([134.53.14.97])
5, 23 -- by mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id k4GKWDBu018999
5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:13 -0400
5, 23 -- From: "Richard E. Edelmann" {edelmare-at-muohio.edu}
5, 23 -- To: microscopy-at-Microscopy.com
5, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:39:28 -0400
5, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
5, 23 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
5, 23 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
5, 23 -- Subject: Sizing 60-atom bucky balls
5, 23 -- Message-ID: {446A0040.18005.1D72926-at-localhost}
5, 23 -- Priority: normal
5, 23 -- X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
5, 23 -- X-Real-ConnectIP: 134.53.14.97
5, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45
5, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 134.53.6.11
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: pgrover-at-bilbo.bio.purdue.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:33:16 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] re: RBC

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Nestor, Finally a question I can answer for someone!
RBC = Red Blood Cell (~7 microns or so in size)

Not to be confused with TLA (three letter acronym) or DAP (Parents against
Dyslexia) ;o)

Paul

----------------------------------------------------------------
Though the boys throw stones at the frogs in sport, the frogs
do not die in sport, but in earnest. - Plutarch



==============================Original Headers==============================
5, 21 -- From pgrover-at-bilbo.bio.purdue.edu Tue May 16 15:33:15 2006
5, 21 -- Received: from mailhub129.itcs.purdue.edu (mailhub129.itcs.purdue.edu [128.210.5.129])
5, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKXFi0016952
5, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:33:15 -0500
5, 21 -- Received: from paklabpgrover (dhcp155-122.bio.purdue.edu [128.210.155.122])
5, 21 -- by mailhub129.itcs.purdue.edu (8.13.6/8.13.4/internal-smtp) with ESMTP id k4GKXErl018860
5, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:33:15 -0400
5, 21 -- From: "pgrover" {pgrover-at-bilbo.bio.purdue.edu}
5, 21 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
5, 21 -- Subject: re: RBC
5, 21 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:33:18 -0400
5, 21 -- Message-ID: {000001c67927$f7957350$7a9bd280-at-paklabpgrover}
5, 21 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
5, 21 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
5, 21 -- charset="us-ascii"
5, 21 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
5, 21 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
5, 21 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5J/dsq3a+geObQAWpSodYpvluUQ==
5, 21 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
5, 21 -- X-PMX-Version: 5.1.2.240295
5, 21 -- X-PerlMx-Virus-Scanned: Yes
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:41:34 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM water recirculator additives

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Beth,

I use deionized water only (no additives) and have had no problems over the
past twenty years. An important note is that we prevent the growth of
algae by plumbing all our chillers and microscopes with opaque water hose.
We never have algae, or any other, growth in our chillers.

Regards,

Gary M. Brown
ExxonMobil Chemical Company
Baytown Technology & Engineering - West
5200 Bayway Drive
Baytown, Texas 77520-2101
phone: 281 834 2387
fax: 281 834 2395
e-mail: Gary.M.Brown-at-ExxonMobil.com



beth-at-plantbio.
uga.edu
To
gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
05/16/06 03:24 cc
PM
Subject
[Microscopy] TEM water recirculator
Please respond additives
to
beth-at-plantbio.
uga.edu










----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


Sorry to bring this topic up again. I know it has been discussed:

What are the additives that can go in a water recirculator for a TEM?
I use to use a product called cool-prep and someone said ethylene
glycol in the same ratio.
Any thoughts on that?

thanks,
Beth

**********************************************************************
Beth Richardson
EM Lab Coordinator
Plant Biology Department
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602-7271

Phone - (706) 542-1790 & FAX - (706) 542-1805
http://www.plantbio.uga.edu/emlab

"Between the two evils,
I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980)
*******************************************************************

"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are".
Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)

************************************************************************
***



==============================Original
Headers==============================
10, 18 -- From beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu Tue May 16 15:22:12 2006
10, 18 -- Received: from dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu (dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu
[128.192.26.2])
10, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k4GKMCnt030129
10, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
15:22:12 -0500
10, 18 -- Received: from plantbio.uga.edu ([128.192.26.46])
10, 18 -- by dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu
10, 18 -- (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits))
10, 18 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com;
10, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 16:22:08 -0400
10, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:22:10 -0400
10, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
10, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
10, 18 -- Subject: TEM water recirculator additives
10, 18 -- From: Beth Richardson {beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
10, 18 -- To: microscopy microscopy {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
10, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
10, 18 -- Message-Id:
{A74986B8-E519-11DA-BE3A-000393137C00-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
10, 18 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
==============================End of -
Headers==============================



==============================Original Headers==============================
28, 19 -- From gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com Tue May 16 15:41:34 2006
28, 19 -- Received: from hoespc02.exxonmobil.com (hoespc02.exxonmobil.com [192.67.48.39])
28, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKfX46004768
28, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:41:34 -0500
28, 19 -- Received: from hounmg03.NA.XOM.COM (hounmg03.na.xom.com [158.35.101.41])
28, 19 -- by hoespc02.exxonmobil.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4GKfFwH016162;
28, 19 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 15:41:15 -0500 (CDT)
28, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605162024.k4GKOIIb001407-at-ns.microscopy.com}
28, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM water recirculator additives
28, 19 -- Importance:
28, 19 -- To: beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu, microscopy-at-microscopy.com
28, 19 -- X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004
28, 19 -- Message-ID: {OF5CEA6C9F.E794C4CE-ON86257170.0070DB22-86257170.0071A9C4-at-exxonmobil.com}
28, 19 -- From: gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
28, 19 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:41:32 -0500
28, 19 -- X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Hounmg03.na.xom.com/S/ExxonMobil(652FP1HF193|March
28, 19 -- 02, 2006) at 05/16/2006 03:41:32 PM
28, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
28, 19 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:43:37 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Hmmm... what is RBC

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I would suggest small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). Can be done
hydrated.

See, for example:

http://www.uni.aps.anl.gov/usaxs/

Jeffrey A. Fortner, Ph.D.
Chemical Engineering Division
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, IL 60439
fortner(at)cmt.anl.gov



-----Original Message-----
X-from: edelmare-at-muohio.edu [mailto:edelmare-at-muohio.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:33 PM
To: Fortner, Jeffrey A.

O.k., folks here's an odd problem:

I've got a user who wants to characterize 60-atom Carbon
Buckyballs. Now He wants to start by determining if they clump, form
larger groupsing etc. when mixed into ultra pure water (Q- water), and
then other quality waters. So, any one out there have any idea on how
to determine simple sizing? In a hydrated state?
In suspension? At potentially nanoscale? Obviously, going EM requires
drying them down - which artifically modifys the samples.
Cryo- might work but we don't have the capability here. SPM might work
but how to adhere to a surface for imaging? Diffraction of some sort?

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance!

Richard E. Edelmann, Ph.D.
Associate Editor of EXPO, Microscopy and Microanalysis Supplement
Electron Microscopy Facility Director
364 Pearson Hall
Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056
Ph: 513.529.5712 Fax: 513.529.4243
E-mail: edelmare-at-muohio.edu
http://www.emf.muohio.edu

==============================Original
Headers==============================
5, 23 -- From edelmare-at-muohio.edu Tue May 16 15:32:16 2006 5, 23 --
Received: from mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu
[134.53.6.67])
5, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k4GKWG5v013777
5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
15:32:16 -0500
5, 23 -- Received: from mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu
[134.53.6.11])
5, 23 -- by mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7)
with ESMTP id k4GKWEox022092
5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
16:32:14 -0400
5, 23 -- Received: from emf03 ([134.53.14.97])
5, 23 -- by mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.6)
with ESMTP id k4GKWDBu018999
5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
16:32:13 -0400
5, 23 -- From: "Richard E. Edelmann" {edelmare-at-muohio.edu} 5, 23 -- To:
microscopy-at-Microscopy.com 5, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:39:28 -0400
5, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 5, 23 -- Content-type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII 5, 23 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT 5, 23 --

Nester,

RBC is the acronym for "red blood cells".

Cheers,

Gary M. Brown
ExxonMobil Chemical Company
Baytown Technology & Engineering - West
5200 Bayway Drive
Baytown, Texas 77520-2101
phone: 281 834 2387
fax: 281 834 2395
e-mail: Gary.M.Brown-at-ExxonMobil.com



zaluzec-at-aaem.a
mc.anl.gov
To
gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
05/16/06 03:31 cc
PM
Subject
[Microscopy] Hmmm... what is RBC
Please respond
to
zaluzec-at-aaem.a
mc.anl.gov









----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


Colleagues....

For those few of us that are not in the life science arena
what is an RBC?

I'm just curious as to what the abrievations mean.

Your Friendly Neighborhood SysOp.

Nestor
--
===========================================
Dr. Nestor J. Zaluzec
Argonne National Lab
Electron Microscopy Center
Materials Science Division/Bldg 212
9700 S. Cass Ave
Argonne, Illinois 60439 USA
Tel: 630-252-7901, Fax: 630-252-4798
Email: Zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov
===========================================
TPMLab: http://tpm.amc.anl.gov
MMSite: http://www.amc.anl.gov
===========================================

The box said ...
"This program requires Win 95/98/NT or better..."
So I bought a Mac !

===========================================

==============================Original
Headers==============================
7, 14 -- From zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov Tue May 16 15:28:59 2006
7, 14 -- Received: from aaem.amc.anl.gov (aaem.amc.anl.gov [146.139.72.3])
7, 14 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k4GKSxYv007613
7, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
15:28:59 -0500
7, 14 -- Received: from [146.139.72.105] (aem105.amc.anl.gov
[146.139.72.105])
7, 14 -- by aaem.amc.anl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with
ESMTP id k4GKSvQ4019849
7, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
15:28:58 -0500
7, 14 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
7, 14 -- Message-Id: {p06110404c08fe5ae32a9-at-[146.139.72.105]}
7, 14 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:28:56 -0500
7, 14 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 14 -- From: "Nestor J. Zaluzec" {zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov}
7, 14 -- Subject: Hmmm... what is RBC
7, 14 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
==============================End of -
Headers==============================



==============================Original Headers==============================
25, 20 -- From gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com Tue May 16 15:43:37 2006
25, 20 -- Received: from hoespc01.exxonmobil.com (hoespc01.exxonmobil.com [192.67.48.38])
25, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKhaFR012118
25, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:43:36 -0500
25, 20 -- Received: from hounmg03.NA.XOM.COM (hounmg03.na.xom.com [158.35.101.41])
25, 20 -- by hoespc01.exxonmobil.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4GKh8Ea013515;
25, 20 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 15:43:09 -0500 (CDT)
25, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605162031.k4GKV022011336-at-ns.microscopy.com}
25, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Hmmm... what is RBC
25, 20 -- Importance:
25, 20 -- To: zaluzec-at-aaem.amc.anl.gov
25, 20 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
25, 20 -- X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004
25, 20 -- Message-ID: {OF2E824BE6.BFAA2F4E-ON86257170.0071BD0E-86257170.0071D8A6-at-exxonmobil.com}
25, 20 -- From: gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com
25, 20 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:43:32 -0500
25, 20 -- X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Hounmg03.na.xom.com/S/ExxonMobil(652FP1HF193|March
25, 20 -- 02, 2006) at 05/16/2006 03:43:32 PM
25, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
25, 20 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dsherman-at-purdue.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:54:16 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Human red blood cells respond nicely to fairly routine fixatives. We use
cacodylate with Ca, Mg, and NaCl added as buffer system but biological
buffers such as PIPES should work also.

However, be aware the RBC's from other animals have different osmotic
requirements and may crenellate easily when the H-RBCs are fine. We ran
into real problems with mouse RBC's a while back. Only sure way to avoid
problems is to check and balance osmolarity of fixatives for the specific
host RBCs.

Debby

Debby Sherman, Manager Phone: 765-494-6666
Life Science Microscopy Facility FAX: 765-494-5896
Purdue University E-mail: dsherman-at-purdue.edu
S-052 Whistler Building
170 S. University Street
West Lafayette, IN 47907
http://www3.agriculture.purdue.edu/microscopy


} From: {TindallR-at-missouri.edu}
} Reply-To: {TindallR-at-missouri.edu}
} Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:11:02 -0500
} To: {dsherman-at-purdue.edu}
} Subject: [Microscopy] RE: SEM of RBC's
}
}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Tom,
}
} We've used poly-l-lysine cover slips and standard fixation/dehydration
} procedures with good success. I believe some people have used HMDS
} successfully, too.
}
} Randy
}
} -----Original Message-----
} X-from: phillipst-at-missouri.edu [mailto:phillipst-at-missouri.edu]
} Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:55 PM
} To: Tindall, Randy D.
} Subject: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's
}
}
}
}
} ------------------------------------------------------------------------
} ----
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of
} America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ------------------------------------------------------------------------
} ----
}
} I need to look at some RBC's using SEM. anyone have a favorite protocol
} for preparing them? Thanks, Tom
}
}
}
} Thomas E. Phillips, PhD
} Professor of Biological Sciences
} Director, Molecular Cytology Core
} 2 Tucker Hall
} University of Missouri
} Columbia, MO 65211-7400
}
} 573-882-4712 (office)
} 573-882-0123 (fax)
} PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu
}
}
}
} ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} 7, 18 -- From PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu Tue May 16 13:54:11 2006
} 7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu
} (um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.49])
} 7, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
} ESMTP id k4GIsAWG019726
} 7, 18 -- for {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006
} 13:54:10 -0500
} 7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.148])
} by um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
} 7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:07 -0500
} 7, 18 -- Received: from phillips-dell.missouri.edu ([128.206.81.132]) by
} um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft
} SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
} 7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500
} 7, 18 -- Message-Id:
} {6.0.0.22.2.20060516135251.01cc6e50-at-pop.missouri.edu}
} 7, 18 -- X-Sender: phillipst-at-pop.missouri.edu
} 7, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
} 7, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500
} 7, 18 -- To: Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com
} 7, 18 -- From: Tom Phillips {phillipst-at-missouri.edu}
} 7, 18 -- Subject: SEM of RBC's
} 7, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
} 7, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
} 7, 18 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 18:54:06.0810 (UTC)
} FILETIME=[1BBCB3A0:01C6791A]
} ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================
}
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 16, 24 -- From TindallR-at-missouri.edu Tue May 16 14:08:17 2006
} 16, 24 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu
} (um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.49])
} 16, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
} k4GJ8GxK008815
} 16, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:17 -0500
} 16, 24 -- Received: from UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.31]) by
} um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
} 16, 24 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:16 -0500
} 16, 24 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
} 16, 24 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
} 16, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 16, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
} 16, 24 -- charset="US-ASCII"
} 16, 24 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's
} 16, 24 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:16 -0500
} 16, 24 -- Message-ID:
} {BA876152E8653240BE8572E897083EE701849FC4-at-UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu}
} 16, 24 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
} 16, 24 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
} 16, 24 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's
} 16, 24 -- thread-index: AcZ5Gj/IXaM4jxnBT36YosCHI/gn+wAAa8yQ
} 16, 24 -- From: "Tindall, Randy D." {TindallR-at-missouri.edu}
} 16, 24 -- To: "Phillips, Thomas E." {PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu}
} 16, 24 -- Cc: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 16, 24 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 19:08:16.0800 (UTC)
} FILETIME=[165EE200:01C6791C]
} 16, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
} 16, 24 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by
} ns.microscopy.com id k4GJ8GxK008815
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 23 -- From dsherman-at-purdue.edu Tue May 16 15:54:16 2006
7, 23 -- Received: from exchange.purdue.edu (1061exfe02.adpc.purdue.edu [128.210.63.223])
7, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKsGb8002076
7, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:54:16 -0500
7, 23 -- Received: from exchange.purdue.edu ([128.210.63.234]) by exchange.purdue.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
7, 23 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 16:54:15 -0400
7, 23 -- Received: from 128.210.161.94 ([128.210.161.94]) by EXCH02.purdue.lcl ([128.210.63.237]) via Exchange Front-End Server exch.itap.purdue.edu ([128.210.63.239]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ;
7, 23 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 20:54:15 +0000
7, 23 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209
7, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:54:14 -0400
7, 23 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] RE: SEM of RBC's
7, 23 -- From: Debby Sherman {dsherman-at-purdue.edu}
7, 23 -- To: Randy Tindall {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} ,
7, 23 -- "message to: MSA list" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
7, 23 -- Message-ID: {C08FB436.10893%dsherman-at-purdue.edu}
7, 23 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] RE: SEM of RBC's
7, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5KuOOIlbu4uUeEdq+igARJN08Mg==
7, 23 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161911.k4GJB2I3012913-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 23 -- Mime-version: 1.0
7, 23 -- Content-type: text/plain;
7, 23 -- charset="US-ASCII"
7, 23 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
7, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 20:54:15.0879 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4AD5570:01C6792A]
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tivol-at-caltech.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:59:24 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM water recirculator additives

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


On May 16, 2006, at 1:22 PM, beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu wrote:

} Sorry to bring this topic up again. I know it has been discussed:
}
} What are the additives that can go in a water recirculator for a TEM?
} I use to use a product called cool-prep and someone said ethylene
} glycol in the same ratio.
} Any thoughts on that?
}
Dear Beth,
I don't know what is in cool-prep, but if ethylene glycol is a good
substitute, it sounds like anti-freeze. The important things for a TEM
water additive are to prevent corrosion and growth of bacteria and
algae, but the cooling water is not so cold that anti-freeze is
necessary. I have added a molybdenum-based corrosion inhibitor and the
chemical 2,2'-Methylenebis(4-chloro-phenol), AKA dichlorophene, to
inhibit growth with good effect. It is also important to keep the pH
at ~8 to prevent Cu from dissolving.
Yours,
Bill Tivol, PhD
EM Scientist and Manager
Cryo-Electron Microscopy Facility
Broad Center, Mail Code 114-96
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena CA 91125
(626) 395-8833
tivol-at-caltech.edu


==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 22 -- From tivol-at-caltech.edu Tue May 16 15:59:24 2006
4, 22 -- Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19])
4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKxOnP011992
4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:59:24 -0500
4, 22 -- Received: from water-dog.caltech.edu (water-dog [192.168.1.26])
4, 22 -- by fire-ox-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BF736587
4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
4, 22 -- Received: from [192.168.157.234] (pix-1.caltech.edu [131.215.2.21])
4, 22 -- by earth-ox.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636B510B473
4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
4, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
4, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605162022.k4GKMSWF030299-at-ns.microscopy.com}
4, 22 -- References: {200605162022.k4GKMSWF030299-at-ns.microscopy.com}
4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
4, 22 -- Message-Id: {9b9f76870a81061eedc92a3f407cecae-at-caltech.edu}
4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
4, 22 -- From: Bill Tivol {tivol-at-caltech.edu}
4, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM water recirculator additives
4, 22 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:09:49 -0700
4, 22 -- To: microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com
4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)
4, 22 -- X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-ITS on water-dog by amavisd-2.3.3
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: vitalylazar-at-att.net
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:22:48 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Sodium compound

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hello listers,

Please suggest a sodium compound soluble in hydrocarbons such as light oil
or kerosene. Must be non-corrosive. Non-toxic preferred.

Vitaly Feingold
SIA
2773 Heath Line
Duluth GA 30096
Ph. 770-232-7785
Fax 770-232-1791
www.sia-cam.com


==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 20 -- From vitalylazar-at-att.net Tue May 16 16:22:48 2006
4, 20 -- Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117])
4, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GLMmoe022342
4, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:22:48 -0500
4, 20 -- Received: from siap6segs20pa8 (h-68-166-27-55.atlngahp.dynamic.covad.net[68.166.27.55])
4, 20 -- by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP
4, 20 -- id {20060516212247113007pv8ge} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 21:22:47 +0000
4, 20 -- Message-ID: {019901c6792e$e0641630$6801a8c0-at-siap6segs20pa8}
4, 20 -- From: "Vitaly Feingold" {vitalylazar-at-att.net}
4, 20 -- To: "Microscopy Listserver" {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
4, 20 -- Subject: Sodium compound
4, 20 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:22:35 -0400
4, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
4, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
4, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
4, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
4, 20 -- X-Priority: 3
4, 20 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
4, 20 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
4, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:28:49 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Rhinovirus - thanks

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Thanks, all, for the suggestions about negative staining of rhinovirus.

With one notorious exception, I have never had to fix virus before
staining, but these people want to send me fixed rhinovirus on commercial
non-glow-discharged grids (sigh). And it looks like I'll try my usual
stable of stains; UrAc, PTA, and NH4M.

Mahalo,
Tina

****************************************************************************
* Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu *
* Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 *
* University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf*
****************************************************************************



==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Tue May 16 17:28:49 2006
6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7])
6, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMSmTE000510
6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:28:49 -0500
6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
6, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GMSjGY022033
6, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:28:46 -1000 (HST)
6, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k4GMSjrc022030
6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:28:45 -1000 (HST)
6, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs
6, 19 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:28:44 -1000 (HST)
6, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu}
6, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia
6, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
6, 19 -- Subject: Rhinovirus - thanks
6, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605161225040.21962-100000-at-halia}
6, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
6, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: tivol-at-caltech.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:32:34 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] TEM water recirculator additives

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


On May 16, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Yang, Ann-Fook wrote:

} Please let us know how much you put in. Thank you.
}
Hi Ann-Fook,
I aim for 100 ppm of the Mo, as determined by a test kit, K1805, from
Taylor Technonogies, Inc. This is somewhat complicated due to not
knowing how much water is in the Haskris and how much is in the tubing,
lenses, etc., so I add a few hundred ml of the corrosion inhibitor,
check it monthly, and add more when necessary. After a few months, you
will get a pretty good idea of how much inhibitor it takes to increase
the ppm Mo by a given amount. I just float a small amount of the
dichlorophene on top of the water in the Haskris--it's not very
soluble--and add more when little solid remains.
Yours,
Bill


==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 22 -- From tivol-at-caltech.edu Tue May 16 17:32:34 2006
4, 22 -- Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19])
4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMWY3i006767
4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:32:34 -0500
4, 22 -- Received: from water-dog.caltech.edu (water-dog [192.168.1.26])
4, 22 -- by water-ox-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP
4, 22 -- id C3ABC34F3D; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
4, 22 -- Received: from [192.168.157.234] (pix-1.caltech.edu [131.215.2.21])
4, 22 -- by water-ox.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
4, 22 -- id D0245354CB; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
4, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
4, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334EC-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca}
4, 22 -- References: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334EC-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca}
4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
4, 22 -- Message-Id: {c8fa41ce51653c0128aaf93b4f011bed-at-caltech.edu}
4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
4, 22 -- From: Bill Tivol {tivol-at-caltech.edu}
4, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: TEM water recirculator additives
4, 22 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:35:35 -0700
4, 22 -- To: microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com, "Yang, Ann-Fook" {YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA}
4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)
4, 22 -- X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-ITS on water-dog by amavisd-2.3.3
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:45:55 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Just wanted to thank everyone for the responses to my posting about the
TEM water chiller additives.
I'll try just using distilled water and monitoring the system more
frequently.
Thank you!
Beth

**********************************************************************
Beth Richardson
EM Lab Coordinator
Plant Biology Department
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602-7271

Phone - (706) 542-1790 & FAX - (706) 542-1805
http://www.plantbio.uga.edu/emlab

"Between the two evils,
I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980)
*******************************************************************

"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are".
Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)

************************************************************************
***



==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 18 -- From beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu Tue May 16 17:45:55 2006
8, 18 -- Received: from dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu (dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu [128.192.26.2])
8, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMjtKd020325
8, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:45:55 -0500
8, 18 -- Received: from plantbio.uga.edu ([128.192.26.46])
8, 18 -- by dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu
8, 18 -- (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits))
8, 18 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com;
8, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 18:45:51 -0400
8, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:45:53 -0400
8, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
8, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
8, 18 -- Subject: thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator
8, 18 -- From: Beth Richardson {beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
8, 18 -- To: microscopy microscopy {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
8, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
8, 18 -- Message-Id: {BB317B38-E52D-11DA-BE3A-000393137C00-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
8, 18 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:51:18 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: em immunolocalizations

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Quite a while ago now I did some pre-embedding immunogold labelling, and
fixed in phosphate rather than Pipes buffer, using 2 mM rather than 5 mM Mg
and EGTA. I think use the fixative that works best for what you're after,
I'd suggest using the same fixative/buffer combination as for the LM work,
taking on board Tobias' comments about how EGTA softens the walls causing
some tissue distortion if you're not careful.

When I did this, I then cut frozen sections, rinsed in PBS then labelled the
sections on slides with antibodies in PBS, after the usual blocking in BSA
or gelatin. Then embedded the sections in Spurr's (messy) before sectioning
for TEM. I did this to get greater penetration of label into tissue, while
avoiding the original cut surface of the tissue block.

good luck,
cheers,
Rosemary


Rosemary White rosemary.white-at-csiro.au
CSIRO Plant Industry ph. 02-6246 5475
GPO Box 1600 mob. 0402 835 973
Canberra, ACT 2601 fax. 02-6246 5334
Australia


} From: meulia.1-at-osu.edu
} Reply-To: meulia.1-at-osu.edu
} Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:19:55 -0500
} To: rosemary.white-at-csiro.au
} Subject: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations
}
}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations
} incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide.
}
} I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant
} tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using
} MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any
} reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the
} em work?
}
} Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save
} me trial time.
}
} Thanks.
}
} Tea
}
}
}
} --
} ***************************************
} Tea Meulia, PhD
} Director
} Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center
} Ohio State University/OARDC
} 1680 Madison Ave.
} Wooster OH 44691
}
} tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828
} fax: 330-202-3563
}
} http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic
}
} *****************************************
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006
} 11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu
} (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78])
} 11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
} k4GIH5xS001081
} 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:05 -0500
} 11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164]
} (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164])
} 11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
} k4GIH5AC031731
} 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:05 -0400
} 11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
} 11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu
} 11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]}
} 11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400
} 11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu}
} 11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations
} 11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
} 11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled
} 11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound
} 11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.12
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================
}

==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 22 -- From Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au Tue May 16 17:51:17 2006
7, 22 -- Received: from act-MTAout6.csiro.au (act-MTAout6.csiro.au [150.229.7.43])
7, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMpGIO030218
7, 22 -- for {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:51:17 -0500
7, 22 -- DomainKey-Signature: s=email; d=csiro.au; c=nofws; q=dns; b=CtH5eq0n7NhwH/zu+AOFn0CNv9fLVrTMaTXnfBEZo4kYpLhxiFeD2RgI+/wLp0iJUo8yaVMHLXIZLatlQlztjp/7BsIH8dZDFC/GmX6TQ2f9X94vVHhYppLtYxShzvdG;
7, 22 -- Received: from exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au ([138.194.3.56])
7, 22 -- by act-MTAout6.csiro.au with ESMTP; 17 May 2006 08:51:15 +1000
7, 22 -- X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,135,1146405600";
7, 22 -- d="scan'208"; a="94577057:sNHT25900424"
7, 22 -- Received: from [152.83.167.45] ([152.83.167.45]) by exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
7, 22 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 08:51:14 +1000
7, 22 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
7, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:53:23 +1000
7, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations
7, 22 -- From: Rosemary White {Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au}
7, 22 -- To: {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com}
7, 22 -- Message-ID: {C0909503.167AA%Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au}
7, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161819.k4GIJtIV005765-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 22 -- Mime-version: 1.0
7, 22 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
7, 22 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
7, 22 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 22:51:14.0869 (UTC) FILETIME=[3C523650:01C6793B]
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: leunissen-at-aurion.nl
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:23:03 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: em immunolocalizations

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Tea,

The buffer you indicated may be fine, although a word of warning may be
in place: be careful when using divalent cations like Mg2+ . We've
never actually tested this for gold conjugates but such ions cause
aggregates of gold particles even at very low concentrations. The
coating proteins should help preventing that but it may still happen.
If that buffer, as Tobias Baskin indicates, is used to open cell walls
to antibodies, then it may be sufficient if it is applied only to
obtain that effect, i.e. fix, treat with the permeabilising buffer and
then wash with PBS a few times before proceeding using the same
protocol that was used for your animal tissue.

Good luck

Jan

On May 17, 2006, at 6:17 AM, meulia.1-at-osu.edu wrote:

}
}
}
} -----------------------------------------------------------------------
} -----
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of
} America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe --
} http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} -----------------------------------------------------------------------
} -----
}
} We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations
} incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide.
}
} I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant
} tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using
} MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any
} reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the
} em work?
}
} Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save
} me trial time.
}
} Thanks.
}
} Tea
}
}
}
} --
} ***************************************
} Tea Meulia, PhD
} Director
} Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center
} Ohio State University/OARDC
} 1680 Madison Ave.
} Wooster OH 44691
}
} tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828
} fax: 330-202-3563
}
} http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic
}
} *****************************************
}
} ==============================Original
} Headers==============================
} 11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006
} 11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu
} (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78])
} 11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP
} id k4GIH5xS001081
} 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:05
} -0500
} 11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164]
} (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164])
} 11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
} k4GIH5AC031731
} 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:05
} -0400
} 11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
} 11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu
} 11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]}
} 11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400
} 11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu}
} 11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations
} 11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ;
} format="flowed"
} 11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled
} 11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound
} 11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on
} 128.146.216.12
} ==============================End of -
} Headers==============================
}


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 22 -- From leunissen-at-aurion.nl Tue May 16 19:23:02 2006
7, 22 -- Received: from mailhub1.otago.ac.nz (mailhub1.otago.ac.nz [139.80.64.218])
7, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4H0N0Hw009205
7, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:23:02 -0500
7, 22 -- Received: from galadriel.otago.ac.nz (galadriel.otago.ac.nz [139.80.64.213])
7, 22 -- by mailhub1.otago.ac.nz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4H0MvS7004469;
7, 22 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 12:22:58 +1200
7, 22 -- Received: from ou034063.otago.ac.nz ([139.80.34.63])
7, 22 -- by galadriel.otago.ac.nz with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
7, 22 -- id 1Fg9oW-0001BU-P9; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:22:56 +1200
7, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161817.k4GIHShJ001598-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 22 -- References: {200605161817.k4GIHShJ001598-at-ns.microscopy.com}
7, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
7, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
7, 22 -- Message-Id: {af5cfb1e829a31cdaf5d162318f247f3-at-aurion.nl}
7, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
7, 22 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 22 -- From: Jan Leunissen {leunissen-at-aurion.nl}
7, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations
7, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:22:57 +1200
7, 22 -- To: meulia.1-at-osu.edu
7, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624)
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: bfoster-at-mme1.com
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:27:49 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Sizing 60-atom bucky balls

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi, Richard

This should be another interesting AFM experiment, done with liquid cell. It would be helpful, however, to get them to adhere to a substrate first, so that they don't roll around. Contact me off-line and we can probably put together a protocol for you. Also, if you can get samples, we can try to run them here. We have an AFM that can run in liquid.

Hope this is helpful,

Barbara Foster

Microscopy/Microscopy Education
313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100
Allen, TX 75002
P: 972-954-8011
W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com


MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.

P. S.
Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.





At 03:35 PM 5/16/2006, edelmare-at-muohio.edu wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America



==============================Original Headers==============================
18, 17 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Tue May 16 21:27:49 2006
18, 17 -- Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.202])
18, 17 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4H2RnQ9021264
18, 17 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 21:27:49 -0500
18, 17 -- Received: (qmail 16839 invoked from network); 17 May 2006 02:27:47 -0000
18, 17 -- Received: from unknown (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (bfostermme-at-sbcglobal.net-at-68.94.44.10 with login)
18, 17 -- by smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 May 2006 02:27:47 -0000
18, 17 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060516212508.0206a450-at-mme1.com}
18, 17 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
18, 17 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:27:55 -0500
18, 17 -- To: edelmare-at-muohio.edu, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
18, 17 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com}
18, 17 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Sizing 60-atom bucky balls
18, 17 -- In-Reply-To: {200605162035.k4GKZYsq025773-at-ns.microscopy.com}
18, 17 -- References: {200605162035.k4GKZYsq025773-at-ns.microscopy.com}
18, 17 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
18, 17 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:54:06 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net)
from on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 19:19:11
Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to both Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net as well as to the Microscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net
Name: Dave Steklenski

Organization: Catherine McAuley School, Rochester NY

Education: K-8 Grade Grammar School

Location: Rochester NY

Question: We are planning an elementary microscopy lab using a variety of natural and synthetic fibers. I would like to locat some photomicrographs of sample fibers so the kids could compare their observations to know appearance samples. I have been unable to find a good set of micrographs on the web.......are there any common references that might have some useable pictures.

THANK you for the help!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com Wed May 17 06:54:05 2006
8, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
8, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HBs451007049
8, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 06:54:05 -0500
8, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
8, 12 -- X-Sender: zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com (Unverified)
8, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c090bf37075f-at-[206.69.208.22]}
8, 12 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:54:04 -0500
8, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
8, 12 -- From: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net (by way of Ask-A-Microscopist)
8, 12 -- Subject: [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab
8, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: milindphd-at-gmail.com
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:54:53 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] AskAMicroscopist: multilamellar vesicle

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Below is the result of your feedback form (NJZFM-ultra-55). It was submitted by (milindphd-at-gmail.com) from http://www.microscopy.com/Ask-A-Microscopist/Ask-A-Microscopist.html on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 00:52:35
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: milindphd-at-gmail.com
Name: Milind Redkar

Organization: University institute of chemical technology

Education: Graduate College

Location: mumbai,India

Question: please let me know, why multilamellar vesicle show maltese crosses when veiwed with crosspolarizing microscopy.?

what is the difference between conoscopy and microscopy with resoect to multilamellar vesicles?


Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com Wed May 17 06:54:53 2006
10, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
10, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HBsq2j007597
10, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 06:54:52 -0500
10, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
10, 12 -- X-Sender: zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com (Unverified)
10, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110402c090bf7615ee-at-[206.69.208.22]}
10, 12 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:54:51 -0500
10, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
10, 12 -- From: milindphd-at-gmail.com (by way of Ask-A-Microscopist)
10, 12 -- Subject: AskAMicroscopist: multilamellar vesicle
10, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: opmills-at-mtu.edu
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:10:59 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] free 35C parts

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I have a small box of new JEOL 35C electronic parts. Potentiometers,
lamps, IC's, transistors,push-button switches, etc. I'll send it to
anyone that wants it. Email me at directly.

Owen



Owen P. Mills
Director, Materials Characterization & Fabrication Facilities
Electron Optics Engineer, Applied Chemical & Morphological Analysis
Laboratory

Materials Science & Engineering
Michigan Technological University
Rm 512 M&M Bldg.
Houghton, MI 49931
PH 906-369-1875
FAX 906-487-2934
mailto:opmills-at-mtu.edu
http://www.mm.mtu.edu/~opmills



==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Wed May 17 08:10:59 2006
8, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7])
8, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDAxhK028058
8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:10:59 -0500
8, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5])
8, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDAwQA028733
8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:58 -0400
8, 31 -- Received: from node2.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node2.mtu.edu [141.219.69.2])
8, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDAwd8013241
8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:58 -0400
8, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4])
8, 31 -- by node2.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDAv7g012056
8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:58 -0400
8, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu)
8, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5])
8, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4HDAvBG010647
8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
8, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45])
8, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4HDAvkp013219
8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:57 -0400
8, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
8, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
8, 31 -- Message-Id: {6444BECD-22E3-48E5-9098-8B73F0C2589E-at-mtu.edu}
8, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
8, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
8, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu}
8, 31 -- Subject: free 35C parts
8, 31 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:55 -0400
8, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
8, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.17.55109
8, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__C230066_P5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: opmills-at-mtu.edu
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:15:42 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Free JEOL Denka LaB6 cathodes

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I have 2 Jeol M3 cathodes I'll give anyone that wants them. They
were bought for a 100CX TEM. Both are new, but have been on a shelf
for 20yrs. Let me know if you want them.

Owen

==============================Original Headers==============================
2, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Wed May 17 08:15:42 2006
2, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7])
2, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDFfxX001183
2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:15:41 -0500
2, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6])
2, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDFfhr029034
2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:41 -0400
2, 31 -- Received: from node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node34.mtu.edu [141.219.69.34])
2, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDFfs3005269
2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:41 -0400
2, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4])
2, 31 -- by node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDFeF4020104
2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:40 -0400
2, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu)
2, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6])
2, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4HDFeVh014345
2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
2, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45])
2, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4HDFdDw005259
2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:39 -0400
2, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
2, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
2, 31 -- Message-Id: {E872D0DE-5441-4783-AD47-788034ED7801-at-mtu.edu}
2, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
2, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
2, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu}
2, 31 -- Subject: Free JEOL Denka LaB6 cathodes
2, 31 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:38 -0400
2, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3)
2, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.17.55109
2, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: bharris-at-uoguelph.ca
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:33 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hello TEM community: I have LEO 912AB TEM and need to order a new LaB6
filament. I can't for the life of me remember or find in my files what I
ordered the last time except that it was a Denka. If anyone has this
information and would pass it on I would be truly grateful. bob harris

Guelph Regional Imaging Facility
Dept.of Molecular and Cellular
Biology
New Science Complex
488 Gordon St.
Univ of Guelph
Guelph,On, Canada
N1G 2W1
ph: 519-824-4120 ext. 56409/58962
Fax: 519-837-1802

==============================Original Headers==============================
2, 27 -- From bharris-at-uoguelph.ca Wed May 17 08:39:32 2006
2, 27 -- Received: from mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.94.205])
2, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDdWnD015600
2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:32 -0500
2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.93.20])
2, 27 -- by mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDdVX5007779
2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDdVlS018349
2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
2, 27 -- Received: (from nobody-at-localhost)
2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k4HDdVGU018347
2, 27 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
2, 27 -- X-Authentication-Warning: pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca: nobody set sender to bharris-at-uoguelph.ca using -f
2, 27 -- Received: from 131.104.80.123 ([131.104.80.123])
2, 27 -- by webmail.uoguelph.ca (IMP) with HTTP
2, 27 -- for {bharris-at-staff.mail.uoguelph.ca} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
2, 27 -- Message-ID: {1147873171.446b2793c3a31-at-webmail.uoguelph.ca}
2, 27 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
2, 27 -- From: Bob Harris {bharris-at-uoguelph.ca}
2, 27 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
2, 27 -- Subject: LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB
2, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
2, 27 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
2, 27 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
2, 27 -- User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4
2, 27 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 131.104.94.205
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:12:44 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi Dave,

Have a look at
http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/index.html
under MENU

It's a bit of struggle with all the links, but under Best Image Galleries &
Collections have a look at the SEM (scanning electron microscope) - the
first one. They aren't light microscopy but SEMs are great for fibre
morphology surface details.

I found things like Cellulose fibers (fibres) in toilet paper, paper towels,
T shirt cotton with dirt, asbestos (best to view that on-line), woven silk
etc.. [In 'Dennis Kunkel Microscopy, Inc.' link.]

Also search through the microscopy primer site, they have loads of stock
images

http://www.microscopy.fsu.edu

e.g.

http://www.microscopy.fsu.edu/primer/techniques/polarized/gallery/pages/silv
ercottonsmall.html

I found rabbit hair, silk, nylon (all under polarised light microscopy so
they appear brightly coloured - rather unlike standard microscope images).

The microscopy primer also tells you loads about microscopes (and you can
operate them virtually).

Plus try the hobby site
http://www.btinternet.com/~stephen.durr/
as it has links that may provide something (but most sites are interested in
things like plants, animals and pond life).

You may be able to get a library loan of an old book that has suitable
pictures for scanning, e.g.

Textile fiber atlas : A collection of photomicrographs of old and new
textile fibers, by Werner Von Bergen (Jan 1, 1949).

The microscopy of animal textile fibres,: Including methods for the complete
analysis of fibre blends. 235 half-tone and ll colour photomicrographs, 88
line drawings by Alec Blakey Wildman (Jan 1, 1954)

I found the book links on amazon.com (both are out of print).

Regards

Keith

----------------------------------------------------------
Dr Keith J Morris
Imaging Facilities Manager
Cell Biology Division
Institute of Ophthalmology
University College London
11-43 Bath Street
London EC1V 9EL

Tel: 020 7608 4050
Fax: 020 7608 4034
email: keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk

-----Original Message-----
X-from: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net [mailto:Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net]
Sent: 17 May 2006 13:03
To: keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk

This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by
(Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net)
from on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 19:19:11
Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the
Question
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to both Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net as well as to the Microscopy
Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net
Name: Dave Steklenski

Organization: Catherine McAuley School, Rochester NY

Education: K-8 Grade Grammar School

Location: Rochester NY

Question: We are planning an elementary microscopy lab using a variety of
natural and synthetic fibers. I would like to locat some photomicrographs of
sample fibers so the kids could compare their observations to know
appearance samples. I have been unable to find a good set of micrographs on
the web.......are there any common references that might have some useable
pictures.

THANK you for the help!!!


==============================Original Headers==============================
31, 26 -- From keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk Wed May 17 09:12:43 2006
31, 26 -- Received: from vscani-e2.ucl.ac.uk (vscani-e2.ucl.ac.uk [144.82.108.34])
31, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HEChiI025888
31, 26 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:12:43 -0500
31, 26 -- Received: from cell23.ioo.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.134.123] helo=keithhigrade)
31, 26 -- by vscani-e.ucl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
31, 26 -- (envelope-from {keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk} )
31, 26 -- id 1FgMlV-00042h-2D; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:12:41 +0100
31, 26 -- From: "Keith J Morris" {keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk}
31, 26 -- To: {Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net}
31, 26 -- Cc: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
31, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab
31, 26 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:11:46 +0100
31, 26 -- Message-ID: {000601c679bb$d5356790$7b865290-at-keithhigrade}
31, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
31, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
31, 26 -- charset="us-ascii"
31, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
31, 26 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
31, 26 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
31, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5qdZktnXyK/AgTe+ppRP1nSzVngACzwsA
31, 26 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171202.k4HC2nPb021701-at-ns.microscopy.com}
31, 26 -- X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk-at-ucl.ac.uk for more information
31, 26 -- X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
31, 26 -- X-UCL-MailScanner-From: keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk
31, 26 -- X-Spam-Status: No
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:45:19 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Ryan,
In addition to all the other suggestions about small sample size, out of the
lens field, etc., also try running your sample through a degausser just
before putting it in the SEM. Any residual magnetism is going to adversely
affect a high mag image. I can remember (too many years ago) swearing at
the SEM I operated (and didn't particularly like) because my resolution was
terrible, then remembering that my sample was a piece of carbon steel.
After degaussing, the resolution was fine.

Ken Converse
owner

QUALITY IMAGES
Servicing Scanning Electron Microscopes
Since 1981
474 So. Bridgton Rd.
Bridgton, ME 04009
207-647-4348
Fax 207-647-2688
kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz
qualityimages.biz


-----Original Message-----
X-from: lewryan-at-gmail.com [mailto:lewryan-at-gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 6:07 PM
To: kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz

This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver
using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying

please copy both lewryan-at-gmail.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email: lewryan-at-gmail.com
Name: Ryan

Organization: Dalhousie University

Title-Subject: [Filtered] SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate

Question: I have a saple with deposits of an alloy of Sn-Co-C on a magnetic
stainless steel substrate (430 stainless steel). I'm using a cold field
emission microscope and am having trouble getting high resolution images.
Could you suggest what setting I should use to get started?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 15 17:03:45 2006
6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22])
6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
k4FM3ipN026657
6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:03:44
-0500
6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified)
6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c08eab2f530f-at-[206.69.208.22]}
6, 12 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:03:44 -0500
6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 12 -- From: lewryan-at-gmail.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver)
6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate
6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================





___________________________________________________________
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com



==============================Original Headers==============================
23, 30 -- From kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz Wed May 17 09:45:19 2006
23, 30 -- Received: from dpmailmta01.doteasy.com (dpmailmta01.doteasy.com [65.61.209.91])
23, 30 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HEjJYC003869
23, 30 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:45:19 -0500
23, 30 -- Received: from qualityimages.biz (unverified [192.168.101.16])
23, 30 -- by dpmta01.doteasy.com (DEO) with ESMTP id 4857839
23, 30 -- for multiple; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:58:13 -0700
23, 30 -- Received: from Ken [24.53.5.245] by qualityimages.biz with ESMTP
23, 30 -- (SMTPD32-8.05) id A6F25693008A; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:45:06 -0700
23, 30 -- From: "Ken Converse" {kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz}
23, 30 -- To: {lewryan-at-gmail.com} , "MSA Listserver" {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
23, 30 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate
23, 30 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:46:18 -0400
23, 30 -- Message-ID: {005101c679c0$ac184030$6501a8c0-at-Ken}
23, 30 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
23, 30 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
23, 30 -- charset="us-ascii"
23, 30 -- X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
23, 30 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
23, 30 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
23, 30 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
23, 30 -- Importance: Normal
23, 30 -- In-Reply-To: {200605152206.k4FM6uej031789-at-ns.microscopy.com}
23, 30 -- X-IMSTrailer: __IMail_7__
23, 30 -- X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=34189668
23, 30 -- X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii
23, 30 -- X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 22, in=226356, out=0, spam=0
23, 30 -- X-External-IP: 192.168.101.16
23, 30 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
23, 30 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HEjJYC003869
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: eschumacher-at-mccrone.com
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:59:33 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dave,

Dave,

I forwarded your request to Scott Stoeffler, a member of our Optical
Microscopy group, and he provided these suggestions:


Any good basic book on textile science will have fiber photomicrographs.
Margery Joseph's Introductory Textile Science is a good one and
available pretty cheaply.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0030507235/002-1547224-5402436?v=glance
&n=283155

There is also a CD available with a lot of fiber pictures, but it's
pretty expensive:

http://www.atexinc.com/digital_textiles_(cd).htm


Natural fibers such as cotton, linen, wool and silk are easier to
distinguish based on morphology alone. Without polarized light,
synthetics aren't easily distinguishable, although you can look at
cross-sections.


You might also take a look at our on-line Atlas of Microscopic Particles
at www.mccroneatlas.com. If you do a basic search on fibers, you'll get
some examples of cloth and paper fiber images with some background
information.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Elaine

*********************************************************************
Elaine F.Schumacher
Senior Research Scientist
McCrone Associates, Inc.
850 Pasquinelli Drive
Westmont, IL 60559-5539 USA
630-887-7100 (tel)
630-887-7417 (fax)
E-mail: eschumacher-at-mccrone.com
Web Site: www.mccrone.com


*********************************************************************
This message and any attachments are solely for the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
disclosure, copying, use or distribution of the information
included in this message is prohibited.
*********************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
X-from: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net [mailto:Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:55 AM
To: Elaine F. Schumacher

This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by
(Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net)
from on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 19:19:11
Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the
Question
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Please reply to both Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net as well as to the
Microscopy Listserver
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

Email: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net
Name: Dave Steklenski

Organization: Catherine McAuley School, Rochester NY

Education: K-8 Grade Grammar School

Location: Rochester NY

Question: We are planning an elementary microscopy lab using a variety
of natural and synthetic fibers. I would like to locat some
photomicrographs of sample fibers so the kids could compare their
observations to know appearance samples. I have been unable to find a
good set of micrographs on the web.......are there any common references
that might have some useable pictures.

THANK you for the help!!!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

==============================Original
Headers==============================
8, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com Wed May 17 06:54:05 2006
8, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com
[206.69.208.22])
8, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with
ESMTP id k4HBs451007049
8, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006
06:54:05 -0500
8, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
8, 12 -- X-Sender: zaluzec-at-ultra5.microscopy.com (Unverified)
8, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c090bf37075f-at-[206.69.208.22]}
8, 12 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:54:04 -0500
8, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
8, 12 -- From: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net (by way of Ask-A-Microscopist)
8, 12 -- Subject: [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab
8, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of -
Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
32, 27 -- From eschumacher-at-mccrone.com Wed May 17 09:59:33 2006
32, 27 -- Received: from pgp.mccrone.com (McCrone-Associates-1051626.cust-rtr.ameritech.net [68.23.63.122])
32, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HExWDf013893
32, 27 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:59:33 -0500
32, 27 -- Received: from pgp.mccrone.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
32, 27 -- by pgp.mccrone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6530D1A8015
32, 27 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:59:34 -0500 (CDT)
32, 27 -- Received: from MCCRONEMSG.tmg.mccrone.com ([192.168.101.20])
32, 27 -- by pgp.mccrone.com (PGP Universal service);
32, 27 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 09:59:34 -0500
32, 27 -- X-PGP-Universal: processed
32, 27 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
32, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
32, 27 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
32, 27 -- charset="US-ASCII"
32, 27 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
32, 27 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab
32, 27 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:59:22 -0500
32, 27 -- Message-ID: {2A27CE0EC2A5C748974EA513DFB285A7B9710B-at-MCCRONEMSG.tmg.mccrone.com}
32, 27 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
32, 27 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
32, 27 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab
32, 27 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5qM2/12dhdJJ5ShCEmf4cuB4//wAGNIYw
32, 27 -- From: "Elaine F. Schumacher" {eschumacher-at-mccrone.com}
32, 27 -- To: {Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net} , {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com}
32, 27 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
32, 27 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HExWDf013893
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: mnesta-at-ebsciences.com
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:33:21 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hello Bob,

The standard configuration of Denka cathode for Leo Microscopes is the
M3-CA, which has a 15 micron round tip. For greater brightness,
especially in TEM applications, many users prefer the M3-CA sharp 60/10
or M3-CA sharp 60/5. Please feel free to contact me off line if you
would like to discuss the differences.

Sincerely,
Mike Nesta

Michael R. Nesta
Managing Director
Energy Beam Sciences, Inc.
Tel: 860 653-0411
Fax: 860 653-0422
MNesta-at-ebsciences.com
www.ebsciences.com
“ADDING BRILLIANCE TO YOUR VISION”




bharris-at-uoguelph.ca wrote:
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
} Hello TEM community: I have LEO 912AB TEM and need to order a new LaB6
} filament. I can't for the life of me remember or find in my files what I
} ordered the last time except that it was a Denka. If anyone has this
} information and would pass it on I would be truly grateful. bob harris
}
} Guelph Regional Imaging Facility
} Dept.of Molecular and Cellular
} Biology
} New Science Complex
} 488 Gordon St.
} Univ of Guelph
} Guelph,On, Canada
} N1G 2W1
} ph: 519-824-4120 ext. 56409/58962
} Fax: 519-837-1802
}
} ==============================Original Headers==============================
} 2, 27 -- From bharris-at-uoguelph.ca Wed May 17 08:39:32 2006
} 2, 27 -- Received: from mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.94.205])
} 2, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDdWnD015600
} 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:32 -0500
} 2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.93.20])
} 2, 27 -- by mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDdVX5007779
} 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
} 2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
} 2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDdVlS018349
} 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
} 2, 27 -- Received: (from nobody-at-localhost)
} 2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k4HDdVGU018347
} 2, 27 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
} 2, 27 -- X-Authentication-Warning: pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca: nobody set sender to bharris-at-uoguelph.ca using -f
} 2, 27 -- Received: from 131.104.80.123 ([131.104.80.123])
} 2, 27 -- by webmail.uoguelph.ca (IMP) with HTTP
} 2, 27 -- for {bharris-at-staff.mail.uoguelph.ca} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
} 2, 27 -- Message-ID: {1147873171.446b2793c3a31-at-webmail.uoguelph.ca}
} 2, 27 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400
} 2, 27 -- From: Bob Harris {bharris-at-uoguelph.ca}
} 2, 27 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
} 2, 27 -- Subject: LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB
} 2, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
} 2, 27 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
} 2, 27 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
} 2, 27 -- User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4
} 2, 27 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 131.104.94.205
} ==============================End of - Headers==============================
}


==============================Original Headers==============================
9, 28 -- From mnesta-at-ebsciences.com Wed May 17 10:33:21 2006
9, 28 -- Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74])
9, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HFXKhp024690
9, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:33:21 -0500
9, 28 -- Received: from pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (pimout6-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.22])
9, 28 -- by ylpvm43.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4HFXMWH030373
9, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:22 -0400
9, 28 -- X-ORBL: [69.182.224.2]
9, 28 -- Received: from mail.ebsciences.com ([69.182.224.2])
9, 28 -- by pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.6 out.dk/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HFXJvT180922;
9, 28 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:19 -0400
9, 28 -- Received: from dhcp-206-53-66-197.myeastern.com ([206.53.66.197] helo=[192.168.0.15])
9, 28 -- by mail.ebsciences.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
9, 28 -- (Exim 4.54)
9, 28 -- id 1FgO1W-0005sO-RY; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:19 -0400
9, 28 -- Message-ID: {446B4245.7050903-at-ebsciences.com}
9, 28 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:25 -0400
9, 28 -- From: Mike Nesta {mnesta-at-ebsciences.com}
9, 28 -- Organization: Energy Beam Sciences
9, 28 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
9, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
9, 28 -- To: bharris-at-uoguelph.ca
9, 28 -- CC: microscopy-at-microscopy.com
9, 28 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB
9, 28 -- References: {200605171342.k4HDgb4g020997-at-ns.microscopy.com}
9, 28 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171342.k4HDgb4g020997-at-ns.microscopy.com}
9, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
9, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:35:40 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Supra40 versus Supra55 advices

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Hi

A question to whose who have made some recent tests on FEG-SEM.

I would have advices about the differences which can be practically seen
between the Zeiss Supra 40 et the Supra 55. Resolutions annonced are
quite different. I want to know if it's only a spec difference, or if
practically it's easy to see it. We have made tests on the 55, but the
budget doesn't follow...
All other advices are welcome.

Thanks

--
J. Faerber
IPCMS-GSI
(Institut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg
Groupe Surface et Interfaces)
23, rue de Loess ; BP43
67034 Strasbourg CEDEX 2
France

Tel 00 33(0)3 88 10 71 01
Fax 00 33(0)3 88 10 72 48
E-mail Jacques.Faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr


==============================Original Headers==============================
7, 28 -- From jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr Wed May 17 10:35:40 2006
7, 28 -- Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.154])
7, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HFZduw029112
7, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:35:40 -0500
7, 28 -- Received: from ipcms.u-strasbg.fr (ipcms.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.2])
7, 28 -- by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.6/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id k4HFZdRA007400
7, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 17:35:39 +0200 (CEST)
7, 28 -- Received: from [130.79.54.3] (odhinn.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.54.3])
7, 28 -- by ipcms.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682DB1000126
7, 28 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 17:35:29 +0200 (CEST)
7, 28 -- Message-ID: {446B42A9.2090103-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr}
7, 28 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:35:05 +0200
7, 28 -- From: "j.faerber" {jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr}
7, 28 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060503)
7, 28 -- X-Accept-Language: fr, en
7, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
7, 28 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
7, 28 -- Subject: Supra40 versus Supra55 advices
7, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
7, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
7, 28 -- X-IPCMS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
7, 28 -- X-IPCMS-MailScanner-From: jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr
7, 28 -- X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.154]); Wed, 17 May 2006 17:35:39 +0200 (CEST)
7, 28 -- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1467/Tue May 16 23:21:47 2006 on mr4.u-strasbg.fr
7, 28 -- X-Virus-Status: Clean
7, 28 -- X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL
7, 28 -- autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1
7, 28 -- X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on mr4.u-strasbg.fr
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: MCarlyle-at-veeco.com
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:37:52 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] SPM - Seeing at Nanoscale Conference - Register Now and Save

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

----Register Before May 19th and Save!---

Seeing at the Nanoscale IV, July 17-20, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

All users of SPM and metrology instruments are invited to Philadelphia, this July to meet and discuss their work informally with colleagues and nanoscience pioneers from around the world!

The three-day, event-filled "Seeing at the Nanoscale" international conference includes a two-and-a-half days of technical presentations, an evening poster session, and a reception at the National Constitution Center.

Technical Program:

-Nanomechanical and Local Property Measurements
-Visualization I: Biomolecules and Biological Processes
-Visualization II: Materials and Polymer Systems
-Measurements of Electrical, Optical, Magnetic, and Thermal Properties of Materials at the Nanoscale
-Instrumentation: New Tools and Techniques for Nanoscience

We are very honored to have Dr. Paul Hansma, University of California, Santa Barbara, as our keynote speaker.

For more information and to register online, please go to: www.veeco.com/nanoconference

Be an early bird! -- Register by May 19 and receive a conference discount!


____________________________
Marlene Carlyle
Veeco Instruments
Conference Coordinator
112 Robin Hill Road
Santa Barbara, CA 93117
Tel: 805-967-1400 (ext. 2312)
Fax: 805-967-7717
Email: mcarlyle-at-veeco.com
____________________________



==============================Original Headers==============================
12, 20 -- From MCarlyle-at-veeco.com Wed May 17 10:37:52 2006
12, 20 -- Received: from sboexch2.int.veeco.com (SBOEXCH2.VEECO.com [68.111.35.167])
12, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HFboWY003725
12, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:37:52 -0500
12, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
12, 20 -- content-class: urn:content-classes:message
12, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
12, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
12, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
12, 20 -- Subject: SPM - Seeing at Nanoscale Conference - Register Now and Save
12, 20 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:37:46 -0700
12, 20 -- Message-ID: {625BD6DD96DE554DBB0558FFE70E0F42011FFE3E-at-sboexch2.int.veeco.com}
12, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
12, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
12, 20 -- Thread-Topic: SPM - Seeing at Nanoscale Conference - Register Now and Save
12, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5x9hlicXmpgM8Sdqyi5NHnuxiUQ==
12, 20 -- From: "Marlene Carlyle" {MCarlyle-at-veeco.com}
12, 20 -- To: {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com}
12, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
12, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HFboWY003725
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:38:08 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html


Hi Beth,

Someone had said that distilled water will cause copper tubing to ionize, and correction will be faster than tap water. Has anybody heard this?

Ann Fook Yang
EM Unit/ Unite EM
AAFC/AAC
960 Carling Ave,
Ottawa,Ontario
Canada K1A 0C6
yanga-at-agr.gc.ca
Telephone/Téléphone: 613-759-1638
Facsimile/Télécopieur: 613-759-1701

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada


-----Original Message-----
X-from: beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu [mailto:beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:50 PM
To: Yang, Ann-Fook

Just wanted to thank everyone for the responses to my posting about the
TEM water chiller additives.
I'll try just using distilled water and monitoring the system more
frequently.
Thank you!
Beth

**********************************************************************
Beth Richardson
EM Lab Coordinator
Plant Biology Department
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602-7271

Phone - (706) 542-1790 & FAX - (706) 542-1805
http://www.plantbio.uga.edu/emlab

"Between the two evils,
I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980)
*******************************************************************

"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are".
Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)

************************************************************************
***



==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 18 -- From beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu Tue May 16 17:45:55 2006
8, 18 -- Received: from dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu (dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu [128.192.26.2])
8, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMjtKd020325
8, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:45:55 -0500
8, 18 -- Received: from plantbio.uga.edu ([128.192.26.46])
8, 18 -- by dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu
8, 18 -- (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits))
8, 18 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com;
8, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 18:45:51 -0400
8, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:45:53 -0400
8, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
8, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
8, 18 -- Subject: thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator
8, 18 -- From: Beth Richardson {beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
8, 18 -- To: microscopy microscopy {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
8, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
8, 18 -- Message-Id: {BB317B38-E52D-11DA-BE3A-000393137C00-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
8, 18 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
==============================End of - Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
20, 26 -- From YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA Wed May 17 10:38:07 2006
20, 26 -- Received: from agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca [192.197.71.137])
20, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HFc61g004692
20, 26 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:38:07 -0500
20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA ([192.168.122.1])
20, 26 -- by agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4HFb41N012152;
20, 26 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 11:37:04 -0400
20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxms3.AGR.GC.CA ([10.117.15.30]) by onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
20, 26 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 11:38:05 -0400
20, 26 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
20, 26 -- content-class: urn:content-classes:message
20, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
20, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
20, 26 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
20, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator
20, 26 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:38:05 -0400
20, 26 -- Message-ID: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334EE-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca}
20, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
20, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
20, 26 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator
20, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5OxFBom7QJ+AcQRGdWLnXnzX8yAAjC8LQ
20, 26 -- From: "Yang, Ann-Fook" {YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA}
20, 26 -- To: {beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu} , {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
20, 26 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 May 2006 15:38:05.0753 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4039290:01C679C7]
20, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
20, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HFc61g004692
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: rothbardd-at-netscape.net
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:14:38 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] RE: TEM water recirculator

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

The only additive I use is colloidal silver, sold as a health food item by Natural Immunogenics 888-328-8840. This method, suggested to me by Vitaly Feingold has worked very well. I also add a quart or so of tap water to the DI water so it is not so aggressive on the copper.

I have no connection with the silver supplier.

David Rothbard

beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu wrote:

}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor:  The Microscopy Society of America
} To  Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver

__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 20 -- From rothbardd-at-netscape.net Wed May 17 11:14:37 2006
8, 20 -- Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com (imo-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.33])
8, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGEb2W032643
8, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:14:37 -0500
8, 20 -- Received: from rothbardd-at-netscape.net
8, 20 -- by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id w.1b1.11dc389c (16239)
8, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:28 -0400 (EDT)
8, 20 -- Received: from netscape.net (mow-d20.webmail.aol.com [205.188.139.161]) by air-in03.mx.aol.com (v109.12) with ESMTP id MAILININ33-3f6f446b4be43d1; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:28 -0400
8, 20 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:28 -0400
8, 20 -- From: rothbardd-at-netscape.net
8, 20 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
8, 20 -- Subject: RE: TEM water recirculator
8, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
8, 20 -- Message-ID: {30E4C578.63394E02.034D9A6A-at-netscape.net}
8, 20 -- X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
8, 20 -- X-AOL-IP: 199.196.144.13
8, 20 -- X-AOL-Language: english
8, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
8, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
8, 20 -- X-Spam-Flag: NO
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: ZZhang-at-uwyo.edu
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:20:30 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Ann:

Distilled water is fine. It is the deionized water that cause problems to the copper tubing due to the lack of ions in it.

Zhaojie Zhang
Microscopy Core Facility
University of Wyoming
Laramie, WY 82071

-----Original Message-----
X-from: YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA [mailto:YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 8:47 AM
To: Z.J. Zhang


Hi Beth,

Someone had said that distilled water will cause copper tubing to ionize, and correction will be faster than tap water. Has anybody heard this?

Ann Fook Yang
EM Unit/ Unite EM
AAFC/AAC
960 Carling Ave,
Ottawa,Ontario
Canada K1A 0C6
yanga-at-agr.gc.ca
Telephone/Téléphone: 613-759-1638
Facsimile/Télécopieur: 613-759-1701

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada


-----Original Message-----
X-from: beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu [mailto:beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:50 PM
To: Yang, Ann-Fook

Just wanted to thank everyone for the responses to my posting about the
TEM water chiller additives.
I'll try just using distilled water and monitoring the system more
frequently.
Thank you!
Beth

**********************************************************************
Beth Richardson
EM Lab Coordinator
Plant Biology Department
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602-7271

Phone - (706) 542-1790 & FAX - (706) 542-1805
http://www.plantbio.uga.edu/emlab

"Between the two evils,
I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980)
*******************************************************************

"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are".
Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)

************************************************************************
***



==============================Original Headers==============================
8, 18 -- From beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu Tue May 16 17:45:55 2006
8, 18 -- Received: from dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu (dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu [128.192.26.2])
8, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMjtKd020325
8, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:45:55 -0500
8, 18 -- Received: from plantbio.uga.edu ([128.192.26.46])
8, 18 -- by dogwood.plantbio.uga.edu
8, 18 -- (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits))
8, 18 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com;
8, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 18:45:51 -0400
8, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:45:53 -0400
8, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
8, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
8, 18 -- Subject: thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator
8, 18 -- From: Beth Richardson {beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
8, 18 -- To: microscopy microscopy {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
8, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
8, 18 -- Message-Id: {BB317B38-E52D-11DA-BE3A-000393137C00-at-plantbio.uga.edu}
8, 18 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
==============================End of - Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
20, 26 -- From YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA Wed May 17 10:38:07 2006
20, 26 -- Received: from agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca [192.197.71.137])
20, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HFc61g004692
20, 26 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:38:07 -0500
20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA ([192.168.122.1])
20, 26 -- by agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4HFb41N012152;
20, 26 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 11:37:04 -0400
20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxms3.AGR.GC.CA ([10.117.15.30]) by onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
20, 26 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 11:38:05 -0400
20, 26 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
20, 26 -- content-class: urn:content-classes:message
20, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
20, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
20, 26 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
20, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator
20, 26 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:38:05 -0400
20, 26 -- Message-ID: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334EE-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca}
20, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
20, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
20, 26 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] thanks for the info - TEM water recirculator
20, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5OxFBom7QJ+AcQRGdWLnXnzX8yAAjC8LQ
20, 26 -- From: "Yang, Ann-Fook" {YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA}
20, 26 -- To: {beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu} , {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
20, 26 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 May 2006 15:38:05.0753 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4039290:01C679C7]
20, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
20, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HFc61g004692
==============================End of - Headers==============================


==============================Original Headers==============================
29, 28 -- From ZZhang-at-uwyo.edu Wed May 17 11:20:29 2006
29, 28 -- Received: from ninemile.uwyo.edu (ninemile.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.29])
29, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGKTAx008969
29, 28 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:20:29 -0500
29, 28 -- Received: from UWMAIL.uwyo.edu (uwmail.uwyo.edu [172.26.4.76])
29, 28 -- by ninemile.uwyo.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HGK7iQ009810
29, 28 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:20:26 -0600 (MDT)
29, 28 -- (envelope-from ZZhang-at-uwyo.edu)
29, 28 -- Received: from TELEGRAPH5.uwyo.edu ([10.84.60.120]) by UWMAIL.uwyo.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
29, 28 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 10:20:17 -0600
29, 28 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
29, 28 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
29, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
29, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
29, 28 -- charset="iso-8859-1"
29, 28 -- Subject: RE: TEM water recirculator
29, 28 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:20:16 -0600
29, 28 -- Message-ID: {C9C1AF307F12AF4087DEF87CB0E6A4AD9A5D45-at-TELEGRAPH5.uwyo.edu}
29, 28 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171546.k4HFkXTg030145-at-ns.microscopy.com}
29, 28 -- X-MS-Has-Attach:
29, 28 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
29, 28 -- Thread-Topic: RE: TEM water recirculator
29, 28 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5yRt1yTkAKigLTGuwnKNcUX2dlAAAg2lw
29, 28 -- From: "Z.J. Zhang" {ZZhang-at-uwyo.edu}
29, 28 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
29, 28 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 May 2006 16:20:17.0099 (UTC) FILETIME=[C8D051B0:01C679CD]
29, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
29, 28 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HGKTAx008969
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: gary-at-gaugler.com
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:21:04 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: Supra40 versus Supra55 advices

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

That is a difficult situation. First off, the Supra 55
was discontinued for some unknown reason, leaving the
Supra 55VP still viable. IMO, the 55 is superior to the
55VP. Why the 40 has lower resolution than the 55 is
unknown to me. At 200KX-350KX, I rather doubt that one
could tell the difference in resolution between the
40 and 55VP. But one probably could see a difference
between the 40 and 55. this assumes identical conditions
(low current, 30u center aperture, 3mm WD, 20KV, in-lens
detector).

gary g.



At 08:37 AM 5/17/2006, you wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America



==============================Original Headers==============================
10, 22 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Wed May 17 11:21:04 2006
10, 22 -- Received: from qsmtp2.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145])
10, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4HGL4MF010367
10, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:21:04 -0500
10, 22 -- Received: (qmail 20354 invoked from network); 17 May 2006 09:21:02 -0700
10, 22 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 20351, pid: 20352, t: 0.2151s
10, 22 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0
10, 22 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211)
10, 22 -- by qsmtp2 with SMTP; 17 May 2006 09:21:02 -0700
10, 22 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060517091458.023bde68-at-gaugler.com}
10, 22 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
10, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:21:01 -0700
10, 22 -- To: jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr
10, 22 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com}
10, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Supra40 versus Supra55 advices
10, 22 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
10, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171537.k4HFb5OS001984-at-ns.microscopy.com}
10, 22 -- References: {200605171537.k4HFb5OS001984-at-ns.microscopy.com}
10, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
10, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
10, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
10, 22 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HGL4MF010367
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: bfoster-at-mme1.com
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:22:05 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Re: AskAMicroscopist: multilamellar vesicle

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear Milind,

The questions you have asked require a whole day lecture on polarized light, but here are the fundamentals.

Materials that respond to polarized light have different refractive indices along different axes. These axes are always perpendicular to each other, but not necessarily to the crystal edges or material directions (although they typically lie along the long and short edges of a fiber and along the direction of draw and perpendicular in a film.. but more about that later). The refractive index is a measurement of the interaction of the electric field in light with the electric field in matter: the greater the interaction, the higher the value. Mathematically, you can calculate RI by dividing the velocity of light in vacuum (300,000 km/s) with the velocity of light in the material.

I can't send diagrams in this email (will do so, if you contact me off line), but imagine a rectangle as representing your object, with the short side having lower RI and the long side having higher RI (Step 1) . (This is highly simplified, but works). Next, imagine the crossed polars, with direction of vibration transmitted through the first polar as vibrating East-West and the permitted direction of vibration through the second polar (the "analyzer") as North-South (Step 2).

Step 3: Cross the polars and put the object in between. Imagine that you are looking down on this "sandwich".
a. When either the short side or long side of the rectangle is parallel to the polarizer, only that direction receives energy from the polarized light. Since that light is vibrating E-W, it will not pass the analyzer. Rather, it will be absorbed, so the crystal appears dark in these two orientations.
b. Imagine rotating the crystal into any 45 degree position. In this orientation, both RI directions receive energy from the polarizer and, if you complete the rectangle so that you have a resultant vector, you will see that the vector has components that will pass through the analyzer. In this position, the crystal will appear bright between crossed polars.

Now for your multi-lamellar vesicle.
The fact that it has areas that appear bright indicates that its internal structure generates differences in electrical field with direction. In other words, it is anisotropic. If you consider how the lamellae are laid down in the vesicle, this makes perfect sense. The maltese cross that you are seeing indicate the two directions of the primary RI's. In each of these positions, only one RI is visible to the incoming polarized light; the same situation as described above in which the short or long side of the crystal is parallel to the direction of the polarizer or analyzer.

Actually, if you removed the analyzer and did RI tests with just the polarizer in place, then rotated the polarizer 90 degrees and did another RI test, you could actually determine the RI in each of those directions.

I don't have direct experience with this type of vesicle, but I would assume that, like starch and polymer spherulites, if you rotate your sample between XPol, the cross will stay in the same orientation indicating that your lamellae are sitting radially within the vesicle.

Hope this was helpful.

Best regards,
Barbara Foster

Microscopy/Microscopy Education
313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100
Allen, TX 75002
P: 972-954-8011
W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com


MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.

P. S.
Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.




At 06:59 AM 5/17/2006, milindphd-at-gmail.com wrote:



} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America


==============================Original Headers==============================
22, 17 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Wed May 17 11:22:05 2006
22, 17 -- Received: from 5starpro.com (enterprise.5starpro.com [207.44.136.95])
22, 17 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGM5Yq014511
22, 17 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:22:05 -0500
22, 17 -- Received: (qmail 5501 invoked by uid 2020); 17 May 2006 11:38:14 -0500
22, 17 -- Received: from host57-99.rancor.birch.net (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (65.17.57.99)
22, 17 -- by enterprise.5starpro.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 17 May 2006 11:38:14 -0500
22, 17 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060517105231.020eaa40-at-mme1.com}
22, 17 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
22, 17 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:22:11 -0500
22, 17 -- To: milindphd-at-gmail.com, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
22, 17 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com}
22, 17 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] AskAMicroscopist: multilamellar vesicle
22, 17 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171159.k4HBx9Nh015503-at-ns.microscopy.com}
22, 17 -- References: {200605171159.k4HBx9Nh015503-at-ns.microscopy.com}
22, 17 -- Mime-Version: 1.0
22, 17 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: dljones-at-bestweb.net
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:05 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] distilled water

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Yes, this can be the case. Distilled water can often be more corrosive to piping
than regular tap water, it does depend upon the water chemistry of the tap
water. What you really want is de-oxygenated water.

Beth, if you'd like more info, I can send you a synopsis of a recent discussion
on this subject from a while back.
Or if you prefer, you may email me directly and we could talk more about this,
as you wish.

dj

On Wed, 17 May 2006 YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA wrote:

}
}
}
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
} The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
} To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
} On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
}
}
} Hi Beth,
}
} Someone had said that distilled water will cause copper tubing to ionize, and
correction will be faster than tap
} water. Has anybody heard this?
}
} Ann Fook Yang
} EM Unit/ Unite EM
} AAFC/AAC
} 960 Carling Ave,
} Ottawa,Ontario
} Canada K1A 0C6
} yanga-at-agr.gc.ca
} Telephone/Tlphone: 613-759-1638
} Facsimile/Tlcopieur: 613-759-1701


==============================Original Headers==============================
6, 16 -- From dljones-at-bestweb.net Wed May 17 11:33:05 2006
6, 16 -- Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48])
6, 16 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGX4LL007337
6, 16 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:05 -0500
6, 16 -- Received: from dlj ([71.249.20.84])
6, 16 -- by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep
6, 16 -- 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id {0IZF0044T4LVJ691-at-vms048.mailsrvcs.net} for
6, 16 -- Microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:32:23 -0500 (CDT)
6, 16 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:42:58 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
6, 16 -- From: "David L. Jones" {dljones-at-bestweb.net}
6, 16 -- Subject: distilled water
6, 16 -- X-X-Sender: dljones-at-pop-croton.bestweb.net
6, 16 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com
6, 16 -- Message-id: {Pine.WNT.4.62.0605171242050.1368-at-dlj}
6, 16 -- MIME-version: 1.0
6, 16 -- Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: JNicolino-at-comcast.net
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:43:45 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] Oxford Electronics Wanted

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

I am looking for an older Oxford Pulse Processor so I can do some testing of
EDX detectors. The model number can go back to #2020 and forward.
I don't need the complete analyzer system. If anyone has one of these pulse
processors that is available for sale, please contact me directly at my
email below.
Kind Regards,
Jim Nicolino

PulseTor/AAT
1816 St. Johns Bluff Road
Suite 305
Jacksonville, Florida 32246
904.646.3069
FAX 904.646.3131
JNicolino-at-comcast.net



==============================Original Headers==============================
4, 22 -- From JNicolino-at-comcast.net Wed May 17 11:43:45 2006
4, 22 -- Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153])
4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGhhav017298
4, 22 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:43:44 -0500
4, 22 -- Received: from dell2400 (c-66-177-10-94.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[66.177.10.94])
4, 22 -- by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP
4, 22 -- id {20060517164341m1300fd0a0e} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:41 +0000
4, 22 -- Message-ID: {00b201c679d0$f63eff40$6601a8c0-at-dell2400}
4, 22 -- From: "Jim Nicolino" {JNicolino-at-comcast.net}
4, 22 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com}
4, 22 -- Subject: Oxford Electronics Wanted
4, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:42:55 -0400
4, 22 -- MIME-Version: 1.0
4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain;
4, 22 -- format=flowed;
4, 22 -- charset="iso-8859-1";
4, 22 -- reply-type=original
4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
4, 22 -- X-Priority: 3
4, 22 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
4, 22 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
==============================End of - Headers==============================




From: maloneyb-at-fiu.edu
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:51:02 -0500
Subject: [Microscopy] grids for cell culture

Contents Retrieved from Microscopy Listserver Archives
http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MicroscopyArchives.html

Dear group - has anyone used gold grids for cell culture and what luck
have you had with these grids?
Thanks
Barbara

==============================Original Headers==============================
1, 18 -- From maloneyb-at-fiu.edu Wed May 17 12:51:02 2006
1, 18 -- Received: from smtp11.fiu.edu (smtp11.fiu.edu [131.94.79.28])
1, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HHp1nA028468
1, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:51:01 -0500
1, 18 -- Received: from [131.94.95.156] (esga680.fiu.edu [131.94.95.156])
1, 18 -- by smtp11.fiu.edu (MOS 3.7.1-GA)
1, 18 -- with ESMTP id CPC71900;
1, 18 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 13:50:57 -0400 (EDT)
1, 18 -- Message-ID: {446B62E5.9040507-at-fiu.edu}
1, 18 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:52:37 -0400
1, 18 -- From: Barbara Maloney {maloneyb-at-fiu.edu}
1, 18 -- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
1, 18 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
1, 18 -- MIME-Version