A very good day to all of you. I would like to know if anyone can direct me to the companies that are selling ZnO Epitaxial Films. I have been searching around but with no results.
I thank you all in advance first!
Have a good day ahead!
Cheers, Yee Yan School of Materials Science and Engineering University of New South Wales
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 1GB free storage! http://sg.whatsnew.mail.yahoo.com
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 18 -- From one_twinklestar-at-yahoo.com.sg Mon May 1 04:01:07 2006 7, 18 -- Received: from web50010.mail.yahoo.com (web50010.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.25]) 7, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k41916Pu024269 7, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 04:01:06 -0500 7, 18 -- Received: (qmail 91664 invoked by uid 60001); 1 May 2006 09:01:05 -0000 7, 18 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; 7, 18 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.sg; 7, 18 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; 7, 18 -- b=5X6mYpJ0adRKGCyi1HYiLfZgfD3n1UTOWYpfktlv7xh0XnsOsytsigvgbd+xaY4l9V3usDjmZ5b0VfJO7lD52mGmDdfilNAZcphfk4Nv5qlOFtelbjHojxXEm8wj+K16VM1ovWTUCpjFd/ahCOmx1JKwb56FxF9SR1P3rBp26DQ= ; 7, 18 -- Message-ID: {20060501090105.91662.qmail-at-web50010.mail.yahoo.com} 7, 18 -- Received: from [202.7.166.164] by web50010.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:01:05 CST 7, 18 -- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:01:05 +0800 (CST) 7, 18 -- From: Tay Yee Yan {one_twinklestar-at-yahoo.com.sg} 7, 18 -- Subject: Sales of Epitaxial Film-Enquires 7, 18 -- To: microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com 7, 18 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 7, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 7, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (woad-at-iinet.net.au) from http://www.microscopy.org/Ask-A-Microscopist/Ask-A-Microscopist.html on Sunday, April 30, 2006 at 21:45:31 Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please reply to both woad-at-iinet.net.au as well as to the Microscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: hi, I'm looking for 3 example images (moved out of phase by a 1/3 each) that have been recorded using structured illumination (say using a standing wave or otherwise projected) and the resultant merged hi-res version. I would like to apply the merging formula myself to the 3 images to see whether they turn out the way I hope them to i.e (that they are identical to a provided merged image). Hope you can help....
Sputter Films Inc (805-963-9651) sells a fluid lubricant (Torr Lube) that is advertised as being especially formulated for use on rotating and sliding seals, to have a vapor pressure below 10-6 Pa, and to provide a service life of up to 30 times that of most vacuum greases in such applications (See Vacuum Methods In Electron Microscopy , p. 460).
I have also found that the perfluorinated polyether diffusion pump fluids (ibid. p. 181) such as Fomblin Y-HVAC 25/9 and Krytox 1625 are very good lubricants for use on rotating and sliding vacuum seals, and might cost you a bit less than the Torr Lube. You can get these from most of the suppliers of EM products (Spi, Ladd, M. E. Taylor, etc.etc). -- Wilbur C. Bigelow, Professor Emeritus Materials Sci. & Engr., Univ. of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136 e-mail: bigelow-at-engin.umich.edu; Fx:734-763-4788; Ph:734-662-5237 Address mail to: 1136 Mixtwood Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48103-3035
==============================Original Headers============================== 2, 14 -- From bigelow-at-engin.umich.edu Mon May 1 14:28:37 2006 2, 14 -- Received: from srvr22.engin.umich.edu (srvr22.engin.umich.edu [141.213.75.21]) 2, 14 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k41JSbTb020718 2, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 14:28:37 -0500 2, 14 -- Received: from [141.212.131.221] (bigelow-g4.engin.umich.edu [141.212.131.221]) 2, 14 -- by srvr22.engin.umich.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k41JSaTT008861 2, 14 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 1 May 2006 15:28:37 -0400 (EDT) 2, 14 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 2, 14 -- Message-Id: {p06210202c07c0e976fb0-at-[141.212.131.221]} 2, 14 -- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:28:36 -0400 2, 14 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 2, 14 -- From: Wil Bigelow {bigelow-at-engin.umich.edu} 2, 14 -- Subject: [Microscopy] RE: Grease for ion millers 2, 14 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both kerverhe-at-msu.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: kerverhe-at-msu.edu Name: Heather Kerver
Organization: Beaumont Hospital
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Diamond knives
Question: I was wondering what kind of glue is used to set the diamond knife. I am aware that it is a hydrophilic glue but what is the actual substance used?
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both carnahan-at-edison-labs.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: carnahan-at-edison-labs.com Name: James Carnahan
Organization: Edison Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
Question: We had an unfortunate electrical accident that led to 120V going through part of the vacuum logic board from a failed turbo controller on an Amray 1700 Turbo. The console was off but the current blew the tops off of several of the logic chips and made a fuse out of one trace in the ground plane. We have some replacement chips and have found others on the net but are concerned about hidden damage. If anyone has an out-of-service 1700 Turbo or any Amray using the ES-7005-025 Vacuum logic board, we would be interested in purchasing the board.
Also, if anyone has experienced this problem we would like to hear their story.
Jim Carnahan Edison Analytical Labs (518) 393-2112
For the sake of SPI I just wanted to precise that the "high price and long delivery times" did not concern SPI products.
Stephane
--- "Garber, Charles A." {cgarber-at-2spi.com} wrote:
} But would you mind my asking you, were you } experiencing long delivery delays from SPI Supplies? } For Formvar coated grids, the delivery times are } usually pretty fast. I can't comment on what you } might perceive to be a high cost for purchased } filmed grids, most of our customers tell us that our } regular prices are lower than they could possibly } make them themselves.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 19 -- From nizets2-at-yahoo.com Tue May 2 06:13:13 2006 6, 19 -- Received: from web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.67]) 6, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k42BDDaX000481 6, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 06:13:13 -0500 6, 19 -- Received: (qmail 7695 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2006 11:13:13 -0000 6, 19 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; 6, 19 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; 6, 19 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; 6, 19 -- b=lRzT9FRlGWfwPLhUX3hDY8FRJljGPFlpmCuZqIULpOobEblfhouFaAU3dDt/S9Kngi5YREC11XcYwA+OxrsGNZceg09BDlyD85FyHaKues8ULyj3i4QKrOgkR93J+AJJkg4hEuf5d3gqXY9a0c27Ctd6J6L45nuJzZehm2rUGJ8= ; 6, 19 -- Message-ID: {20060502111313.7693.qmail-at-web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com} 6, 19 -- Received: from [80.122.101.102] by web37414.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:13:13 PDT 6, 19 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 04:13:13 -0700 (PDT) 6, 19 -- From: Stephane Nizet {nizets2-at-yahoo.com} 6, 19 -- Subject: Re: holes in the formvar film 6, 19 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 6, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {000c01c66a2d$1df584e0$b5750a0a-at-ibm1x23g2abfyg} 6, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 6, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 6, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both leforestier-at-lps.u-psud.fr as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organization: CNRS Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Orsay
Title-Subject: [Filtered] engineer position in cryo-electron microscopy
Question: We are seeking an engineer in cryo-electron microscopy: The candidate will be in charge of a 200 kV LaB6 electron microscope equipped with a cryo-specimen holder and a post-column energy filter (GIF). He/she will conduct cryo-TEM experiments in biology as well as in physics of complex systems (polymers, colloids, amphiphiles, Ö), from specimen preparation to interpretation and image analysis. He/she must possess good abilities to design new and delicate experiments. Theoretical and practical background in transmission electron microscopy is required. Cryo-EM expertise will be appreciated. The candidate will integrate a multidisciplinary team "Structure and function of condensed DNA" located at the Solid State Physics Laboratory of the Paris-Sud University (Orsay, France). The position could suit either a physicist or a biologist with strong motivation for interdisciplinarity. Mastering of the English and French languages is required (the interview will be in French). Application deadline May 22.
Today's challenge is trying to image platinum nanoparticles in an agarose matrix, in order to see how they distribute themselves and to get a size distribution. TEM and/or SEM are possibilities. So far, my check of the literature finds tons of stuff on nanoparticles in electrophoresis gels, but none of it is relevant, since the particles are removed from the gels and put back into a liquid medium. The one article I found that is comparable to our problem used thin-sectioning and we have tried that.
We have also tried melting the agarose, dipping grids into the particle/agarose mix, then rinsing the grid in hot water to thin the gelatin out. We can get images in the TEM, but the results are inconsistent when repeating with the same sample. Also, there is the chance that the hot water and melting are re-arranging the particles.
We have tried thin sectioning the dehydrated agarose with particles, but finding the particles in a given thin section is a crap shoot with long odds. Also, we may be cutting through aggregations we want to see.
We have tried viewing carbon-coated dehydrated agarose with particles using backscattered electrons in our FESEM. This gives images with particles, but only those on or right at the surface are imaged clearly enough for good size data. Plus, we can't see far into the agarose for good distribution data.
We are going to try increasing the concentration of the particles to increase chances of getting them reliably in thin sections, and we will also try putting the melted mixture on cover slips in a thin layer and re-trying the BSE imaging after carbon coating. (The latter still has the potential problem of redistributing the particles, however.) We could also try doing large thick or semi-thin sections and viewing them in BSE imaging.
However, if someone out there has viewing nanos in agarose down to a fine art, we, as usual, would be delighted to hear about it. In the meantime, I will continue to search the databases.
Thanks to all!
Randy
Randy Tindall EM Specialist Electron Microscopy Core Facility---We Do Small Immediately----Nano Takes a Little Longer! W125 Veterinary Medicine University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211 Tel: (573) 882-8304 Fax: (573) 884-2227 Email: tindallr-at-missouri.edu Web: http://www.emc.missouri.edu
==============================Original Headers============================== 15, 23 -- From TindallR-at-missouri.edu Tue May 2 14:26:14 2006 15, 23 -- Received: from um-exproto8.um.umsystem.edu (um-exproto8.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.48]) 15, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42JQE72005637 15, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:26:14 -0500 15, 23 -- Received: from UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.31]) by um-exproto8.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 15, 23 -- Tue, 2 May 2006 14:26:11 -0500 15, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 15, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 15, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 15, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 15, 23 -- charset="US-ASCII" 15, 23 -- Subject: TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose 15, 23 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:26:11 -0500 15, 23 -- Message-ID: {BA876152E8653240BE8572E897083EE701849F8F-at-UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu} 15, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 15, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 15, 23 -- Thread-Topic: TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose 15, 23 -- thread-index: AcZuHkZUxNruEcQPRg2DlV4T+iVDcw== 15, 23 -- From: "Tindall, Randy D." {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} 15, 23 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 15, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2006 19:26:11.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[451CFE00:01C66E1E] 15, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 15, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42JQE72005637 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I have recently had a discussion with a colleague about the best protocol to follow when staining cells during a time course experiment. I don't think there is a single correct answer, however, would like to know current thinking on the following issue:
Live cells were treated with a compound and observed at various time points during a period of 48 hours. At each time point, cells were fixed and immunofluorescently stained for the protein of interest.
Is it a less artefactual procedure to fix cells at each time point and keep in a buffer until the end of 48 hours to stain them all at the same time or fix and stain at each sampling time point? To stain at the same time may would reduce staining differences, however, keeping cells in buffer for different times may induce changes in the protein.
I look forward to hearing your opinions. Thank you. Judy
Judy Trogadis Bio-Imaging Coordinator St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen 30 Bond St. Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada ph: 416-864-6060 x6337 pager: 416-685-9219 fax: 416-864-6043 trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 19 -- From trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca Tue May 2 14:59:26 2006 7, 19 -- Received: from smh.toronto.on.ca (mail.smh.toronto.on.ca [199.71.175.103]) 7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42JxQwa015870 7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:26 -0500 7, 19 -- Received: from ([199.71.171.15]) 7, 19 -- by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca with ESMTP id KP-GCT47.12851322; 7, 19 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400 7, 19 -- Received: from SMTPOUT-MTA by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca 7, 19 -- with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400 7, 19 -- Message-Id: {s45781c4.036-at-beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca} 7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2 7, 19 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:58:48 -0400 7, 19 -- From: "Judy Trogadis" {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca} 7, 19 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 7, 19 -- Subject: time course experiment 7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 7, 19 -- Content-Disposition: inline ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Judy, An end run around the problem is to start off the treatments at different times so they all end together and then fix and stain is all done at the same time. This doesn't answer your question but maybe a useful wrinkle?
Good luck, Tobias } } } Dear microscopists } } I have recently had a discussion with a colleague about the best } protocol to follow when staining cells during a time course experiment. } I don't think there is a single correct answer, however, would like to } know current thinking on the following issue: } } Live cells were treated with a compound and observed at various time } points during a period of 48 hours. At each time point, cells were fixed } and immunofluorescently stained for the protein of interest. } } Is it a less artefactual procedure to fix cells at each time point and } keep in a buffer until the end of 48 hours to stain them all at the same } time or fix and stain at each sampling time point? To stain at the same } time may would reduce staining differences, however, keeping cells in } buffer for different times may induce changes in the protein. } } I look forward to hearing your opinions. } Thank you. } Judy } } Judy Trogadis } Bio-Imaging Coordinator } St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen } 30 Bond St. } Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada } ph: 416-864-6060 x6337 } pager: 416-685-9219 } fax: 416-864-6043 } trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca } } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 7, 19 -- From trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca Tue May 2 14:59:26 2006 } 7, 19 -- Received: from smh.toronto.on.ca (mail.smh.toronto.on.ca } [199.71.175.103]) } 7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with } ESMTP id k42JxQwa015870 } 7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:26 -0500 } 7, 19 -- Received: from ([199.71.171.15]) } 7, 19 -- by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca with ESMTP id } KP-GCT47.12851322; } 7, 19 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400 } 7, 19 -- Received: from SMTPOUT-MTA by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca } 7, 19 -- with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400 } 7, 19 -- Message-Id: {s45781c4.036-at-beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca} } 7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2 } 7, 19 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:58:48 -0400 } 7, 19 -- From: "Judy Trogadis" {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca} } 7, 19 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 7, 19 -- Subject: time course experiment } 7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 } 7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII } 7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit } 7, 19 -- Content-Disposition: inline } ==============================End of - Headers==============================
There are some other things to consider. First off, a great deal of this debate will depend on what you are looking for and how it reacts with your fixative. If the cells are 'lightly fixed' there may be some reversal of fixation with prolonged buffer storage. Does that effect the staining? Tobias offered a good suggestion but there might be some chrono effects, cells fixed at different times of the day or night depending on your experimental design. I suggest avoiding all problems and debate by keeping all of the fixation, buffer wash times and staining times the same. Your staining proceedure should be sufficiently standardized so that it is not a variable, or is the least problematic of the potential variables. Finally, people looking for something to criticize in your proceedures will always find something 'wrong'.
Geoff
TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
-- -- ********************************************** Geoff McAuliffe, Ph.D. Neuroscience and Cell Biology Robert Wood Johnson Medical School 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 voice: (732)-235-4583; fax: -4029 mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu **********************************************
==============================Original Headers============================== 8, 35 -- From mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu Tue May 2 15:42:49 2006 8, 35 -- Received: from zix01.umdnj.edu (zix01.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.124]) 8, 35 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42KgnJv003454 8, 35 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 15:42:49 -0500 8, 35 -- Received: from zix01.umdnj.edu (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) 8, 35 -- by Outbound.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 2E3001C3292 8, 35 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:42:48 -0400 (EDT) 8, 35 -- Received: from umdnj.edu (imail2.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.139]) 8, 35 -- by zix01.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id D37DCA7B42 8, 35 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:42:46 -0400 (EDT) 8, 35 -- Received: from ([130.219.34.131]) 8, 35 -- by imail2.umdnj.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRCRF.12376868; 8, 35 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 16:42:19 -0400 8, 35 -- Received: from conversion-daemon.Polaris.umdnj.edu by Polaris.umdnj.edu 8, 35 -- (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) 8, 35 -- id {0IYN00M01NR1C0-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} (original mail from mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu) 8, 35 -- for microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com; Tue, 02 May 2006 16:42:19 -0400 (EDT) 8, 35 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.138.2.123]) 8, 35 -- by Polaris.umdnj.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 8, 35 -- 2004)) with ESMTP id {0IYN008LMO5VGO-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} ; Tue, 8, 35 -- 02 May 2006 16:41:56 -0400 (EDT) 8, 35 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 16:42:52 -0400 8, 35 -- From: Geoff McAuliffe {mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu} 8, 35 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] time course experiment 8, 35 -- In-reply-to: {200605022000.k42K0PwK017876-at-ns.microscopy.com} 8, 35 -- To: TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca, 8, 35 -- MicroscopyListserver {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} 8, 35 -- Message-id: {4457C44C.8030800-at-umdnj.edu} 8, 35 -- MIME-version: 1.0 8, 35 -- Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii 8, 35 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT 8, 35 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 8, 35 -- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) 8, 35 -- Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) 8, 35 -- References: {200605022000.k42K0PwK017876-at-ns.microscopy.com} ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I don't know in detail what you want to observe, but isn't there a fluorescent tracker-molecule (such as a Lyso-tracker) available for your purpose? Another more ideal solution might be creating a, for that one protein GFP-positive cell-line?! Than you could make a continuous time-lapse without the need of fixation etc., all depending on your experiment's requests of course!
Anyway, if the fixation is strong enough, does the protein still show activity / are changes still induced? To my opinion and experience, if fixed strong enough and there are no/little changes, it should not matter whether the cells are stained immediately or a few hours later, especially when also stored cold. Best regards,
Sven Terclavers
-----Original Message----- X-from: TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca [mailto:TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca] Sent: dinsdag 2 mei 2006 22:02 To: sven.terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be
Dear microscopists
I have recently had a discussion with a colleague about the best protocol to follow when staining cells during a time course experiment. I don't think there is a single correct answer, however, would like to know current thinking on the following issue:
Live cells were treated with a compound and observed at various time points during a period of 48 hours. At each time point, cells were fixed and immunofluorescently stained for the protein of interest.
Is it a less artefactual procedure to fix cells at each time point and keep in a buffer until the end of 48 hours to stain them all at the same time or fix and stain at each sampling time point? To stain at the same time may would reduce staining differences, however, keeping cells in buffer for different times may induce changes in the protein.
I look forward to hearing your opinions. Thank you. Judy
Judy Trogadis Bio-Imaging Coordinator St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen 30 Bond St. Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada ph: 416-864-6060 x6337 pager: 416-685-9219 fax: 416-864-6043 trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 19 -- From trogadisj-at-smh.toronto.on.ca Tue May 2 14:59:26 2006 7, 19 -- Received: from smh.toronto.on.ca (mail.smh.toronto.on.ca [199.71.175.103]) 7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42JxQwa015870 7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:26 -0500 7, 19 -- Received: from ([199.71.171.15]) 7, 19 -- by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca with ESMTP id KP-GCT47.12851322; 7, 19 -- Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400 7, 19 -- Received: from SMTPOUT-MTA by beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca 7, 19 -- with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 02 May 2006 15:59:00 -0400 7, 19 -- Message-Id: {s45781c4.036-at-beethoven.smh.toronto.on.ca} 7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2 7, 19 -- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:58:48 -0400 7, 19 -- From: "Judy Trogadis" {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca} 7, 19 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 7, 19 -- Subject: time course experiment 7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 7, 19 -- Content-Disposition: inline ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 17, 26 -- From Sven.Terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be Tue May 2 16:36:50 2006 17, 26 -- Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.73]) 17, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42LanKo014651 17, 26 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:36:49 -0500 17, 26 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 17, 26 -- by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP 17, 26 -- id B58261243D6; Tue, 2 May 2006 23:36:48 +0200 (CEST) 17, 26 -- Received: from gwydion (d54C3B21A.access.telenet.be [84.195.178.26]) 17, 26 -- by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP 17, 26 -- id 196E9124519; Tue, 2 May 2006 23:36:48 +0200 (CEST) 17, 26 -- Reply-To: {Sven.Terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be} 17, 26 -- From: "Sven Terclavers" {Sven.Terclavers-at-med.kuleuven.be} 17, 26 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 17, 26 -- Cc: {TrogadisJ-at-smh.toronto.on.ca} 17, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] time course experiment 17, 26 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:36:46 +0200 17, 26 -- Organization: Home 17, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 17, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 17, 26 -- charset="US-ASCII" 17, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 17, 26 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 17, 26 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022002.k42K26IW021687-at-ns.microscopy.com} 17, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZuI0qIhRcgu4y2SSy9OSe9sNcMaQAC6iGA 17, 26 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 17, 26 -- Message-Id: {20060502213648.196E9124519-at-hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be} ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical support, we are double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.
We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.
When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.
ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?
A thousand thanks in advance!
Danielle Crippen Morphology and Imaging Core Manager Buck Institute for Age Research 8001 Redwood Blvd. Novato, CA 94945 415-209-2046 dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24]) 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42MidAD025692 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 -0500 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1" 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700 9, 20 -- Message-ID: {C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org} 9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw== 9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org} 9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Are you SURE it's lead citrate precip? There are many other sources of precipitates and "pepper", as I'm sure you're aware. What kind of sample are you preparing? What buffer is being used? Are you osmicating your samples?
We fought a pepper problem for over two years, before finally discovering that adding 2-mercaptoethanol to our buffer solved the problem.
Feel free to email an image, if you like.
Randy
Randy Tindall EM Specialist Electron Microscopy Core Facility---We Do Small Well! W125 Veterinary Medicine University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211 Tel: (573) 882-8304 Fax: (573) 884-2227 Email: tindallr-at-missouri.edu Web: http://www.emc.missouri.edu
-----Original Message----- X-from: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org [mailto:dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:47 PM To: Tindall, Randy D.
Dear TEM users,
This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical support, we are double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.
We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.
When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.
ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?
A thousand thanks in advance!
Danielle Crippen Morphology and Imaging Core Manager Buck Institute for Age Research 8001 Redwood Blvd. Novato, CA 94945 415-209-2046 dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24]) 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42MidAD025692 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 -0500 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1" 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 9, 20 --
Danielle,
I haven't worked in biological electron microscopy for over 25 years. However, I vividly remember a colleague having a terrible time with precipitates from lead citrate staining. Turned out that the problem was his eye-sight. He was extremely near-sighted. To watch his work, his face was only several inches from the staining grid and water rinse. The source of the problem was CO2 from his breath. Another colleague happened to see his proximity to the stain and suggested the source of the problem. The precipitates disappeared once he isolated his exhaust from the process.
Food for thought.
Regards,
Gary M. Brown ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering - West 5200 Bayway Drive Baytown, Texas 77520-2101 phone: 281 834 2387 fax: 281 834 2395 e-mail: Gary.M.Brown-at-ExxonMobil.com
dcrippen-at-bucki nstitute.org To gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com 05/02/06 05:48 cc PM Subject [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Please respond Citrate--HELP!! to dcrippen-at-bucki nstitute.org
The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
Dear TEM users,
This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical support, we are double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.
We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.
When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.
ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?
A thousand thanks in advance!
Danielle Crippen Morphology and Imaging Core Manager Buck Institute for Age Research 8001 Redwood Blvd. Novato, CA 94945 415-209-2046 dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24]) 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42MidAD025692 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 -0500 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1" 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700 9, 20 -- Message-ID: {C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org} 9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw== 9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org} 9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 28, 19 -- From gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com Tue May 2 18:10:15 2006 28, 19 -- Received: from hoespc01.exxonmobil.com (hoespc01.exxonmobil.com [192.67.48.38]) 28, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42NAFLn013101 28, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:10:15 -0500 28, 19 -- Received: from hounmg03.NA.XOM.COM (hounmg03.na.xom.com [158.35.101.41]) 28, 19 -- by hoespc01.exxonmobil.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k42N9roU006716; 28, 19 -- Tue, 2 May 2006 18:09:54 -0500 (CDT) 28, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022248.k42Mm0ti029416-at-ns.microscopy.com} 28, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 28, 19 -- Importance: 28, 19 -- To: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org, microscopy-at-microscopy.com 28, 19 -- X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004 28, 19 -- Message-ID: {OF1CB0C5B8.3466EB9F-ON86257162.007E1D3A-86257162.007F44B0-at-exxonmobil.com} 28, 19 -- From: gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com 28, 19 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:10:07 -0500 28, 19 -- X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Hounmg03.na.xom.com/S/ExxonMobil(652FP1HF193|March 28, 19 -- 02, 2006) at 05/02/2006 06:10:12 PM 28, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 28, 19 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII ==============================End of - Headers==============================
On May 2, 2006, at 12:26 PM, TindallR-at-missouri.edu wrote:
} Today's challenge is trying to image platinum nanoparticles in an } agarose matrix, in order to see how they distribute themselves and to } get a size distribution. TEM and/or SEM are possibilities. So far, my } check of the literature finds tons of stuff on nanoparticles in } electrophoresis gels, but none of it is relevant, since the particles } are removed from the gels and put back into a liquid medium. The one } article I found that is comparable to our problem used thin-sectioning } and we have tried that. } } We have also tried melting the agarose, dipping grids into the } particle/agarose mix, then rinsing the grid in hot water to thin the } gelatin out. We can get images in the TEM, but the results are } inconsistent when repeating with the same sample. Also, there is the } chance that the hot water and melting are re-arranging the particles. } } We have tried thin sectioning the dehydrated agarose with particles, } but } finding the particles in a given thin section is a crap shoot with long } odds. Also, we may be cutting through aggregations we want to see. } } We have tried viewing carbon-coated dehydrated agarose with particles } using backscattered electrons in our FESEM. This gives images with } particles, but only those on or right at the surface are imaged clearly } enough for good size data. Plus, we can't see far into the agarose for } good distribution data. } } We are going to try increasing the concentration of the particles to } increase chances of getting them reliably in thin sections, and we will } also try putting the melted mixture on cover slips in a thin layer and } re-trying the BSE imaging after carbon coating. (The latter still has } the potential problem of redistributing the particles, however.) We } could also try doing large thick or semi-thin sections and viewing them } in BSE imaging. } } However, if someone out there has viewing nanos in agarose down to a } fine art, we, as usual, would be delighted to hear about it. In the } meantime, I will continue to search the databases. } Dear Randy, Thick or semi-thick sections in TEM would be my choice--probably since I have a 300 kV TEM. If you can get to a high-pressure freezer, I would suggest using that to prepare your specimens, followed by freeze-substitution and resin embedding. Assuming that you do not need to image the strands of agarose, just section the embedded specimen and observe. Yours, Bill Tivol, PhD EM Scientist and Manager Cryo-Electron Microscopy Facility Broad Center, Mail Code 114-96 California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125 (626) 395-8833 tivol-at-caltech.edu
==============================Original Headers============================== 4, 22 -- From tivol-at-caltech.edu Tue May 2 18:22:21 2006 4, 22 -- Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) 4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42NML6K022993 4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:22:21 -0500 4, 22 -- Received: from water-dog.caltech.edu (water-dog [192.168.1.26]) 4, 22 -- by fire-ox-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP 4, 22 -- id 0412A361B2; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:22:21 -0700 (PDT) 4, 22 -- Received: from [192.168.157.234] (pix-1.caltech.edu [131.215.2.21]) 4, 22 -- by earth-ox.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP 4, 22 -- id F421210AB45; Tue, 2 May 2006 16:22:19 -0700 (PDT) 4, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) 4, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605021926.k42JQQx1005807-at-ns.microscopy.com} 4, 22 -- References: {200605021926.k42JQQx1005807-at-ns.microscopy.com} 4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed 4, 22 -- Message-Id: {550efc1d94e877099710308bf41bdfde-at-caltech.edu} 4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 4, 22 -- From: Bill Tivol {tivol-at-caltech.edu} 4, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM/SEM: Nanoparticles in agarose 4, 22 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:32:36 -0700 4, 22 -- To: "Randy D.Tindall" {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} , microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com 4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) 4, 22 -- X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-ITS on water-dog by amavisd-2.3.3 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Reaching into my past......We used special analytical grade NaOH, since it seemed to us that the NaOH was picking up carbonate from the air. The analytical grade stuff came in a sealed glass vial, and made quite a difference.
Joel
Date sent: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:45:41 -0500 To: jbs-at-temple.edu X-from: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Send reply to: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
This may be shear luck, but I've never had trouble with precipitate (other things yes, but ppte no) - I keep my lead citrate (made up with ordinary distilled water, not specially CO2 free) in a volumetric flask (50ml), which sits in the same place month after month and is never moved. I don't use the stain for 24 hours after it's prepared, but then just carefully take off what's needed from close to the surface using a glass pipette. I wipe the end of the pipette with a tissue before dispensing the stain and then discard the first drop. I put the drops onto Parafilm in a covered glass petri dish. No need for NaOH pellets. Finally wash the grids for 5 seconds in a gentle stream of water from a wash bottle. I probably shouldn't admit this but I've had a bottle of stain last over 2 years (the surface of the bottle becomes cloudy with ppte) and still produce perfect results.
Cheers,
Diana
On 3 May 2006, at 8:47 AM, dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org wrote:
} } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- } ------ } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of } America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/ } MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- } ------ } } Dear TEM users, } } This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM } expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate } contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates } showing up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science } technical support, we are double distilling our own water (they say } Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for } EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly } upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent } prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to } cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds. } } We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed } in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) } (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free } double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and } then again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is } milky white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially } prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns } clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to } 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly with } rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day. } } When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash } well before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in } addition to surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH } pellets. In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 } minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate. } } ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? } What can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining? } } A thousand thanks in advance! } } Danielle Crippen } Morphology and Imaging Core Manager } Buck Institute for Age Research } 8001 Redwood Blvd. } Novato, CA 94945 } 415-209-2046 } dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org } } } } ==============================Original } Headers============================== } 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006 } 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org } (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24]) } 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP } id k42MidAD025692 } 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 } -0500 } 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message } 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; } 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1" } 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 } 9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! } 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700 } 9, 20 -- Message-ID: } {C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org} } 9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: } 9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: } 9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! } 9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw== } 9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org} } 9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit } 9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by } ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692 } ==============================End of - } Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 19 -- From dianavd-at-eye.usyd.edu.au Tue May 2 20:37:34 2006 7, 19 -- Received: from galen.med.usyd.edu.au (nugalen.med.usyd.edu.au [129.78.36.39]) 7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k431bXgq011889 7, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 20:37:33 -0500 7, 19 -- Received: from [129.78.203.144] (helo=[129.78.203.144]) 7, 19 -- by galen.med.usyd.edu.au with esmtp (Exim 4.43) 7, 19 -- id 1Fb6Ix-0001Sc-26; Wed, 03 May 2006 11:37:27 +1000 7, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) 7, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022247.k42MlH5w028230-at-ns.microscopy.com} 7, 19 -- References: {200605022247.k42MlH5w028230-at-ns.microscopy.com} 7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed 7, 19 -- Message-Id: {04E1FDBE-5BAF-4337-B5E4-2C18ED258184-at-eye.usyd.edu.au} 7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 7, 19 -- From: Diana van Driel {dianavd-at-eye.usyd.edu.au} 7, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 7, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:37:25 +1000 7, 19 -- To: Microscopy {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} , dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org 7, 19 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) 7, 19 -- X-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) ==============================End of - Headers==============================
We keep lead citrate prepared by reynold's method for months in a volumetric flask, Use Whatman 1 to filter and make drops on a parafilm in a petridish containing NaOH pellets. After staining for 1-3 min, wash the grids in water, then water with about 0.01% NaOH and again water. Never had any precipitates.
} } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The } Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Dear TEM users, } } This is a specimen prep question for everyone out } there with EM expertise. We are having terrible } success with Lead Citrate contrast staining. } Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up } all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science } technical support, we are double distilling our own } water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is } de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we } make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly } upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the } morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the } bottle for longer than it takes to cool down before } we begin making up the Reynolds. } } We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the } protocol listed in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's } Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead } nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free } double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few } minutes and then again 5-6 times over the next 30 } minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free } of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, } titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns } clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. } Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled } water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and } parafilm until use later that day. } } When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make } sure to wash well before and after with CO2 free } double distilled water in addition to surrounding } the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. } In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg } for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it } into staining plate. } } ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we } doing wrong?? What can we change about this } protocol to ensure ppt free staining? } } A thousand thanks in advance! } } Danielle Crippen } Morphology and Imaging Core Manager } Buck Institute for Age Research } 8001 Redwood Blvd. } Novato, CA 94945 } 415-209-2046 } dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org } } } } ==============================Original } Headers============================== } 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 } 17:44:40 2006 } 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org } (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24]) } 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com } (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id } k42MidAD025692 } 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 } May 2006 17:44:40 -0500 } 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message } 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; } 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1" } 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange } V6.5 } 9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! } 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700 } 9, 20 -- Message-ID: } {C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org} } 9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: } 9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: } 9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! } 9, 20 -- Thread-Index: } AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw== } 9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" } {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org} } 9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit } 9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable } to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692 } ==============================End of - } Headers============================== }
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 20 -- From shashis_99-at-yahoo.com Tue May 2 23:10:44 2006 6, 20 -- Received: from web54613.mail.yahoo.com (web54613.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.183]) 6, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k434AhDg024111 6, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 23:10:44 -0500 6, 20 -- Received: (qmail 76169 invoked by uid 60001); 3 May 2006 04:10:42 -0000 6, 20 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; 6, 20 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; 6, 20 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; 6, 20 -- b=ptQ7cT0W7aXsSDn7d2ujxNFCzmYsX6OWtiAAqbMZ/lfsNfYQNavioZdPDA2ZFfZH2w6s0IGPQFg/+g7kAbfXmKCNf1sFjy01pjBnf5VypfnA6HFkr3O2WiHAMjSKPo9oZ+H/s7uzILZehFv4AK5MOshoI/Tuu8UhcnIIIJs9lp8= ; 6, 20 -- Message-ID: {20060503041042.76167.qmail-at-web54613.mail.yahoo.com} 6, 20 -- Received: from [203.200.217.180] by web54613.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 May 2006 21:10:42 PDT 6, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 21:10:42 -0700 (PDT) 6, 20 -- From: shashi singh {shashis_99-at-yahoo.com} 6, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 6, 20 -- To: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org, 6, 20 -- "microscopy-at-microscopy.com" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 6, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605022247.k42MlX9q028672-at-ns.microscopy.com} 6, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 6, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 6, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Doesn't anybody else use or recommend Sato's lead stain as a more stable replacement for Reynolds Pb citrate? We've used it since the 1970s. 1968 Sato, T.: J. Electron Microsc. 17:158, 1968. 1968 Sato and others: Proc. XIth Int. Cong. on Electron Microscopy. Kyoto. 1986, pp. 2181-2182. [
-mike reedy-
At 5:49 PM -0500 5/2/06, dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org wrote: } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
-- -mike reedy-
************************ Michael K. Reedy, M.D. Duke Univ. Med. Center Dept. Cell Biology, Box 3011 (for U.S. Mail) 458 Alex Sands Bldg, Research Dr (courier) Durham, NC 27710
since it was not an issue in the replies so far, I would like to ask wether your double distilling apparatus overall is made of quartz glass or does have a destillate } container { bin made from metal (e. g. copper).
I only would like to add this since we had - several years ago - a problem when our destillation apparatus was out of function and on repair for some month and we used } bidistilled { water obtained from our hospital pharmacy. We had a lot of precipitation problems then, which ended not before we changed to the ddH2O from the repaired quartz-glass still used formerly.
When checking the quality of the "pharmacy"-water later on it turned out to contain a high amount of copper-ions (storage bin was made from copper sheets), which IMO perhaps might have had a detrimental precipitating action on the lead-staining performance.
By the way: we use Lead Citrate according to Venable&Coggeshall (1965), store solutions in "ultraclean" snap cap-glass-vials [and also ultraclean plastic snap cap!] which are used only for that purpose, that means we take care of any traces of cleaning substances by washing /cleaning also with chrome-sulfuric acid or a modern substitute but take care by ourselves (not a washing machine) to get rid of any resting traces of substances by vigorously washing several times with bidistilled hot water and a final step with ultrapure water (UHQ). We found also that intermittent air drying of glass vial/bottle creates probably otherwise insoluble incrustations, so we always keep the stuff in wet condition until the final step of cleaning.
Another point we found is that "freshly" made lead citrate solution (Venable&Coggeshall) -if used the same day - will be "more aggressive/more reactive", that means, we decrease staining times (say 30 sec when freshly prepared instead of 2-3 min -at-room temperature, e.g. after one week storage in the dark).
Avoiding or at least some sort of control for the CO2-reaction is obligatory in our lab (NaOH-pellets in a petridish filled with dental wax, the latter always being melted and } flamed/singed { after a staining cycle, but perhaps use of virgin, clean? { {Parafilm} } sheets is the better choice) knowing that some/severely disturbing precipitation nuclei also could be present in previousely uncleaned, and therefore } oily { injection needles, syringes, (plastic) tips, rubber stoppers (especially if always one and the same is used) as well as the surface areas where you are staining/handling your grids.
In general our experience is / was: the more steps you are introducing in your schedule to reduce an anticipated precipitate (or to inhibit the formation of such one) the more you (likely) will initiate precipitation due to unexpected particle impurities.
All best wishes for an excellent result of your next staining series,
Wolfgang Muss Salzburg Austria ---------- Von: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org[SMTP:dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org] Antwort an: dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Mai 2006 00:50 An: W.Muss-at-salk.at Betreff: [Microscopy] TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
Dear TEM users,
This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical support, we are double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly upon removal from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent prep--so it doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to cool down before we begin making up the Reynolds.
We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few minutes and then again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free double distilled water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and parafilm until use later that day.
When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate.
ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining?
A thousand thanks in advance!
Danielle Crippen Morphology and Imaging Core Manager Buck Institute for Age Research 8001 Redwood Blvd. Novato, CA 94945 415-209-2046 dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 20 -- From dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org Tue May 2 17:44:40 2006 9, 20 -- Received: from inverness.buckcenter.org (webmail.buckinstitute.org [64.84.58.24]) 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42MidAD025692 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:40 -0500 9, 20 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 9, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1" 9, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 9, 20 -- Subject: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:44:39 -0700 9, 20 -- Message-ID: {C7CAAAC7D2D14C409367E8D9026C1D78162E31-at-inverness.buckcenter.org} 9, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 9, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 9, 20 -- Thread-Topic: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZuOf68iZ+IkEf+SMS5wpYa7hbUNw== 9, 20 -- From: "Danielle Crippen" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org} 9, 20 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 9, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k42MidAD025692 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 24, 28 -- From W.Muss-at-salk.at Wed May 3 03:00:12 2006 24, 28 -- Received: from Hermes.salk.at (hermes.lks.at [193.170.167.9]) 24, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4380Bmm014853 24, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 03:00:11 -0500 24, 28 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 24, 28 -- by hermes.lks.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6518A5A901F; 24, 28 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:04 +0200 (CEST) 24, 28 -- Received: from hermes.lks.at ([127.0.0.1]) 24, 28 -- by localhost (hermes.lks.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 24, 28 -- with ESMTP id 71716-05; Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:04 +0200 (CEST) 24, 28 -- Received: from c1pa003 (unknown [192.168.42.3]) 24, 28 -- by hermes.lks.at (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FD325A900A; 24, 28 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:04 +0200 (CEST) 24, 28 -- Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:03 +0200 24, 28 -- Message-ID: {01C66E98.5941B2C0.W.Muss-at-salk.at} 24, 28 -- From: MUSS Wolfgang PhD {W.Muss-at-salk.at} 24, 28 -- Reply-To: "W.Muss-at-salk.at" {W.Muss-at-salk.at} 24, 28 -- To: "'dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org'" {dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org} , 24, 28 -- "'microscopy-at-microscopy.com'" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 24, 28 -- Subject: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 24, 28 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:00:01 +0200 24, 28 -- Return-Receipt-To: MUSS Wolfgang PhD {W.Muss-at-salk.at} 24, 28 -- Organization: SALK,Salzburger Landeskliniken, Pathologie, EM-Labor 24, 28 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 24, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 24, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" 24, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 24, 28 -- X-Virii-Scanned: by Sophos/ClamAV at salk.at ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Hi folks, Strictly this isn't a microscopy question but I think I have a fair chance of catching someone who might be able to help!
I was looking through our boxes of 'historical' samples (there has been a materials analysis lab here for more than 50 years), and I have examples of 1", 2", 3", 4", 6" and 8" Si wafers. Since we stopped getting Si samples to analyse about 5 years ago I don't have any 12" (or 300mm, I should say) wafers. Is there anyone out there willing to swap a 12" wafer for a 1" one? I know it doesn't seem like good value for the amount of material but I hope that would be more than compensated for by the historical interest. Or I could swap odd bits of Ge, GaAs, InP, sapphire, etc. etc. if Si isn't your bag. Perhaps I should start up a little 'Caswell museum'..
======================================================================= This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only. The information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use, forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. No part of this message can be considered a request for goods or services. =======================================================================
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 31 -- From richard.beanland-at-bookham.com Wed May 3 05:08:50 2006 9, 31 -- Received: from mail72.messagelabs.com (mail72.messagelabs.com [193.109.255.147]) 9, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k43A8oWW029818 9, 31 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 05:08:50 -0500 9, 31 -- X-VirusChecked: Checked 9, 31 -- X-Env-Sender: richard.beanland-at-bookham.com 9, 31 -- X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-72.messagelabs.com!1146650928!34334684!1 9, 31 -- X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=bookham.com,-,- 9, 31 -- X-Originating-IP: [213.249.209.179] 9, 31 -- Received: (qmail 6827 invoked from network); 3 May 2006 10:08:48 -0000 9, 31 -- Received: from unknown (HELO cas-smx-brdg-01.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI) (213.249.209.179) 9, 31 -- by server-14.tower-72.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 3 May 2006 10:08:48 -0000 9, 31 -- Received: from cas-smx-02.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI ([10.4.0.223]) by cas-smx-brdg-01.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); 9, 31 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 11:08:48 +0100 9, 31 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 9, 31 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 9, 31 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 9, 31 -- charset="us-ascii" 9, 31 -- Subject: Si wafers 9, 31 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 11:08:47 +0100 9, 31 -- Message-ID: {9645D3E33E4C6548B12A7B25F611533E083603-at-cas-smx-02.BOOKHAM.ENTERPRISE.PRI} 9, 31 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 9, 31 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 9, 31 -- Thread-Topic: Si wafers 9, 31 -- Thread-Index: AcZumZF7SpnmhpHcRrOQHPRrNC+AIA== 9, 31 -- From: "Richard Beanland" {richard.beanland-at-bookham.com} 9, 31 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 9, 31 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2006 10:08:48.0562 (UTC) FILETIME=[9206F920:01C66E99] 9, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 9, 31 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k43A8oWW029818 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
} This may be shear luck, but I've never had trouble with } precipitate (other things yes, but ppte no) - I keep my lead } citrate (made up with ordinary distilled water, not specially } CO2 free) in a volumetric flask (50ml), which sits in the } same place month after month and is never moved. I don't use } the stain for 24 hours after it's prepared, but then just } carefully take off what's needed from close to the surface } using a glass pipette. I wipe the end of the pipette with a } tissue before dispensing the stain and then discard the first } drop. I put the drops onto Parafilm in a covered glass petri } dish. No need for NaOH pellets. Finally wash the grids for 5 } seconds in a gentle stream of water from a wash bottle. I } probably shouldn't admit this but I've had a bottle of stain } last over 2 years (the surface of the bottle becomes cloudy } with ppte) and still produce perfect results. } } Cheers, } } Diana
I use similar protocol, but I do use DI-} distilled-} boiled water and I do put NaOH pellets in the petry dish. Never tried to keep stain for 2 years, but for 6 month it works fine.
Vladimir
Vladimir M. Dusevich, Ph.D. Electron Microscope Lab Manager 371 School of Dentistry 650 E. 25th Street Kansas City, MO 64108-2784
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------- } } ------ } } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of } } America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/ } } MicroscopyListserver On-Line Help
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 23 -- From DusevichV-at-umkc.edu Wed May 3 09:18:33 2006 9, 23 -- Received: from kc-msxproto3.kc.umkc.edu (exchange.umkc.edu [134.193.44.10]) 9, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k43EIXjZ011623 9, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 09:18:33 -0500 9, 23 -- Received: from KC-MSX1.kc.umkc.edu ([134.193.32.11]) by kc-msxproto3.kc.umkc.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 9, 23 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 09:18:33 -0500 9, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 9, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 9, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 9, 23 -- charset="us-ascii" 9, 23 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 23 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:18:32 -0500 9, 23 -- Message-ID: {032EC4F75A527A4FA58C5B1B5DECFBB33ADC12-at-KC-MSX1.kc.umkc.edu} 9, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 9, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 9, 23 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] Re: TEM--Lead Citrate--HELP!! 9, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZuUkF607FRWDc1TtCl4//Np/qEYQAaLHnw 9, 23 -- From: "Dusevich, Vladimir" {DusevichV-at-umkc.edu} 9, 23 -- To: {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} 9, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2006 14:18:33.0065 (UTC) FILETIME=[757CAD90:01C66EBC] 9, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 9, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k43EIXjZ011623 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I have been using "calcined lead citrate" (apparently a modification of Sato's lead citrate) for a couple of years, and it certainly is much more stable than traditional Reynold's lead citrate. Takamasa Hanaichi et al. (1986) A Stable Lead by Modification of Sato's Method. J. Electron Microsc., Vol. 35. No. 3. 304-306. --Jan Factor
--------------------------------------- Jan Robert Factor, Ph.D. Professor of Biology --------------------------------------- Natural Sciences Purchase College, State University of New York 735 Anderson Hill Rd. Purchase, NY 10577 USA --------------------------------------- Office Tel: 914-251-6659 Office Fax: 914-251-6635 E-mail: jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu or- jan.factor-at-purchase.edu ---------------------------------------
mike.reedy-at-cellbio.duke.edu wrote: --| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --| The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America --| To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver --| On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html --| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --| --| Doesn't anybody else use or recommend Sato's lead stain as a more --| stable replacement for Reynolds Pb citrate? We've used it since the --| 1970s. --| 1968 Sato, T.: J. Electron Microsc. 17:158, 1968. --| 1968 Sato and others: Proc. XIth Int. Cong. on Electron Microscopy. --| Kyoto. 1986, pp. 2181-2182. [ --| --| -mike reedy- --| --| At 5:49 PM -0500 5/2/06, dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org wrote: --| --|--| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --|--| The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America --|--| To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver --|--| On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html --|--| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --|--| --|--| Dear TEM users, --|--| --|--| This is a specimen prep question for everyone out there with EM --|--| expertise. We are having terrible success with Lead Citrate --|--| contrast staining. Principally, we suffer from precipitates showing --|--| up all over the specimen. On the advice of EM science technical --|--| support, we are double distilling our own water (they say Milli-Q is --|--| too pure and also is de-ionized which we don't want for EM). Then --|--| we make it CO2 free by autoclaving and capping directly upon removal --|--| --| --|from the autoclave. We do this the morning of reagent prep--so it --| --|--| doesn't sit in the bottle for longer than it takes to cool down --|--| before we begin making up the Reynolds. --|--| --|--| We make the Reynolds Lead citrate according to the protocol listed --|--| in Ch 5 of Bozzola and Russell's Electron Microscopy (2nd edition) --|--| (mix 1.33g lead nitrate, 1.76g sodium citrate, and 30ml CO2 free --|--| double distilled water...shake vigorously for a few miutes and then --|--| again 5-6 times over the next 30 minutes). Ensure solution is milky --|--| white and free of particles. Add 8.0 ml commercially prepared, --|--| titrated 1.0 N NaOH--from EM science--solution turns clear. Adjust --|--| pH strictly to 12.0+/-0.1 unit. Bring volume to 50ml with CO2-free --|--| double distilled water. Stopper tightly with rubber stopper and --|--| parafilm until use later that day. --|--| --|--| When we stain the grids with lead nitrate, we make sure to wash well --|--| before and after with CO2 free double distilled water in addition to --|--| surrounding the staining plate (Hiraoka kit) with NaOH pellets. In --|--| addition, we centrifuge the Reynolds at 5000xg for 8 minutes prior --|--| to use AND we 0.2um filter it into staining plate. --|--| --|--| ANY advice or thoughts are welcome...what are we doing wrong?? What --|--| can we change about this protocol to ensure ppt free staining? --|--| --|--| A thousand thanks in advance! --|--| --|--| Danielle Crippen --|--| Morphology and Imaging Core Manager --|--| Buck Institute for Age Research --|--| 8001 Redwood Blvd. --|--| Novato, CA 94945 --|--| 415-209-2046 --|--| dcrippen-at-buckinstitute.org --|--| --|--|
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 16 -- From jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu Wed May 3 17:27:11 2006 7, 16 -- Received: from zephyr.ns.purchase.edu (zephyr.ns.purchase.edu [199.79.168.193]) 7, 16 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k43MRAVQ029989 7, 16 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:27:10 -0500 7, 16 -- Received: from [10.52.0.79] ([10.52.0.79]) 7, 16 -- by zephyr.ns.purchase.edu (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id k43MV1520666; 7, 16 -- Wed, 3 May 2006 18:31:01 -0400 7, 16 -- Message-ID: {44592E41.5000605-at-ns.purchase.edu} 7, 16 -- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:27:13 -0400 7, 16 -- From: Jan Factor {jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu} 7, 16 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) 7, 16 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 7, 16 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 7, 16 -- Subject: Re: Lead Citrate 7, 16 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 7, 16 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I've had a couple of inquiries about calcined lead citrate, so I thought I'd send this to the list in case anyone else is interested. (To be fair, I learned about this method by perusing the EMS Catalog, which has the formulation.) I've pasted the relevant page from my in-house lab manual (below). To prepare the calcined the lead citrate, the unusual step, I simply went up to our chemistry program and asked them to fire up their high-temp oven (which is in a fume hood) for the day. Once you get a successful batch of calcined lead citrate, and I suggest making a good deal more than you need immediately, it can be stored as a powder in a vial for some time (perhaps indefinitely?). This way, you only have to bake it once, and you can make enough for multiple batches of lead citrate stain. I still use the usual precautions when handling lead stain, such as using NaOH pellets, and I spin down the stain in a table-top centrifuge before each use. Hope this is helpful. --Jan
--------------------------------------- Jan Robert Factor, Ph.D. Professor of Biology --------------------------------------- Natural Sciences Purchase College State University of New York 735 Anderson Hill Rd. Purchase, NY 10577 USA --------------------------------------- Office Tel: 914-251-6659 Office Fax: 914-251-6635 E-mail: jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu or- jan.factor-at-purchase.edu ---------------------------------------
Calcined lead citrate (Hanaichi et al., 1986)
Calcined lead citrate is a stable, non-precipitating replacement for Reynolds’ lead citrate, which is reportedly free from precipitates for over one year when kept at room temperature. Takamasa Hanaichi et al. (1986) A Stable Lead by Modification of Sato's Method. J. Electron Microsc., Vol. 35. No. 3. 304-306. Calcined lead citrate: Heat crystal lead citrate for several hours in a melting pot (200-300̊C) until the color changes to a light brownish yellow. This takes ~6.5 hrs at 250̊C. Note: Check the color periodically, as overheated lead citrate with a dark brownish or black color can't be used. The calcined lead citrate can be stored and used for repeated batches of stain.
The stock lead solution: 1. The following reagents are placed in a 50 ml volumetric flask and mixed well to produce a yellowish milky solution: CALCINED LEAD CITRATE........0.20 g Prepared from lead citrate Lead nitrate......................................0.15 g Lead acetate....................................0.15 g EMS #17600-25, 25g Sodium citrate.................................1.00 g Distilled water................................ 41.00 ml
2. Then, add: 1.0N NaOH.....................................9.0 ml Carbonate free, EMS #21170-01, 225ml Then 9.0 ml of 1N NaOH (use carbonate free solution) is added to the solution and mixed well until the solution becomes clear with a light yellowish color. The solution is then transferred to an amber glass with screw cap bottle for storage, and can be stored at room temperature or in the refrigerator (recommended) for over 1 year.
-
==============================Original Headers============================== 12, 19 -- From jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu Wed May 3 19:02:12 2006 12, 19 -- Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.198]) 12, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4402Cd9008597 12, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 19:02:12 -0500 12, 19 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ool-4357e602.dyn.optonline.net [67.87.230.2]) 12, 19 -- by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net 12, 19 -- (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) 12, 19 -- with ESMTP id {0IYP00FL8S34FY65-at-mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net} for 12, 19 -- microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com; Wed, 03 May 2006 20:01:53 -0400 (EDT) 12, 19 -- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 20:02:00 -0400 12, 19 -- From: Jan Factor {jfactor-at-ns.purchase.edu} 12, 19 -- Subject: Calcined lead citrate 12, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} 12, 19 -- Message-id: {44594478.8020707-at-ns.purchase.edu} 12, 19 -- MIME-version: 1.0 12, 19 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed 12, 19 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) 12, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 12, 19 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4402Cd9008597 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks, or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips gratefully accepted!
Aloha, Tina
**************************************************************************** * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu * * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 * * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf* ****************************************************************************
==============================Original Headers============================== 5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Wed May 3 22:56:05 2006 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7]) 5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k443u4UL021598 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:56:05 -0500 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k443u0kp023231 5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:56:00 -1000 (HST) 5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k443txfE023228 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST) 5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs 5, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST) 5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu} 5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia 5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 5, 19 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM? 5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605031752360.23000-100000-at-halia} 5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I am observing the internalization of a fluorescent component in the cells. I thought it would be a good idea to quench the extracellular fluorescence after several hours of incubation. This way I would see only the fluorescence coming from inside the cells. Would you know a substance which quenches Alexa488 dyes and which is not toxic to the cells (and do not enter the cells)? Stéphane-without-an-i
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================Original Headers============================== 3, 18 -- From nizets2-at-yahoo.com Thu May 4 05:44:45 2006 3, 18 -- Received: from web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.66]) 3, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k44Aij0f004607 3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 05:44:45 -0500 3, 18 -- Received: (qmail 1686 invoked by uid 60001); 4 May 2006 10:44:45 -0000 3, 18 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; 3, 18 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; 3, 18 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; 3, 18 -- b=nqm/XzURMI3axvbmJZsvwkIBQ/KWvp7vwWzV66J26ivZKNEbGL+t4EtML2piRt2x+fsuORpYb9WXbSAqyni8b1Ok2ZWbjYfcwVq3Fb/bXNgmLACLGSGYC7RTq4WHmfsNfE3pR0v7ZMhk/BbD3jqLwcQQOlilu+MaLkA0l22SBw8= ; 3, 18 -- Message-ID: {20060504104445.1684.qmail-at-web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com} 3, 18 -- Received: from [80.122.101.102] by web37413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 04 May 2006 03:44:45 PDT 3, 18 -- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 03:44:45 -0700 (PDT) 3, 18 -- From: Stephane Nizet {nizets2-at-yahoo.com} 3, 18 -- Subject: quenching extracellular fluorescence 3, 18 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 3, 18 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 3, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 3, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I am not aware of anti-GFP gold conjugate (although it may be somewhere out there), but you can use the indirect method, i.e. primary antibody/secondary conjugate (protein A/gold or secondary antibody/gold). For the primary, we use Torrey Pines Biolabs purified rabbit Anti-GFP, that works well even after 2% formaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde (that is what we use for Tokuyashu's technique).
Hope this helps,
Michal
tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu wrote: } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Hi, All- } } I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed } Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need } to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks, } or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips } gratefully accepted! } } Aloha, } Tina } } **************************************************************************** } * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu * } * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 * } * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf* } **************************************************************************** } } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Wed May 3 22:56:05 2006 } 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7]) } 5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k443u4UL021598 } 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:56:05 -0500 } 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) } 5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k443u0kp023231 } 5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) } 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:56:00 -1000 (HST) } 5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k443txfE023228 } 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST) } 5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs } 5, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST) } 5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu} } 5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia } 5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} } 5, 19 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM? } 5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605031752360.23000-100000-at-halia} } 5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII } ==============================End of - Headers============================== }
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 20 -- From M_Jarnik-at-fccc.edu Thu May 4 07:20:26 2006 6, 20 -- Received: from azah.fccc.edu (azah.fccc.edu [131.249.4.237]) 6, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44CKQZn015740 6, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 07:20:26 -0500 6, 20 -- Received: from [131.249.8.162] (macloan2.fccc.edu [131.249.8.162]) 6, 20 -- by azah.fccc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k44CKPHb019420 6, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 08:20:26 -0400 (EDT) 6, 20 -- Message-ID: {4459F2D9.5010705-at-fccc.edu} 6, 20 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 08:26:01 -0400 6, 20 -- From: Michal Jarnik {M_Jarnik-at-fccc.edu} 6, 20 -- Reply-To: M_Jarnik-at-fccc.edu 6, 20 -- Organization: Fox Chase Cancer Center 6, 20 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) 6, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 6, 20 -- To: Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com 6, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM? 6, 20 -- References: {200605040356.k443usWD022646-at-ns.microscopy.com} 6, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605040356.k443usWD022646-at-ns.microscopy.com} 6, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 6, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com Name: Rick Powell
Organization: Nanoprobes, Incorporated
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Re: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM?
Question: Hello Tina and Everyone:
We don't have a gold probe for this (yet), and can't comment on the best antibodies, but the question comes up occasionally, and we keep an eye out for references. We have reported on several that might be helpful in back issues of our newsletter:
http://www.nanoprobes.com/Newsletter_Archive.html
(1) Follet‚Gueye and co-workers have reported an improved fixation method for the immunogold localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP). The method is a simple one-step procedure which consists of fixing in the dark for 30 min, 60 min, or 120 min at 4ƒC in a solution consisting of 1% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M Na cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2. This mixture was prepared and used immediately. After washing in distilled water, the samples were gradually dehydrated in 10%, 20%, and 40% aqueous ethanol (10 min in each bath), then in 60% and 80% (20 min in each bath), and finally in anhydrous ethanol for 30 min, and embedded in LR White or Spurr resin. GFP-tagged Golgi glycosyltransferase was localized in transgenic BY-2 cells using rabbit anti-GFP primary and 10 nm gold anti-rabbit secondary antibodies; this method allowed improved structural preservation of the endomembrane system, and anti-GFP antibodies bound with high specificity, allowing the localization of GFP-tagged glycosyltransferases within individual Golgi cisternae.
Reference:
Follet-Gueye, M. L.; Pagny, S.; Faye, L.; Gomord, V., and Driouich, A.: An improved chemical fixation method suitable for immunogold localization of green fluorescent protein in the Golgi apparatus of tobacco Bright Yellow (BY-2) cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 51, 931-940 (2003).
Abstract (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry): http://www.jhc.org/cgi/content/abstract/51/7/931
Reprint (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry): http://www.jhc.org/cgi/reprint/51/7/931
(2) Luby-Phelps and co-workers describe a procedure for labeling green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing cells in 1-micron zebrafish sections for fluorescence and electron microscope observation using a 10 nm gold-labeled secondary antibody. GFP fluorescence survived fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde and can be visualized directly by fluorescence microscopy. For electron microscopy, thin sections of silver‚gold color were collected on nickel grids and were incubated in anti-GFP antibody at a 1:25 dilution for 2 hr at room temperature, followed by 10-nm immunogold-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG for 1 hr. After contrasting with 3% aqueous uranyl acetate solution, the grids were dried and viewed with a Hitachi 600 transmission electron microscope operated at 75 kV.
Reference:
Luby‚Phelps, K.; Ning, G.; Fogerty, J., and Besharse, J. C.: Visualization of Identified GFP-expressing Cells by Light and Electron Microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 51, 271-274 (2003).
Abstract (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry): http://www.jhc.org/cgi/content/abstract/51/3/271
Reprint (courtesy of the Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry): http://www.jhc.org/cgi/reprint/51/3/271
(3) Joanne Buchanan and co-workers investigated immuno-EM of GFP with NanogoldÆ secondary antibody conjugates, and described some results at Microscopy & Microanalysis 2002: use of microwave processing greatly shortened all the steps.
Reference:
Buchanan, J.; Micheva, K. D., and Smith, S. J.; Microwave Processing and Pre-embedding Nanogold Immunolabeling for Electron Microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 8, (Suppl. 2: Proceedings); Lyman, C. E.; Albrecht, R. M.; Carter, C. B.; Dravid, V. P.; Herman, B., and Schatten, H. (Eds.); Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2002, 160.
Prior and co-workers prepared their own 5nm gold anti-GFP:
Prior, I. A.; Muncke, C.; Parton, R. G., and Hancock J. F.: Direct visualization of Ras proteins in spatially distinct cell surface microdomains. J. Cell. Biol., 160, 165-170 (2003).
Reprint (Journal of Cell Science): http://www.jcb.org/cgi/reprint/160/2/165
Hope some of this is helpful,
Rick Powell
******************************************************** Richard D. Powell rpowell-at-nanoprobes.com * www.nanoprobes.com NANOPROBES, Incorporated US Toll-free: (877) 447-6266 * Tel: (919) 845-6324 ********************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
At 11:57 PM 5/3/2006, you wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
Hi, All-
I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks, or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips gratefully accepted!
Aloha, Tina
**************************************************************************** * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu * * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 * * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf* ****************************************************************************
Hi Tina, I have not had very good luck with localizing GFP for on TEM sectios. Hope you will share any good suggestions that you get
Greg
tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu wrote: } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Hi, All- } } I have a client who would like to do some confocal on GFP-transformed } Arabidopsis (no problem) and then some TEM immunolabeling. What do I need } to know about buying an anti-GFP antibody conjugated to gold? Any tricks, } or is it straightforward? Does anyone have a favorite vendor? Any tips } gratefully accepted! } } Aloha, } Tina } } **************************************************************************** } * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu * } * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 * } * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf* } **************************************************************************** } } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Wed May 3 22:56:05 2006 } 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7]) } 5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k443u4UL021598 } 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 22:56:05 -0500 } 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) } 5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k443u0kp023231 } 5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) } 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:56:00 -1000 (HST) } 5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k443txfE023228 } 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST) } 5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs } 5, 19 -- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:55:59 -1000 (HST) } 5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu} } 5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia } 5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} } 5, 19 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM? } 5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605031752360.23000-100000-at-halia} } 5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII } ==============================End of - Headers============================== }
-- Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program Scientific Director, EM Core Lab P.O. Box 118525 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 gwe-at-ufl.edu Phone: 352-392-1295 Fax: 352-846-0251
-- Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program Scientific Director, EM Core Lab P.O. Box 118525 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 gwe-at-ufl.edu Phone: 352-392-1295 Fax: 352-846-0251
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 24 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Thu May 4 10:17:48 2006 7, 24 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165]) 7, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44FHmNN006072 7, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 10:17:48 -0500 7, 24 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63] (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63]) 7, 24 -- (authenticated bits=0) 7, 24 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id k44FHk3S1302702; 7, 24 -- Thu, 4 May 2006 11:17:46 -0400 7, 24 -- Message-ID: {445A1B19.3060508-at-ufl.edu} 7, 24 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:17:45 -0400 7, 24 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu} 7, 24 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu 7, 24 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) 7, 24 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 7, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 7, 24 -- To: tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu, 7, 24 -- "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com" {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 7, 24 -- Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Microscopy] Anti-GFP for TEM?] 7, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 7, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 7, 24 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 7, 24 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 7, 24 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) 7, 24 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Dear All, I am looking for a flange to mount a KEVEX EDS detector on my Philips 525 SEM (conical lens). Or for a drawing to help manufacturing the flange.
Hi Tina. We published a detailed protocol : Micheva, Buchanan, Hotz and Smith Nature Neuroscience 2003 Vol 6 #9 p925-32. I have had some good results with anti GFP antibodies from MBL and Roche for TEM. We used Fluro-Nanogold secondaries and silver enhanced and looked at hippocampal neurons in culture, Drosophila salivary glands and mouse brain -all pre-embedding labeling. I don't have any experience with aradadopsis. Good luck let me know if you need more info. JoAnn Buchanan
Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA 94305 650-723-5856
==============================Original Headers============================== 3, 18 -- From redhair-at-stanford.edu Thu May 4 13:09:06 2006 3, 18 -- Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu (smtp1.Stanford.EDU [171.67.22.28]) 3, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44I964k029103 3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 13:09:06 -0500 3, 18 -- Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 3, 18 -- by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id DDAF24BED1 3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 11:09:04 -0700 (PDT) 3, 18 -- Received: from Bucky.stanford.edu (B135-WinXP.Stanford.EDU [171.65.21.62]) 3, 18 -- by smtp1.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47724C16D 3, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 11:09:04 -0700 (PDT) 3, 18 -- Message-Id: {6.2.5.6.2.20060504110100.06cdd770-at-stanford.edu} 3, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 3, 18 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:09:01 -0700 3, 18 -- To: "Microscopy Listserver" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 3, 18 -- From: JoAnn Buchanan {redhair-at-stanford.edu} 3, 18 -- Subject: Anti-GFP for TEM 3, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 3, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I am looking for a method to identify Type IIB skeletal muscle fibers at the electron microscopy level in human muscle biopsies. There are well established techniques for light microscopy, typically detecting ATPase, but I need good fixation and embedding for immunoelectron microscopy. A reasonable fixation compromise is 2% formaldehyde and 0.1% --0.2% glutaraldehyde with embedding in LR White/Gold or one of the Lowicryl resins. Any suggestions? Any experience with a particular antibody for human type IIB fibers?
-- Larry Ackerman, Associate Specialist UCSF, Dept. of Anatomy, Rm S1347 513 Parnassus Ave., Box 0452 San Francisco, CA 94143
larry.ackerman-at-ucsf.edu
==============================Original Headers============================== 4, 28 -- From Larry.Ackerman-at-ucsf.edu Thu May 4 14:35:17 2006 4, 28 -- Received: from emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org (emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org [64.54.46.98]) 4, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k44JZGEP007901 4, 28 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 4 May 2006 14:35:16 -0500 4, 28 -- Received: from 64.54.128.152 by emfmcb02.ucsfmedicalcenter.org with 4, 28 -- ESMTP (Tumbleweed Email Firewall SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.1.0)); 4, 28 -- Thu, 04 May 2006 12:44:27 -0700 4, 28 -- X-Server-Uuid: 44B63953-633F-4500-B2DA-A3E478718104 4, 28 -- Received: from [128.218.123.88] ([128.218.123.88]) by 4, 28 -- exvs06.net.ucsf.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 4 May 4, 28 -- 2006 12:35:03 -0700 4, 28 -- Message-ID: {445A5767.7030601-at-ucsf.edu} 4, 28 -- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 12:35:03 -0700 4, 28 -- From: "Larry Ackerman" {larry.ackerman-at-ucsf.edu} 4, 28 -- Reply-to: larry.ackerman-at-ucsf.edu 4, 28 -- Organization: UCSF, NeuroAnatomy 4, 28 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923) 4, 28 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 4, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 4, 28 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 4, 28 -- Subject: Type IIB skeletal muscle 4, 28 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2006 19:35:03.0740 (UTC) 4, 28 -- FILETIME=[D73977C0:01C66FB1] 4, 28 -- X-WSS-ID: 684486111G81226191-01-01 4, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 4, 28 -- charset=iso-8859-1; 4, 28 -- format=flowed 4, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both bschneid-at-fhcrc.org as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: bschneid-at-fhcrc.org Name: Bobbie S.
Organization: FHCRC
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Independent microscope service engineers for JEOL microsocpes
Question: Is there an independent person servicing JEOL microscopes who on the west coast,specifically Washington.
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov Name: Ferri
Organization: NCI
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Breakage of section under the beam of TEM H7600 EM
Question: Dear All,
We're recently experiencing breakage of our sections (no matter what the thickness is) while imaging our samples under TEM H7600 Electron Microscope.
The section's thickness is usually 70-90 nm and spread nicely on a 200 mesh square Cu grid.
Our TEM H7600 is only two years old and works very well except for breaking the section. Even though we changed HV from 80 to 100 (Acc. Voltage Control, it didn't help and still broke the section.
We most likely experience this problem while imaging with the BottomMount of AMT542 camera, which used for high magnification samples.
Any comment on how to solve this problem or to control the beam from breaking the sections?
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both staffan-at-physto.se as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organization: Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Title-Subject: [Filtered] TEM EELS; any old/used spectrometer available?
Question: Hello everyone!
I have a question that I would like to ask and Gerald Kothleitner at Graz recommended this forum to me, i.e. this is my first posting here.
At Stockholm University, we are buying some new TEM and spectrometer equipment. In the purchase process, however, we have an extra microscope. My idea is, if possible, to buy an additional spectrometer, a used one, for example GIF or PEELS to use together with our extra microscope (our old JEOL 3010 LaB6 instrument) so that young scientists can get more access to the instruments as well. So my question is, if you have, or if you know someone who has an old GIF or PEELS or similar that is not or will not be needed anymore at your lab due to for example an upgrade, or if is not needed anymore for any reason. Then "I" would be very interested in somehow purchasing this old/used spectrometer system for an affordable price (because it is not part of our current budget). I am asking this question as a PhD student, but I will happily forward your proposals or give you the contact information to the people who are making the decisions at my university.
Dear Ferri, We have the same instrument and I have seen the problem you are experiencing. We have found it is usually a no more than a specimen clamping problem.You must make sure that the clamping mechanism is correctly located over the grid hole. We always use a pointed wooden spill to gently push it into place , you will hear a 'click' as it locates. It could be that the holder and clamping mechanism just need cleaning so that a good contact can be made.. This is not a unique problem to the H7600 in any TEM if the grid is not firmly clamped this will happen. Hope this solves it for you. Regards
Christine.
Christine Richardson Experimental Officer School of Biological and Biomedical Science Centre for Molecular Imaging University of Durham Science site South Rd Durham England DH1 3LE Tel: 0191 3341285\3341321 Fax:0191 3341201 E-mail: a.c.richardson-at-dur.ac.uk
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 19 -- From ac.richardson2-at-btinternet.com Fri May 5 09:01:59 2006 7, 19 -- Received: from web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.60]) 7, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k45E1v4F031181 7, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:01:58 -0500 7, 19 -- Received: (qmail 39272 invoked by uid 60001); 5 May 2006 14:01:56 -0000 7, 19 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; 7, 19 -- s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; 7, 19 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; 7, 19 -- b=lnecs6ps7yNpne0eGWewOguxBALIBSF+UESue92Nz9lFrRgvkRH2d+qCAqd/OuvNd3wHjoAECO5q0aMXLD8AJaez+HxbaYKhb9ekD6HEzsWsGuYhX+fVG9oHalEDdUOoHJDvYxaSp3nHYscTqlqI4yEi+qV0oV1mDFm9Ah7+yd0= ; 7, 19 -- Message-ID: {20060505140156.39270.qmail-at-web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com} 7, 19 -- Received: from [86.137.69.9] by web86301.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:01:56 BST 7, 19 -- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:01:56 +0100 (BST) 7, 19 -- From: Christine Richardson {ac.richardson2-at-btinternet.com} 7, 19 -- Subject: Breakage of section under the beam of TEM H7600 EM 7, 19 -- To: fsoheilian-at-ncifcrf.gov 7, 19 -- Cc: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 7, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 7, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 7, 19 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Thanks to all who responded with tips. We will try an indirect labeling process, and I will fix more lightly than usual. If we are dramatically successful, I'll post our procedure!
Mahalo, Tina
**************************************************************************** * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu * * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 * * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf* ****************************************************************************
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Fri May 5 13:54:00 2006 6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7]) 6, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k45IrxDX012977 6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 13:53:59 -0500 6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 6, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k45IrtUn008540 6, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) 6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:53:55 -1000 (HST) 6, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k45Irs2g008537 6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 08:53:54 -1000 (HST) 6, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs 6, 19 -- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:53:53 -1000 (HST) 6, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu} 6, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia 6, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 6, 19 -- Subject: Thanks- Anti-GFP for TEM 6, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605050850340.8459-100000-at-halia} 6, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 6, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Here is the May 2006 Microscopy Today table of contents. I will close the subscription list for this issue on Thursday May 11, 2006.
Microscopists in North America and MSA members anywhere can subscribe for free. Anyone else may subscribe for US$50 per year (to PARTIALLY cover postage). All subscriptions at http://www.microscopy-today.com Thank you.
Ron Anderson, Editor =======================================================
Teaching Old Microscopes New Tricks Stephen W. Carmichael, Mayo Clinic
VisBio: a Flexible Open-Source Visualization Package for Multidimensional Image Data Curtis T. Rueden and Kevin W. Eliceiri, U. Wisconsin-Madison
BioImageXD – New Open Source Free Software for the Processing, Analysis and Visualization of Multidimensional Microscopic Images P. Kankaanpää1, K. Pahajoki1, V. Marjomäki2, J. Heino2, D. White2 1University Turku, 2University Jyväskylä, Finland
Novel Developments in High-Frequency Micro-Ultrasound Imaging Tom Little, VisualSonics Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Precise SEM Cross Section Polishing via Argon Beam Milling N. Erdman, R. Campbell, and S. Asahina,* JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, Massachusetts, *JEOL Ltd., Japan
Perfusion Fixation of Research Animals C. W. Scouten,* R. O’Connor,** & M. Cunningham** *MyNeuroLab.com, St Louis, MO, ** Harvard U., Belmont, MA
Three-Dimensional Crystallographic Analysis Beyond EBSD Mapping: The Next Dimension J.J.L. Mulders*, and A. Gholinia**, * FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, ** HKL Technology, Hobro, Denmark
Improved Cutting of One-Micron Plastic Sections using Qwick Glass Knives J. T. McMahon and J. Alsouss, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio
The Scanning of Colour and B&W Film and Photographs for Image Processing, Analysis and Archiving - On a Tight Budget Keith J. Morris, The Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, UK
A Comment on AFM vs. Replicas for High Resolution Imaging Don Chernoff, Advanced Surface Microscopy, Inc.
Embedding Cultured Cells Grown in Well Plates Leona Cohen-Gould, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Flies in a Box P. S. Connelly & L. Ruggiero,* *Oregon Health and Science U. Portland, OR
A Comment on using FLIM with FRET Karl Garsha, Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ
Microscopy for Children Carolyn Schooley, MSA Project MICRO
New and Interesting at PITTCON & Industry News
NetNotes Topics
--LM - floaters
--SAMPLE PREPARATION - viral particles
--SAMPLE PREPARATION – cell culture preparation
--SAMPLE PREPARATION - propylene oxide
--SAMPLE PREPARATION - MgO preparation and Fe oxidation
--MICROTOMY – cleaning grids
--MICROTOMY - section thickness
--IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY - nanogold in semithin sections
--EM - microscope cooling lines
--EM – operating voltage
--TEM - Replicas
--TEM - carbon post-coating
--EDS - Low Z peak pileup
Index of Advertisers
==============================Original Headers============================== 35, 18 -- From microscopytoday-at-tampabay.rr.com Fri May 5 14:51:40 2006 35, 18 -- Received: from ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.135]) 35, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k45Jpej7023464 35, 18 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.Com} ; Fri, 5 May 2006 14:51:40 -0500 35, 18 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rrcs-24-73-73-214.se.biz.rr.com [24.73.73.214]) 35, 18 -- by ms-smtp-05.tampabay.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k45JpZZh000413; 35, 18 -- Fri, 5 May 2006 15:51:38 -0400 (EDT) 35, 18 -- Message-ID: {445BACC4.1020406-at-tampabay.rr.com} 35, 18 -- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:51:32 -0400 35, 18 -- From: Microscopy Today {microscopytoday-at-tampabay.rr.com} 35, 18 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) 35, 18 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 35, 18 -- To: Listserver {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.Com} , 35, 18 -- Confocal Listserver {confocal-at-listserv.buffalo.edu} 35, 18 -- Subject: Microscopy Today May 2006 Table of Contents 35, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed 35, 18 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 35, 18 -- X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I am new to the listserve and was hoping somebody could give me some advise and/or guidance. I am looking for the best way to embed, cut, and adhere to microscope slides wool/hair fibers. I have tried nitrocellulose/paraffin, Spurr's Resin, Epon, and LR white. I am having an issue with the fibers popping out of the resin during sectioning and/or during the sample processing. I have tried cutting the resin dry and wet - floating off into water. I have tried infiltrating with acetone/resin and ethanol/resin mixtures with the Spurr's resin, acetone/resin infiltration with the Epon and LR white. I seem to get the best cuts with LR white (5 microns) dry but then I have a problem adhering them to a slide for processing. To improve sample adhesion, I have tried albumin, gelatin, and neoprene. Of the three, neoprene seems to work the best. If anybody can offer advice for any or all of these issues, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you, Felicia Dixon
==============================Original Headers============================== 2, 16 -- From fmdixon-at-comcast.net Sat May 6 09:42:14 2006 2, 16 -- Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153]) 2, 16 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k46EgEtL023443 2, 16 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Sat, 6 May 2006 09:42:14 -0500 2, 16 -- Received: from rmailcenter06.comcast.net ([204.127.197.116]) 2, 16 -- by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP 2, 16 -- id {20060506144213m1300pbq3se} ; Sat, 6 May 2006 14:42:13 +0000 2, 16 -- Received: from [67.167.241.97] by rmailcenter06.comcast.net; 2, 16 -- Sat, 06 May 2006 14:42:13 +0000 2, 16 -- From: fmdixon-at-comcast.net 2, 16 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 2, 16 -- Subject: LM - hair sample prep 2, 16 -- Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 14:42:13 +0000 2, 16 -- Message-Id: {050620061442.29057.445CB5C500084791000071812200734830020198070B0300-at-comcast.net} 2, 16 -- X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Apr 11 2006) 2, 16 -- X-Authenticated-Sender: Zm1kaXhvbkBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA== ==============================End of - Headers==============================
If I recall my history of optics properly, people in the Middle Ages knew precisely what things looked like at the microscopical level but just couldn't draw accurate pictures of them. So they made the technological decision to develop the microscope so they could show each other what they already knew God had created. Really, it wasn't investigation, it was just confirmation of what they already knew was there. Thus, they were able to illustrate that ontogeny really does recapitulate philogeny. They "illustrated", not "investigated".
I hope we've settled this issue.
-Michael the OHR (Optics Historian of Record)
At 03:22 PM 04/20/06 -0500, you wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
____________________________________________________________________________ Michael Cammer Analytical Imaging Facility Albert Einstein Coll. of Med. URL: http://www.aecom.yu.edu/aif/
==============================Original Headers============================== 11, 23 -- From cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu Mon May 8 10:23:27 2006 11, 23 -- Received: from mailgw.aecom.yu.edu (mailgw.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.1.16]) 11, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k48FNQJO025529 11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 10:23:27 -0500 11, 23 -- Received: from mailvx.aecom.yu.edu (mailvx.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.1.17]) 11, 23 -- by mailgw.aecom.yu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k48FNHvV019156 11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:23:24 -0400 11, 23 -- Received: from post.aecom.yu.edu ([129.98.1.100]) 11, 23 -- by mailvx.aecom.yu.edu (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2006050811232026666 11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 08 May 2006 11:23:20 -0400 11, 23 -- Received: from AIF3.aecom.yu.edu (aif3.aif.aecom.yu.edu [129.98.30.137]) 11, 23 -- by post.aecom.yu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B801A 11, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 11:23:19 -0400 (EDT) 11, 23 -- Message-Id: {5.2.1.1.2.20060508111658.011768c8-at-mailserver.aecom.yu.edu} 11, 23 -- X-Sender: cammer-at-mailserver.aecom.yu.edu 11, 23 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 11, 23 -- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:23:24 -0400 11, 23 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 11, 23 -- From: Michael Cammer {cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu} 11, 23 -- Subject: Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration 11, 23 -- In-Reply-To: {200604202022.k3KKMNNG012581-at-ns.microscopy.com} 11, 23 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 11, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed ==============================End of - Headers==============================
What!? There are several ideas in there that are hard for me to swallow. Of course, I know that my ability to swallow alone does not determine the truth of concept.
I am not so familiar with the early history of microscopy and the thinking surrounding it. (I would not think of challenging you for the position of OHR.) I doubt there was a decision made to develop microscopy to only verify what was suspected of being there. Their preconceptions might be considered hypotheses in need of verification, but we certainly get surprised enough about hypotheses on a macro scale. Microscopy would hardly be more of a sure thing.
I thought that microscopy would have developed more out of a desire to explore. I can guess what might be out there on a microscopic scale, but until I actually go and take a look, it is only conjecture - no matter how accurate the conjecture might be.
Maybe I am misunderstanding Mr. Cammer's point on Ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny. Are you saying that _those_ folks used microscopy to "prove" it? Perhaps they "proved" it to themselves. Or are you saying you still accept the idea yourself? If so, my understanding is that the concept has been discredited for some time. I am not a great fan of Stephen Gould but I found the following comment in an Amazon review of his book, _Ontogeny and Phylogeny_.
"Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" was Haeckel's answer--the wrong one--to the most vexing question of nineteenth-century biology: what is the relationship between individual development (ontogeny) and the evolution of species and lineages (phylogeny)? In this, the first major book on the subject in fifty years, Stephen Gould documents the history of the idea of recapitulation from its first appearance among the pre-Socratics to its fall in the early twentieth century. -Ernst Mayr.
FWIW, I consider microscopy an important tool for investigation. However, it must be used carefully as many of our observations are quite few. We need to pay attention to the statistics if we are going to generalize.
Warren Straszheim Iowa State University
-----Original Message----- X-from: cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu [mailto:cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 10:26 AM To: wesaia-at-iastate.edu
Microscopists, Please please forgive me for leaving out the word "only" in my original post. I meant to write ..."it is worth remembering that microscopy can be used for demonstration not ONLY investigation.
I was simply trying to point out that it is reasonable to demand one kind of thing when we are investigating but also have room for another purpose, namely the demonstration, for which demands are different. In no way shape or form was I meaning to suggest that microscopy cannot be used to investigate. Indeed, that suggestion is ludicrous.
I did send an apology after my post and it seems once is not enough. So once more, I am sorry to have wasted time and bandwith with my failure to proofread.
As ever, Tobias
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
I agree that EM or LM can and are used for investigation. They are also used for discovery. In the context of IC reverse engineering and technology evaluation, discovery and investigation are biggies. For failure analysis, I suspect that investigation fits the bill better than does discovery--unless investigation leads to the discovery of the failure mechanism.
IMO, I suspect that the early scientists and researchers had a clue that microbes existed but did not know what they looked like. Along comes the microscope. Now they could get a good idea of what they looked like and confirm that they existed. Is this investigation, discovery or both?
gary g.
At 10:23 AM 5/8/2006, you wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 11, 21 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Mon May 8 13:01:33 2006 11, 21 -- Received: from qsmtp2.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) 11, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k48I1Xf1025048 11, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:01:33 -0500 11, 21 -- Received: (qmail 29671 invoked from network); 8 May 2006 11:01:32 -0700 11, 21 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 29668, pid: 29669, t: 0.2843s 11, 21 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 11, 21 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211) 11, 21 -- by qsmtp2 with SMTP; 8 May 2006 11:01:32 -0700 11, 21 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060508105621.024f5678-at-gaugler.com} 11, 21 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 11, 21 -- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:01:34 -0700 11, 21 -- To: baskin-at-bio.umass.edu 11, 21 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com} 11, 21 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. 11, 21 -- illustration 11, 21 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 11, 21 -- In-Reply-To: {200605081723.k48HND4g017893-at-ns.microscopy.com} 11, 21 -- References: {200605081723.k48HND4g017893-at-ns.microscopy.com} 11, 21 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 11, 21 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed ==============================End of - Headers==============================
You're too clever by half. I assume that "philogeny" was not a misspelling.
Now, where did I hear that ontology recapitulates phylogeny?
Joel
} } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- } ------ The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society } of America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver On-Line Help } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- } ------ } } Microscopy can be used for investigation? Really? } } If I recall my history of optics properly, people in the Middle Ages } knew precisely what things looked like at the microscopical level but } just couldn't draw accurate pictures of them. So they made the } technological decision to develop the microscope so they could show } each other what they already knew God had created. Really, it wasn't } investigation, it was just confirmation of what they already knew was } there. Thus, they were able to illustrate that ontogeny really does } recapitulate philogeny. They "illustrated", not "investigated". } } I hope we've settled this issue. } } -Michael the OHR (Optics Historian of Record) } } } At 03:22 PM 04/20/06 -0500, you wrote: } } } } } --------------------------------------------------------------------- } } ------- The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy } } Society of America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- } } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver On-Line Help } } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html
Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D. Biology Department, Temple University 1900 North 12th Street Philadelphia, PA 19122 jbs-at-temple.edu (215) 204 8839, fax (215) 204 0486 http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 27 -- From jbs-at-temple.edu Mon May 8 13:04:33 2006 7, 27 -- Received: from po-smtp3.temple.edu (po-smtp3.temple.edu [155.247.166.231]) 7, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k48I4XhC028812 7, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:04:33 -0500 7, 27 -- Received: from [155.247.98.40] (jbs.bio.temple.edu [155.247.98.40]) 7, 27 -- by po-smtp3.temple.edu (MOS 3.7.5-GA) 7, 27 -- with ESMTP id CPU52947 (AUTH jbs); 7, 27 -- Mon, 8 May 2006 14:04:08 -0400 (EDT) 7, 27 -- From: "Joel Sheffield" {jbs-at-temple.edu} 7, 27 -- To: cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu, cammer-at-aecom.yu.edu, microscopy-at-microscopy.com 7, 27 -- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:41 -0400 7, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 7, 27 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: Ethical question; investigation vs. illustration 7, 27 -- Reply-to: jbs-at-temple.edu 7, 27 -- Message-ID: {445F4FF9.1379.3AFE2A1D-at-jbs.temple.edu} 7, 27 -- Priority: normal 7, 27 -- In-reply-to: {200605081524.k48FOBBI025741-at-ns.microscopy.com} 7, 27 -- X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.30 public beta 1) 7, 27 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 7, 27 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT 7, 27 -- Content-description: Mail message body 7, 27 -- X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=po-smtp3.temple.edu 7, 27 -- X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, 7, 27 -- refid=str=0001.0A090209.445F8635.0065,ss=1,fgs=0, 7, 27 -- ip=155.247.98.40, 7, 27 -- so=2006-03-30 10:46:40, 7, 27 -- dmn=5.1.5/2006-04-27 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both dotys-at-hss.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: dotys-at-hss.edu Name: Steve Doty
Organization: Hospital for Special Surgery
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Billing for core services.
Question: As director of a microscopy core, I am also responsible for sending bills/invoices for services provided by core. We have external as well as internal users. We provide TEM, SEM, LM, morphometric analysis, paraffin embedding and methacrylate embedding and sectioning, immuno and enzyme histochemistry. And we have a mix of clinical and basic research to accomodate. My problem is trying to keep the user and techniques together for billing purposes since any particular technique may take several days and different technician's support. Does anyone have a "system" that will help me keep track of everything that is happening around me! Many thanks, Steve Doty, PhD.
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organization: Natl.Inst.for Materials Physics, Bucharest, Romania
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid dissolved
Question: Dear colleagues,
Is there anybody who could give me a hint concerning the acid or acid mixture that would be effective in surface etching a piece of ternary metallic glass having the composition Zr70Ni10Pd20 ? I need to reveal the dimensions of grains which are most probably formed in the material after a short aannealing during which an icosahedral quasicrystalline phase was formed (it was revealed by X-ray diffraction). Any suggestion will be very welcome.
Thank you in advance.
Dr. Corneliu Sarbu National Institute for Materials Physics Magurele-Bucharest Romania
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both dainis-at-red5wood.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although we are an academic lab in materials, our problems with billing are very similar. The data, of course, has to feed into the corporate financial management system (SAP, in our case).
After a long period of wondering what to do, and a false start with an almost institute-wide system that promised to be totally comprehensive but was in fact far too ambitious for our resources, we are currently developing an in-house system which will enable us to track usage by instrument, user, date, project, etc. etc., as well, of course, as providing the data for our billing.
It has a MySQL heart, with Visual Basic and Filemaker Pro front-ends (for historical reasons). The data collection part of the system is up and running, and in use for most of our systems. All the instruments should be using it by the end of next month. Then we have to develop the interface to the billing system, and the analysis tools (currently we extract the data from the database by manual SQL calls and generate a text file).
Tony
At 08:40 PM 5/8/2006, you wrote: Email: dotys-at-hss.edu Name: Steve Doty
Organization: Hospital for Special Surgery
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Billing for core services.
Question: As director of a microscopy core, I am also responsible for sending bills/invoices for services provided by core. We have external as well as internal users. We provide TEM, SEM, LM, morphometric analysis, paraffin embedding and methacrylate embedding and sectioning, immuno and enzyme histochemistry. And we have a mix of clinical and basic research to accomodate. My problem is trying to keep the user and techniques together for billing purposes since any particular technique may take several days and different technician's support. Does anyone have a "system" that will help me keep track of everything that is happening around me! Many thanks, Steve Doty, PhD.
*********************************************** Anthony J. Garratt-Reed, M.A., D.Phil. MIT Room 13-1027 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 USA
Good day, Corneliu, Considering Ti as chemically similar to Zr, I found some etchant solutions for Ti alloys in Metals Handbook from ASM. That these might work for Zr alloys is supported by comments in Cotton and Wilkinson, Adv. Inorg. Chem. Anyway, here are a couple that ASM suggests as general purpose etchants:
10 ml HF, 5 ml HNO3, 85ml water 1-3 ml HF, 2-6 ml HNO3, water to 1000 ml
You can also try contacting ATI Wah Chang in Oregon, USA. They've been producing Zr alloys for decades and have plenty of expertise in that area. phone: 1-541-926-4211 www.wahchang.com
Good luck, and BE CAREFUL if you use HF.
Rob Bowen
-- Robert C. Bowen Research Scientist Caddock Electronics, Inc rob.bowen-at-caddock.com http://www.caddock.com
} From: {crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com} } Reply-To: {crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com} } Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:37:44 -0500 } To: {rob.bowen-at-caddock.com} } Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be } acid } } } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver } using the WWW based Form at } http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html } --------------------------------------------------------------------------- } Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying } please copy both crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver } --------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Email: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com } Name: Corneliu Sarbu } } Organization: Natl.Inst.for Materials Physics, Bucharest, Romania } } Title-Subject: [Filtered] Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid } dissolved } } Question: Dear colleagues, } } Is there anybody who could give me a hint concerning the acid or acid mixture } that would be effective in surface etching a piece of ternary metallic glass } having the composition Zr70Ni10Pd20 ? I need to reveal the dimensions of } grains which are most probably formed in the material after a short aannealing } during which an icosahedral quasicrystalline phase was formed (it was revealed } by X-ray diffraction). Any suggestion will be very welcome. } } Thank you in advance. } } Dr. Corneliu Sarbu } National Institute for Materials Physics } Magurele-Bucharest } Romania } } e-mail: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com } } } --------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 11, 13 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 8 19:32:38 2006 } 11, 13 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22]) } 11, 13 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id } k490WbBA031859 } 11, 13 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:38 -0500 } 11, 13 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 } 11, 13 -- X-Sender: (Unverified) } 11, 13 -- Message-Id: {p06110403c0859396e5cc-at-[206.69.208.22]} } 11, 13 -- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:32:36 -0500 } 11, 13 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com } 11, 13 -- From: crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver) } 11, 13 -- Subject: viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can they be acid } 11, 13 -- dissolved } 11, 13 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" } ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 11, 20 -- From Rob.Bowen-at-caddock.com Tue May 9 10:39:16 2006 11, 20 -- Received: from msg.caddock.com (69-29-3-221.stat.centurytel.net [69.29.3.221]) 11, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k49FdFhP022433 11, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 10:39:16 -0500 11, 20 -- Received: from [10.1.2.107] ([10.1.2.107]) 11, 20 -- by msg.caddock.com (Merak 8.3.8) with ESMTP id NUW63907; 11, 20 -- Tue, 9 May 2006 08:39:07 -0700 11, 20 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405 11, 20 -- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:32:54 -0700 11, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Zr70Ni10Pd20 metalic glasses - how can 11, 20 -- they be acid 11, 20 -- From: Rob Bowen {Rob.Bowen-at-caddock.com} 11, 20 -- To: {crnl_srbu-at-yahoo.com} 11, 20 -- CC: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 11, 20 -- Message-ID: {C0860436.2FF3%Rob.Bowen-at-caddock.com} 11, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605090037.k490biw6016005-at-ns.microscopy.com} 11, 20 -- Mime-version: 1.0 11, 20 -- Content-type: text/plain; 11, 20 -- charset="US-ASCII" 11, 20 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Hi, Might any of you know if polyurethane (Festo blue PU) tubing is compatible with P-10 gas. I currently have blue PU 3/16" tubing plumbed from the P-10 tank regulator to the first gfpc WDS on my uProbe. Is anyone 100% sure that this type of tubing should not be used to delivered P-10 gas to gas floow proportional counter detectors?
TIA Mike -- ******************************************************************** Michael M. Cheatham 312 Heroy Geology Laboratory Phone (315)-443-1261 Syracuse University Fax (315)-443-3363 Syracuse, NY 13244-1070
owner of PLASMACHEM-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/plasmachem-l.html owner of XRF-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/xrf-l.html owner of TIMS-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/tims-l.html owner of SIRIS-L: http://listserv.syr.edu/archives/siris-l.html ******************************************************************** --
==============================Original Headers============================== 4, 12 -- From mmcheath-at-mailbox.syr.edu Tue May 9 16:45:07 2006 4, 12 -- Received: from mailer.syr.edu (mailer.syr.edu [128.230.18.29]) 4, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k49Lj7e5001406 4, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-ns.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:45:07 -0500 4, 12 -- Received: from [128.230.24.90] (www.geochemistry.syr.edu) by mailer.syr.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id {0.1534C967-at-mailer.syr.edu} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 16:25:54 -0400 4, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 4, 12 -- Message-Id: {a06230902c086aa40f639-at-[128.230.24.90]} 4, 12 -- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:25:52 -0400 4, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-ns.microscopy.com 4, 12 -- From: Michael Cheatham {mmcheath-at-mailbox.syr.edu} 4, 12 -- Subject: [Microscopy] EPMA: P-10 gas and polyurethane tubing 4, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" ==============================End of - Headers==============================
CSIRO Plant Industry Black Mountain, Canberra Australia
Reference: 2006/411
We require an experienced microscopist with demonstrated knowledge of plant structure and developmental biology to assist in the Microscopy Centre in the Division of Plant Industry. Ideally, the appointee would have skills in preparation of plant material for light and electron microscopy, especially in cryo-scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis. The Microscopy Centre currently has light, fluorescence and confocal microscopes, a cryo-SEM with EDX, image analysis software and other ancilliary equipment.
The successful applicant will assist the Manager in training other staff in use of the instruments and in microscopy techniques, and in carrying out microscopy work for specific research projects. He/she will have at least a Bachelor's degree or equivalent training in plant structure and functional plant anatomy and experience in working in a research laboratory. Additional skills required are the ability to collaborate effectively with scientists and members of a research team and strong communication and computer skills.
This position is indefinite after a probationary period, salary $44K - $57K p.a plus Superannuation . To obtain selection documentation or details on how to apply visit http://recruitment.csiro.au/asp/job_details.asp?RefNo=2006%2F411. For further information contact Dr Rosemary White - rosemary.white-at-csiro.au . Responses to the selection criteria accompanied by a CV, must be received by close of business 4 June 2006.
Unfortunately, the powers-that-be have decided it's open to Australian residents only, largely so they don't have to fly people in for interviews. However, if you're interested, or know anyone who might be, contact me anyway.
cheers, Rosemary
Dr. Rosemary White rosemary.white-at-csiro.au CSIRO Plant Industry ph. 02-6246 5475 GPO Box 1600 mob. 0402 835 973 Canberra, ACT 2601 fax. 02-6246 5334 Australia
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 21 -- From Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au Tue May 9 22:16:44 2006 6, 21 -- Received: from act-MTAout4.csiro.au (act-MTAout4.csiro.au [150.229.7.41]) 6, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4A3Gfjj025723 6, 21 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 9 May 2006 22:16:43 -0500 6, 21 -- DomainKey-Signature: s=email; d=csiro.au; c=nofws; q=dns; b=bC6HYyfTUYh9CaPTvDUc3AjFXzW/zu8QZjKb+0k9l/CW8i5tvKSN+QHvOhErmGLrka3ACr9POWuOgf3jKrLizs3RXMNq5812A6CeLM2dzlUjk76BvvPASlMoyhkE+SAC; 6, 21 -- Received: from exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au ([138.194.3.56]) 6, 21 -- by act-MTAout4.csiro.au with ESMTP; 10 May 2006 13:16:39 +1000 6, 21 -- X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,107,1146405600"; 6, 21 -- d="scan'208"; a="93509110:sNHT29987620" 6, 21 -- Received: from [152.83.167.45] ([152.83.167.45]) by exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); 6, 21 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 13:16:38 +1000 6, 21 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 6, 21 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:18:17 +1000 6, 21 -- Subject: position available 6, 21 -- From: Rosemary White {Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au} 6, 21 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 6, 21 -- Message-ID: {C0879899.16529%Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au} 6, 21 -- Mime-version: 1.0 6, 21 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" 6, 21 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit 6, 21 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2006 03:16:38.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[26F0C660:01C673E0] ==============================End of - Headers==============================
We are considering buying EDX system integrated with EBSD for elemental and "structural" analysis of inorganic materials in SEM. I hope therefore that vendors of such equipment will contact me off the list. However, I would be grateful also for any comments from listers on the possibilities of EBSD as the method of structure identification of individual nanocrystals in composite materials.
Thank you,
Leszek
Leszek Kepinski Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1410, 50-950 Wroclaw, Poland e-mail: L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl
==============================Original Headers============================== 13, 33 -- From L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl Wed May 10 05:31:44 2006 13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.6]) 13, 33 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4AAVh7k009241 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 05:31:43 -0500 13, 33 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with ESMTP id 7143C134196 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:43:45 +0200 (CEST) 13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl ([127.0.0.1]) 13, 33 -- by localhost (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) 13, 33 -- with LMTP id 06540-02-6 for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; 13, 33 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 12:43:43 +0200 (CEST) 13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanner: This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus system 13, 33 -- NOD32 for Linux Mail Server. 13, 33 -- For more information on NOD32 Antivirus System, 13, 33 -- please, visit our website: http://www.nod32.com/. 13, 33 -- Received: from b8p020 (sqd.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.20]) 13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with SMTP id 2ED7B134276 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 12:36:15 +0200 (CEST) 13, 33 -- Message-ID: {006101c6741b$d020fe40$7f01a8c0-at-b8p020} 13, 33 -- From: =?iso-8859-2?B?TC4gS+pwafFza2k=?= {L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl} 13, 33 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 13, 33 -- Subject: EDS_EBSD system 13, 33 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:23:43 +0200 13, 33 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 13, 33 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 13, 33 -- charset="iso-8859-2" 13, 33 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 13, 33 -- X-Priority: 3 13, 33 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 13, 33 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 13, 33 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 13, 33 -- X-Scan-Module: SMTP[2006.04.28 (2006.01.25)] 13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at int.pan.wroc.pl ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Hello, I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this? It has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves. Controlling the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your skin. Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run?
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron Microscope Lab AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini Hall gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA 94720-3330 fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793
==============================Original Headers============================== 2, 24 -- From gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu Wed May 10 18:04:34 2006 2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU (nature.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.253.219]) 2, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4AN4YCx001108 2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:04:34 -0500 2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26521C1E40 2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:34 -0700 (PDT) 2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1]) 2, 24 -- by localhost (nature.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 2, 24 -- with ESMTP id 02522-01 for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; 2, 24 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:23 -0700 (PDT) 2, 24 -- Received: by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix, from userid 7458) 2, 24 -- id F2661C1E4F; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) 2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB150C1E43 2, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) 2, 24 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) 2, 24 -- From: Gordon Vrololjak {gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu} 2, 24 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 2, 24 -- Subject: cpd pains 2, 24 -- Message-ID: {Pine.SOC.4.64.0605101602510.1811-at-nature.Berkeley.EDU} 2, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 2, 24 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed 2, 24 -- X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
When we had one of those we used pliers to turn the knobs.
gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu wrote: } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Hello, } I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this? It } has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves. Controlling } the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your skin. } Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to } make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run? } } \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ } Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron Microscope Lab } AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini Hall } gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley } phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA 94720-3330 } fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793 } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 2, 24 -- From gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu Wed May 10 18:04:34 2006 } 2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU (nature.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.253.219]) } 2, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4AN4YCx001108 } 2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 18:04:34 -0500 } 2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) } 2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26521C1E40 } 2, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:34 -0700 (PDT) } 2, 24 -- Received: from nature.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1]) } 2, 24 -- by localhost (nature.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) } 2, 24 -- with ESMTP id 02522-01 for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; } 2, 24 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:23 -0700 (PDT) } 2, 24 -- Received: by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix, from userid 7458) } 2, 24 -- id F2661C1E4F; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) } 2, 24 -- Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) } 2, 24 -- by nature.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB150C1E43 } 2, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) } 2, 24 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) } 2, 24 -- From: Gordon Vrololjak {gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu} } 2, 24 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com } 2, 24 -- Subject: cpd pains } 2, 24 -- Message-ID: {Pine.SOC.4.64.0605101602510.1811-at-nature.Berkeley.EDU} } 2, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 2, 24 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed } 2, 24 -- X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 } ==============================End of - Headers============================== }
-- Greg Erdos 5410 SE 185th Ave. Micanopy, FL 32667
==============================Original Headers============================== 3, 24 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Wed May 10 20:59:01 2006 3, 24 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165]) 3, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4B1x0jY013536 3, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 20:59:00 -0500 3, 24 -- Received: from [10.228.8.36] (ssrb-vpn2-8-36.vpn.ufl.edu [10.228.8.36]) 3, 24 -- (authenticated bits=0) 3, 24 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id k4B1wvei508066; 3, 24 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 21:58:58 -0400 3, 24 -- Message-ID: {44629A6A.7050902-at-ufl.edu} 3, 24 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:59:06 -0400 3, 24 -- From: greg erdos {gwe-at-ufl.edu} 3, 24 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu 3, 24 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) 3, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 3, 24 -- To: gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu, microscopy-at-microscopy.com 3, 24 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] cpd pains 3, 24 -- References: {200605102306.k4AN68TT002400-at-ns.microscopy.com} 3, 24 -- In-Reply-To: {200605102306.k4AN68TT002400-at-ns.microscopy.com} 3, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 3, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 3, 24 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 3, 24 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 3, 24 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) 3, 24 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Sending to list--direct msgs bounce. If you have a better address, please advise and I will send any other material off-list.
-------
What SEM do you plan on using? What type of gun does it use?
What feature sizes are you interested in resolving? Ta and Cu seed layers are not possible to resolve even at .01u step size. I think that this is because no discernable grains have formed as yet. The electrodep Cu for damascene interconnects works well.
I've done single crystal Sapphire, Silicon and micro crystal Si. What would your nano crystals be made of? If the material is non-conductive, this may pose a charging issue. Since EBSD penetrates only about 50nm, this does not leave much depth for coating. The preferred coating is C. However, I rarely coat any insulating material even at 20KV.
There are basically two EBSD choices. TSL/EDAX or HKL/PGT. TSL and EDAX have been integrated for much longer than HKL and PGT (I think HKL connected just this year). TSL's camera/phosphor is round while HKL's camera end is square. This allows the HKL camera screen to get closer to the specimen. But I think that the TSL software complement is much better. AFAIK, only TSL has drift correction during data collection. At high mag and small step size, this is critical. However TSL's drift correction is not always repeatable and its own set of problems. But at least it is there and does usually work.
The SEM is going to be at issue too since higher frames per second need more probe current. However, this is at the expense of probe diameter and lattice resolution.
I'm using EDAX/TSL Pegasus with EDAX Genesis EDS and like it. The SEM is a Zeiss Supra 55VP, which has its own set of issues.
gary g.
At 03:34 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 15, 19 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Thu May 11 11:17:49 2006 15, 19 -- Received: from qsmtp3.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) 15, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4BGHmMP004357 15, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:17:48 -0500 15, 19 -- Received: (qmail 26316 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700 15, 19 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 26311, pid: 26312, t: 0.1909s 15, 19 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 15, 19 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211) 15, 19 -- by qsmtp3 with SMTP; 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700 15, 19 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060511090631.02476f70-at-gaugler.com} 15, 19 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 15, 19 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700 15, 19 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 15, 19 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com} 15, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] EDS_EBSD system 15, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com} 15, 19 -- References: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com} 15, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 15, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Hi Gordon - we have that same unit and have well developed calluses! Two simple tricks to keep your skin more or less intact: - I never adjust the coarse vent valve. Permanently leave it halfway open and control venting with the needle valve. - When going through the fill-drain cycles - open the fill valve one-half turn or so and leave it there until you're finished. Then you just open the drain valve to let fluid out, and close it to let fluid in. This cuts the number of knob-turning operations down by half. On our unit, the fill valve is the hardest to operate so this trick is very helpful.
I'd avoid pliers unless you absolutely can't get the knobs to turn. Pliers can strip the knurled texture and just make things harder in the future. And too much force can damage the valves. I do have one user that uses vise-grip pliers on the fill valve, but she is under stern warnings to pad the knob with cloth and not use force to close the valve.
Rick
gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu wrote: } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Hello, } I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this? It } has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves. Controlling } the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your skin. } Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to } make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run? } } \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ } Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron Microscope Lab } AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini Hall } gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley } phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA 94720-3330 } fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793 } }
-- {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} Richard C. Hugo, Ph.D Geomicrobiology and Electron Microscopy Laboratory Portland State University Ph# 503-725-3356 FAX 503-725-3025 {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {} {}
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 23 -- From hugo-at-pdx.edu Thu May 11 11:40:54 2006 6, 23 -- Received: from fafnir.oit.pdx.edu (fafnir.oit.pdx.edu [131.252.120.58]) 6, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BGerPO014461 6, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:40:53 -0500 6, 23 -- Received: from [131.252.193.7] (host-193-7.dhcp.pdx.edu [131.252.193.7]) 6, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0) 6, 23 -- by fafnir.oit.pdx.edu (8.13.3+/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4BGeo6r025730 6, 23 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); 6, 23 -- Thu, 11 May 2006 09:40:51 -0700 6, 23 -- X-Authentication-Warning: fafnir.oit.pdx.edu: Host host-193-7.dhcp.pdx.edu [131.252.193.7] claimed to be [131.252.193.7] 6, 23 -- Message-ID: {44636912.8020908-at-pdx.edu} 6, 23 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:40:50 -0700 6, 23 -- From: Rick Hugo {hugo-at-pdx.edu} 6, 23 -- Organization: Portland State University 6, 23 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) 6, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 6, 23 -- To: gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu, 6, 23 -- Microscopy List {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 6, 23 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] cpd pains 6, 23 -- References: {200605102307.k4AN7rwa004554-at-ns.microscopy.com} 6, 23 -- In-Reply-To: {200605102307.k4AN7rwa004554-at-ns.microscopy.com} 6, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 6, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
All this talk of forcing needle valves and pliers, etc. on CPD systems is scaring me. There used to be a homemade CPD in the Berkeley Microlab which sounds very similar to the unit currently being discussed. It was retired in favor of a Tousimis unit chiefly because of safety concerns. The pressures and explosive-release volumes on these systems are sufficient to cause serious injury in the event of a failed valve or fitting. Trust me - It's Not Worth It. If you find you are using hand tools to adjust needle valves on these systems, you DO have a safety problem.
-------- Original Message --------
Right, it is HKL+Oxford now. Thanks for the correction.
TSL uses a Digiview 1612 Firewire camera that does a good job.
Depending on the grain size you are examining, probe diameter will be critical. Too large and small grains will be missed. Probe current increases frames per second--which is good.
TSL will do multi-phase EBSD. Their expansion of this is their Delphi option. I do not have this. I figure it is more for those trying to discover new things than sorting out what is basically known but not quantified. The plain OIM system comes with the TSL database and accepts the AMCS database....a very huge set of materials indeed.
EDAX EDS has drift correction (maps). This is the same basic shell used by TSL. Without correction, long scans at high mag are IMO useless and impossible. These are easy to spot since the resulting scans are wavy rather than consistent. Coating with C pretty much eliminates that element from analysis and also reduces signal by about 20-30%. High Z coating is not in the cards--too much absorption to produce diffraction patterns. VP is workable. Since one is not doing EDS maps, drift correction during EBSD collection is the key. EDAX/TSL also offers off-line dataset analysis for EBSD like they do for EDS. I'm not sure if HKL has the same option. I would ask about this when shopping.
gary g.
At 10:11 AM 5/11/2006, you wrote: } Gary, } } We're also considering a new EBSD system for an old LaB6 JEOL 840 that } delivers lots of beam current. It's to replace an old TSL system with a } deteriorated SIT camera. We're interested in the phase ID capabilities as } well as grain orientation analysis. } } Your comments on drift correction are especially interesting. I don't know } that a PGT/HKL connection exists any more. (Is PGT still in business?) HKL } is now part of Oxford, and they have at least partially integrated the EBSD } operation with Oxford's EDS software (INCA). INCA does has drift } correction, but I don't believe the combined system does yet. } } Larry } } } Larry Thomas } Pacific Northwest National Laboratory } Richland, WA 99352 } } email: Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov } phone: 509 372-0793 } -- } } } } } On 5/11/06 9:23 AM, "gary-at-gaugler.com" {gary-at-gaugler.com} wrote: } } } } } } } } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } } } Sending to list--direct msgs bounce. If you } } have a better address, please advise and I will } } send any other material off-list. } } } } ------- } } } } What SEM do you plan on using? What type of } } gun does it use? } } } } What feature sizes are you interested in resolving? } } Ta and Cu seed layers are not possible to resolve } } even at .01u step size. I think that this is because } } no discernable grains have formed as yet. The electrodep Cu for } } damascene interconnects works well. } } } } I've done single crystal Sapphire, Silicon and micro } } crystal Si. What would your nano crystals be made of? } } If the material is non-conductive, this may pose a } } charging issue. Since EBSD penetrates only about 50nm, } } this does not leave much depth for coating. The } } preferred coating is C. However, I rarely coat any } } insulating material even at 20KV. } } } } There are basically two EBSD choices. TSL/EDAX or } } HKL/PGT. TSL and EDAX have been integrated for much } } longer than HKL and PGT (I think HKL connected just this } } year). TSL's camera/phosphor is round while HKL's camera end } } is square. This allows the HKL camera screen to get } } closer to the specimen. But I think that the TSL } } software complement is much better. AFAIK, only TSL } } has drift correction during data collection. At high } } mag and small step size, this is critical. However TSL's } } drift correction is not always repeatable and its own } } set of problems. But at least it is there and does } } usually work. } } } } The SEM is going to be at issue too since higher frames } } per second need more probe current. However, this is } } at the expense of probe diameter and lattice resolution. } } } } I'm using EDAX/TSL Pegasus with EDAX Genesis EDS and like it. } } The SEM is a Zeiss Supra 55VP, which has its own set } } of issues. } } } } gary g. } } } } } } At 03:34 AM 5/10/2006, you wrote: } } } } } } } } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } } } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } } } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } } } } } Hi, } } } } } } We are considering buying EDX system integrated with EBSD for } } } elemental and "structural" analysis of inorganic materials in SEM. I hope } } } therefore that vendors of such equipment will contact me off the list. } } } However, I would be grateful also for any comments from listers on the } } } possibilities of EBSD as the method of structure identification of } } } individual nanocrystals in composite materials. } } } } } } Thank you, } } } } } } } } } } } } Leszek } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } Leszek Kepinski } } } Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, } } } Polish Academy of Sciences, } } } P.O.Box 1410, } } } 50-950 Wroclaw, Poland } } } e-mail: L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl } } } } } } } } } } } } ==============================Original } Headers============================== } } } 13, 33 -- From L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl Wed May 10 05:31:44 2006 } } } 13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl } } } (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.6]) } } } 13, 33 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with } } } ESMTP id k4AAVh7k009241 } } } 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 } } } 05:31:43 -0500 } } } 13, 33 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) } } } 13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with ESMTP } } } id 7143C134196 } } } 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 } } } 12:43:45 +0200 (CEST) } } } 13, 33 -- Received: from mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl ([127.0.0.1]) } } } 13, 33 -- by localhost (mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl [127.0.0.1]) } } } (amavisd-new, port 10025) } } } 13, 33 -- with LMTP id 06540-02-6 for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; } } } 13, 33 -- Wed, 10 May 2006 12:43:43 +0200 (CEST) } } } 13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanner: This message was checked by NOD32 } Antivirus system } } } 13, 33 -- NOD32 for Linux Mail Server. } } } 13, 33 -- For more information on NOD32 Antivirus System, } } } 13, 33 -- please, visit our website: http://www.nod32.com/. } } } 13, 33 -- Received: from b8p020 (sqd.int.pan.wroc.pl [156.17.85.20]) } } } 13, 33 -- by mserv2.int.pan.wroc.pl (INTiBS (1.0)) with SMTP } } } id 2ED7B134276 } } } 13, 33 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 10 May 2006 } } } 12:36:15 +0200 (CEST) } } } 13, 33 -- Message-ID: {006101c6741b$d020fe40$7f01a8c0-at-b8p020} } } } 13, 33 -- From: =?iso-8859-2?B?TC4gS+pwafFza2k=?= } } } {L.Kepinski-at-int.pan.wroc.pl} } } } 13, 33 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } } } 13, 33 -- Subject: EDS_EBSD system } } } 13, 33 -- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:23:43 +0200 } } } 13, 33 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } } } 13, 33 -- Content-Type: text/plain; } } } 13, 33 -- charset="iso-8859-2" } } } 13, 33 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit } } } 13, 33 -- X-Priority: 3 } } } 13, 33 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal } } } 13, 33 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 } } } 13, 33 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 } } } 13, 33 -- X-Scan-Module: SMTP[2006.04.28 (2006.01.25)] } } } 13, 33 -- X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at int.pan.wroc.pl } } } ==============================End of - } Headers============================== } } } } } } ==============================Original } Headers============================== } } 15, 19 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Thu May 11 11:17:49 2006 } } 15, 19 -- Received: from qsmtp3.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net } } [66.60.130.145]) } } 15, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id } } k4BGHmMP004357 } } 15, 19 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 11:17:48 -0500 } } 15, 19 -- Received: (qmail 26316 invoked from network); 11 May } 2006 09:17:46 } } -0700 } } 15, 19 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 26311, pid: 26312, t: 0.1909s } } 15, 19 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 } } 15, 19 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211) } } 15, 19 -- by qsmtp3 with SMTP; 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700 } } 15, 19 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060511090631.02476f70-at-gaugler.com} } } 15, 19 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 } } 15, 19 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:17:46 -0700 } } 15, 19 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } } 15, 19 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com} } } 15, 19 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] EDS_EBSD system } } 15, 19 -- In-Reply-To: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com} } } 15, 19 -- References: {200605101034.k4AAYo4n012418-at-ns.microscopy.com} } } 15, 19 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 } } 15, 19 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed } } ==============================End of - } Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 10, 21 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Thu May 11 13:23:11 2006 10, 21 -- Received: from qsmtp1.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) 10, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4BINAVK003464 10, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:23:10 -0500 10, 21 -- Received: (qmail 3963 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 11:23:10 -0700 10, 21 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 3960, pid: 3961, t: 0.1827s 10, 21 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 10, 21 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211) 10, 21 -- by qsmtp1 with SMTP; 11 May 2006 11:23:09 -0700 10, 21 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060511110407.02424110-at-gaugler.com} 10, 21 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 10, 21 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:23:09 -0700 10, 21 -- To: "Thomas, Larry (PNNL)" {Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov} 10, 21 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com} 10, 21 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: EDS_EBSD system 10, 21 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 10, 21 -- In-Reply-To: {C088BE6F.7E5%Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov} 10, 21 -- References: {200605111623.k4BGN9cK010183-at-ns.microscopy.com} 10, 21 -- {C088BE6F.7E5%Larry.Thomas-at-pnl.gov} 10, 21 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 10, 21 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed ==============================End of - Headers==============================
The first question I would ask: WHY are the knobs hard to turn?
Generally it's a couple reasons.
#1 If the threads are lubricated and the grease/oil and enough of the VOCs (even if they aren't very volatile) dissipate the lubricant can turn to glue. -Solution: Disassemble, clean (with WD-40, CRC or other solvating lubricants), and re-apply some lightweight grease (lithium or wheel bearing would be fine), or a touch of heavy oil.
#2 If the threads/valve are damaged, you probably should replace the valve.
These all are extremely simple devices. And as such parts are relatively easy to repair/replace or fix. Assuming you have the patience to source the proper valves. The pressures the CPDs the microscopy community utilizes are relatively insignificant to some of the devices folks in Physics and engineering play with daily, not to mention, McMaster-Carr has a great selection of valves and what not that are rated well above the typical 1500-3000 psi burst limit (safety) on the CPDs.
If the valve was always hard to turn that's one thing, if it is now, make it easy to turn.
Try even spraying the threads with some WD-40 or liquid Wrench and run a cycle or two and see if that helps anything.
I am a big fan of the Polaron type CPD. I've never been let down by one, and it is the best model for 'teaching' the principles... no black boxes and although manual, no sane minded individual should start a CPD run and let it go un-attended... so why not be manual? My apologies to those who sell automatic ones, this is just my opinion.
Geoff Williams Leduc Bioimaging Facility Manager Brown University
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:10 PM To: Williams, Geoffrey
Hello, I'm using an older Pelco CPD 2 critical point drier. Anyone use this? It has these gnurled steel knobs for opening/closing the valves. Controlling the valves kills your fingers since the rough metal is hard on your skin. Anyone modified it with plastic knobs or rubber covers or something to make it less of a literal pain to do a critical point drying run?
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ \/\/\ Gordon Ante Vrdoljak Electron Microscope Lab AOL/IM rakhasha http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gvrdolja 26 Giannini Hall gvrdolja-at-nature.berkeley.edu UC Berkeley phone (510) 642-2085 Berkeley CA 94720-3330 fax (510) 643-6207 cell (510) 290-6793
==============================Original Headers============================== 19, 29 -- From Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu Thu May 11 14:29:30 2006 19, 29 -- Received: from pyxis.services.brown.edu (pyxis.services.brown.edu [128.148.106.154]) 19, 29 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BJTUwW014301 19, 29 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 14:29:30 -0500 19, 29 -- Received: from ex-gateway2-out.AD.Brown.Edu (ex-gateway2.ad.brown.edu [128.148.21.53]) 19, 29 -- by pyxis.services.brown.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7/) with ESMTP id k4BJTT1G029302 19, 29 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:29:30 -0400 (EDT) 19, 29 -- Received: from mail1.AD.Brown.Edu ([128.148.21.31]) by ex-gateway2-out.AD.Brown.Edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 19, 29 -- Thu, 11 May 2006 15:29:29 -0400 19, 29 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 19, 29 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 19, 29 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 19, 29 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 19, 29 -- charset="US-ASCII" 19, 29 -- Subject: RE: cpd pains 19, 29 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:29:27 -0400 19, 29 -- Message-ID: {A1A84D541C161C4C988B4E0FB38F5A0F044FFAB6-at-MAIL1.AD.Brown.Edu} 19, 29 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 19, 29 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 19, 29 -- Thread-Topic: cpd pains 19, 29 -- Thread-Index: AcZ0hu6v536bZuTJRHefGkmGyiABXgAp6KHg 19, 29 -- From: "Williams, Geoffrey" {Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu} 19, 29 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 19, 29 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2006 19:29:29.0855 (UTC) FILETIME=[391AE8F0:01C67531] 19, 29 -- X-Brown-Proofpoint: Not Infected 19, 29 -- X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051106 19, 29 -- X-Brown-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051106 19, 29 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 19, 29 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4BJTUwW014301 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I am writing to get information on web-pages which have compiled links to bio-imaging and microscopy facilities both within the US and internationally.
I have searched and located a few such web-sites, but they are not very comprehensive and many of the links are dead.
If anyone in the community may have web-addresses or information on sites of this nature, I would appreciate their input.
Thank you,
David Lowry School of Life Sciences Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 office: 480-727-0725 lab: 480-965-2463
==============================Original Headers============================== 10, 26 -- From dlowry-at-asu.edu Thu May 11 15:13:41 2006 10, 26 -- Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) 10, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BKDeKs025039 10, 26 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:13:40 -0500 10, 26 -- Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) 10, 26 -- id {0IZ400A01AOYKN-at-asu.edu} for Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu, 10, 26 -- 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700 (MST) 10, 26 -- Received: from EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu 10, 26 -- (excl1-a0.asurite.ad.asu.edu [129.219.12.199]) 10, 26 -- by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) with ESMTP id {0IZ40094UAOXGF-at-asu.edu} for 10, 26 -- Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:09 -0700 (MST) 10, 26 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700 10, 26 -- From: David Lowry {dlowry-at-asu.edu} 10, 26 -- Subject: 10, 26 -- To: Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com 10, 26 -- Cc: Douglas Chandler {d.chandler-at-asu.edu} , Robert Roberson {robby2-at-asu.edu} 10, 26 -- Message-id: {B9366E69DACF09458B402E4C4385012601188099-at-EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu} 10, 26 -- MIME-version: 1.0 10, 26 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 10, 26 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 10, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ1NueqXPUlUZH9SzS8YvyHUcm0cw== 10, 26 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 10, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 10, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 10, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 10, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4BKDeKs025039 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (cheetham.3-at-osu.edu) from http://www.microscopy.org/Ask-A-Microscopist/Ask-A-Microscopist.html on Thursday, May 11, 2006 at 16:42:15 Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please reply to both cheetham.3-at-osu.edu as well as to the Microscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: cheetham.3-at-osu.edu Name: Sonia Cheetham
Organization: The Ohio State University
Education: Graduate College
Location: Wooster , Ohio
Title: question on photomicrophotography
Question: I have being trying to find out what photomicrophotography is about. I came across this term in a paper regarding confirmation of PMO getting into the cells. Can you give me a brief exlanation of what is this technique? Thanks
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both junhe-at-unmc.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: junhe-at-unmc.edu Name: Jun
Organization: unmc
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Freon113 in Dehydration and Critical Point Drying
Question: I have a question on the role of Froen 113 in the common route of: wet specimen---70% to 100% Ethanol----Freon113--Liduid CO2
CO2 is the common transitional fluid. Ethanol is the dehydration fluid. I know that in some cases people go from Ethanol to CO2 directely. But, Since the above route is also mentioned, I wonder what advantage Froen113 brings to the preparation process.
Ann Fook Yang EM Unit/ Unite EM AAFC/AAC 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa,Ontario Canada K1A 0C6 yanga-at-agr.gc.ca Telephone/Téléphone: 613-759-1638 Facsimile/Télécopieur: 613-759-1701
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada
-----Original Message----- X-from: dlowry-at-asu.edu [mailto:dlowry-at-asu.edu] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:18 PM To: Yang, Ann-Fook
Colleagues,
I am writing to get information on web-pages which have compiled links to bio-imaging and microscopy facilities both within the US and internationally.
I have searched and located a few such web-sites, but they are not very comprehensive and many of the links are dead.
If anyone in the community may have web-addresses or information on sites of this nature, I would appreciate their input.
Thank you,
David Lowry School of Life Sciences Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 office: 480-727-0725 lab: 480-965-2463
==============================Original Headers============================== 10, 26 -- From dlowry-at-asu.edu Thu May 11 15:13:41 2006 10, 26 -- Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) 10, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4BKDeKs025039 10, 26 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:13:40 -0500 10, 26 -- Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) 10, 26 -- id {0IZ400A01AOYKN-at-asu.edu} for Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu, 10, 26 -- 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700 (MST) 10, 26 -- Received: from EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu 10, 26 -- (excl1-a0.asurite.ad.asu.edu [129.219.12.199]) 10, 26 -- by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) with ESMTP id {0IZ40094UAOXGF-at-asu.edu} for 10, 26 -- Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:09 -0700 (MST) 10, 26 -- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:10:10 -0700 10, 26 -- From: David Lowry {dlowry-at-asu.edu} 10, 26 -- Subject: 10, 26 -- To: Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com 10, 26 -- Cc: Douglas Chandler {d.chandler-at-asu.edu} , Robert Roberson {robby2-at-asu.edu} 10, 26 -- Message-id: {B9366E69DACF09458B402E4C4385012601188099-at-EX03.asurite.ad.asu.edu} 10, 26 -- MIME-version: 1.0 10, 26 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 10, 26 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 10, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ1NueqXPUlUZH9SzS8YvyHUcm0cw== 10, 26 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 10, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 10, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 10, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 10, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4BKDeKs025039 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 20, 26 -- From YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA Fri May 12 07:29:30 2006 20, 26 -- Received: from agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca [192.197.71.137]) 20, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4CCTUYt006840 20, 26 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 07:29:30 -0500 20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA ([192.168.122.1]) 20, 26 -- by agrpazsmtp2.agr.gc.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4CCSAAN000796; 20, 26 -- Fri, 12 May 2006 08:28:20 -0400 20, 26 -- Received: from onncrxms3.AGR.GC.CA ([10.117.15.30]) by onncrxcn4.AGR.GC.CA with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); 20, 26 -- Fri, 12 May 2006 08:29:01 -0400 20, 26 -- x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 20, 26 -- content-class: urn:content-classes:message 20, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 20, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 20, 26 -- charset="iso-8859-1" 20, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] 20, 26 -- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:29:00 -0400 20, 26 -- Message-ID: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334E7-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca} 20, 26 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 20, 26 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 20, 26 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] 20, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ1N/gepqIvATEgTJuQuG904vfthgAh0jrg 20, 26 -- From: "Yang, Ann-Fook" {YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA} 20, 26 -- To: {dlowry-at-asu.edu} , {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 20, 26 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2006 12:29:01.0678 (UTC) FILETIME=[A65A58E0:01C675BF] 20, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 20, 26 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4CCTUYt006840 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both nyilmaz-at-mersin.edu.tr as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We're trying to investigate bacteria biofilms on a latex material (like surgical gloves) with TEM. We couldn't cut the latex material with our regular glass knives. Is there any suggestion about this problem?
Thanks for any comment...
Dr. Necat Yilmaz Mersin University Medical School Histology & Embryolgy Dept.
We are looking for a lab to do some contract work, embedding, sectioning and H&E staining of zebrafish using JB4/GMA plastics. We will provide fixed specimens. Ultimately we would like serial sections but for now we just want to see what sort of results we can expect. Please contact me directly. Nothe that I will be out of the office next week (15th-19th) so my response may be delayed. Thanks.
Geoff
-- -- ********************************************** Geoff McAuliffe, Ph.D. Neuroscience and Cell Biology Robert Wood Johnson Medical School 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 voice: (732)-235-4583; fax: -4029 mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu **********************************************
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 33 -- From mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu Fri May 12 12:40:53 2006 6, 33 -- Received: from zix02.umdnj.edu (zix02.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.125]) 6, 33 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4CHeq10031341 6, 33 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:40:52 -0500 6, 33 -- Received: from zix02.umdnj.edu (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) 6, 33 -- by Outbound.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 9E1464BE1E 6, 33 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:40:51 -0500 (CDT) 6, 33 -- Received: from umdnj.edu (imail2.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.34.139]) 6, 33 -- by zix02.umdnj.edu (Proprietary) with ESMTP id C8ECC4BDAD 6, 33 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:40:49 -0500 (CDT) 6, 33 -- Received: from ([130.219.34.131]) 6, 33 -- by imail2.umdnj.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRCRF.13635540; 6, 33 -- Fri, 12 May 2006 13:40:20 -0400 6, 33 -- Received: from conversion-daemon.Polaris.umdnj.edu by Polaris.umdnj.edu 6, 33 -- (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) 6, 33 -- id {0IZ500F01XNDSY-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} (original mail from mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu) 6, 33 -- for microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:40:20 -0400 (EDT) 6, 33 -- Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.138.2.123]) 6, 33 -- by Polaris.umdnj.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 6, 33 -- 2004)) with ESMTP id {0IZ5006KPYF739-at-Polaris.umdnj.edu} ; Fri, 6, 33 -- 12 May 2006 13:40:20 -0400 (EDT) 6, 33 -- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:41:17 -0400 6, 33 -- From: Geoff McAuliffe {mcauliff-at-umdnj.edu} 6, 33 -- Subject: GMA/JB4 Contract work 6, 33 -- To: Histonet {histonet-at-pathology.swmed.edu} , 6, 33 -- MicroscopyListserver {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} 6, 33 -- Message-id: {4464C8BD.7090000-at-umdnj.edu} 6, 33 -- MIME-version: 1.0 6, 33 -- Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 6, 33 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT 6, 33 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 6, 33 -- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) 6, 33 -- Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) ==============================End of - Headers==============================
At the risk of putting my foot in my oversized mouth - - - You need a cryo-microtome and work around -40. This gets you below the glass transistion temperature for most elastomers and the latex will no longer behave like an elastic material, but a hard brittle glass. You may need to fiddle with temperature and pick-up technique. I've sectioned polymer and and used both glycerin/water, mineral spirits/xylene and DMSO/water depending on the temperature and my end goal (Light, SEM or TEM). A diamond knife and boat would be my prefered method. I like to pick up with a "perfect loop" and place on carbon coated grid.
good luck and have fun........
Frank Karl Degussa Corporation Akron Technical Center 3500 Embassy Parkway Suite 100 Akron, Ohio 44333
330-668-2235 Ext. 238
This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you.
nyilmaz-at-mersin.ed u.tr To: frank.karl-at-degussa.com cc: 05/12/2006 08:44 Subject: [Microscopy] viaWWW: Cutting latex for TEM AM Please respond to nyilmaz
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Cutting latex for TEM
Question: Hello Everybody...
We're trying to investigate bacteria biofilms on a latex material (like surgical gloves) with TEM. We couldn't cut the latex material with our regular glass knives. Is there any suggestion about this problem?
Thanks for any comment...
Dr. Necat Yilmaz Mersin University Medical School Histology & Embryolgy Dept.
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both dyel-at-mail.nih.gov as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: dyel-at-mail.nih.gov Name: Chip Dye
Organization: NIH
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Locust brain
Question: Hello ListServers,
Does anyone have a good reference or two for images of the locust brain? It would be great if I could find both LM and TEM images.
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.org/MicroscopyListserver/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both dgmorgan-at-ucdavis.edu as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: dgmorgan-at-ucdavis.edu Name: David Morgan
Organization: University of California, Davis
Title-Subject: [Filtered] polymer microtomy
Question: I am forwarding two different questions regarding the microtomy of polymers from associates, and if additional information would be useful, please let me know and I will find out what else I can.
1) polymer embedded ZnO nano-rods. I do not know what type of polymer this specimen contains, which is probably critical to any advice that might be offered. I suspect that we will need to use a cryo-microtome and simply experiment to determine the best temperature to use. Any and all suggestions would be most welcome. Also, does anyone have experience with ZnO nano-rods, especially with regard to whether this material is capable of damaging a diamond knife?
2) poly-styrene beads. Another colleague is potentially interested in sectioning ~6 micron beads. Suggestions about the best way to handle such a sample would be welcome - the proper embedding material, sectioning temperature, etc.
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both AMCGroup2-at-aol.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: AMCGroup2-at-aol.com Name: James Glossinger
Organization: AMC Group
Title-Subject: TEM Contractor
We are currently seeking an independent TEM analyst, academic/non-profit TEM facility or, commercial TEM lab for contracting ongoing advanced TEM imaging and AEM projects, involving semiconductor materials and devices.
If interested and qualified, please contact me off-line via email.
Thanks, Jim
--------------------- James Glossinger, Ph.D. Principal Scientist AMC Group
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both palladineus-at-yahoo.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: palladineus-at-yahoo.com Name: Randy Khoo
Title-Subject: [Filtered] Masson-Fontana staining for melanin
Question: I am wondering if anybody can help me out on a poser that I have.
Melanin is able to reduce the ammoniacal silver nitrate solution without the addition of an external reducing agent. However, as I understand it, melanin exists in 2 forms, both in oxidized form and reduced form. So, is the reduced form only responsible for reducing the silver nitrate? If so, can the addition of a reducing agent result in both forms reducing the silver nitrate and show a better staining profile? Can this method be used to semi-quantify both the reduced and oxidized forms?
I have a project where I need to positively identify human cells that may have mouse cells mixed with them in a tumor. Does anyone have a suggestion for a protocol that will positively identify a cell as mouse or as human. Antibodies that I have tried so far have not worked, post-embedding.
Thanks, Greg -- Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program Scientific Director, EM Core Lab P.O. Box 118525 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 gwe-at-ufl.edu Phone: 352-392-1295 Fax: 352-846-0251
==============================Original Headers============================== 2, 23 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Mon May 15 08:18:13 2006 2, 23 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165]) 2, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDID2j018130 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:18:13 -0500 2, 23 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63] (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63]) 2, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0) 2, 23 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id k4FDIB1j1122394 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:12 -0400 2, 23 -- Message-ID: {44687F92.8060003-at-ufl.edu} 2, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:10 -0400 2, 23 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu} 2, 23 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu 2, 23 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) 2, 23 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 2, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 2, 23 -- To: "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com" {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 2, 23 -- Subject: Mouse -vs-Human 2, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 2, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2, 23 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 2, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Ah... I'm disappointed. I thought we were going to have a nice discussion about the transition from human adjustments (knobs) to using the mouse (bar sliders)....
I was already to pull out the link to http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/powermate/ ... suggesting that maybe it is the answer we old school knob aficionados have been waiting for.
Alas I have no suggestions relating to the topic. So please accept or excuse this mild attempt at being funny on a Monday morning.
Geoff Williams Leduc Bioimaging Facility Manager Brown University
-----Original Message----- X-from: gwe-at-ufl.edu [mailto:gwe-at-ufl.edu] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:22 AM To: Williams, Geoffrey
I have a project where I need to positively identify human cells that may have mouse cells mixed with them in a tumor. Does anyone have a suggestion for a protocol that will positively identify a cell as mouse or as human. Antibodies that I have tried so far have not worked, post-embedding.
Thanks, Greg -- Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D. Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program Scientific Director, EM Core Lab P.O. Box 118525 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 gwe-at-ufl.edu Phone: 352-392-1295 Fax: 352-846-0251
==============================Original Headers============================== 2, 23 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Mon May 15 08:18:13 2006 2, 23 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165]) 2, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDID2j018130 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:18:13 -0500 2, 23 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63] (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63]) 2, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0) 2, 23 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with ESMTP id k4FDIB1j1122394 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:12 -0400 2, 23 -- Message-ID: {44687F92.8060003-at-ufl.edu} 2, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:10 -0400 2, 23 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu} 2, 23 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu 2, 23 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) 2, 23 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en 2, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 2, 23 -- To: "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com" {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 2, 23 -- Subject: Mouse -vs-Human 2, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 2, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2, 23 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, tests=ALL_TRUSTED 2, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 12, 29 -- From Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu Mon May 15 08:29:50 2006 12, 29 -- Received: from pyxis.services.brown.edu (pyxis.services.brown.edu [128.148.106.154]) 12, 29 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDToxx028190 12, 29 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:29:50 -0500 12, 29 -- Received: from ex-gateway1-out.AD.Brown.Edu (ex-gateway1.ad.brown.edu [128.148.21.51]) 12, 29 -- by pyxis.services.brown.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7/) with ESMTP id k4FDTdO1011626; 12, 29 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 09:29:49 -0400 (EDT) 12, 29 -- Received: from mail1.AD.Brown.Edu ([128.148.21.31]) by ex-gateway1-out.AD.Brown.Edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 12, 29 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 09:29:47 -0400 12, 29 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 12, 29 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 12, 29 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 12, 29 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 12, 29 -- charset="US-ASCII" 12, 29 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human 12, 29 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:29:47 -0400 12, 29 -- Message-ID: {A1A84D541C161C4C988B4E0FB38F5A0F044FFC0C-at-MAIL1.AD.Brown.Edu} 12, 29 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 12, 29 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 12, 29 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human 12, 29 -- Thread-Index: AcZ4IoOHi5Mh71SqR4y2kC4rjGtdoAAALxag 12, 29 -- From: "Williams, Geoffrey" {Geoffrey_Williams-at-brown.edu} 12, 29 -- To: {gwe-at-ufl.edu} , {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 12, 29 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 13:29:47.0713 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2CC6310:01C67823] 12, 29 -- X-Brown-Proofpoint: Not Infected 12, 29 -- X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051209 12, 29 -- X-Brown-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=-1 adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=safe engine=3.1.0-06042601 definitions=3.0.0-06051209 12, 29 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 12, 29 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4FDToxx028190 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Does anyone where to find one of the spatial calibration slides that used to be sold by a company called Richardson Technologies? The company appears to be gone but I'm trying to get hold of one the slides.
Thank you!
--David Hitrys QImaging Corporation
==============================Original Headers============================== 1, 20 -- From dhitrys-at-qimaging.com Mon May 15 08:39:54 2006 1, 20 -- Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) 1, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FDdsFA005775 1, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 08:39:54 -0500 1, 20 -- Received: from 209-6-80-225.c3-0.frm-ubr2.sbo-frm.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO DHPC) ([209.6.80.225]) 1, 20 -- by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 May 2006 09:40:40 -0400 1, 20 -- X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,130,1146456000"; 1, 20 -- d="scan'208"; a="203995933:sNHT1448836834" 1, 20 -- From: "David Hitrys" {dhitrys-at-qimaging.com} 1, 20 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 1, 20 -- Subject: Spatial Calibration Slide from Richardson Technologies 1, 20 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:39:39 -0400 1, 20 -- Message-ID: {003401c67825$03e01ce0$0302a8c0-at-DHPC} 1, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 1, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 1, 20 -- charset="us-ascii" 1, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 1, 20 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 1, 20 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 1, 20 -- Thread-index: AcZ4JQOdwz3Z0tRTQpK666aP0DxGaQ== ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Microscopy/Microscopy Education 313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100 Allen, TX 75002 P: 972-954-8011 W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com
MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.
P. S. Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.
At 08:42 AM 5/15/2006, dhitrys-at-qimaging.com wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 14, 18 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Mon May 15 11:08:05 2006 14, 18 -- Received: from 5starpro.com (enterprise.5starpro.com [207.44.136.95]) 14, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FG85cl022948 14, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:08:05 -0500 14, 18 -- Received: (qmail 12441 invoked by uid 2020); 15 May 2006 11:24:05 -0500 14, 18 -- Received: from host57-99.rancor.birch.net (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (65.17.57.99) 14, 18 -- by enterprise.5starpro.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 15 May 2006 11:24:05 -0500 14, 18 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060515110734.02067758-at-mme1.com} 14, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 14, 18 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:08:15 -0500 14, 18 -- To: dhitrys-at-qimaging.com, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 14, 18 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com} 14, 18 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Spatial Calibration Slide from Richardson 14, 18 -- Technologies 14, 18 -- In-Reply-To: {200605151342.k4FDgKaa009921-at-ns.microscopy.com} 14, 18 -- References: {200605151342.k4FDgKaa009921-at-ns.microscopy.com} 14, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 14, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ==============================End of - Headers==============================
In response to a recent question on the ListServer which, in part, asked about the status of PGT Microanalysis, I would like to reply:
On Nov 17, 2005 Bruker AXS announced the acquisition of Princeton Gamma-Tech Microanalysis and Röntec AG. These two organizations were merged to form Bruker AXS Microanalysis. Bruker AXS develops and manufactures a broad range of analytical X-ray systems including XRF, XRD and now, X-ray Microanalysis.
Customer service and support for both PGT Microanalysis and Röntec have been expanded as part of the Bruker AXS worldwide operation. PGT and Röntec customers should contact Bruker AXS for continued product and applications support.
Bruker AXS Microanalysis is a proud Sustaining Member of MSA and MAS, carrying on the long time support given by PGT Microanalysis and Röntec to these fine professional organizations.
Doug Skinner Assistant Vice President Bruker-AXS Microanalysis 609-771-4400 Doug.Skinner-at-Bruker-AXS.com www.bruker-axs-ma.com
==============================Original Headers============================== 10, 23 -- From Doug.Skinner-at-bruker-axs.com Mon May 15 12:34:01 2006 10, 23 -- Received: from isa1.bruker-axs.com (68-22-68-158.ded.ameritech.net [68.22.68.158]) 10, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FHY0Gf001851 10, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:34:01 -0500 10, 23 -- Received: from mail1.bruker-axs.com ([172.16.0.32]) by isa1.bruker-axs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); 10, 23 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 12:34:42 -0500 10, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 10, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 10, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 10, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 10, 23 -- charset="iso-8859-1" 10, 23 -- Subject: Status of Princeton Gamma-Tech Microanalysis (PGT) 10, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:34:42 -0500 10, 23 -- Message-ID: {235D0F9F0400B3449E8C229D9D24CC57024C2EE3-at-mail1.bruker-axs.com} 10, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 10, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 10, 23 -- Thread-Topic: Status of Princeton Gamma-Tech Microanalysis (PGT) 10, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZ4RdBgdQwFFMgTR4CD5qIjFruOCw== 10, 23 -- From: "Skinner, Doug" {Doug.Skinner-at-bruker-axs.com} 10, 23 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 10, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 17:34:42.0631 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9A6ED70:01C67845] 10, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 10, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4FHY0Gf001851 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Does anybody have any experience with this digital microscope camera? I don't see on the webpage I found that the chip is cooled. How opinions about the image quality? Reliability? The price is attractive. Thanks.
Phil -- Philip Oshel Microscopy Facility Supervisor Department of Biology Central Michigan University 024C Brooks Hall Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859 (989) 774-3576
==============================Original Headers============================== 3, 20 -- From oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu Mon May 15 16:14:10 2006 3, 20 -- Received: from ob2.cmich.edu (ob2.cmich.edu [141.209.20.21]) 3, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FLE9wk016011 3, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 16:14:09 -0500 3, 20 -- Received: from egateb.central.cmich.local ([141.209.15.85]) 3, 20 -- by ob2.cmich.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4FLo84l006919 3, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:50:08 -0400 3, 20 -- Received: from [141.209.160.132] ([141.209.160.132]) by egateb.central.cmich.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); 3, 20 -- Mon, 15 May 2006 17:14:05 -0400 3, 20 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 3, 20 -- Message-Id: {f06230916c08e9f8899eb-at-[141.209.160.132]} 3, 20 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:14:07 -0400 3, 20 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 3, 20 -- From: Philip Oshel {oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu} 3, 20 -- Subject: Polaroid DMC2 3, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" 3, 20 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 21:14:05.0814 (UTC) FILETIME=[7F854160:01C67864] 3, 20 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: default 3, 20 -- X-Spam-Score: -4 () L_EXCH_MF 3, 20 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 141.209.20.21 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying please copy both lewryan-at-gmail.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: lewryan-at-gmail.com Name: Ryan
Organization: Dalhousie University
Title-Subject: [Filtered] SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate
Question: I have a saple with deposits of an alloy of Sn-Co-C on a magnetic stainless steel substrate (430 stainless steel). I'm using a cold field emission microscope and am having trouble getting high resolution images. Could you suggest what setting I should use to get started?
(honest, that's the page URL, I got it from Googling polaroid dmc2)
is says that it's no longer manufactured.
seems a pity
cheers
rtch
On 15 May 2006 at 16:16, oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu wrote:
} } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Listers, } } Does anybody have any experience with this digital microscope camera? } I don't see on the webpage I found that the chip is cooled. } How opinions about the image quality? Reliability? The price is attractive. } Thanks. } } Phil } -- } Philip Oshel } Microscopy Facility Supervisor } Department of Biology } Central Michigan University } 024C Brooks Hall } Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859 } (989) 774-3576 }
-- Ritchie Sims Ph D Phone : 64 9 3737599 ext 87713 Microanalyst Fax : 64 9 3737435 Department of Geology email : r.sims-at-auckland.ac.nz The University of Auckland Private Bag 92019 Auckland New Zealand
==============================Original Headers============================== 16, 27 -- From r.sims-at-auckland.ac.nz Mon May 15 17:29:41 2006 16, 27 -- Received: from zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz (zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.190.14]) 16, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FMTeeX004396 16, 27 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:29:41 -0500 16, 27 -- Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 16, 27 -- by zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF93A3546E; 16, 27 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 10:29:39 +1200 (NZST) 16, 27 -- Received: from zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz ([127.0.0.1]) 16, 27 -- by localhost (smtpd.itss.auckland.ac.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 16, 27 -- with ESMTP id 21284-30; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:29:39 +1200 (NZST) 16, 27 -- Received: from rs (r.sims.glg.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.59.18]) 16, 27 -- by zeppo.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15BD353A5; 16, 27 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 10:29:39 +1200 (NZST) 16, 27 -- From: "Ritchie Sims" {r.sims-at-auckland.ac.nz} 16, 27 -- To: oshel1pe-at-cmich.edu 16, 27 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:33:26 +1200 16, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 16, 27 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Polaroid DMC2 16, 27 -- Cc: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 16, 27 -- Message-ID: {4469AA76.24160.7DE2DE-at-localhost} 16, 27 -- Priority: normal 16, 27 -- In-reply-to: {200605152116.k4FLGVBG017899-at-ns.microscopy.com} 16, 27 -- X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) 16, 27 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 16, 27 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT 16, 27 -- Content-description: Mail message body 16, 27 -- X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailhost.auckland.ac.nz ==============================End of - Headers==============================
If your purpose is just to identify mouse cells in a human culture, you don't need EM. Actually it would be much easier in LM. Any way, you could think about using HLA marker, they are external (it's just an idea I have no experience with that).
regards,
Stephane
--- gwe-at-ufl.edu wrote:
} } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The } Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } I have a project where I need to positively identify } human cells that } may have mouse cells mixed with them in a tumor. } Does anyone have a } suggestion for a protocol that will positively } identify a cell as mouse } or as human. Antibodies that I have tried so far } have not worked, } post-embedding. } } Thanks, Greg } -- } Gregory W. Erdos, Ph.D. } Assistant Director, Biotechnology Program } Scientific Director, EM Core Lab } P.O. Box 118525 } University of Florida } Gainesville, FL 32611 } gwe-at-ufl.edu } Phone: 352-392-1295 } Fax: 352-846-0251 } } ==============================Original } Headers============================== } 2, 23 -- From gwe-at-ufl.edu Mon May 15 08:18:13 2006 } 2, 23 -- Received: from smtp.ufl.edu } (smtp02.osg.ufl.edu [128.227.74.165]) } 2, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com } (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id } k4FDID2j018130 } 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, } 15 May 2006 08:18:13 -0500 } 2, 23 -- Received: from [10.227.60.63] } (empc14419.dhcp.clas.ufl.edu [10.227.60.63]) } 2, 23 -- (authenticated bits=0) } 2, 23 -- by smtp.ufl.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/2.5.1) with } ESMTP id k4FDIB1j1122394 } 2, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Mon, } 15 May 2006 09:18:12 -0400 } 2, 23 -- Message-ID: {44687F92.8060003-at-ufl.edu} } 2, 23 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:18:10 -0400 } 2, 23 -- From: greg {gwe-at-ufl.edu} } 2, 23 -- Reply-To: gwe-at-ufl.edu } 2, 23 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 } (Windows/20050923) } 2, 23 -- X-Accept-Language: en-us, en } 2, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 2, 23 -- To: "Microscopy-at-sparc5.microscopy.com" } {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} } 2, 23 -- Subject: Mouse -vs-Human } 2, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; } charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed } 2, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit } 2, 23 -- X-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, } tests=ALL_TRUSTED } 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Spam-Status: hits=-1.44, required=5, } tests=ALL_TRUSTED } 2, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group } (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) } 2, 23 -- X-UFL-Scanned-By: CNS Open Systems Group } (http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/smtp-relay/) } ==============================End of - } Headers============================== }
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 20 -- From nizets2-at-yahoo.com Tue May 16 03:56:59 2006 9, 20 -- Received: from web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.62]) 9, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4G8uxm1001022 9, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 03:56:59 -0500 9, 20 -- Received: (qmail 62761 invoked by uid 60001); 16 May 2006 08:56:58 -0000 9, 20 -- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; 9, 20 -- s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; 9, 20 -- h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; 9, 20 -- b=vkjIObXA9f/aAyD94BBUxAzib2BM5EVypr+zAyrZbcJXw3DbTY9XHamLv+w8EwXUZoBveEPbQFuW/7B/ntgqlD4+vmHjziXn81Df70FmpPXvsfoVxU2WCHF7S12cpP3LehOC+8BkcXw+b1m1HCfeSsveM+1eEKv6JU7u7TmFRtc= ; 9, 20 -- Message-ID: {20060516085658.62759.qmail-at-web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com} 9, 20 -- Received: from [80.122.101.102] by web37409.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:56:58 PDT 9, 20 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 01:56:58 -0700 (PDT) 9, 20 -- From: Stephane Nizet {nizets2-at-yahoo.com} 9, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Mouse -vs-Human 9, 20 -- To: gwe-at-ufl.edu 9, 20 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 9, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605151322.k4FDMVbw027060-at-ns.microscopy.com} 9, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 9, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
We are considering Fovea Pro as a set of quantitation plug-ins for Photoshop. Can I ask those who use FP, and who also teach IA, to contact me off list? I'd like to get an idea of the user base, and accumulate any thoughts on re-establishing an FP forum.
Several years ago many (most?) of the EM supply vendors switched the formula for carbon tabs to a "stiff", non-flexible formula. I was told at that time that the old formula used typewriter tape as a component.
These new stiff tabs are unsuitable for many of the preps we do. I was able to find the old formula at Fullam and now they have switched too.
Does anyone know where to find truly flexible carbon tabs. The ones Fullam had were from Nisshin EM, very expensive but quite high quality.
Thanks in advance.
Owen Mills MTU, Houghton MI
==============================Original Headers============================== 5, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Tue May 16 07:48:57 2006 5, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7]) 5, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmvf9024068 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:48:57 -0500 5, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5]) 5, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4GCmu39024410 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400 5, 31 -- Received: from node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node34.mtu.edu [141.219.69.34]) 5, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmuco022544 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400 5, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4]) 5, 31 -- by node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GCmu6b023709 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400 5, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu) 5, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6]) 5, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4GCmtjx010574 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400 (EDT) 5, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45]) 5, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4GCmtRx016397 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400 5, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) 5, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 5, 31 -- Message-Id: {E9327AEB-33E3-4E6C-9DA6-F2AA87734FF8-at-mtu.edu} 5, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed 5, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 5, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu} 5, 31 -- Subject: dbl stick carbon tab blues 5, 31 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:49:15 -0400 5, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) 5, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.16.53106 5, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_MEDIA_2_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Have you looked at Ted Pella's assortment (Pelco)? Some answers to your questions may be found in his letter above. Best wishes,
Jim
-----Original Message----- X-from: opmills-at-mtu.edu [mailto:opmills-at-mtu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:56 PM To: James Chalcroft
Several years ago many (most?) of the EM supply vendors switched the formula for carbon tabs to a "stiff", non-flexible formula. I was told at that time that the old formula used typewriter tape as a component.
These new stiff tabs are unsuitable for many of the preps we do. I was able to find the old formula at Fullam and now they have switched too.
Does anyone know where to find truly flexible carbon tabs. The ones Fullam had were from Nisshin EM, very expensive but quite high quality.
Thanks in advance.
Owen Mills MTU, Houghton MI
==============================Original Headers============================== 16, 23 -- From jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de Tue May 16 08:26:15 2006 16, 23 -- Received: from neuro.mpg.de (mail.neuro.mpg.de [130.183.250.1]) 16, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GDQEre001944 16, 23 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:26:15 -0500 16, 23 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 16, 23 -- Return-Receipt-To: "James Chalcroft" {jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de} 16, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 16, 23 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 16, 23 -- charset="US-ASCII" 16, 23 -- Disposition-Notification-To: "James Chalcroft" {jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de} 16, 23 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues 16, 23 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 16, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:26:13 +0200 16, 23 -- Message-ID: {6BBC089D4E1E87459875FB80D8030031BE21D2-at-s6.neuro.mpg.de} 16, 23 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 16, 23 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 16, 23 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues 16, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZ46A6qIDfGYibgSqi1YHWKtSO+WwAA5z8g 16, 23 -- From: "James Chalcroft" {jchalcro-at-neuro.mpg.de} 16, 23 -- To: {opmills-at-mtu.edu} 16, 23 -- Cc: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 16, 23 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 16, 23 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4GDQEre001944 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
-----Original Message----- X-from: opmills-at-mtu.edu [mailto:opmills-at-mtu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:50 PM To: j.bilde-at-risoe.dk
Several years ago many (most?) of the EM supply vendors switched the formula for carbon tabs to a "stiff", non-flexible formula. I was told at that time that the old formula used typewriter tape as a component.
These new stiff tabs are unsuitable for many of the preps we do. I was able to find the old formula at Fullam and now they have switched too.
Does anyone know where to find truly flexible carbon tabs. The ones Fullam had were from Nisshin EM, very expensive but quite high quality.
Thanks in advance.
Owen Mills MTU, Houghton MI
==============================Original Headers============================== 5, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Tue May 16 07:48:57 2006 5, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7]) 5, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmvf9024068 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 07:48:57 -0500 5, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5]) 5, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4GCmu39024410 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400 5, 31 -- Received: from node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node34.mtu.edu [141.219.69.34]) 5, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GCmuco022544 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400 5, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4]) 5, 31 -- by node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GCmu6b023709 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:56 -0400 5, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu) 5, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6]) 5, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4GCmtjx010574 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400 (EDT) 5, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45]) 5, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4GCmtRx016397 5, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:48:55 -0400 5, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) 5, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 5, 31 -- Message-Id: {E9327AEB-33E3-4E6C-9DA6-F2AA87734FF8-at-mtu.edu} 5, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed 5, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 5, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu} 5, 31 -- Subject: dbl stick carbon tab blues 5, 31 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:49:15 -0400 5, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) 5, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.16.53106 5, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CP_MEDIA_2_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 18, 24 -- From j.bilde-at-risoe.dk Tue May 16 08:29:28 2006 18, 24 -- Received: from mail.risoe.dk (mail.risoe.dk [130.226.48.21]) 18, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GDTS2l007866 18, 24 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:29:28 -0500 18, 24 -- Received: from EXCHG-VS1.risoe.dk (exchg-01.risoe.dk [10.0.0.26]) 18, 24 -- by risoe.dk (PMDF V6.2-X26 #31094) with ESMTP id {ZHVS08QY0HQOW604L8-at-risoe.dk} 18, 24 -- for Microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Tue, 18, 24 -- 16 May 2006 15:29:05 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) 18, 24 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:28:16 +0200 18, 24 -- From: j.bilde-at-risoe.dk 18, 24 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues 18, 24 -- To: opmills-at-mtu.edu 18, 24 -- Cc: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 18, 24 -- Message-id: {6463F256A85DC14CAB07F087A247997232D4E0-at-EXCHG-VS1.risoe.dk} 18, 24 -- MIME-version: 1.0 18, 24 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 18, 24 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 18, 24 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues 18, 24 -- Thread-Index: AcZ454gbgA//L9RHSESEcXhV+9r4twAA62Ug 18, 24 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message 18, 24 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 18, 24 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 18, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 18, 24 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4GDTS2l007866 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I suppose that you have not only a cold FEG SEM, but a so called "semi-in-lens" type of OL on it too. In fact the cold or schottky type of FEG doesn't play a role in the problem. It's only a OL question. That type of OL has a strong magnetic field coming out of it, which enveloppe the sample at short working distance, alouding to work virtuusely at WD0 and to get nice high res images of ..... non magnetic materials, with the "trough the lens" SE detector. The field coming out of the OL can be very strong ; I have measured values such as 3kG at WD2 and 10keV primary energie. With lower beam energy the field decreases and at 3keV, I measured a value of 1.2kG at WD3 mm, and 0.3kG at WD8 mm.
Pratically, you have a few solutions, but all are half solutions.
First, you must avoid to work with short WD. Look at the shortes WD possible without too much astigmatisme. Ask the SEM manufacturer at which WD the sample is quite out of the field. If your shortest WD is 2mm or so, it will bee something like 6-8mm.
Second, you must find a primary energie not to low, which would give a poor resolution, due to the perturbation of the primary beam by the field lignes in the sample, and not too high, to minimase the filed coming out of the OL, wich increases with increasing primary energy. In most cases, you 'll find a good compromise between 5 and 10 keV.
Third, you must play very very much with the astigmatism corrections, at replay again if you move your sample a little bit. And depending of the electronic, you may touch the range limits of the astigmatism corrections. In that case, if you have a CL astigmatism correction setting, you can play on it a little bit, puting astigmatisme at the Cl, in the opposit direction, to gain some margin of the OL astigmatism settings. It's not a clean way to work, but in may help.
Fourth, take the smalest sample possible, not too thick, not too wide, and fix it very securly on the holder. It may land from it and stick to the OL !
Fifth solutions : buy an other SEM for that kind of samples !!!
Don't wait as well resolved images than with ..... gold particles on silicon. If you have a nice picture at x50000, you can be satisfied ! More depends on your particular situation, sample and SEM.
Hope it helps
J. Faerber IPCMS-GSI (Institut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg Groupe Surface et Interfaces) 23, rue de Loess ; BP43 67034 Strasbourg CEDEX 2 France
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 17, 30 -- From jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr Tue May 16 08:50:33 2006 17, 30 -- Received: from mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.157]) 17, 30 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GDoX8l022053 17, 30 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:50:33 -0500 17, 30 -- Received: from ipcms.u-strasbg.fr (ipcms.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.210.2]) 17, 30 -- by mailhost.u-strasbg.fr (8.13.4/jtpda-5.5pre1) with ESMTP id k4GDoRKQ074518 17, 30 -- ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:27 +0200 (CEST) 17, 30 -- Received: from [130.79.54.3] (odhinn.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.54.3]) 17, 30 -- by ipcms.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA41810000E6; 17, 30 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:15 +0200 (CEST) 17, 30 -- Message-ID: {4469D88A.7030305-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr} 17, 30 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:02 +0200 17, 30 -- From: "j.faerber" {jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr} 17, 30 -- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060503) 17, 30 -- X-Accept-Language: fr, en 17, 30 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 17, 30 -- To: lewryan-at-gmail.com, Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 17, 30 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate 17, 30 -- References: {200605152208.k4FM88SO002253-at-ns.microscopy.com} 17, 30 -- In-Reply-To: {200605152208.k4FM88SO002253-at-ns.microscopy.com} 17, 30 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 17, 30 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 17, 30 -- X-IPCMS-MailScanner: Found to be clean 17, 30 -- X-IPCMS-MailScanner-From: jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr 17, 30 -- X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mailhost.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.157]); Tue, 16 May 2006 15:50:27 +0200 (CEST) 17, 30 -- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.1/1464/Tue May 16 11:36:19 2006 on mr7.u-strasbg.fr 17, 30 -- X-Virus-Status: Clean 17, 30 -- X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL 17, 30 -- autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1 17, 30 -- X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on mr7.u-strasbg.fr ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I have a faculty member at UIC who is looking for a one off image of a purified protein. She has seen this done by rotary shadowing and while we have the instrumentation at the university we do not have the necessary experience. As it is a one off experiment (she needs an image showing to confirm if there is bend in the middle of a mutant) I was wondering if there was a lab out there that regularly uses rotary shadowing who could help us?
Alan
Alan W Nicholls, PhD Director of Research Service Facility (Electron Microscopy) Research Resources Center - East (M/C 337) Room 100 Science and Engineering South Building The University of Illinois at Chicago 845 West Taylor St Chicago, IL 60607-7058
We have used the AFM to image DNA conformation and think that it might also work for your protein, without all the elaborate preparation.
If you are interested in having us give it a try, contact Dr. Kim Kangasniemi (just call him "Kim") at (972)954-8014 or kim-at-nt-america.com
Hope this was helpful,
Best regards, Barbara Foster
Microscopy/Microscopy Education 313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100 Allen, TX 75002 P: 972-954-8011 W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com
MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.
P. S. Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.
At 08:54 AM 5/16/2006, nicholls-at-uic.edu wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 15, 17 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Tue May 16 10:18:21 2006 15, 17 -- Received: from 5starpro.com (enterprise.5starpro.com [207.44.136.95]) 15, 17 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GFIKxw011149 15, 17 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:18:20 -0500 15, 17 -- Received: (qmail 9713 invoked by uid 2020); 16 May 2006 10:34:25 -0500 15, 17 -- Received: from host57-99.rancor.birch.net (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (65.17.57.99) 15, 17 -- by enterprise.5starpro.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 May 2006 10:34:24 -0500 15, 17 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060516101501.020b2278-at-mme1.com} 15, 17 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 15, 17 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:18:26 -0500 15, 17 -- To: nicholls-at-uic.edu, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 15, 17 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com} 15, 17 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Rotary Shadowing 15, 17 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161354.k4GDssi4001193-at-ns.microscopy.com} 15, 17 -- References: {200605161354.k4GDssi4001193-at-ns.microscopy.com} 15, 17 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 15, 17 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Ted Pella has good ones as does EMS. No experience with SPI tabs.
gary g.
At 05:51 AM 5/16/2006, you wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 10, 20 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Tue May 16 11:27:57 2006 10, 20 -- Received: from qsmtp3.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) 10, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4GGRu3l022232 10, 20 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 11:27:57 -0500 10, 20 -- Received: (qmail 704 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 09:27:56 -0700 10, 20 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 701, pid: 702, t: 0.1669s 10, 20 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 10, 20 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211) 10, 20 -- by qsmtp3 with SMTP; 16 May 2006 09:27:56 -0700 10, 20 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060516092606.023c7328-at-gaugler.com} 10, 20 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 10, 20 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:27:33 -0700 10, 20 -- To: opmills-at-mtu.edu 10, 20 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com} 10, 20 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] dbl stick carbon tab blues 10, 20 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 10, 20 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161251.k4GCpEVf027234-at-ns.microscopy.com} 10, 20 -- References: {200605161251.k4GCpEVf027234-at-ns.microscopy.com} 10, 20 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 10, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed ==============================End of - Headers==============================
We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide.
I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the em work?
Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save me trial time.
Thanks.
Tea
-- *************************************** Tea Meulia, PhD Director Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center Ohio State University/OARDC 1680 Madison Ave. Wooster OH 44691
tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828 fax: 330-202-3563
http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic
*****************************************
==============================Original Headers============================== 11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006 11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78]) 11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GIH5xS001081 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:05 -0500 11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164] (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164]) 11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4GIH5AC031731 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:05 -0400 11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu 11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]} 11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400 11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu} 11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations 11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" 11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled 11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound 11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.12 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Hi, In dealing with plant tissue, EGTA is included in buffers because calcium chelation removes calcium cross bridges and probably some pectin from the cell wall and allows antiboody access. Although protocols for doing this originally called for having EGTA in the fixation buffer, in our hands, we get better preservation if the EGTA is included after the fixation as a separate incubation. The removal of the calcium by the same token makes the cell wall weaker. You may find quite distorted tissue. It may be possible to minimize this distortion by including an incubation in mM CaCl2 after the 2nd antibody and before dehydration.
Note that buffers with pipes, magnesium, and EGTA are not microtubule stablizing (if that is what you mean by MTSB). They are the standard buffers for studying microtubule dynamics in vitro.
Hope this helps.
Tobias } } } We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations } incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide. } } I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant } tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using } MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any } reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the } em work? } } Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save } me trial time. } } Thanks. } } Tea } } } } -- } *************************************** } Tea Meulia, PhD } Director } Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center } Ohio State University/OARDC } 1680 Madison Ave. } Wooster OH 44691 } } tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828 } fax: 330-202-3563 } } http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic } } ***************************************** } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006 } 11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu } (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78]) } 11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with } ESMTP id k4GIH5xS001081 } 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 } 13:17:05 -0500 } 11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164] } (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164]) } 11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with } ESMTP id k4GIH5AC031731 } 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 } 14:17:05 -0400 } 11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 } 11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu } 11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]} } 11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400 } 11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu} } 11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations } 11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" } 11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled } 11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound } 11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.12 } ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I would suggest setting the specimen at a working distance of at least 15mm so as to be outside the field of the lens. What may also help is to lower the kV as this will also lower the lens field. Of course the kV level will depend upon what you are asking of the specimen?
If you wish to examine the TRUE surface {5kV will be ideal. If you wish to investigate the sub surface detail 15kV backscatter would probably be a good starting point.
Do not try to use an upper detector if fitted tot he instrument as this will require you being close to the lens. Lower detectors in a twin detector system require a higher probe current (weaker C1) than that used for an upper detector.
Good luck
Steve Chapman Senior Consultant Protrain For electron microscopy consultancy and training world wide Tel +44 1280 816512 Fax +44 1280 814007 Mobile +44 7711 606967 Web www.emcourses.com
----- Original Message ----- X-from: {lewryan-at-gmail.com} To: {protrain-at-emcourses.com} Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:04 PM
I need to look at some RBC's using SEM. anyone have a favorite protocol for preparing them? Thanks, Tom
Thomas E. Phillips, PhD Professor of Biological Sciences Director, Molecular Cytology Core 2 Tucker Hall University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211-7400
We've used poly-l-lysine cover slips and standard fixation/dehydration procedures with good success. I believe some people have used HMDS successfully, too.
Randy
-----Original Message----- X-from: phillipst-at-missouri.edu [mailto:phillipst-at-missouri.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:55 PM To: Tindall, Randy D.
I need to look at some RBC's using SEM. anyone have a favorite protocol for preparing them? Thanks, Tom
Thomas E. Phillips, PhD Professor of Biological Sciences Director, Molecular Cytology Core 2 Tucker Hall University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211-7400
Someone wants to send me isolated, fixed rhinovirus on a grid for negative staining and imaging. I have not worked with rhinovirus before. Does anyone have a favorite protocol for fixation and staining? Glut or PFA? Uranyl acetate or PTA?
Mahalo! Tina
**************************************************************************** * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu * * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 * * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf* ****************************************************************************
==============================Original Headers============================== 5, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Tue May 16 14:32:01 2006 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7]) 5, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GJVxtS019267 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:32:00 -0500 5, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 5, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GJVs2a020635 5, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 09:31:55 -1000 (HST) 5, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k4GJVrsk020630 5, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 09:31:53 -1000 (HST) 5, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs 5, 19 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:31:52 -1000 (HST) 5, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu} 5, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia 5, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 5, 19 -- Subject: Rhinovirus negative stain 5, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605160929390.20461-100000-at-halia} 5, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 5, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Sorry to bring this topic up again. I know it has been discussed:
What are the additives that can go in a water recirculator for a TEM? I use to use a product called cool-prep and someone said ethylene glycol in the same ratio. Any thoughts on that?
thanks, Beth
********************************************************************** Beth Richardson EM Lab Coordinator Plant Biology Department University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-7271
"Between the two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980) *******************************************************************
"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are". Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)
I've got a user who wants to characterize 60-atom Carbon Buckyballs. Now He wants to start by determining if they clump, form larger groupsing etc. when mixed into ultra pure water (Q- water), and then other quality waters. So, any one out there have any idea on how to determine simple sizing? In a hydrated state? In suspension? At potentially nanoscale? Obviously, going EM requires drying them down - which artifically modifys the samples. Cryo- might work but we don't have the capability here. SPM might work but how to adhere to a surface for imaging? Diffraction of some sort?
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Richard E. Edelmann, Ph.D. Associate Editor of EXPO, Microscopy and Microanalysis Supplement Electron Microscopy Facility Director 364 Pearson Hall Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 Ph: 513.529.5712 Fax: 513.529.4243 E-mail: edelmare-at-muohio.edu http://www.emf.muohio.edu
==============================Original Headers============================== 5, 23 -- From edelmare-at-muohio.edu Tue May 16 15:32:16 2006 5, 23 -- Received: from mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.6.67]) 5, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKWG5v013777 5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:32:16 -0500 5, 23 -- Received: from mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.6.11]) 5, 23 -- by mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4GKWEox022092 5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:14 -0400 5, 23 -- Received: from emf03 ([134.53.14.97]) 5, 23 -- by mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id k4GKWDBu018999 5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:13 -0400 5, 23 -- From: "Richard E. Edelmann" {edelmare-at-muohio.edu} 5, 23 -- To: microscopy-at-Microscopy.com 5, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:39:28 -0400 5, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 5, 23 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 5, 23 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT 5, 23 -- Subject: Sizing 60-atom bucky balls 5, 23 -- Message-ID: {446A0040.18005.1D72926-at-localhost} 5, 23 -- Priority: normal 5, 23 -- X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) 5, 23 -- X-Real-ConnectIP: 134.53.14.97 5, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 5, 23 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 134.53.6.11 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Nestor, Finally a question I can answer for someone! RBC = Red Blood Cell (~7 microns or so in size)
Not to be confused with TLA (three letter acronym) or DAP (Parents against Dyslexia) ;o)
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------- Though the boys throw stones at the frogs in sport, the frogs do not die in sport, but in earnest. - Plutarch
==============================Original Headers============================== 5, 21 -- From pgrover-at-bilbo.bio.purdue.edu Tue May 16 15:33:15 2006 5, 21 -- Received: from mailhub129.itcs.purdue.edu (mailhub129.itcs.purdue.edu [128.210.5.129]) 5, 21 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKXFi0016952 5, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:33:15 -0500 5, 21 -- Received: from paklabpgrover (dhcp155-122.bio.purdue.edu [128.210.155.122]) 5, 21 -- by mailhub129.itcs.purdue.edu (8.13.6/8.13.4/internal-smtp) with ESMTP id k4GKXErl018860 5, 21 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:33:15 -0400 5, 21 -- From: "pgrover" {pgrover-at-bilbo.bio.purdue.edu} 5, 21 -- To: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 5, 21 -- Subject: re: RBC 5, 21 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:33:18 -0400 5, 21 -- Message-ID: {000001c67927$f7957350$7a9bd280-at-paklabpgrover} 5, 21 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 5, 21 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 5, 21 -- charset="us-ascii" 5, 21 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 5, 21 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 5, 21 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5J/dsq3a+geObQAWpSodYpvluUQ== 5, 21 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 5, 21 -- X-PMX-Version: 5.1.2.240295 5, 21 -- X-PerlMx-Virus-Scanned: Yes ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I use deionized water only (no additives) and have had no problems over the past twenty years. An important note is that we prevent the growth of algae by plumbing all our chillers and microscopes with opaque water hose. We never have algae, or any other, growth in our chillers.
Regards,
Gary M. Brown ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering - West 5200 Bayway Drive Baytown, Texas 77520-2101 phone: 281 834 2387 fax: 281 834 2395 e-mail: Gary.M.Brown-at-ExxonMobil.com
beth-at-plantbio. uga.edu To gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com 05/16/06 03:24 cc PM Subject [Microscopy] TEM water recirculator Please respond additives to beth-at-plantbio. uga.edu
The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
Sorry to bring this topic up again. I know it has been discussed:
What are the additives that can go in a water recirculator for a TEM? I use to use a product called cool-prep and someone said ethylene glycol in the same ratio. Any thoughts on that?
thanks, Beth
********************************************************************** Beth Richardson EM Lab Coordinator Plant Biology Department University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-7271
"Between the two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980) *******************************************************************
"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are". Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)
I would suggest small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS). Can be done hydrated.
See, for example:
http://www.uni.aps.anl.gov/usaxs/
Jeffrey A. Fortner, Ph.D. Chemical Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 60439 fortner(at)cmt.anl.gov
-----Original Message----- X-from: edelmare-at-muohio.edu [mailto:edelmare-at-muohio.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:33 PM To: Fortner, Jeffrey A.
O.k., folks here's an odd problem:
I've got a user who wants to characterize 60-atom Carbon Buckyballs. Now He wants to start by determining if they clump, form larger groupsing etc. when mixed into ultra pure water (Q- water), and then other quality waters. So, any one out there have any idea on how to determine simple sizing? In a hydrated state? In suspension? At potentially nanoscale? Obviously, going EM requires drying them down - which artifically modifys the samples. Cryo- might work but we don't have the capability here. SPM might work but how to adhere to a surface for imaging? Diffraction of some sort?
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Richard E. Edelmann, Ph.D. Associate Editor of EXPO, Microscopy and Microanalysis Supplement Electron Microscopy Facility Director 364 Pearson Hall Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 Ph: 513.529.5712 Fax: 513.529.4243 E-mail: edelmare-at-muohio.edu http://www.emf.muohio.edu
==============================Original Headers============================== 5, 23 -- From edelmare-at-muohio.edu Tue May 16 15:32:16 2006 5, 23 -- Received: from mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.6.67]) 5, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKWG5v013777 5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:32:16 -0500 5, 23 -- Received: from mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu [134.53.6.11]) 5, 23 -- by mulnx12.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4GKWEox022092 5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:14 -0400 5, 23 -- Received: from emf03 ([134.53.14.97]) 5, 23 -- by mulnx24.mcs.muohio.edu (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id k4GKWDBu018999 5, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:13 -0400 5, 23 -- From: "Richard E. Edelmann" {edelmare-at-muohio.edu} 5, 23 -- To: microscopy-at-Microscopy.com 5, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:39:28 -0400 5, 23 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 5, 23 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 5, 23 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT 5, 23 --
Nester,
RBC is the acronym for "red blood cells".
Cheers,
Gary M. Brown ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering - West 5200 Bayway Drive Baytown, Texas 77520-2101 phone: 281 834 2387 fax: 281 834 2395 e-mail: Gary.M.Brown-at-ExxonMobil.com
zaluzec-at-aaem.a mc.anl.gov To gary.m.brown-at-exxonmobil.com 05/16/06 03:31 cc PM Subject [Microscopy] Hmmm... what is RBC Please respond to zaluzec-at-aaem.a mc.anl.gov
Human red blood cells respond nicely to fairly routine fixatives. We use cacodylate with Ca, Mg, and NaCl added as buffer system but biological buffers such as PIPES should work also.
However, be aware the RBC's from other animals have different osmotic requirements and may crenellate easily when the H-RBCs are fine. We ran into real problems with mouse RBC's a while back. Only sure way to avoid problems is to check and balance osmolarity of fixatives for the specific host RBCs.
Debby
Debby Sherman, Manager Phone: 765-494-6666 Life Science Microscopy Facility FAX: 765-494-5896 Purdue University E-mail: dsherman-at-purdue.edu S-052 Whistler Building 170 S. University Street West Lafayette, IN 47907 http://www3.agriculture.purdue.edu/microscopy
} From: {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} } Reply-To: {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} } Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:11:02 -0500 } To: {dsherman-at-purdue.edu} } Subject: [Microscopy] RE: SEM of RBC's } } } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Tom, } } We've used poly-l-lysine cover slips and standard fixation/dehydration } procedures with good success. I believe some people have used HMDS } successfully, too. } } Randy } } -----Original Message----- } X-from: phillipst-at-missouri.edu [mailto:phillipst-at-missouri.edu] } Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:55 PM } To: Tindall, Randy D. } Subject: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's } } } } } ------------------------------------------------------------------------ } ---- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of } America To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ------------------------------------------------------------------------ } ---- } } I need to look at some RBC's using SEM. anyone have a favorite protocol } for preparing them? Thanks, Tom } } } } Thomas E. Phillips, PhD } Professor of Biological Sciences } Director, Molecular Cytology Core } 2 Tucker Hall } University of Missouri } Columbia, MO 65211-7400 } } 573-882-4712 (office) } 573-882-0123 (fax) } PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu } } } } ==============================Original } Headers============================== } 7, 18 -- From PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu Tue May 16 13:54:11 2006 } 7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu } (um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.49]) } 7, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with } ESMTP id k4GIsAWG019726 } 7, 18 -- for {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 } 13:54:10 -0500 } 7, 18 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.148]) } by um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); } 7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:07 -0500 } 7, 18 -- Received: from phillips-dell.missouri.edu ([128.206.81.132]) by } um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft } SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); } 7, 18 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500 } 7, 18 -- Message-Id: } {6.0.0.22.2.20060516135251.01cc6e50-at-pop.missouri.edu} } 7, 18 -- X-Sender: phillipst-at-pop.missouri.edu } 7, 18 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 } 7, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:54:06 -0500 } 7, 18 -- To: Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com } 7, 18 -- From: Tom Phillips {phillipst-at-missouri.edu} } 7, 18 -- Subject: SEM of RBC's } 7, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 } 7, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed } 7, 18 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 18:54:06.0810 (UTC) } FILETIME=[1BBCB3A0:01C6791A] } ==============================End of - } Headers============================== } } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 16, 24 -- From TindallR-at-missouri.edu Tue May 16 14:08:17 2006 } 16, 24 -- Received: from um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu } (um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu [207.160.151.49]) } 16, 24 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id } k4GJ8GxK008815 } 16, 24 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:17 -0500 } 16, 24 -- Received: from UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.151.31]) by } um-exproto9.um.umsystem.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); } 16, 24 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:16 -0500 } 16, 24 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 } 16, 24 -- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message } 16, 24 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 16, 24 -- Content-Type: text/plain; } 16, 24 -- charset="US-ASCII" } 16, 24 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's } 16, 24 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:08:16 -0500 } 16, 24 -- Message-ID: } {BA876152E8653240BE8572E897083EE701849FC4-at-UM-EMAIL09.um.umsystem.edu} } 16, 24 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: } 16, 24 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: } 16, 24 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] SEM of RBC's } 16, 24 -- thread-index: AcZ5Gj/IXaM4jxnBT36YosCHI/gn+wAAa8yQ } 16, 24 -- From: "Tindall, Randy D." {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} } 16, 24 -- To: "Phillips, Thomas E." {PhillipsT-at-missouri.edu} } 16, 24 -- Cc: {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 16, 24 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 19:08:16.0800 (UTC) } FILETIME=[165EE200:01C6791C] } 16, 24 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit } 16, 24 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by } ns.microscopy.com id k4GJ8GxK008815 } ==============================End of - Headers==============================
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 23 -- From dsherman-at-purdue.edu Tue May 16 15:54:16 2006 7, 23 -- Received: from exchange.purdue.edu (1061exfe02.adpc.purdue.edu [128.210.63.223]) 7, 23 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKsGb8002076 7, 23 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:54:16 -0500 7, 23 -- Received: from exchange.purdue.edu ([128.210.63.234]) by exchange.purdue.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); 7, 23 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 16:54:15 -0400 7, 23 -- Received: from 128.210.161.94 ([128.210.161.94]) by EXCH02.purdue.lcl ([128.210.63.237]) via Exchange Front-End Server exch.itap.purdue.edu ([128.210.63.239]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; 7, 23 -- Tue, 16 May 2006 20:54:15 +0000 7, 23 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 7, 23 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:54:14 -0400 7, 23 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] RE: SEM of RBC's 7, 23 -- From: Debby Sherman {dsherman-at-purdue.edu} 7, 23 -- To: Randy Tindall {TindallR-at-missouri.edu} , 7, 23 -- "message to: MSA list" {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 7, 23 -- Message-ID: {C08FB436.10893%dsherman-at-purdue.edu} 7, 23 -- Thread-Topic: [Microscopy] RE: SEM of RBC's 7, 23 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5KuOOIlbu4uUeEdq+igARJN08Mg== 7, 23 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161911.k4GJB2I3012913-at-ns.microscopy.com} 7, 23 -- Mime-version: 1.0 7, 23 -- Content-type: text/plain; 7, 23 -- charset="US-ASCII" 7, 23 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit 7, 23 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 20:54:15.0879 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4AD5570:01C6792A] ==============================End of - Headers==============================
On May 16, 2006, at 1:22 PM, beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu wrote:
} Sorry to bring this topic up again. I know it has been discussed: } } What are the additives that can go in a water recirculator for a TEM? } I use to use a product called cool-prep and someone said ethylene } glycol in the same ratio. } Any thoughts on that? } Dear Beth, I don't know what is in cool-prep, but if ethylene glycol is a good substitute, it sounds like anti-freeze. The important things for a TEM water additive are to prevent corrosion and growth of bacteria and algae, but the cooling water is not so cold that anti-freeze is necessary. I have added a molybdenum-based corrosion inhibitor and the chemical 2,2'-Methylenebis(4-chloro-phenol), AKA dichlorophene, to inhibit growth with good effect. It is also important to keep the pH at ~8 to prevent Cu from dissolving. Yours, Bill Tivol, PhD EM Scientist and Manager Cryo-Electron Microscopy Facility Broad Center, Mail Code 114-96 California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125 (626) 395-8833 tivol-at-caltech.edu
==============================Original Headers============================== 4, 22 -- From tivol-at-caltech.edu Tue May 16 15:59:24 2006 4, 22 -- Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) 4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GKxOnP011992 4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:59:24 -0500 4, 22 -- Received: from water-dog.caltech.edu (water-dog [192.168.1.26]) 4, 22 -- by fire-ox-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BF736587 4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:59:23 -0700 (PDT) 4, 22 -- Received: from [192.168.157.234] (pix-1.caltech.edu [131.215.2.21]) 4, 22 -- by earth-ox.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636B510B473 4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:59:01 -0700 (PDT) 4, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) 4, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605162022.k4GKMSWF030299-at-ns.microscopy.com} 4, 22 -- References: {200605162022.k4GKMSWF030299-at-ns.microscopy.com} 4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed 4, 22 -- Message-Id: {9b9f76870a81061eedc92a3f407cecae-at-caltech.edu} 4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 4, 22 -- From: Bill Tivol {tivol-at-caltech.edu} 4, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] TEM water recirculator additives 4, 22 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:09:49 -0700 4, 22 -- To: microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com 4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624) 4, 22 -- X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-ITS on water-dog by amavisd-2.3.3 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Thanks, all, for the suggestions about negative staining of rhinovirus.
With one notorious exception, I have never had to fix virus before staining, but these people want to send me fixed rhinovirus on commercial non-glow-discharged grids (sigh). And it looks like I'll try my usual stable of stains; UrAc, PTA, and NH4M.
Mahalo, Tina
**************************************************************************** * Tina (Weatherby) Carvalho * tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu * * Biological Electron Microscope Facility * (808) 956-6251 * * University of Hawaii at Manoa * http://www.pbrc.hawaii.edu/bemf* ****************************************************************************
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 19 -- From tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu Tue May 16 17:28:49 2006 6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu [128.171.22.7]) 6, 19 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMSmTE000510 6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:28:49 -0500 6, 19 -- Received: from halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 6, 19 -- by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4GMSjGY022033 6, 19 -- (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) 6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:28:46 -1000 (HST) 6, 19 -- Received: from localhost by halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k4GMSjrc022030 6, 19 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 12:28:45 -1000 (HST) 6, 19 -- X-Authentication-Warning: halia.pbrc.hawaii.edu: tina owned process doing -bs 6, 19 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:28:44 -1000 (HST) 6, 19 -- From: Tina Carvalho {tina-at-pbrc.hawaii.edu} 6, 19 -- X-Sender: tina-at-halia 6, 19 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 6, 19 -- Subject: Rhinovirus - thanks 6, 19 -- Message-ID: {Pine.GSO.4.21.0605161225040.21962-100000-at-halia} 6, 19 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 6, 19 -- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ==============================End of - Headers==============================
On May 16, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Yang, Ann-Fook wrote:
} Please let us know how much you put in. Thank you. } Hi Ann-Fook, I aim for 100 ppm of the Mo, as determined by a test kit, K1805, from Taylor Technonogies, Inc. This is somewhat complicated due to not knowing how much water is in the Haskris and how much is in the tubing, lenses, etc., so I add a few hundred ml of the corrosion inhibitor, check it monthly, and add more when necessary. After a few months, you will get a pretty good idea of how much inhibitor it takes to increase the ppm Mo by a given amount. I just float a small amount of the dichlorophene on top of the water in the Haskris--it's not very soluble--and add more when little solid remains. Yours, Bill
==============================Original Headers============================== 4, 22 -- From tivol-at-caltech.edu Tue May 16 17:32:34 2006 4, 22 -- Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) 4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMWY3i006767 4, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:32:34 -0500 4, 22 -- Received: from water-dog.caltech.edu (water-dog [192.168.1.26]) 4, 22 -- by water-ox-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP 4, 22 -- id C3ABC34F3D; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:32:33 -0700 (PDT) 4, 22 -- Received: from [192.168.157.234] (pix-1.caltech.edu [131.215.2.21]) 4, 22 -- by water-ox.its.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP 4, 22 -- id D0245354CB; Tue, 16 May 2006 15:24:46 -0700 (PDT) 4, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) 4, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334EC-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca} 4, 22 -- References: {E035A9C87303AE4AB9BA10FD8324DFB1024334EC-at-onncrxms3.agr.gc.ca} 4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed 4, 22 -- Message-Id: {c8fa41ce51653c0128aaf93b4f011bed-at-caltech.edu} 4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 4, 22 -- From: Bill Tivol {tivol-at-caltech.edu} 4, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Re: TEM water recirculator additives 4, 22 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:35:35 -0700 4, 22 -- To: microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com, "Yang, Ann-Fook" {YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA} 4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624) 4, 22 -- X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-ITS on water-dog by amavisd-2.3.3 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Just wanted to thank everyone for the responses to my posting about the TEM water chiller additives. I'll try just using distilled water and monitoring the system more frequently. Thank you! Beth
********************************************************************** Beth Richardson EM Lab Coordinator Plant Biology Department University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-7271
"Between the two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980) *******************************************************************
"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are". Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)
Quite a while ago now I did some pre-embedding immunogold labelling, and fixed in phosphate rather than Pipes buffer, using 2 mM rather than 5 mM Mg and EGTA. I think use the fixative that works best for what you're after, I'd suggest using the same fixative/buffer combination as for the LM work, taking on board Tobias' comments about how EGTA softens the walls causing some tissue distortion if you're not careful.
When I did this, I then cut frozen sections, rinsed in PBS then labelled the sections on slides with antibodies in PBS, after the usual blocking in BSA or gelatin. Then embedded the sections in Spurr's (messy) before sectioning for TEM. I did this to get greater penetration of label into tissue, while avoiding the original cut surface of the tissue block.
good luck, cheers, Rosemary
Rosemary White rosemary.white-at-csiro.au CSIRO Plant Industry ph. 02-6246 5475 GPO Box 1600 mob. 0402 835 973 Canberra, ACT 2601 fax. 02-6246 5334 Australia
} From: meulia.1-at-osu.edu } Reply-To: meulia.1-at-osu.edu } Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:19:55 -0500 } To: rosemary.white-at-csiro.au } Subject: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations } } } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations } incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide. } } I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant } tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using } MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any } reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the } em work? } } Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save } me trial time. } } Thanks. } } Tea } } } } -- } *************************************** } Tea Meulia, PhD } Director } Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center } Ohio State University/OARDC } 1680 Madison Ave. } Wooster OH 44691 } } tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828 } fax: 330-202-3563 } } http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic } } ***************************************** } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006 } 11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu } (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78]) } 11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id } k4GIH5xS001081 } 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:05 -0500 } 11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164] } (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164]) } 11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id } k4GIH5AC031731 } 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:05 -0400 } 11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 } 11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu } 11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]} } 11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400 } 11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu} } 11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations } 11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" } 11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled } 11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound } 11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.12 } ==============================End of - Headers============================== }
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 22 -- From Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au Tue May 16 17:51:17 2006 7, 22 -- Received: from act-MTAout6.csiro.au (act-MTAout6.csiro.au [150.229.7.43]) 7, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4GMpGIO030218 7, 22 -- for {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 17:51:17 -0500 7, 22 -- DomainKey-Signature: s=email; d=csiro.au; c=nofws; q=dns; b=CtH5eq0n7NhwH/zu+AOFn0CNv9fLVrTMaTXnfBEZo4kYpLhxiFeD2RgI+/wLp0iJUo8yaVMHLXIZLatlQlztjp/7BsIH8dZDFC/GmX6TQ2f9X94vVHhYppLtYxShzvdG; 7, 22 -- Received: from exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au ([138.194.3.56]) 7, 22 -- by act-MTAout6.csiro.au with ESMTP; 17 May 2006 08:51:15 +1000 7, 22 -- X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,135,1146405600"; 7, 22 -- d="scan'208"; a="94577057:sNHT25900424" 7, 22 -- Received: from [152.83.167.45] ([152.83.167.45]) by exgw1-mel.nexus.csiro.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); 7, 22 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 08:51:14 +1000 7, 22 -- User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 7, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:53:23 +1000 7, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations 7, 22 -- From: Rosemary White {Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au} 7, 22 -- To: {Microscopy-at-msa.microscopy.com} 7, 22 -- Message-ID: {C0909503.167AA%Rosemary.White-at-csiro.au} 7, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161819.k4GIJtIV005765-at-ns.microscopy.com} 7, 22 -- Mime-version: 1.0 7, 22 -- Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" 7, 22 -- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit 7, 22 -- X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 22:51:14.0869 (UTC) FILETIME=[3C523650:01C6793B] ==============================End of - Headers==============================
The buffer you indicated may be fine, although a word of warning may be in place: be careful when using divalent cations like Mg2+ . We've never actually tested this for gold conjugates but such ions cause aggregates of gold particles even at very low concentrations. The coating proteins should help preventing that but it may still happen. If that buffer, as Tobias Baskin indicates, is used to open cell walls to antibodies, then it may be sufficient if it is applied only to obtain that effect, i.e. fix, treat with the permeabilising buffer and then wash with PBS a few times before proceeding using the same protocol that was used for your animal tissue.
Good luck
Jan
On May 17, 2006, at 6:17 AM, meulia.1-at-osu.edu wrote:
} } } } ----------------------------------------------------------------------- } ----- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of } America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- } http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ----------------------------------------------------------------------- } ----- } } We have been doing our pre-embedding immunogold localizations } incubations for animal tissue in PBS, 0.2% BSA and 10mM Na Azide. } } I am working now on some em pre-embedding localizations on plant } tissue, for which light microscopy localizations have been done using } MTSB buffer (50mM PIPES, 5mM MgSO4, 5mM EGTA, pH~7.0). Is there any } reason for which I should not be using this same MTSB buffer for the } em work? } } Thank you very much for your suggestions. They will definitely save } me trial time. } } Thanks. } } Tea } } } } -- } *************************************** } Tea Meulia, PhD } Director } Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center } Ohio State University/OARDC } 1680 Madison Ave. } Wooster OH 44691 } } tel.: 330-263-3836 or -3828 } fax: 330-202-3563 } } http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/mcic } } ***************************************** } } ==============================Original } Headers============================== } 11, 18 -- From meulia.1-at-osu.edu Tue May 16 13:17:06 2006 } 11, 18 -- Received: from defang9.net.ohio-state.edu } (defang9.net.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.78]) } 11, 18 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP } id k4GIH5xS001081 } 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:17:05 } -0500 } 11, 18 -- Received: from [164.107.85.164] } (dhcp-107-85-164.oardc.ohio-state.edu [164.107.85.164]) } 11, 18 -- by defang9.net.ohio-state.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id } k4GIH5AC031731 } 11, 18 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:05 } -0400 } 11, 18 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 } 11, 18 -- X-Sender: meulia.1-at-pop.service.ohio-state.edu } 11, 18 -- Message-Id: {p05200f03c08fc56f761a-at-[164.107.85.164]} } 11, 18 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:17:12 -0400 } 11, 18 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 11, 18 -- From: Tea Meulia {meulia.1-at-osu.edu} } 11, 18 -- Subject: em immunolocalizations } 11, 18 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; } format="flowed" } 11, 18 -- X-Spam-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled } 11, 18 -- X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound } 11, 18 -- X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on } 128.146.216.12 } ==============================End of - } Headers============================== }
==============================Original Headers============================== 7, 22 -- From leunissen-at-aurion.nl Tue May 16 19:23:02 2006 7, 22 -- Received: from mailhub1.otago.ac.nz (mailhub1.otago.ac.nz [139.80.64.218]) 7, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4H0N0Hw009205 7, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:23:02 -0500 7, 22 -- Received: from galadriel.otago.ac.nz (galadriel.otago.ac.nz [139.80.64.213]) 7, 22 -- by mailhub1.otago.ac.nz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4H0MvS7004469; 7, 22 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 12:22:58 +1200 7, 22 -- Received: from ou034063.otago.ac.nz ([139.80.34.63]) 7, 22 -- by galadriel.otago.ac.nz with esmtp (Exim 4.50) 7, 22 -- id 1Fg9oW-0001BU-P9; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:22:56 +1200 7, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605161817.k4GIHShJ001598-at-ns.microscopy.com} 7, 22 -- References: {200605161817.k4GIHShJ001598-at-ns.microscopy.com} 7, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) 7, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed 7, 22 -- Message-Id: {af5cfb1e829a31cdaf5d162318f247f3-at-aurion.nl} 7, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 7, 22 -- Cc: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 7, 22 -- From: Jan Leunissen {leunissen-at-aurion.nl} 7, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] em immunolocalizations 7, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:22:57 +1200 7, 22 -- To: meulia.1-at-osu.edu 7, 22 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.624) ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This should be another interesting AFM experiment, done with liquid cell. It would be helpful, however, to get them to adhere to a substrate first, so that they don't roll around. Contact me off-line and we can probably put together a protocol for you. Also, if you can get samples, we can try to run them here. We have an AFM that can run in liquid.
Hope this is helpful,
Barbara Foster
Microscopy/Microscopy Education 313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100 Allen, TX 75002 P: 972-954-8011 W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com
MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.
P. S. Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.
At 03:35 PM 5/16/2006, edelmare-at-muohio.edu wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 18, 17 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Tue May 16 21:27:49 2006 18, 17 -- Received: from smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.202]) 18, 17 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4H2RnQ9021264 18, 17 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Tue, 16 May 2006 21:27:49 -0500 18, 17 -- Received: (qmail 16839 invoked from network); 17 May 2006 02:27:47 -0000 18, 17 -- Received: from unknown (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (bfostermme-at-sbcglobal.net-at-68.94.44.10 with login) 18, 17 -- by smtp103.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 May 2006 02:27:47 -0000 18, 17 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060516212508.0206a450-at-mme1.com} 18, 17 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 18, 17 -- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:27:55 -0500 18, 17 -- To: edelmare-at-muohio.edu, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 18, 17 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com} 18, 17 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Sizing 60-atom bucky balls 18, 17 -- In-Reply-To: {200605162035.k4GKZYsq025773-at-ns.microscopy.com} 18, 17 -- References: {200605162035.k4GKZYsq025773-at-ns.microscopy.com} 18, 17 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 18, 17 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ==============================End of - Headers==============================
This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net) from on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 19:19:11 Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please reply to both Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net as well as to the Microscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net Name: Dave Steklenski
Organization: Catherine McAuley School, Rochester NY
Education: K-8 Grade Grammar School
Location: Rochester NY
Question: We are planning an elementary microscopy lab using a variety of natural and synthetic fibers. I would like to locat some photomicrographs of sample fibers so the kids could compare their observations to know appearance samples. I have been unable to find a good set of micrographs on the web.......are there any common references that might have some useable pictures.
Below is the result of your feedback form (NJZFM-ultra-55). It was submitted by (milindphd-at-gmail.com) from http://www.microscopy.com/Ask-A-Microscopist/Ask-A-Microscopist.html on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 00:52:35 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: milindphd-at-gmail.com Name: Milind Redkar
Organization: University institute of chemical technology
Education: Graduate College
Location: mumbai,India
Question: please let me know, why multilamellar vesicle show maltese crosses when veiwed with crosspolarizing microscopy.?
what is the difference between conoscopy and microscopy with resoect to multilamellar vesicles?
I have a small box of new JEOL 35C electronic parts. Potentiometers, lamps, IC's, transistors,push-button switches, etc. I'll send it to anyone that wants it. Email me at directly.
Owen
Owen P. Mills Director, Materials Characterization & Fabrication Facilities Electron Optics Engineer, Applied Chemical & Morphological Analysis Laboratory
Materials Science & Engineering Michigan Technological University Rm 512 M&M Bldg. Houghton, MI 49931 PH 906-369-1875 FAX 906-487-2934 mailto:opmills-at-mtu.edu http://www.mm.mtu.edu/~opmills
==============================Original Headers============================== 8, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Wed May 17 08:10:59 2006 8, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7]) 8, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDAxhK028058 8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:10:59 -0500 8, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5]) 8, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDAwQA028733 8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:58 -0400 8, 31 -- Received: from node2.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node2.mtu.edu [141.219.69.2]) 8, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDAwd8013241 8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:58 -0400 8, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4]) 8, 31 -- by node2.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDAv7g012056 8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:58 -0400 8, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu) 8, 31 -- Received: from node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node5.mtu.edu [141.219.69.5]) 8, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4HDAvBG010647 8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:57 -0400 (EDT) 8, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45]) 8, 31 -- by node5.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4HDAvkp013219 8, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:57 -0400 8, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) 8, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 8, 31 -- Message-Id: {6444BECD-22E3-48E5-9098-8B73F0C2589E-at-mtu.edu} 8, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed 8, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 8, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu} 8, 31 -- Subject: free 35C parts 8, 31 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:10:55 -0400 8, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) 8, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.17.55109 8, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__C230066_P5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I have 2 Jeol M3 cathodes I'll give anyone that wants them. They were bought for a 100CX TEM. Both are new, but have been on a shelf for 20yrs. Let me know if you want them.
Owen
==============================Original Headers============================== 2, 31 -- From opmills-at-mtu.edu Wed May 17 08:15:42 2006 2, 31 -- Received: from node7.mtu.edu (node7.mtu.edu [141.219.69.7]) 2, 31 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDFfxX001183 2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:15:41 -0500 2, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6]) 2, 31 -- by node7.mtu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDFfhr029034 2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:41 -0400 2, 31 -- Received: from node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node34.mtu.edu [141.219.69.34]) 2, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDFfs3005269 2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:41 -0400 2, 31 -- Received: from mail.mtu.edu (campus4.mtu.edu [141.219.70.4]) 2, 31 -- by node34.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDFeF4020104 2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:40 -0400 2, 31 -- (envelope-from opmills-at-mtu.edu) 2, 31 -- Received: from node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (node6.mtu.edu [141.219.69.6]) 2, 31 -- by mail.mtu.edu (8.13.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4HDFeVh014345 2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:40 -0400 (EDT) 2, 31 -- Received: from [141.219.192.45] (opmills.eecn.sabo.mtu.edu [141.219.192.45]) 2, 31 -- by node6.edge.dcsint.mtu.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.3/auth_ssl.mc v1.0) with ESMTP id k4HDFdDw005259 2, 31 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:39 -0400 2, 31 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) 2, 31 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2, 31 -- Message-Id: {E872D0DE-5441-4783-AD47-788034ED7801-at-mtu.edu} 2, 31 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed 2, 31 -- To: Microscopy Listserver {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 2, 31 -- From: "Owen P. Mills" {opmills-at-mtu.edu} 2, 31 -- Subject: Free JEOL Denka LaB6 cathodes 2, 31 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:15:38 -0400 2, 31 -- X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) 2, 31 -- X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.5.17.55109 2, 31 -- X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Hello TEM community: I have LEO 912AB TEM and need to order a new LaB6 filament. I can't for the life of me remember or find in my files what I ordered the last time except that it was a Denka. If anyone has this information and would pass it on I would be truly grateful. bob harris
Guelph Regional Imaging Facility Dept.of Molecular and Cellular Biology New Science Complex 488 Gordon St. Univ of Guelph Guelph,On, Canada N1G 2W1 ph: 519-824-4120 ext. 56409/58962 Fax: 519-837-1802
==============================Original Headers============================== 2, 27 -- From bharris-at-uoguelph.ca Wed May 17 08:39:32 2006 2, 27 -- Received: from mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.94.205]) 2, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDdWnD015600 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:32 -0500 2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.93.20]) 2, 27 -- by mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDdVX5007779 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDdVlS018349 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 2, 27 -- Received: (from nobody-at-localhost) 2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k4HDdVGU018347 2, 27 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 2, 27 -- X-Authentication-Warning: pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca: nobody set sender to bharris-at-uoguelph.ca using -f 2, 27 -- Received: from 131.104.80.123 ([131.104.80.123]) 2, 27 -- by webmail.uoguelph.ca (IMP) with HTTP 2, 27 -- for {bharris-at-staff.mail.uoguelph.ca} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 2, 27 -- Message-ID: {1147873171.446b2793c3a31-at-webmail.uoguelph.ca} 2, 27 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 2, 27 -- From: Bob Harris {bharris-at-uoguelph.ca} 2, 27 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 2, 27 -- Subject: LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB 2, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 2, 27 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2, 27 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 2, 27 -- User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4 2, 27 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 131.104.94.205 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Have a look at http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/index.html under MENU
It's a bit of struggle with all the links, but under Best Image Galleries & Collections have a look at the SEM (scanning electron microscope) - the first one. They aren't light microscopy but SEMs are great for fibre morphology surface details.
I found things like Cellulose fibers (fibres) in toilet paper, paper towels, T shirt cotton with dirt, asbestos (best to view that on-line), woven silk etc.. [In 'Dennis Kunkel Microscopy, Inc.' link.]
Also search through the microscopy primer site, they have loads of stock images
I found rabbit hair, silk, nylon (all under polarised light microscopy so they appear brightly coloured - rather unlike standard microscope images).
The microscopy primer also tells you loads about microscopes (and you can operate them virtually).
Plus try the hobby site http://www.btinternet.com/~stephen.durr/ as it has links that may provide something (but most sites are interested in things like plants, animals and pond life).
You may be able to get a library loan of an old book that has suitable pictures for scanning, e.g.
Textile fiber atlas : A collection of photomicrographs of old and new textile fibers, by Werner Von Bergen (Jan 1, 1949).
The microscopy of animal textile fibres,: Including methods for the complete analysis of fibre blends. 235 half-tone and ll colour photomicrographs, 88 line drawings by Alec Blakey Wildman (Jan 1, 1954)
I found the book links on amazon.com (both are out of print).
Regards
Keith
---------------------------------------------------------- Dr Keith J Morris Imaging Facilities Manager Cell Biology Division Institute of Ophthalmology University College London 11-43 Bath Street London EC1V 9EL
-----Original Message----- X-from: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net [mailto:Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net] Sent: 17 May 2006 13:03 To: keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk
This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net) from on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 19:19:11 Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please reply to both Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net as well as to the Microscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net Name: Dave Steklenski
Organization: Catherine McAuley School, Rochester NY
Education: K-8 Grade Grammar School
Location: Rochester NY
Question: We are planning an elementary microscopy lab using a variety of natural and synthetic fibers. I would like to locat some photomicrographs of sample fibers so the kids could compare their observations to know appearance samples. I have been unable to find a good set of micrographs on the web.......are there any common references that might have some useable pictures.
THANK you for the help!!!
==============================Original Headers============================== 31, 26 -- From keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk Wed May 17 09:12:43 2006 31, 26 -- Received: from vscani-e2.ucl.ac.uk (vscani-e2.ucl.ac.uk [144.82.108.34]) 31, 26 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HEChiI025888 31, 26 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:12:43 -0500 31, 26 -- Received: from cell23.ioo.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.134.123] helo=keithhigrade) 31, 26 -- by vscani-e.ucl.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60) 31, 26 -- (envelope-from {keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk} ) 31, 26 -- id 1FgMlV-00042h-2D; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:12:41 +0100 31, 26 -- From: "Keith J Morris" {keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk} 31, 26 -- To: {Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net} 31, 26 -- Cc: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 31, 26 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] [Filtered] AskAMicroscopist: elementary microscopy lab 31, 26 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:11:46 +0100 31, 26 -- Message-ID: {000601c679bb$d5356790$7b865290-at-keithhigrade} 31, 26 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 31, 26 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 31, 26 -- charset="us-ascii" 31, 26 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 31, 26 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 31, 26 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 31, 26 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5qdZktnXyK/AgTe+ppRP1nSzVngACzwsA 31, 26 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171202.k4HC2nPb021701-at-ns.microscopy.com} 31, 26 -- X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk-at-ucl.ac.uk for more information 31, 26 -- X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean 31, 26 -- X-UCL-MailScanner-From: keith.morris-at-ucl.ac.uk 31, 26 -- X-Spam-Status: No ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Ryan, In addition to all the other suggestions about small sample size, out of the lens field, etc., also try running your sample through a degausser just before putting it in the SEM. Any residual magnetism is going to adversely affect a high mag image. I can remember (too many years ago) swearing at the SEM I operated (and didn't particularly like) because my resolution was terrible, then remembering that my sample was a piece of carbon steel. After degaussing, the resolution was fine.
Ken Converse owner
QUALITY IMAGES Servicing Scanning Electron Microscopes Since 1981 474 So. Bridgton Rd. Bridgton, ME 04009 207-647-4348 Fax 207-647-2688 kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz qualityimages.biz
-----Original Message----- X-from: lewryan-at-gmail.com [mailto:lewryan-at-gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 6:07 PM To: kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz
This Question/Comment was submitted to the Microscopy Listserver using the WWW based Form at http://www.microscopy.com/MLFormMail.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember this posting is most likely not from a Subscriber, so when replying
please copy both lewryan-at-gmail.com as well as the MIcroscopy Listserver ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: lewryan-at-gmail.com Name: Ryan
Organization: Dalhousie University
Title-Subject: [Filtered] SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate
Question: I have a saple with deposits of an alloy of Sn-Co-C on a magnetic stainless steel substrate (430 stainless steel). I'm using a cold field emission microscope and am having trouble getting high resolution images. Could you suggest what setting I should use to get started?
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 12 -- From zaluzec-at-microscopy.com Mon May 15 17:03:45 2006 6, 12 -- Received: from [206.69.208.22] (mac22.zaluzec.com [206.69.208.22]) 6, 12 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4FM3ipN026657 6, 12 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:03:44 -0500 6, 12 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 6, 12 -- X-Sender: (Unverified) 6, 12 -- Message-Id: {p06110401c08eab2f530f-at-[206.69.208.22]} 6, 12 -- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:03:44 -0500 6, 12 -- To: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 6, 12 -- From: lewryan-at-gmail.com (by way of MicroscopyListserver) 6, 12 -- Subject: viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate 6, 12 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ==============================End of - Headers==============================
___________________________________________________________ $0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer 10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more. Signup at www.doteasy.com
==============================Original Headers============================== 23, 30 -- From kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz Wed May 17 09:45:19 2006 23, 30 -- Received: from dpmailmta01.doteasy.com (dpmailmta01.doteasy.com [65.61.209.91]) 23, 30 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HEjJYC003869 23, 30 -- for {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:45:19 -0500 23, 30 -- Received: from qualityimages.biz (unverified [192.168.101.16]) 23, 30 -- by dpmta01.doteasy.com (DEO) with ESMTP id 4857839 23, 30 -- for multiple; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:58:13 -0700 23, 30 -- Received: from Ken [24.53.5.245] by qualityimages.biz with ESMTP 23, 30 -- (SMTPD32-8.05) id A6F25693008A; Wed, 17 May 2006 07:45:06 -0700 23, 30 -- From: "Ken Converse" {kenconverse-at-qualityimages.biz} 23, 30 -- To: {lewryan-at-gmail.com} , "MSA Listserver" {Microscopy-at-MSA.Microscopy.Com} 23, 30 -- Subject: RE: [Microscopy] viaWWW: SEM imaging on sample with magnetic substrate 23, 30 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:46:18 -0400 23, 30 -- Message-ID: {005101c679c0$ac184030$6501a8c0-at-Ken} 23, 30 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 23, 30 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 23, 30 -- charset="us-ascii" 23, 30 -- X-Priority: 3 (Normal) 23, 30 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 23, 30 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 23, 30 -- X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 23, 30 -- Importance: Normal 23, 30 -- In-Reply-To: {200605152206.k4FM6uej031789-at-ns.microscopy.com} 23, 30 -- X-IMSTrailer: __IMail_7__ 23, 30 -- X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=34189668 23, 30 -- X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii 23, 30 -- X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 22, in=226356, out=0, spam=0 23, 30 -- X-External-IP: 192.168.101.16 23, 30 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 23, 30 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HEjJYC003869 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I forwarded your request to Scott Stoeffler, a member of our Optical Microscopy group, and he provided these suggestions:
Any good basic book on textile science will have fiber photomicrographs. Margery Joseph's Introductory Textile Science is a good one and available pretty cheaply.
There is also a CD available with a lot of fiber pictures, but it's pretty expensive:
http://www.atexinc.com/digital_textiles_(cd).htm
Natural fibers such as cotton, linen, wool and silk are easier to distinguish based on morphology alone. Without polarized light, synthetics aren't easily distinguishable, although you can look at cross-sections.
You might also take a look at our on-line Atlas of Microscopic Particles at www.mccroneatlas.com. If you do a basic search on fibers, you'll get some examples of cloth and paper fiber images with some background information.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Elaine
********************************************************************* Elaine F.Schumacher Senior Research Scientist McCrone Associates, Inc. 850 Pasquinelli Drive Westmont, IL 60559-5539 USA 630-887-7100 (tel) 630-887-7417 (fax) E-mail: eschumacher-at-mccrone.com Web Site: www.mccrone.com
********************************************************************* This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use or distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited. *********************************************************************
-----Original Message----- X-from: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net [mailto:Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:55 AM To: Elaine F. Schumacher
This Question was submitted to Ask-A-Microscopist by (Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net) from on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 at 19:19:11 Remember to consider the Grade/Age of the student when considering the Question ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- Please reply to both Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net as well as to the Microscopy Listserver ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---
Email: Dstekl-at-frontiernet.net Name: Dave Steklenski
Organization: Catherine McAuley School, Rochester NY
Education: K-8 Grade Grammar School
Location: Rochester NY
Question: We are planning an elementary microscopy lab using a variety of natural and synthetic fibers. I would like to locat some photomicrographs of sample fibers so the kids could compare their observations to know appearance samples. I have been unable to find a good set of micrographs on the web.......are there any common references that might have some useable pictures.
The standard configuration of Denka cathode for Leo Microscopes is the M3-CA, which has a 15 micron round tip. For greater brightness, especially in TEM applications, many users prefer the M3-CA sharp 60/10 or M3-CA sharp 60/5. Please feel free to contact me off line if you would like to discuss the differences.
Sincerely, Mike Nesta
Michael R. Nesta Managing Director Energy Beam Sciences, Inc. Tel: 860 653-0411 Fax: 860 653-0422 MNesta-at-ebsciences.com www.ebsciences.com “ADDING BRILLIANCE TO YOUR VISION”
bharris-at-uoguelph.ca wrote: } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } Hello TEM community: I have LEO 912AB TEM and need to order a new LaB6 } filament. I can't for the life of me remember or find in my files what I } ordered the last time except that it was a Denka. If anyone has this } information and would pass it on I would be truly grateful. bob harris } } Guelph Regional Imaging Facility } Dept.of Molecular and Cellular } Biology } New Science Complex } 488 Gordon St. } Univ of Guelph } Guelph,On, Canada } N1G 2W1 } ph: 519-824-4120 ext. 56409/58962 } Fax: 519-837-1802 } } ==============================Original Headers============================== } 2, 27 -- From bharris-at-uoguelph.ca Wed May 17 08:39:32 2006 } 2, 27 -- Received: from mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.94.205]) } 2, 27 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HDdWnD015600 } 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 08:39:32 -0500 } 2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.93.20]) } 2, 27 -- by mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4HDdVX5007779 } 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 } 2, 27 -- Received: from pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) } 2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4HDdVlS018349 } 2, 27 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 } 2, 27 -- Received: (from nobody-at-localhost) } 2, 27 -- by pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k4HDdVGU018347 } 2, 27 -- for microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 } 2, 27 -- X-Authentication-Warning: pippin.cs.uoguelph.ca: nobody set sender to bharris-at-uoguelph.ca using -f } 2, 27 -- Received: from 131.104.80.123 ([131.104.80.123]) } 2, 27 -- by webmail.uoguelph.ca (IMP) with HTTP } 2, 27 -- for {bharris-at-staff.mail.uoguelph.ca} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 } 2, 27 -- Message-ID: {1147873171.446b2793c3a31-at-webmail.uoguelph.ca} } 2, 27 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:31 -0400 } 2, 27 -- From: Bob Harris {bharris-at-uoguelph.ca} } 2, 27 -- To: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} } 2, 27 -- Subject: LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB } 2, 27 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 } 2, 27 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 } 2, 27 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit } 2, 27 -- User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4 } 2, 27 -- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 131.104.94.205 } ==============================End of - Headers============================== }
==============================Original Headers============================== 9, 28 -- From mnesta-at-ebsciences.com Wed May 17 10:33:21 2006 9, 28 -- Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) 9, 28 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HFXKhp024690 9, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:33:21 -0500 9, 28 -- Received: from pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (pimout6-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.22]) 9, 28 -- by ylpvm43.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4HFXMWH030373 9, 28 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:22 -0400 9, 28 -- X-ORBL: [69.182.224.2] 9, 28 -- Received: from mail.ebsciences.com ([69.182.224.2]) 9, 28 -- by pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.6 out.dk/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HFXJvT180922; 9, 28 -- Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:19 -0400 9, 28 -- Received: from dhcp-206-53-66-197.myeastern.com ([206.53.66.197] helo=[192.168.0.15]) 9, 28 -- by mail.ebsciences.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) 9, 28 -- (Exim 4.54) 9, 28 -- id 1FgO1W-0005sO-RY; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:19 -0400 9, 28 -- Message-ID: {446B4245.7050903-at-ebsciences.com} 9, 28 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:25 -0400 9, 28 -- From: Mike Nesta {mnesta-at-ebsciences.com} 9, 28 -- Organization: Energy Beam Sciences 9, 28 -- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) 9, 28 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 9, 28 -- To: bharris-at-uoguelph.ca 9, 28 -- CC: microscopy-at-microscopy.com 9, 28 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] LaB6 filament for a LEO 912AB 9, 28 -- References: {200605171342.k4HDgb4g020997-at-ns.microscopy.com} 9, 28 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171342.k4HDgb4g020997-at-ns.microscopy.com} 9, 28 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed 9, 28 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ==============================End of - Headers==============================
A question to whose who have made some recent tests on FEG-SEM.
I would have advices about the differences which can be practically seen between the Zeiss Supra 40 et the Supra 55. Resolutions annonced are quite different. I want to know if it's only a spec difference, or if practically it's easy to see it. We have made tests on the 55, but the budget doesn't follow... All other advices are welcome.
Thanks
-- J. Faerber IPCMS-GSI (Institut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg Groupe Surface et Interfaces) 23, rue de Loess ; BP43 67034 Strasbourg CEDEX 2 France
Seeing at the Nanoscale IV, July 17-20, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
All users of SPM and metrology instruments are invited to Philadelphia, this July to meet and discuss their work informally with colleagues and nanoscience pioneers from around the world!
The three-day, event-filled "Seeing at the Nanoscale" international conference includes a two-and-a-half days of technical presentations, an evening poster session, and a reception at the National Constitution Center.
Technical Program:
-Nanomechanical and Local Property Measurements -Visualization I: Biomolecules and Biological Processes -Visualization II: Materials and Polymer Systems -Measurements of Electrical, Optical, Magnetic, and Thermal Properties of Materials at the Nanoscale -Instrumentation: New Tools and Techniques for Nanoscience
We are very honored to have Dr. Paul Hansma, University of California, Santa Barbara, as our keynote speaker.
For more information and to register online, please go to: www.veeco.com/nanoconference
Be an early bird! -- Register by May 19 and receive a conference discount!
____________________________ Marlene Carlyle Veeco Instruments Conference Coordinator 112 Robin Hill Road Santa Barbara, CA 93117 Tel: 805-967-1400 (ext. 2312) Fax: 805-967-7717 Email: mcarlyle-at-veeco.com ____________________________
==============================Original Headers============================== 12, 20 -- From MCarlyle-at-veeco.com Wed May 17 10:37:52 2006 12, 20 -- Received: from sboexch2.int.veeco.com (SBOEXCH2.VEECO.com [68.111.35.167]) 12, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HFboWY003725 12, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:37:52 -0500 12, 20 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 12, 20 -- content-class: urn:content-classes:message 12, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 12, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 12, 20 -- charset="iso-8859-1" 12, 20 -- Subject: SPM - Seeing at Nanoscale Conference - Register Now and Save 12, 20 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:37:46 -0700 12, 20 -- Message-ID: {625BD6DD96DE554DBB0558FFE70E0F42011FFE3E-at-sboexch2.int.veeco.com} 12, 20 -- X-MS-Has-Attach: 12, 20 -- X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 12, 20 -- Thread-Topic: SPM - Seeing at Nanoscale Conference - Register Now and Save 12, 20 -- Thread-Index: AcZ5x9hlicXmpgM8Sdqyi5NHnuxiUQ== 12, 20 -- From: "Marlene Carlyle" {MCarlyle-at-veeco.com} 12, 20 -- To: {Microscopy-at-Microscopy.com} 12, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 12, 20 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HFboWY003725 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Someone had said that distilled water will cause copper tubing to ionize, and correction will be faster than tap water. Has anybody heard this?
Ann Fook Yang EM Unit/ Unite EM AAFC/AAC 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa,Ontario Canada K1A 0C6 yanga-at-agr.gc.ca Telephone/Téléphone: 613-759-1638 Facsimile/Télécopieur: 613-759-1701
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada
-----Original Message----- X-from: beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu [mailto:beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:50 PM To: Yang, Ann-Fook
Just wanted to thank everyone for the responses to my posting about the TEM water chiller additives. I'll try just using distilled water and monitoring the system more frequently. Thank you! Beth
********************************************************************** Beth Richardson EM Lab Coordinator Plant Biology Department University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-7271
"Between the two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980) *******************************************************************
"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are". Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)
The only additive I use is colloidal silver, sold as a health food item by Natural Immunogenics 888-328-8840. This method, suggested to me by Vitaly Feingold has worked very well. I also add a quart or so of tap water to the DI water so it is not so aggressive on the copper.
I have no connection with the silver supplier.
David Rothbard
beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu wrote:
} } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver
__________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register
Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp
==============================Original Headers============================== 8, 20 -- From rothbardd-at-netscape.net Wed May 17 11:14:37 2006 8, 20 -- Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com (imo-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.33]) 8, 20 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGEb2W032643 8, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:14:37 -0500 8, 20 -- Received: from rothbardd-at-netscape.net 8, 20 -- by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id w.1b1.11dc389c (16239) 8, 20 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:28 -0400 (EDT) 8, 20 -- Received: from netscape.net (mow-d20.webmail.aol.com [205.188.139.161]) by air-in03.mx.aol.com (v109.12) with ESMTP id MAILININ33-3f6f446b4be43d1; Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:28 -0400 8, 20 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:14:28 -0400 8, 20 -- From: rothbardd-at-netscape.net 8, 20 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 8, 20 -- Subject: RE: TEM water recirculator 8, 20 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 8, 20 -- Message-ID: {30E4C578.63394E02.034D9A6A-at-netscape.net} 8, 20 -- X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 8, 20 -- X-AOL-IP: 199.196.144.13 8, 20 -- X-AOL-Language: english 8, 20 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 8, 20 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 8, 20 -- X-Spam-Flag: NO ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Distilled water is fine. It is the deionized water that cause problems to the copper tubing due to the lack of ions in it.
Zhaojie Zhang Microscopy Core Facility University of Wyoming Laramie, WY 82071
-----Original Message----- X-from: YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA [mailto:YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 8:47 AM To: Z.J. Zhang
Hi Beth,
Someone had said that distilled water will cause copper tubing to ionize, and correction will be faster than tap water. Has anybody heard this?
Ann Fook Yang EM Unit/ Unite EM AAFC/AAC 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa,Ontario Canada K1A 0C6 yanga-at-agr.gc.ca Telephone/Téléphone: 613-759-1638 Facsimile/Télécopieur: 613-759-1701
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada
-----Original Message----- X-from: beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu [mailto:beth-at-plantbio.uga.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:50 PM To: Yang, Ann-Fook
Just wanted to thank everyone for the responses to my posting about the TEM water chiller additives. I'll try just using distilled water and monitoring the system more frequently. Thank you! Beth
********************************************************************** Beth Richardson EM Lab Coordinator Plant Biology Department University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602-7271
"Between the two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before". Mae West (1893-1980) *******************************************************************
"And it's only the giving that makes you what you are". Wond'ring Aloud, Jethro Tull (Aqualung)
That is a difficult situation. First off, the Supra 55 was discontinued for some unknown reason, leaving the Supra 55VP still viable. IMO, the 55 is superior to the 55VP. Why the 40 has lower resolution than the 55 is unknown to me. At 200KX-350KX, I rather doubt that one could tell the difference in resolution between the 40 and 55VP. But one probably could see a difference between the 40 and 55. this assumes identical conditions (low current, 30u center aperture, 3mm WD, 20KV, in-lens detector).
gary g.
At 08:37 AM 5/17/2006, you wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 10, 22 -- From gary-at-gaugler.com Wed May 17 11:21:04 2006 10, 22 -- Received: from qsmtp2.mc.surewest.net (qsmtp.mc.surewest.net [66.60.130.145]) 10, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with SMTP id k4HGL4MF010367 10, 22 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:21:04 -0500 10, 22 -- Received: (qmail 20354 invoked from network); 17 May 2006 09:21:02 -0700 10, 22 -- Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 20351, pid: 20352, t: 0.2151s 10, 22 -- scanners: regex: 1.1.0 attach: 1.1.0 10, 22 -- Received: from unknown (HELO ivan.gaugler.com) (66.60.171.211) 10, 22 -- by qsmtp2 with SMTP; 17 May 2006 09:21:02 -0700 10, 22 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.2.20060517091458.023bde68-at-gaugler.com} 10, 22 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 10, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:21:01 -0700 10, 22 -- To: jacques.faerber-at-ipcms.u-strasbg.fr 10, 22 -- From: Gary Gaugler {gary-at-gaugler.com} 10, 22 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] Supra40 versus Supra55 advices 10, 22 -- Cc: MSA listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 10, 22 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171537.k4HFb5OS001984-at-ns.microscopy.com} 10, 22 -- References: {200605171537.k4HFb5OS001984-at-ns.microscopy.com} 10, 22 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 10, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed 10, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 10, 22 -- X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ns.microscopy.com id k4HGL4MF010367 ==============================End of - Headers==============================
The questions you have asked require a whole day lecture on polarized light, but here are the fundamentals.
Materials that respond to polarized light have different refractive indices along different axes. These axes are always perpendicular to each other, but not necessarily to the crystal edges or material directions (although they typically lie along the long and short edges of a fiber and along the direction of draw and perpendicular in a film.. but more about that later). The refractive index is a measurement of the interaction of the electric field in light with the electric field in matter: the greater the interaction, the higher the value. Mathematically, you can calculate RI by dividing the velocity of light in vacuum (300,000 km/s) with the velocity of light in the material.
I can't send diagrams in this email (will do so, if you contact me off line), but imagine a rectangle as representing your object, with the short side having lower RI and the long side having higher RI (Step 1) . (This is highly simplified, but works). Next, imagine the crossed polars, with direction of vibration transmitted through the first polar as vibrating East-West and the permitted direction of vibration through the second polar (the "analyzer") as North-South (Step 2).
Step 3: Cross the polars and put the object in between. Imagine that you are looking down on this "sandwich". a. When either the short side or long side of the rectangle is parallel to the polarizer, only that direction receives energy from the polarized light. Since that light is vibrating E-W, it will not pass the analyzer. Rather, it will be absorbed, so the crystal appears dark in these two orientations. b. Imagine rotating the crystal into any 45 degree position. In this orientation, both RI directions receive energy from the polarizer and, if you complete the rectangle so that you have a resultant vector, you will see that the vector has components that will pass through the analyzer. In this position, the crystal will appear bright between crossed polars.
Now for your multi-lamellar vesicle. The fact that it has areas that appear bright indicates that its internal structure generates differences in electrical field with direction. In other words, it is anisotropic. If you consider how the lamellae are laid down in the vesicle, this makes perfect sense. The maltese cross that you are seeing indicate the two directions of the primary RI's. In each of these positions, only one RI is visible to the incoming polarized light; the same situation as described above in which the short or long side of the crystal is parallel to the direction of the polarizer or analyzer.
Actually, if you removed the analyzer and did RI tests with just the polarizer in place, then rotated the polarizer 90 degrees and did another RI test, you could actually determine the RI in each of those directions.
I don't have direct experience with this type of vesicle, but I would assume that, like starch and polymer spherulites, if you rotate your sample between XPol, the cross will stay in the same orientation indicating that your lamellae are sitting radially within the vesicle.
Hope this was helpful.
Best regards, Barbara Foster
Microscopy/Microscopy Education 313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100 Allen, TX 75002 P: 972-954-8011 W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com
MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through September. Call us today for details.
P. S. Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Spring semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght Microscopy". Copies still available through MME... even for class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at (972)954-8011.
At 06:59 AM 5/17/2006, milindphd-at-gmail.com wrote:
} ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America
==============================Original Headers============================== 22, 17 -- From bfoster-at-mme1.com Wed May 17 11:22:05 2006 22, 17 -- Received: from 5starpro.com (enterprise.5starpro.com [207.44.136.95]) 22, 17 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGM5Yq014511 22, 17 -- for {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:22:05 -0500 22, 17 -- Received: (qmail 5501 invoked by uid 2020); 17 May 2006 11:38:14 -0500 22, 17 -- Received: from host57-99.rancor.birch.net (HELO barbsd505.mme1.com) (65.17.57.99) 22, 17 -- by enterprise.5starpro.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 17 May 2006 11:38:14 -0500 22, 17 -- Message-Id: {7.0.1.0.0.20060517105231.020eaa40-at-mme1.com} 22, 17 -- X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 22, 17 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:22:11 -0500 22, 17 -- To: milindphd-at-gmail.com, microscopy Listserver {microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 22, 17 -- From: Barbara Foster {bfoster-at-mme1.com} 22, 17 -- Subject: Re: [Microscopy] AskAMicroscopist: multilamellar vesicle 22, 17 -- In-Reply-To: {200605171159.k4HBx9Nh015503-at-ns.microscopy.com} 22, 17 -- References: {200605171159.k4HBx9Nh015503-at-ns.microscopy.com} 22, 17 -- Mime-Version: 1.0 22, 17 -- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ==============================End of - Headers==============================
Yes, this can be the case. Distilled water can often be more corrosive to piping than regular tap water, it does depend upon the water chemistry of the tap water. What you really want is de-oxygenated water.
Beth, if you'd like more info, I can send you a synopsis of a recent discussion on this subject from a while back. Or if you prefer, you may email me directly and we could talk more about this, as you wish.
dj
On Wed, 17 May 2006 YANGA-at-AGR.GC.CA wrote:
} } } } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } The Microscopy ListServer -- CoSponsor: The Microscopy Society of America } To Subscribe/Unsubscribe -- http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver } On-Line Help http://www.microscopy.com/MicroscopyListserver/FAQ.html } ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- } } } Hi Beth, } } Someone had said that distilled water will cause copper tubing to ionize, and correction will be faster than tap } water. Has anybody heard this? } } Ann Fook Yang } EM Unit/ Unite EM } AAFC/AAC } 960 Carling Ave, } Ottawa,Ontario } Canada K1A 0C6 } yanga-at-agr.gc.ca } Telephone/Tlphone: 613-759-1638 } Facsimile/Tlcopieur: 613-759-1701
==============================Original Headers============================== 6, 16 -- From dljones-at-bestweb.net Wed May 17 11:33:05 2006 6, 16 -- Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48]) 6, 16 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGX4LL007337 6, 16 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:33:05 -0500 6, 16 -- Received: from dlj ([71.249.20.84]) 6, 16 -- by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 6, 16 -- 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id {0IZF0044T4LVJ691-at-vms048.mailsrvcs.net} for 6, 16 -- Microscopy-at-microscopy.com; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:32:23 -0500 (CDT) 6, 16 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:42:58 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) 6, 16 -- From: "David L. Jones" {dljones-at-bestweb.net} 6, 16 -- Subject: distilled water 6, 16 -- X-X-Sender: dljones-at-pop-croton.bestweb.net 6, 16 -- To: Microscopy-at-microscopy.com 6, 16 -- Message-id: {Pine.WNT.4.62.0605171242050.1368-at-dlj} 6, 16 -- MIME-version: 1.0 6, 16 -- Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed ==============================End of - Headers==============================
I am looking for an older Oxford Pulse Processor so I can do some testing of EDX detectors. The model number can go back to #2020 and forward. I don't need the complete analyzer system. If anyone has one of these pulse processors that is available for sale, please contact me directly at my email below. Kind Regards, Jim Nicolino
PulseTor/AAT 1816 St. Johns Bluff Road Suite 305 Jacksonville, Florida 32246 904.646.3069 FAX 904.646.3131 JNicolino-at-comcast.net
==============================Original Headers============================== 4, 22 -- From JNicolino-at-comcast.net Wed May 17 11:43:45 2006 4, 22 -- Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153]) 4, 22 -- by ns.microscopy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4HGhhav017298 4, 22 -- for {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 11:43:44 -0500 4, 22 -- Received: from dell2400 (c-66-177-10-94.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[66.177.10.94]) 4, 22 -- by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP 4, 22 -- id {20060517164341m1300fd0a0e} ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:41 +0000 4, 22 -- Message-ID: {00b201c679d0$f63eff40$6601a8c0-at-dell2400} 4, 22 -- From: "Jim Nicolino" {JNicolino-at-comcast.net} 4, 22 -- To: {Microscopy-at-microscopy.com} 4, 22 -- Subject: Oxford Electronics Wanted 4, 22 -- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:42:55 -0400 4, 22 -- MIME-Version: 1.0 4, 22 -- Content-Type: text/plain; 4, 22 -- format=flowed; 4, 22 -- charset="iso-8859-1"; 4, 22 -- reply-type=original 4, 22 -- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 4, 22 -- X-Priority: 3 4, 22 -- X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 4, 22 -- X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 4, 22 -- X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 ==============================End of - Headers==============================